All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
@ 2013-02-16 13:25 Hauke Mehrtens
  2013-02-18 10:10 ` Johannes Berg
  2013-02-18 16:09 ` Rafał Miłecki
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Hauke Mehrtens @ 2013-02-16 13:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linville; +Cc: linux-wireless, Hauke Mehrtens

The mac address should be aligned to u16 to prevent an unaligned access
in drivers/ssb/pci.c where it is casted to __be16.

Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
---
 include/linux/ssb/ssb.h |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
index 22958d6..457e8eb 100644
--- a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
+++ b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct ssb_sprom_core_pwr_info {
 
 struct ssb_sprom {
 	u8 revision;
+	u8 country_code;	/* Country Code */
 	u8 il0mac[6];		/* MAC address for 802.11b/g */
 	u8 et0mac[6];		/* MAC address for Ethernet */
 	u8 et1mac[6];		/* MAC address for 802.11a */
@@ -36,7 +37,6 @@ struct ssb_sprom {
 	u16 board_rev;		/* Board revision number from SPROM. */
 	u16 board_num;		/* Board number from SPROM. */
 	u16 board_type;		/* Board type from SPROM. */
-	u8 country_code;	/* Country Code */
 	char alpha2[2];		/* Country Code as two chars like EU or US */
 	u8 leddc_on_time;	/* LED Powersave Duty Cycle On Count */
 	u8 leddc_off_time;	/* LED Powersave Duty Cycle Off Count */
-- 
1.7.10.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-02-16 13:25 [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address Hauke Mehrtens
@ 2013-02-18 10:10 ` Johannes Berg
  2013-02-18 16:09 ` Rafał Miłecki
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Johannes Berg @ 2013-02-18 10:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hauke Mehrtens; +Cc: linville, linux-wireless

On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 14:25 +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> The mac address should be aligned to u16 to prevent an unaligned access
> in drivers/ssb/pci.c where it is casted to __be16.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/ssb/ssb.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
> index 22958d6..457e8eb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct ssb_sprom_core_pwr_info {
>  
>  struct ssb_sprom {
>  	u8 revision;
> +	u8 country_code;	/* Country Code */
>  	u8 il0mac[6];		/* MAC address for 802.11b/g */

You should probably add __aligned(2) or so to them to avoid relying on
the struct layout only.

johannes


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-02-16 13:25 [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address Hauke Mehrtens
  2013-02-18 10:10 ` Johannes Berg
@ 2013-02-18 16:09 ` Rafał Miłecki
  2013-02-20 17:31   ` Joe Perches
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2013-02-18 16:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hauke Mehrtens; +Cc: linville, linux-wireless

2013/2/16 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>:
> The mac address should be aligned to u16 to prevent an unaligned access
> in drivers/ssb/pci.c where it is casted to __be16.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
> ---
>  include/linux/ssb/ssb.h |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
> index 22958d6..457e8eb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct ssb_sprom_core_pwr_info {
>
>  struct ssb_sprom {
>         u8 revision;
> +       u8 country_code;        /* Country Code */
>         u8 il0mac[6];           /* MAC address for 802.11b/g */

It looks a little hacky to me too, it's easy to forget about that
requirement and break that again in the future.

What about not casting il0mac to u16 at all? Maybe we should just fill
it as u8 (which it is)?

-- 
Rafał

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-02-18 16:09 ` Rafał Miłecki
@ 2013-02-20 17:31   ` Joe Perches
  2013-02-20 17:56     ` Larry Finger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-02-20 17:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafał Miłecki; +Cc: Hauke Mehrtens, linville, linux-wireless

On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 17:09 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2013/2/16 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>:
> > The mac address should be aligned to u16 to prevent an unaligned access
> > in drivers/ssb/pci.c where it is casted to __be16.
[]
> > diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
[]
> > @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct ssb_sprom_core_pwr_info {
> >
> >  struct ssb_sprom {
> >         u8 revision;
> > +       u8 country_code;        /* Country Code */
> >         u8 il0mac[6];           /* MAC address for 802.11b/g */
> 
> It looks a little hacky to me too, it's easy to forget about that
> requirement and break that again in the future.
> 
> What about not casting il0mac to u16 at all? Maybe we should just fill
> it as u8 (which it is)?
> 

Perhaps this?

