From: Jared Hulbert <jaredeh@gmail.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-nvdimm <linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dax: fix bdev NULL pointer dereferences
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 23:08:32 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+ZsKJ5ghtd6E1K8tmXrvezkqA3ZMbc79rVk8Y6DQ8O1XDv7jg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4h-wv6oCK1-=zWM8Av4jaB0oHkSLjfH9Yg3JEZenSrw3Q@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 10:01 PM, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 9:28 PM, Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:28:15AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
>>> I guess I need to go off and understand if we can have DAX mappings on such a
>>> device. If we can, we may have a problem - we can get the block_device from
>>> get_block() in I/O path and the various fault paths, but we don't have access
>>> to get_block() when flushing via dax_writeback_mapping_range(). We avoid
>>> needing it the normal case by storing the sector results from get_block() in
>>> the radix tree.
>>
>> I think we're doing it wrong by storing the sector in the radix tree; we'd
>> really need to store both the sector and the bdev which is too much data.
>>
>> If we store the PFN of the underlying page instead, we don't have this
>> problem. Instead, we have a different problem; of the device going
>> away under us. I'm trying to find the code which tears down PTEs when
>> the device goes away, and I'm not seeing it. What do we do about user
>> mappings of the device?
>>
>
> I deferred the dax tear down code until next cycle as Al rightly
> pointed out some needed re-works:
>
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/linux-nvdimm/2016-January/003995.html
If you store sectors in the radix and the device gets removed you
still have to unmap user mappings of PFNs.
So why is the device remove harder with the PFN vs bdev+sector radix
entry? Either way you need a list of PFNs and their corresponding
PTE's, right?
And are we just talking graceful removal? Any plans for device failures?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-30 7:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-28 19:35 [PATCH 1/2] block: fix pfn_mkwrite() DAX fault handler Ross Zwisler
2016-01-28 19:35 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-28 19:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] dax: fix bdev NULL pointer dereferences Ross Zwisler
2016-01-28 19:35 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-28 20:21 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-28 20:21 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-28 21:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-29 18:28 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-29 23:34 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-30 0:18 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-31 22:44 ` Dave Chinner
2016-01-30 5:28 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-30 6:01 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-30 7:08 ` Jared Hulbert [this message]
2016-01-31 2:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-31 6:12 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-31 10:55 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-31 16:38 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-31 18:07 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-31 18:18 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-31 18:27 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-31 18:50 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-31 19:51 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-01 13:44 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-01 14:51 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-01 20:49 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-01 21:47 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-02 6:06 ` Jared Hulbert
2016-02-02 6:46 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 8:05 ` Jared Hulbert
2016-02-02 16:51 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 21:46 ` Jared Hulbert
2016-02-03 0:34 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-03 1:21 ` Jared Hulbert
2016-02-02 11:17 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-02 16:33 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 16:46 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-02 17:10 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 17:34 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 17:46 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 17:47 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 18:24 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 18:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-02 18:59 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 20:14 ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-03 11:09 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-03 10:46 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-03 20:13 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-04 9:15 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-04 23:38 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-06 23:15 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-07 5:27 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-04 19:56 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-04 20:29 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-04 22:19 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-05 22:25 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-06 23:40 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-07 6:43 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08 13:48 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-07 8:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 15:55 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 18:41 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 18:53 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 0:02 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 7:10 ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-02 10:34 ` Jan Kara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CA+ZsKJ5ghtd6E1K8tmXrvezkqA3ZMbc79rVk8Y6DQ8O1XDv7jg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jaredeh@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jack@suse.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
--cc=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.