* [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier
@ 2019-10-11 13:51 Ycn aKaJoseph
2019-10-11 15:54 ` [opkg-devel] " Alejandro Del Castillo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ycn aKaJoseph @ 2019-10-11 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yocto; +Cc: opkg-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 545 bytes --]
Hi guys,
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528
I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-utils dir
are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX Identifier
to add.
The doubt concerns those script :
makePackage
opkg-build
opkg-buildpackage
opkg-compare-indexes
opkg-diff
opkg-extract-file
opkg-graph-deps
opkg-list-fields
opkg-make-index
opkg-show-deps
opkg-unbuild
opkg-update-index
What license do you want them to carry ?
Best regards,
Yann CARDAILLAC
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 823 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [opkg-devel] [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier
2019-10-11 13:51 [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier Ycn aKaJoseph
@ 2019-10-11 15:54 ` Alejandro Del Castillo
2019-10-11 16:25 ` Haris Okanovic
2019-10-11 16:45 ` richard.purdie
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alejandro Del Castillo @ 2019-10-11 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: opkg-devel, Ycn aKaJoseph, yocto, Haris Okanovic, Richard Purdie
On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!8RtsWJXbDz_l063ZSVKrRMwvQ5KGdD0lk9aSjlUW9VHM2wufITJnBuIvovQxoT0yJXu-6Q$>
>
> I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-utils
> dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX
> Identifier to add.
thanks for doing this!
> The doubt concerns those script :
> makePackage
> opkg-build
> opkg-buildpackage
> opkg-compare-indexes
> opkg-diff
> opkg-extract-file
> opkg-graph-deps
> opkg-list-fields
> opkg-make-index
> opkg-show-deps
> opkg-unbuild
> opkg-update-index
>
> What license do you want them to carry ?
Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris
Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the thread).
My take on it: since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that
have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license the
rest as GPLv2+ too.
Haris, Richard, thoughts?
--
Cheers,
Alejandro
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [opkg-devel] [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier
2019-10-11 15:54 ` [opkg-devel] " Alejandro Del Castillo
@ 2019-10-11 16:25 ` Haris Okanovic
2019-10-11 16:45 ` richard.purdie
1 sibling, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Haris Okanovic @ 2019-10-11 16:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alejandro Del Castillo, opkg-devel, Ycn aKaJoseph, yocto, Richard Purdie
I have no objection. Do you have a patch with this change?
-- Haris
On 10/11/19 10:54 AM, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote:
>
> On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!8RtsWJXbDz_l063ZSVKrRMwvQ5KGdD0lk9aSjlUW9VHM2wufITJnBuIvovQxoT0yJXu-6Q$>
>>
>> I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-utils
>> dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX
>> Identifier to add.
>
> thanks for doing this!
>
>> The doubt concerns those script :
>> makePackage
>> opkg-build
>> opkg-buildpackage
>> opkg-compare-indexes
>> opkg-diff
>> opkg-extract-file
>> opkg-graph-deps
>> opkg-list-fields
>> opkg-make-index
>> opkg-show-deps
>> opkg-unbuild
>> opkg-update-index
>>
>> What license do you want them to carry ?
>
> Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris
> Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the thread).
>
> My take on it: since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that
> have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license the
> rest as GPLv2+ too.
>
> Haris, Richard, thoughts?
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [opkg-devel] [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier
2019-10-11 15:54 ` [opkg-devel] " Alejandro Del Castillo
2019-10-11 16:25 ` Haris Okanovic
@ 2019-10-11 16:45 ` richard.purdie
2019-10-14 12:36 ` Ycn aKaJoseph
1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: richard.purdie @ 2019-10-11 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alejandro Del Castillo, opkg-devel, Ycn aKaJoseph, yocto, Haris Okanovic
On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 15:54 +0000, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote:
> On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528
> > <
> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!8RtsWJXbDz_l063ZSVKrRMwvQ5KGdD0lk9aSjlUW9VHM2wufITJnBuIvovQxoT0yJXu-6Q$
> > >
> >
> > I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-
> > utils
> > dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX
> > Identifier to add.
>
> thanks for doing this!
>
> > The doubt concerns those script :
> > makePackage
> > opkg-build
> > opkg-buildpackage
> > opkg-compare-indexes
> > opkg-diff
> > opkg-extract-file
> > opkg-graph-deps
> > opkg-list-fields
> > opkg-make-index
> > opkg-show-deps
> > opkg-unbuild
> > opkg-update-index
> >
> > What license do you want them to carry ?
>
> Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris
> Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the
> thread).
>
> My take on it: since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that
> have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license
> the rest as GPLv2+ too.