From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address

Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
---
 drivers/ssb/pci.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ssb/pci.c b/drivers/ssb/pci.c
index e9d9496..62fc9b5 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/pci.c
@@ -231,6 +231,15 @@ static inline u8 ssb_crc8(u8 crc, u8 data)
 	return t[crc ^ data];
 }
 
+static void sprom_get_mac(char *mac, const u16 *in)
+{
+	int i;
+	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+		*mac++ = in[i];
+		*mac++ = in[i] >> 8;
+	}
+}
+
 static u8 ssb_sprom_crc(const u16 *sprom, u16 size)
 {
 	int word;
@@ -341,8 +350,6 @@ static s8 r123_extract_antgain(u8 sprom_revision, const u16 *in,
 
 static void sprom_extract_r123(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 {
-	int i;
-	u16 v;
 	u16 loc[3];
 
 	if (out->revision == 3)			/* rev 3 moved MAC */
@@ -352,19 +359,10 @@ static void sprom_extract_r123(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 		loc[1] = SSB_SPROM1_ET0MAC;
 		loc[2] = SSB_SPROM1_ET1MAC;
 	}
-	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
-		v = in[SPOFF(loc[0]) + i];
-		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
-	}
+	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SPOFF(loc[0])]);
 	if (out->revision < 3) { 	/* only rev 1-2 have et0, et1 */
-		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
-			v = in[SPOFF(loc[1]) + i];
-			*(((__be16 *)out->et0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
-		}
-		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
-			v = in[SPOFF(loc[2]) + i];
-			*(((__be16 *)out->et1mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
-		}
+		sprom_get_mac(out->et0mac, &in[SPOFF(loc[1])]);
+		sprom_get_mac(out->et1mac, &in[SPOFF(loc[2])]);
 	}
 	SPEX(et0phyaddr, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY_ET0A, 0);
 	SPEX(et1phyaddr, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY_ET1A,
@@ -454,19 +452,15 @@ static void sprom_extract_r458(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 
 static void sprom_extract_r45(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 {
-	int i;
-	u16 v;
 	u16 il0mac_offset;
 
 	if (out->revision == 4)
 		il0mac_offset = SSB_SPROM4_IL0MAC;
 	else
 		il0mac_offset = SSB_SPROM5_IL0MAC;
-	/* extract the MAC address */
-	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
-		v = in[SPOFF(il0mac_offset) + i];
-		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
-	}
+
+	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SPOFF(il0mac_offset)]);
+
 	SPEX(et0phyaddr, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY_ET0A, 0);
 	SPEX(et1phyaddr, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY_ET1A,
 	     SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY_ET1A_SHIFT);
@@ -530,7 +524,7 @@ static void sprom_extract_r45(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 static void sprom_extract_r8(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 {
 	int i;
-	u16 v, o;
+	u16 o;
 	u16 pwr_info_offset[] = {
 		SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE0, SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE1,
 		SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE2, SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE3
@@ -539,10 +533,8 @@ static void sprom_extract_r8(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 			ARRAY_SIZE(out->core_pwr_info));
 
 	/* extract the MAC address */
-	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
-		v = in[SPOFF(SSB_SPROM8_IL0MAC) + i];
-		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
-	}
+	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SSB_SPROM8_IL0MAC]);
+
 	SPEX(board_rev, SSB_SPROM8_BOARDREV, 0xFFFF, 0);
 	SPEX(alpha2[0], SSB_SPROM8_CCODE, 0xff00, 8);
 	SPEX(alpha2[1], SSB_SPROM8_CCODE, 0x00ff, 0);
-- 
1.8.1.2.459.gbcd45b4.dirty




