All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
To: Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"ACPI Devel Maling List" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"Steven Price" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
	Sami Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu: Introduce a union to struct iommu_resv_region
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:47:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9df40b8f09f6488382f25f419519a2fa@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABdtJHtB7apg809UkrmDHQvtL012FqA_0+4_pL9NVD-mVm42YA@mail.gmail.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Nettleton [mailto:jon@solid-run.com]
> Sent: 09 October 2021 07:58
> To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Cc: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; ACPI Devel Maling
> List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>; Linux IOMMU
> <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)
> <guohanjun@huawei.com>; yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>; Sami
> Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>; Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>;
> wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu: Introduce a union to struct
> iommu_resv_region
> 
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:14 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-08-05 09:07, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > > A union is introduced to struct iommu_resv_region to hold any
> > > firmware specific data. This is in preparation to add support for
> > > IORT RMR reserve regions and the union now holds the RMR specific
> > > information.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum
> > > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > >   include/linux/iommu.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h index
> > > 32d448050bf7..bd0e4641c569 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> > > @@ -114,6 +114,13 @@ enum iommu_resv_type {
> > >       IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI,
> > >   };
> > >
> > > +struct iommu_iort_rmr_data {
> > > +#define IOMMU_RMR_REMAP_PERMITTED    (1 << 0)
> > > +     u32 flags;
> > > +     u32 sid;        /* Stream Id associated with RMR entry */
> > > +     void *smmu;     /* Associated IORT SMMU node pointer */
> > > +};
> >
> > Do we really need to duplicate all this data? AFAICS we could just
> > save the acpi_iort_rmr pointer in the iommu_resv_region (with a
> > forward declaration here if necessary) and defer parsing its actual
> > mappings until the point where we can directly consume the results.
> 
> From earlier discussions on this patchset, the original goal was also for
> device-tree mechanisms to be able to hook into this code to support similar
> RMR's and SMMU initialization, just not through the ACPI / IORT path.

Yes. IIRC, there were some earlier attempts to have DT support for reserved regions
and there was a suggestion to provide generic interfaces so that when DT solution
comes up it is easier to add the support.

Thanks,
Shameer

> >
> > Robin.
> >
> > > +
> > >   /**
> > >    * struct iommu_resv_region - descriptor for a reserved memory region
> > >    * @list: Linked list pointers
> > > @@ -121,6 +128,7 @@ enum iommu_resv_type {
> > >    * @length: Length of the region in bytes
> > >    * @prot: IOMMU Protection flags (READ/WRITE/...)
> > >    * @type: Type of the reserved region
> > > + * @rmr: ACPI IORT RMR specific data
> > >    */
> > >   struct iommu_resv_region {
> > >       struct list_head        list;
> > > @@ -128,6 +136,9 @@ struct iommu_resv_region {
> > >       size_t                  length;
> > >       int                     prot;
> > >       enum iommu_resv_type    type;
> > > +     union {
> > > +             struct iommu_iort_rmr_data rmr;
> > > +     } fw_data;
> > >   };
> > >
> > >   /**
> > >

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
To: Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>,
	"Guohanjun \(Hanjun Guo\)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
	Sami Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu: Introduce a union to struct iommu_resv_region
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:47:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9df40b8f09f6488382f25f419519a2fa@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABdtJHtB7apg809UkrmDHQvtL012FqA_0+4_pL9NVD-mVm42YA@mail.gmail.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Nettleton [mailto:jon@solid-run.com]
> Sent: 09 October 2021 07:58
> To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Cc: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; ACPI Devel Maling
> List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>; Linux IOMMU
> <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)
> <guohanjun@huawei.com>; yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>; Sami
> Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>; Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>;
> wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu: Introduce a union to struct
> iommu_resv_region
> 
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:14 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-08-05 09:07, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > > A union is introduced to struct iommu_resv_region to hold any
> > > firmware specific data. This is in preparation to add support for
> > > IORT RMR reserve regions and the union now holds the RMR specific
> > > information.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum
> > > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > >   include/linux/iommu.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h index
> > > 32d448050bf7..bd0e4641c569 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> > > @@ -114,6 +114,13 @@ enum iommu_resv_type {
> > >       IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI,
> > >   };
> > >
> > > +struct iommu_iort_rmr_data {
> > > +#define IOMMU_RMR_REMAP_PERMITTED    (1 << 0)
> > > +     u32 flags;
> > > +     u32 sid;        /* Stream Id associated with RMR entry */
> > > +     void *smmu;     /* Associated IORT SMMU node pointer */
> > > +};
> >
> > Do we really need to duplicate all this data? AFAICS we could just
> > save the acpi_iort_rmr pointer in the iommu_resv_region (with a
> > forward declaration here if necessary) and defer parsing its actual
> > mappings until the point where we can directly consume the results.
> 
> From earlier discussions on this patchset, the original goal was also for
> device-tree mechanisms to be able to hook into this code to support similar
> RMR's and SMMU initialization, just not through the ACPI / IORT path.

