From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Cc: Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>, kernel@collabora.com, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>, Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, Ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:10:26 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAASaF6xQG691q9JxiEF5HgqCNfGd1FHhwEX5TG_WpW3rHpBFKQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxia2NNMPUCQzjo6Gsnz8xr_9YKTeTqzOu-hgdsjfHHx0w@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 2:49 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:16 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > v5.16 released => patchset merged. > > Thanks! > > > > Guys, > > Looks like we have a regression. agreed, "abort" option stopped working: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests/-/issues/945 Lukas pointed out this patch that didn't make it in yet: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/12/21/384 This should be new version: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/YcSYvk5DdGjjB9q%2F@mit.edu/T/#t > With kernel v5.17-rc1, test fanotify22 blocks on the first test case, > because the expected ECORRUPTED event on remount,abort is never received. > The multiple error test cases also fail for the same reason. > > Gabriel, > > Are you aware of any ext4 change that could explain this regression? > > In any case, Petr, I suggest adding a short timeout to the test > instead of the default 5min. > Test takes less than 1 second on my VM on v5.16, so... > > Thanks, > Amir. > > -- > Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com> To: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Cc: Ext4 <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com>, Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>, kernel@collabora.com, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@collabora.com>, LTP List <ltp@lists.linux.it> Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 15:10:26 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAASaF6xQG691q9JxiEF5HgqCNfGd1FHhwEX5TG_WpW3rHpBFKQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAOQ4uxia2NNMPUCQzjo6Gsnz8xr_9YKTeTqzOu-hgdsjfHHx0w@mail.gmail.com> On Wed, Feb 2, 2022 at 2:49 PM Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 5:16 PM Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > v5.16 released => patchset merged. > > Thanks! > > > > Guys, > > Looks like we have a regression. agreed, "abort" option stopped working: https://gitlab.com/cki-project/kernel-tests/-/issues/945 Lukas pointed out this patch that didn't make it in yet: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/12/21/384 This should be new version: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/YcSYvk5DdGjjB9q%2F@mit.edu/T/#t > With kernel v5.17-rc1, test fanotify22 blocks on the first test case, > because the expected ECORRUPTED event on remount,abort is never received. > The multiple error test cases also fail for the same reason. > > Gabriel, > > Are you aware of any ext4 change that could explain this regression? > > In any case, Petr, I suggest adding a short timeout to the test > instead of the default 5min. > Test takes less than 1 second on my VM on v5.16, so... > > Thanks, > Amir. > > -- > Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp > -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-02 14:10 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2021-11-18 23:57 [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] syscalls: fanotify: Add macro to require specific mark types Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] syscalls: fanotify: Add macro to require specific events Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Introduce FAN_FS_ERROR test Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Validate the generic error info Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-19 5:38 ` Amir Goldstein 2021-11-19 5:38 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein 2021-11-19 19:29 ` Petr Vorel 2021-11-19 19:29 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel 2021-11-19 22:39 ` Petr Vorel 2021-11-19 22:39 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Validate incoming FID in FAN_FS_ERROR Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Support submission of debugfs commands Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Create a corrupted file Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Test file event with broken inode Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] syscalls/fanotify22: Test capture of multiple errors Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-18 23:57 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-19 5:48 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] Test the new fanotify FAN_FS_ERROR event Amir Goldstein 2021-11-19 5:48 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein 2021-11-19 19:29 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-19 19:29 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-20 10:43 ` Amir Goldstein 2021-11-20 10:43 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein 2021-11-22 7:47 ` Petr Vorel 2021-11-22 7:47 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel 2021-11-22 17:35 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-22 17:35 ` [LTP] " Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2021-11-22 21:09 ` Petr Vorel 2021-11-22 21:09 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel 2021-11-24 10:39 ` Petr Vorel 2021-11-24 10:39 ` Petr Vorel 2021-12-20 11:48 ` Amir Goldstein 2021-12-20 11:48 ` Amir Goldstein 2021-12-20 18:07 ` Petr Vorel 2021-12-20 18:07 ` Petr Vorel 2022-01-10 15:16 ` Petr Vorel 2022-01-10 15:16 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel 2022-02-02 13:49 ` Amir Goldstein 2022-02-02 13:49 ` [LTP] " Amir Goldstein 2022-02-02 14:10 ` Jan Stancek [this message] 2022-02-02 14:10 ` Jan Stancek 2022-02-02 16:45 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2022-02-02 16:45 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi 2022-02-02 14:22 ` Petr Vorel 2022-02-02 14:22 ` [LTP] " Petr Vorel 2022-02-02 16:13 ` Cyril Hrubis 2022-02-02 16:13 ` Cyril Hrubis 2022-02-02 16:57 ` Petr Vorel 2022-02-02 16:57 ` Petr Vorel
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAASaF6xQG691q9JxiEF5HgqCNfGd1FHhwEX5TG_WpW3rHpBFKQ@mail.gmail.com \ --to=jstancek@redhat.com \ --cc=amir73il@gmail.com \ --cc=jack@suse.com \ --cc=kernel@collabora.com \ --cc=khazhy@google.com \ --cc=krisman@collabora.com \ --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=ltp@lists.linux.it \ --cc=pvorel@suse.cz \ --cc=repnop@google.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.