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-02-20 17:31   ` Joe Perches
@ 2013-02-20 17:56     ` Larry Finger
  2013-02-20 18:29       ` Joe Perches
  2013-02-20 19:07       ` [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address Joe Perches
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2013-02-20 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Perches
  Cc: Rafał Miłecki, Hauke Mehrtens, linville, linux-wireless

On 02/20/2013 11:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 17:09 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> 2013/2/16 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>:
>>> The mac address should be aligned to u16 to prevent an unaligned access
>>> in drivers/ssb/pci.c where it is casted to __be16.
> []
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
> []
>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct ssb_sprom_core_pwr_info {
>>>
>>>   struct ssb_sprom {
>>>          u8 revision;
>>> +       u8 country_code;        /* Country Code */
>>>          u8 il0mac[6];           /* MAC address for 802.11b/g */
>>
>> It looks a little hacky to me too, it's easy to forget about that
>> requirement and break that again in the future.
>>
>> What about not casting il0mac to u16 at all? Maybe we should just fill
>> it as u8 (which it is)?
>>
>
> Perhaps this?
>
> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> Subject: [PATCH] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address
>
> Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> ---
>   drivers/ssb/pci.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ssb/pci.c b/drivers/ssb/pci.c
> index e9d9496..62fc9b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/ssb/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ssb/pci.c
> @@ -231,6 +231,15 @@ static inline u8 ssb_crc8(u8 crc, u8 data)
>   	return t[crc ^ data];
>   }
>
> +static void sprom_get_mac(char *mac, const u16 *in)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> +		*mac++ = in[i];
> +		*mac++ = in[i] >> 8;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   static u8 ssb_sprom_crc(const u16 *sprom, u16 size)
>   {
>   	int word;
> @@ -341,8 +350,6 @@ static s8 r123_extract_antgain(u8 sprom_revision, const u16 *in,
>
>   static void sprom_extract_r123(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>   {
> -	int i;
> -	u16 v;
>   	u16 loc[3];
>
>   	if (out->revision == 3)			/* rev 3 moved MAC */
> @@ -352,19 +359,10 @@ static void sprom_extract_r123(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>   		loc[1] = SSB_SPROM1_ET0MAC;
>   		loc[2] = SSB_SPROM1_ET1MAC;
>   	}
> -	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> -		v = in[SPOFF(loc[0]) + i];
> -		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
> -	}
> +	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SPOFF(loc[0])]);
>   	if (out->revision < 3) { 	/* only rev 1-2 have et0, et1 */
> -		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> -			v = in[SPOFF(loc[1]) + i];
> -			*(((__be16 *)out->et0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
> -		}
> -		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> -			v = in[SPOFF(loc[2]) + i];
> -			*(((__be16 *)out->et1mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
> -		}
> +		sprom_get_mac(out->et0mac, &in[SPOFF(loc[1])]);
> +		sprom_get_mac(out->et1mac, &in[SPOFF(loc[2])]);
>   	}
>   	SPEX(et0phyaddr, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY_ET0A, 0);
>   	SPEX(et1phyaddr, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY_ET1A,
> @@ -454,19 +452,15 @@ static void sprom_extract_r458(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>
>   static void sprom_extract_r45(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>   {
> -	int i;
> -	u16 v;
>   	u16 il0mac_offset;
>
>   	if (out->revision == 4)
>   		il0mac_offset = SSB_SPROM4_IL0MAC;
>   	else
>   		il0mac_offset = SSB_SPROM5_IL0MAC;
> -	/* extract the MAC address */
> -	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> -		v = in[SPOFF(il0mac_offset) + i];
> -		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
> -	}
> +
> +	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SPOFF(il0mac_offset)]);
> +
>   	SPEX(et0phyaddr, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY_ET0A, 0);
>   	SPEX(et1phyaddr, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY_ET1A,
>   	     SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY_ET1A_SHIFT);
> @@ -530,7 +524,7 @@ static void sprom_extract_r45(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>   static void sprom_extract_r8(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>   {
>   	int i;
> -	u16 v, o;
> +	u16 o;
>   	u16 pwr_info_offset[] = {
>   		SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE0, SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE1,
>   		SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE2, SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE3
> @@ -539,10 +533,8 @@ static void sprom_extract_r8(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>   			ARRAY_SIZE(out->core_pwr_info));
>
>   	/* extract the MAC address */
> -	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> -		v = in[SPOFF(SSB_SPROM8_IL0MAC) + i];
> -		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
> -	}
> +	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SSB_SPROM8_IL0MAC]);
> +
>   	SPEX(board_rev, SSB_SPROM8_BOARDREV, 0xFFFF, 0);
>   	SPEX(alpha2[0], SSB_SPROM8_CCODE, 0xff00, 8);
>   	SPEX(alpha2[1], SSB_SPROM8_CCODE, 0x00ff, 0);
>