Yes. IIRC, there were some earlier attempts to have DT support for reserved regions
and there was a suggestion to provide generic interfaces so that when DT solution
comes up it is easier to add the support.

Thanks,
Shameer

> >
> > Robin.
> >
> > > +
> > >   /**
> > >    * struct iommu_resv_region - descriptor for a reserved memory region
> > >    * @list: Linked list pointers
> > > @@ -121,6 +128,7 @@ enum iommu_resv_type {
> > >    * @length: Length of the region in bytes
> > >    * @prot: IOMMU Protection flags (READ/WRITE/...)
> > >    * @type: Type of the reserved region
> > > + * @rmr: ACPI IORT RMR specific data
> > >    */
> > >   struct iommu_resv_region {
> > >       struct list_head        list;
> > > @@ -128,6 +136,9 @@ struct iommu_resv_region {
> > >       size_t                  length;
> > >       int                     prot;
> > >       enum iommu_resv_type    type;
> > > +     union {
> > > +             struct iommu_iort_rmr_data rmr;
> > > +     } fw_data;
> > >   };
> > >
> > >   /**
> > >
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
To: Jon Nettleton <jon@solid-run.com>, Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"ACPI Devel Maling List" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux IOMMU <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
	"Steven Price" <steven.price@arm.com>,
	"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
	yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>,
	Sami Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu: Introduce a union to struct iommu_resv_region
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 05:47:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9df40b8f09f6488382f25f419519a2fa@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABdtJHtB7apg809UkrmDHQvtL012FqA_0+4_pL9NVD-mVm42YA@mail.gmail.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Nettleton [mailto:jon@solid-run.com]
> Sent: 09 October 2021 07:58
> To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> Cc: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>; ACPI Devel Maling
> List <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>; Linux IOMMU
> <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>; Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>;
> Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)
> <guohanjun@huawei.com>; yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>; Sami
> Mujawar <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>; Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>;
> wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu: Introduce a union to struct
> iommu_resv_region
> 
> On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 2:14 PM Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-08-05 09:07, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > > A union is introduced to struct iommu_resv_region to hold any
> > > firmware specific data. This is in preparation to add support for
> > > IORT RMR reserve regions and the union now holds the RMR specific
> > > information.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum
> > > <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
> > > ---
> > >   include/linux/iommu.h | 11 +++++++++++
> > >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/iommu.h b/include/linux/iommu.h index
> > > 32d448050bf7..bd0e4641c569 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/iommu.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/iommu.h
> > > @@ -114,6 +114,13 @@ enum iommu_resv_type {
> > >       IOMMU_RESV_SW_MSI,
> > >   };
> > >
> > > +struct iommu_iort_rmr_data {
> > > +#define IOMMU_RMR_REMAP_PERMITTED    (1 << 0)
> > > +     u32 flags;
> > > +     u32 sid;        /* Stream Id associated with RMR entry */
> > > +     void *smmu;     /* Associated IORT SMMU node pointer */
> > > +};
> >
> > Do we really need to duplicate all this data? AFAICS we could just
> > save the acpi_iort_rmr pointer in the iommu_resv_region (with a
> > forward declaration here if necessary) and defer parsing its actual
> > mappings until the point where we can directly consume the results.
> 
> From earlier discussions on this patchset, the original goal was also for
> device-tree mechanisms to be able to hook into this code to support similar
> RMR's and SMMU initialization, just not through the ACPI / IORT path.