I didn't author these, they were imported from ipkg-utils which was
part of handhelds.org. I did modify things quite a bit during the
import.
handhelds.org's CVS repos aren't there any more but I do have old
sources lying around locally. I have a snapshot of the CVS repo from
20050930 and it has GPLv2 COPYING file (not 2+, just 2).
I'd suggest we follow the original licensing of that and go with GPLv2.
Cheers,
Richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [opkg-devel] [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier
2019-10-11 16:45 ` richard.purdie
@ 2019-10-14 12:36 ` Ycn aKaJoseph
2019-10-15 19:58 ` Alejandro Del Castillo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Ycn aKaJoseph @ 2019-10-14 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: richard.purdie; +Cc: Haris Okanovic, yocto, opkg-devel
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2167 bytes --]
Hi,
GPL-2.0-only was applied to script without previous Licences and
GPL-2.0-or-later to those mentioning it, however I'm wondering if I should
also add a SPDX id to the makefile ?
Here's first attempt without identifier to the Makefile.
Best regards,
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:45 PM <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 15:54 +0000, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote:
> > On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528
> > > <
> > >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!8RtsWJXbDz_l063ZSVKrRMwvQ5KGdD0lk9aSjlUW9VHM2wufITJnBuIvovQxoT0yJXu-6Q$
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-
> > > utils
> > > dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX
> > > Identifier to add.
> >
> > thanks for doing this!
> >
> > > The doubt concerns those script :
> > > makePackage
> > > opkg-build
> > > opkg-buildpackage
> > > opkg-compare-indexes
> > > opkg-diff
> > > opkg-extract-file
> > > opkg-graph-deps
> > > opkg-list-fields
> > > opkg-make-index
> > > opkg-show-deps
> > > opkg-unbuild
> > > opkg-update-index
> > >
> > > What license do you want them to carry ?
> >
> > Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris
> > Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the
> > thread).
> >
> > My take on it: since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that
> > have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license
> > the rest as GPLv2+ too.
>
> I didn't author these, they were imported from ipkg-utils which was
> part of handhelds.org. I did modify things quite a bit during the
> import.
>
> handhelds.org's CVS repos aren't there any more but I do have old
> sources lying around locally. I have a snapshot of the CVS repo from
> 20050930 and it has GPLv2 COPYING file (not 2+, just 2).
>
> I'd suggest we follow the original licensing of that and go with GPLv2.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
>
[-- Attachment #1.2: Type: text/html, Size: 3389 bytes --]
[-- Attachment #2: 0001-add-SPDX-license-identifiers.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 4336 bytes --]
From f660e59d0a1b80e4e7d206386577105a4465db2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yann CARDAILLAC <ycnakajsph@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2019 14:15:03 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] add SPDX license identifiers
Signed-off-by: Yann CARDAILLAC <ycnakajsph@gmail.com>
---
arfile.py | 1 +
opkg-build | 2 +-
opkg-buildpackage | 1 +
opkg-compare-indexes | 1 +
opkg-diff | 2 +-
| 2 +-
opkg-graph-deps | 1 +
opkg-list-fields | 1 +
opkg-make-index | 1 +
opkg-show-deps | 1 +
opkg-unbuild | 1 +
opkg-update-index | 1 +
opkg.py | 1 +
update-alternatives | 1 +
14 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arfile.py b/arfile.py
index 60edd9b..3b351d8 100644
--- a/arfile.py
+++ b/arfile.py
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
"""
arfile - A module to parse GNU ar archives.