I like the looks of sprom_get_mac() over that ugly *(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) 
construct, but this patch breaks ssb. The resulting MAC address is all ones. I 
have not yet figured out the problem.

Larry


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-02-20 17:56     ` Larry Finger
@ 2013-02-20 18:29       ` Joe Perches
  2013-02-20 19:17         ` Hauke Mehrtens
  2013-02-20 19:07       ` [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address Joe Perches
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-02-20 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Larry Finger
  Cc: Rafał Miłecki, Hauke Mehrtens, linville, linux-wireless

On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 11:56 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 02/20/2013 11:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 17:09 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >> 2013/2/16 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>:
> >>> The mac address should be aligned to u16 to prevent an unaligned access
> >>> in drivers/ssb/pci.c where it is casted to __be16.
> > []
> >>> diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
> > []
> >>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct ssb_sprom_core_pwr_info {
> >>>
> >>>   struct ssb_sprom {
> >>>          u8 revision;
> >>> +       u8 country_code;        /* Country Code */
> >>>          u8 il0mac[6];           /* MAC address for 802.11b/g */
> >>
> >> It looks a little hacky to me too, it's easy to forget about that
> >> requirement and break that again in the future.
> >>
> >> What about not casting il0mac to u16 at all? Maybe we should just fill
> >> it as u8 (which it is)?
> >>
> >
> > Perhaps this?
> >
> > From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> > Subject: [PATCH] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address
> >
> > Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.
[]
> > diff --git a/drivers/ssb/pci.c b/drivers/ssb/pci.c
[]
> > @@ -231,6 +231,15 @@ static inline u8 ssb_crc8(u8 crc, u8 data)
> >   	return t[crc ^ data];
> >   }
> >
> > +static void sprom_get_mac(char *mac, const u16 *in)
> > +{
> > +	int i;
> > +	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> > +		*mac++ = in[i];
> > +		*mac++ = in[i] >> 8;
> > +	}
> > +}
> > +
> >   static u8 ssb_sprom_crc(const u16 *sprom, u16 size)
> >   {
> >   	int word;
> > @@ -341,8 +350,6 @@ static s8 r123_extract_antgain(u8 sprom_revision, const u16 *in,
> >
> >   static void sprom_extract_r123(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
> >   {
> > -	int i;
> > -	u16 v;
> >   	u16 loc[3];
> >
> >   	if (out->revision == 3)			/* rev 3 moved MAC */
> > @@ -352,19 +359,10 @@ static void sprom_extract_r123(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
> >   		loc[1] = SSB_SPROM1_ET0MAC;
> >   		loc[2] = SSB_SPROM1_ET1MAC;
> >   	}
> > -	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> > -		v = in[SPOFF(loc[0]) + i];
> > -		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
> > -	}
> > +	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SPOFF(loc[0])]);
[]
> I like the looks of sprom_get_mac() over that ugly *(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) 
> construct, but this patch breaks ssb. The resulting MAC address is all ones. I 
> have not yet figured out the problem.