Yes. IIRC, there were some earlier attempts to have DT support for reserved regions
and there was a suggestion to provide generic interfaces so that when DT solution
comes up it is easier to add the support.

Thanks,
Shameer

> >
> > Robin.
> >
> > > +
> > >   /**
> > >    * struct iommu_resv_region - descriptor for a reserved memory region
> > >    * @list: Linked list pointers
> > > @@ -121,6 +128,7 @@ enum iommu_resv_type {
> > >    * @length: Length of the region in bytes
> > >    * @prot: IOMMU Protection flags (READ/WRITE/...)
> > >    * @type: Type of the reserved region
> > > + * @rmr: ACPI IORT RMR specific data
> > >    */
> > >   struct iommu_resv_region {
> > >       struct list_head        list;
> > > @@ -128,6 +136,9 @@ struct iommu_resv_region {
> > >       size_t                  length;
> > >       int                     prot;
> > >       enum iommu_resv_type    type;
> > > +     union {
> > > +             struct iommu_iort_rmr_data rmr;
> > > +     } fw_data;
> > >   };
> > >
> > >   /**
> > >
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-10-11  5:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 150+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-05  8:07 [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu: Introduce a union to struct iommu_resv_region Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-20 10:22   ` Steven Price
2021-08-20 10:22     ` Steven Price
2021-08-20 10:22     ` Steven Price
2021-10-08 12:14   ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 12:14     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 12:14     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-09  6:57     ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-09  6:57       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-09  6:57       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11  5:47       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi [this message]
2021-10-11  5:47         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11  5:47         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11 13:47         ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 13:47           ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 13:47           ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 16:03   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 16:03     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 16:03     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 16:31     ` Jon Nettleton
2021-08-05 16:31       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-08-05 16:31       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-08-05 18:37     ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-08-05 18:37       ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-08-05 18:37       ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-09-06 17:44     ` Robin Murphy
2021-09-06 17:44       ` Robin Murphy
2021-09-06 17:44       ` Robin Murphy
2021-09-06 19:51       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-06 19:51         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-06 19:51         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16  7:26         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16  7:26           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16  7:26           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16  7:52           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16  7:52             ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16  7:52             ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16  8:26             ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16  8:26               ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16  8:26               ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16 11:16               ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16 11:16                 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16 11:16                 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-17 11:26                 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-17 11:26                   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-17 11:26                   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-05 10:53                   ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-10-05 10:53                     ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-10-05 10:53                     ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-10-08 12:48   ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 12:48     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 12:48     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-09  7:06     ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-09  7:06       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-09  7:06       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11 14:04       ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 14:04         ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 14:04         ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-12  8:00         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-12  8:00           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-12  8:00           ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 12:18           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-12-08 12:18             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-12-08 12:18             ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-12-08 13:26             ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 13:26               ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 13:26               ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 14:37               ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-08 14:37                 ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-08 14:37                 ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-08 15:11                 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 15:11                   ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 15:11                   ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11  5:59     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11  5:59       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11  5:59       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-10-08 13:03   ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 13:03     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 13:03     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11  5:51     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11  5:51       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11  5:51       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] ACPI/IORT: Add a helper to retrieve RMR memory regions Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 15:43   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 15:43     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 15:43     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Refactor arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() to force bypass Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] iommu/dma: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05  8:07   ` Shameer Kolothum
2021-10-08 13:09   ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 13:09     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-08 13:09     ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-09  7:07     ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-09  7:07       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-09  7:07       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11 15:00       ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 15:00         ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 15:00         ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 15:42         ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11 15:42           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11 15:42           ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-05 13:22   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-05 13:22   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-05 13:35   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 13:35     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 13:35     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 14:09     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-05 14:09       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-05 14:09       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-31  5:06       ` Jon Nettleton
2021-08-31  5:06         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-08-31  5:06         ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-30  9:47 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-30  9:47   ` Eric Auger
2021-09-30  9:47   ` Eric Auger
2021-09-30 10:50   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-30 10:50     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-30 10:50     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-01-25 13:00 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi via iommu
2022-01-25 13:00   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-01-25 13:00   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-01-25 19:30   ` Robin Murphy
2022-01-25 19:30     ` Robin Murphy
2022-01-25 19:30     ` Robin Murphy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9df40b8f09f6488382f25f419519a2fa@huawei.com \
    --to=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=Sami.Mujawar@arm.com \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jon@solid-run.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.