From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: add configurable debugging. Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:16:44 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87y3tdmdbo.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170510211925.17468-1-adrian@freebsd.org> (Adrian Chadd's message of "Wed, 10 May 2017 14:19:25 -0700") Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> writes: > This adds a few configurable debugging options: > > * driver debugging and tracing is now configurable per device > * driver debugging and tracing is now configurable at runtime > * the debugging / tracing is not run at all (besides a mask check) > unless the specific debugging bitmap field is configured. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org> [...] > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c > @@ -2444,6 +2444,8 @@ struct ath10k *ath10k_core_create(size_t priv_size,= struct device *dev, > ar->hw_rev =3D hw_rev; > ar->hif.ops =3D hif_ops; > ar->hif.bus =3D bus; > + ar->debug_mask =3D ath10k_debug_mask; > + ar->trace_debug_mask =3D ath10k_debug_mask; Until now tracing has been always enabled, irrespective what debug_mask has contained. Now you are changing that and by default log messages are not delivered through tracing until user enables them. So I think to keep the old behaviour trace_debug_mask should be ATH10K_DBG_ANY (0xffffffff) by default and the user can modify the mask per device via the debugfs file. But is it really needed to be able to filter trace messages? debug_mask I understand, but not sure about trace_debug_mask. --=20 Kalle Valo=
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> Cc: "linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>, "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" <ath10k@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ath10k: add configurable debugging. Date: Wed, 31 May 2017 12:16:44 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <87y3tdmdbo.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20170510211925.17468-1-adrian@freebsd.org> (Adrian Chadd's message of "Wed, 10 May 2017 14:19:25 -0700") Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> writes: > This adds a few configurable debugging options: > > * driver debugging and tracing is now configurable per device > * driver debugging and tracing is now configurable at runtime > * the debugging / tracing is not run at all (besides a mask check) > unless the specific debugging bitmap field is configured. > > Signed-off-by: Adrian Chadd <adrian@FreeBSD.org> [...] > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c > @@ -2444,6 +2444,8 @@ struct ath10k *ath10k_core_create(size_t priv_size, struct device *dev, > ar->hw_rev = hw_rev; > ar->hif.ops = hif_ops; > ar->hif.bus = bus; > + ar->debug_mask = ath10k_debug_mask; > + ar->trace_debug_mask = ath10k_debug_mask; Until now tracing has been always enabled, irrespective what debug_mask has contained. Now you are changing that and by default log messages are not delivered through tracing until user enables them. So I think to keep the old behaviour trace_debug_mask should be ATH10K_DBG_ANY (0xffffffff) by default and the user can modify the mask per device via the debugfs file. But is it really needed to be able to filter trace messages? debug_mask I understand, but not sure about trace_debug_mask. -- Kalle Valo _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-31 12:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2017-05-10 21:19 [PATCH] ath10k: add configurable debugging Adrian Chadd 2017-05-10 21:19 ` Adrian Chadd 2017-05-19 9:51 ` Kalle Valo 2017-05-19 9:51 ` Kalle Valo 2017-05-31 11:53 ` Kalle Valo 2017-05-31 11:53 ` Kalle Valo 2017-05-31 12:16 ` Kalle Valo [this message] 2017-05-31 12:16 ` Kalle Valo 2017-05-31 20:20 ` Arend van Spriel 2017-05-31 20:20 ` Arend van Spriel 2017-05-31 20:23 ` Adrian Chadd 2017-05-31 20:23 ` Adrian Chadd 2017-05-31 21:28 ` Arend van Spriel 2017-05-31 21:28 ` Arend van Spriel 2017-05-31 21:32 ` Adrian Chadd 2017-05-31 21:32 ` Adrian Chadd 2017-06-01 13:34 ` Kalle Valo 2017-06-01 13:34 ` Kalle Valo 2017-06-01 13:24 ` Kalle Valo 2017-06-01 13:24 ` Kalle Valo 2017-06-01 13:33 ` Adrian Chadd 2017-06-01 13:33 ` Adrian Chadd -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below -- 2017-05-10 16:25 Adrian Chadd 2017-05-10 16:25 ` Adrian Chadd 2017-05-10 16:44 ` Steve deRosier 2017-05-10 16:44 ` Steve deRosier 2017-05-10 16:50 ` Adrian Chadd 2017-05-10 16:50 ` Adrian Chadd 2017-05-19 9:47 ` Kalle Valo 2017-05-19 9:47 ` Kalle Valo
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=87y3tdmdbo.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com \ --to=kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com \ --cc=adrian@freebsd.org \ --cc=ath10k@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.