Dunno, I must have done something stupid.

I don't have one of these but the transform
looked correct when I did  it.

I'm not sure it's the best solution anyway
because some of the other ether address
functions like compare_ether_addr also
require 2 byte alignment and cast to u16.

cheers, Joe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-02-20 17:56     ` Larry Finger
  2013-02-20 18:29       ` Joe Perches
@ 2013-02-20 19:07       ` Joe Perches
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-02-20 19:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Larry Finger
  Cc: Rafał Miłecki, Hauke Mehrtens, linville, linux-wireless

On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 11:56 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:

> I like the looks of sprom_get_mac() over that ugly
> *(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) 
> construct, but this patch breaks ssb.
> The resulting MAC address is all ones.
[]
> > @@ -539,10 +533,8 @@ static void sprom_extract_r8(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
> >   			ARRAY_SIZE(out->core_pwr_info));
> >
> >   	/* extract the MAC address */
> > -	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> > -		v = in[SPOFF(SSB_SPROM8_IL0MAC) + i];
> > -		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
> > -	}
> > +	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SSB_SPROM8_IL0MAC]);

Yup, I did a stupid.

This one should be:

	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SPOFF(SSB_SPROM8_IL0MAC)]);



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-02-20 18:29       ` Joe Perches
@ 2013-02-20 19:17         ` Hauke Mehrtens
  2013-02-20 20:11           ` Joe Perches
  2013-02-20 20:16           ` [PATCH 2/2] ssb: Convert ssb_printk to ssb_<level> Joe Perches
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Hauke Mehrtens @ 2013-02-20 19:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Perches
  Cc: Larry Finger, Rafał Miłecki, linville, linux-wireless

On 02/20/2013 07:29 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 11:56 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>> On 02/20/2013 11:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 17:09 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>> 2013/2/16 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>:
>>>>> The mac address should be aligned to u16 to prevent an unaligned access
>>>>> in drivers/ssb/pci.c where it is casted to __be16.
>>> []
>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
>>> []
>>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct ssb_sprom_core_pwr_info {
>>>>>
>>>>>   struct ssb_sprom {
>>>>>          u8 revision;
>>>>> +       u8 country_code;        /* Country Code */
>>>>>          u8 il0mac[6];           /* MAC address for 802.11b/g */
>>>>
>>>> It looks a little hacky to me too, it's easy to forget about that
>>>> requirement and break that again in the future.
>>>>
>>>> What about not casting il0mac to u16 at all? Maybe we should just fill
>>>> it as u8 (which it is)?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Perhaps this?
>>>
>>> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>>> Subject: [PATCH] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address
>>>
>>> Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.

...

>> I like the looks of sprom_get_mac() over that ugly *(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) 
>> construct, but this patch breaks ssb. The resulting MAC address is all ones. I 
>> have not yet figured out the problem.
> 
> Dunno, I must have done something stupid.
> 
> I don't have one of these but the transform
> looked correct when I did  it.
> 
> I'm not sure it's the best solution anyway
> because some of the other ether address
> functions like compare_ether_addr also
> require 2 byte alignment and cast to u16.

Your patch looks good (haven't tested it), but as you said we should
still align the mac addresses to u16 so functions like
compare_ether_addr work with them.

There is also a v2 of my patch:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg103628.html

Hauke

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-02-20 19:17         ` Hauke Mehrtens
@ 2013-02-20 20:11           ` Joe Perches
  2013-02-21  3:34             ` Larry Finger
  2013-02-20 20:16           ` [PATCH 2/2] ssb: Convert ssb_printk to ssb_<level> Joe Perches
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-02-20 20:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hauke Mehrtens
  Cc: Larry Finger, Rafał Miłecki, linville, linux-wireless