diff --git a/opkg-build b/opkg-build
index 2517a2b..d09bbfe 100755
--- a/opkg-build
+++ b/opkg-build
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
#!/bin/sh
-
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
: <<=cut
=head1 NAME
diff --git a/opkg-buildpackage b/opkg-buildpackage
index b7c0e8c..9e00e42 100755
--- a/opkg-buildpackage
+++ b/opkg-buildpackage
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
#!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
#
# Author: Oliver Kurth <oliver.kurth@innominate.com>
#
diff --git a/opkg-compare-indexes b/opkg-compare-indexes
index b60d20a..45134e2 100755
--- a/opkg-compare-indexes
+++ b/opkg-compare-indexes
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
from __future__ import absolute_import
from __future__ import print_function
diff --git a/opkg-diff b/opkg-diff
index bad0b3c..06e6020 100755
--- a/opkg-diff
+++ b/opkg-diff
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
#!/bin/sh
-
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
pkg1=$1
dir1=`echo $pkg1 | sed s/.opk//`
dir1=`basename $dir1`
--git a/opkg-extract-file b/opkg-extract-file
index 7c952ad..bc7c9bd 100755
--- a/opkg-extract-file
+++ b/opkg-extract-file
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
#!/bin/sh
-
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
set -e
if [ $# -lt 1 ]; then
diff --git a/opkg-graph-deps b/opkg-graph-deps
index 6653fd5..316057a 100755
--- a/opkg-graph-deps
+++ b/opkg-graph-deps
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
from __future__ import absolute_import
from __future__ import print_function
diff --git a/opkg-list-fields b/opkg-list-fields
index 8a5a588..434f2ae 100755
--- a/opkg-list-fields
+++ b/opkg-list-fields
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
from __future__ import absolute_import
from __future__ import print_function
diff --git a/opkg-make-index b/opkg-make-index
index 83e5160..6c6ecad 100755
--- a/opkg-make-index
+++ b/opkg-make-index
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
"""
Utility to create opkg compatible indexes
"""
diff --git a/opkg-show-deps b/opkg-show-deps
index 153f21e..f345087 100755
--- a/opkg-show-deps
+++ b/opkg-show-deps
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
from __future__ import absolute_import
from __future__ import print_function
diff --git a/opkg-unbuild b/opkg-unbuild
index 4f36bec..9683de7 100755
--- a/opkg-unbuild
+++ b/opkg-unbuild
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
from __future__ import absolute_import
from __future__ import print_function
diff --git a/opkg-update-index b/opkg-update-index
index 341c1c2..43f1234 100755
--- a/opkg-update-index
+++ b/opkg-update-index
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
from __future__ import absolute_import
import sys, os
diff --git a/opkg.py b/opkg.py
index d4e7825..43a2ead 100644
--- a/opkg.py
+++ b/opkg.py
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
# Copyright (C) 2001 Alexander S. Guy <a7r@andern.org>
# Andern Research Labs
#
diff --git a/update-alternatives b/update-alternatives
index d4fa7eb..1389b3f 100644
--- a/update-alternatives
+++ b/update-alternatives
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
#!/bin/sh
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
# update-alternatives
#
# Copyright (C) 2001 Carl D. Worth
--
2.7.4
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [opkg-devel] [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier
2019-10-14 12:36 ` Ycn aKaJoseph
@ 2019-10-15 19:58 ` Alejandro Del Castillo
2019-10-18 18:01 ` Alejandro Del Castillo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alejandro Del Castillo @ 2019-10-15 19:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ycn aKaJoseph, richard.purdie; +Cc: Haris Okanovic, yocto, opkg-devel
On 10/14/19 7:36 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
> Hi,
>
> GPL-2.0-only was applied to script without previous Licences and
> GPL-2.0-or-later to those mentioning it, however I'm wondering if I
> should also add a SPDX id to the makefile ?
>
> Here's first attempt without identifier to the Makefile.
I don't have a preference regarding adding a SPDX identifier for the
Makefile. If I don't see any comments one way or the other, I will pull
the patch in, by the end of the week.
thanks again for taking care of this,
Alejandro
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:45 PM <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org
> <mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 15:54 +0000, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote:
> > On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
> > > Hi guys,
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!4ZugVhFkOciFucw9FbYbLCErJ647XFyLvF76MP_0Uo4F8sa51hi1GbwmPmZTisU17VqszQ$>
>
> > > <
> > >
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!8RtsWJXbDz_l063ZSVKrRMwvQ5KGdD0lk9aSjlUW9VHM2wufITJnBuIvovQxoT0yJXu-6Q$
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-
> > > utils
> > > dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX
> > > Identifier to add.
> >
> > thanks for doing this!
> >
> > > The doubt concerns those script :
> > > makePackage
> > > opkg-build
> > > opkg-buildpackage
> > > opkg-compare-indexes
> > > opkg-diff
> > > opkg-extract-file
> > > opkg-graph-deps
> > > opkg-list-fields
> > > opkg-make-index
> > > opkg-show-deps
> > > opkg-unbuild
> > > opkg-update-index
> > >
> > > What license do you want them to carry ?
> >
> > Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris
> > Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the
> > thread).
> >
> > My take on it: since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that
> > have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license
> > the rest as GPLv2+ too.
>
> I didn't author these, they were imported from ipkg-utils which was
> part of handhelds.org
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://handhelds.org__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!4ZugVhFkOciFucw9FbYbLCErJ647XFyLvF76MP_0Uo4F8sa51hi1GbwmPmZTisWdWuYokA$>.
> I did modify things quite a bit during the
> import.
>
> handhelds.org
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://handhelds.org__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!4ZugVhFkOciFucw9FbYbLCErJ647XFyLvF76MP_0Uo4F8sa51hi1GbwmPmZTisWdWuYokA$>'s
> CVS repos aren't there any more but I do have old
> sources lying around locally. I have a snapshot of the CVS repo from
> 20050930 and it has GPLv2 COPYING file (not 2+, just 2).
>
> I'd suggest we follow the original licensing of that and go with GPLv2.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Richard
>
>
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [opkg-devel] [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier
2019-10-15 19:58 ` Alejandro Del Castillo
@ 2019-10-18 18:01 ` Alejandro Del Castillo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Alejandro Del Castillo @ 2019-10-18 18:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ycn aKaJoseph, richard.purdie; +Cc: Haris Okanovic, yocto, opkg-devel
merged, thanks!
On 10/15/19 2:58 PM, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote:
>
>
> On 10/14/19 7:36 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> GPL-2.0-only was applied to script without previous Licences and
>> GPL-2.0-or-later to those mentioning it, however I'm wondering if I
>> should also add a SPDX id to the makefile ?
>>
>> Here's first attempt without identifier to the Makefile.
>
> I don't have a preference regarding adding a SPDX identifier for the
> Makefile. If I don't see any comments one way or the other, I will pull
> the patch in, by the end of the week.
>
> thanks again for taking care of this,
>
> Alejandro
>
>> On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 6:45 PM <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org
>> <mailto:richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 2019-10-11 at 15:54 +0000, Alejandro Del Castillo wrote:
>> > On 10/11/19 8:51 AM, Ycn aKaJoseph wrote:
>> > > Hi guys,
>> > >
>> > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!4_UTkft6YvqISMi_ZyxT3nbBDdxbyllWZ59OHmmikFQqAnQ-ln7pGeLjNidedeIGY0iDgA$
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!4ZugVhFkOciFucw9FbYbLCErJ647XFyLvF76MP_0Uo4F8sa51hi1GbwmPmZTisU17VqszQ$>
>>
>> > > <
>> > >
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13528__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!8RtsWJXbDz_l063ZSVKrRMwvQ5KGdD0lk9aSjlUW9VHM2wufITJnBuIvovQxoT0yJXu-6Q$
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > > I'm about to work on that bug however most of the script in opkg-
>> > > utils
>> > > dir are un-licenced and there's no hint for me to decide what SPDX
>> > > Identifier to add.
>> >
>> > thanks for doing this!
>> >
>> > > The doubt concerns those script :
>> > > makePackage
>> > > opkg-build
>> > > opkg-buildpackage
>> > > opkg-compare-indexes
>> > > opkg-diff
>> > > opkg-extract-file
>> > > opkg-graph-deps
>> > > opkg-list-fields
>> > > opkg-make-index
>> > > opkg-show-deps
>> > > opkg-unbuild
>> > > opkg-update-index
>> > >
>> > > What license do you want them to carry ?
>> >
>> > Looking at the commit history, opkg-graph-deps was authored by Haris
>> > Okanovic, and the rest by Richard Purdie (included them on the
>> > thread).
>> >
>> > My take on it: since opkg is licensed as GPLv2+, and the files that
>> > have a license in opkg-utils are GPLv2+, make sense to me to license
>> > the rest as GPLv2+ too.
>>
>> I didn't author these, they were imported from ipkg-utils which was
>> part of handhelds.org
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://handhelds.org__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!4ZugVhFkOciFucw9FbYbLCErJ647XFyLvF76MP_0Uo4F8sa51hi1GbwmPmZTisWdWuYokA$>.
>> I did modify things quite a bit during the
>> import.
>>
>> handhelds.org
>> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://handhelds.org__;!fqWJcnlTkjM!4ZugVhFkOciFucw9FbYbLCErJ647XFyLvF76MP_0Uo4F8sa51hi1GbwmPmZTisWdWuYokA$>'s
>> CVS repos aren't there any more but I do have old
>> sources lying around locally. I have a snapshot of the CVS repo from
>> 20050930 and it has GPLv2 COPYING file (not 2+, just 2).
>>
>> I'd suggest we follow the original licensing of that and go with GPLv2.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Richard
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
Cheers,
Alejandro
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-10-18 18:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-10-11 13:51 [OE-core][opkg-utils ] Bug 13528 : adding SPDX license identifier Ycn aKaJoseph
2019-10-11 15:54 ` [opkg-devel] " Alejandro Del Castillo
2019-10-11 16:25 ` Haris Okanovic
2019-10-11 16:45 ` richard.purdie
2019-10-14 12:36 ` Ycn aKaJoseph
2019-10-15 19:58 ` Alejandro Del Castillo
2019-10-18 18:01 ` Alejandro Del Castillo
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.