On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 20:17 +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
> On 02/20/2013 07:29 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 11:56 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
> >> On 02/20/2013 11:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 17:09 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >>>> 2013/2/16 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>:
> >>>>> The mac address should be aligned to u16 to prevent an unaligned access
> >>>>> in drivers/ssb/pci.c where it is casted to __be16.
> >>> []
> >>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
> >>> []
> >>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct ssb_sprom_core_pwr_info {
> >>>>>
> >>>>>   struct ssb_sprom {
> >>>>>          u8 revision;
> >>>>> +       u8 country_code;        /* Country Code */
> >>>>>          u8 il0mac[6];           /* MAC address for 802.11b/g */
> >>>>
> >>>> It looks a little hacky to me too, it's easy to forget about that
> >>>> requirement and break that again in the future.
> >>>>
> >>>> What about not casting il0mac to u16 at all? Maybe we should just fill
> >>>> it as u8 (which it is)?
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps this?
> >>>
> >>> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> >>> Subject: [PATCH] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address
> >>>
> >>> Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.
> 
> ...
> 
> >> I like the looks of sprom_get_mac() over that ugly *(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) 
> >> construct, but this patch breaks ssb. The resulting MAC address is all ones. I 
> >> have not yet figured out the problem.
> > 
> > Dunno, I must have done something stupid.
> > 
> > I don't have one of these but the transform
> > looked correct when I did  it.
> > 
> > I'm not sure it's the best solution anyway
> > because some of the other ether address
> > functions like compare_ether_addr also
> > require 2 byte alignment and cast to u16.
> 
> Your patch looks good (haven't tested it), but as you said we should
> still align the mac addresses to u16 so functions like
> compare_ether_addr work with them.
> 
> There is also a v2 of my patch:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg103628.html

Seems OK to me, though I suggest using ETH_ALEN
instead of 6.

Maybe using both patches would be better still.

And as long as I'm futzing with ssb, there's another
logging cleanup to go with it.

Here's a V2 with the missing SPOFF fixed.

Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address
From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>

Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
---

V2: Add missing SPOFF

 drivers/ssb/pci.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ssb/pci.c b/drivers/ssb/pci.c
index e9d9496..4ec0bdb 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/pci.c
@@ -231,6 +231,15 @@ static inline u8 ssb_crc8(u8 crc, u8 data)
 	return t[crc ^ data];
 }
 
+static void sprom_get_mac(char *mac, const u16 *in)
+{
+	int i;
+	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+		*mac++ = in[i];
+		*mac++ = in[i] >> 8;
+	}
+}
+
 static u8 ssb_sprom_crc(const u16 *sprom, u16 size)
 {
 	int word;
@@ -341,8 +350,6 @@ static s8 r123_extract_antgain(u8 sprom_revision, const u16 *in,
 
 static void sprom_extract_r123(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 {
-	int i;
-	u16 v;
 	u16 loc[3];
 
 	if (out->revision == 3)			/* rev 3 moved MAC */
@@ -352,19 +359,10 @@ static void sprom_extract_r123(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 		loc[1] = SSB_SPROM1_ET0MAC;
 		loc[2] = SSB_SPROM1_ET1MAC;
 	}
-	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
-		v = in[SPOFF(loc[0]) + i];
-		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
-	}
+	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SPOFF(loc[0])]);
 	if (out->revision < 3) { 	/* only rev 1-2 have et0, et1 */
-		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
-			v = in[SPOFF(loc[1]) + i];
-			*(((__be16 *)out->et0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
-		}
-		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
-			v = in[SPOFF(loc[2]) + i];
-			*(((__be16 *)out->et1mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
-		}
+		sprom_get_mac(out->et0mac, &in[SPOFF(loc[1])]);
+		sprom_get_mac(out->et1mac, &in[SPOFF(loc[2])]);
 	}
 	SPEX(et0phyaddr, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY_ET0A, 0);
 	SPEX(et1phyaddr, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY_ET1A,
@@ -454,19 +452,15 @@ static void sprom_extract_r458(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 
 static void sprom_extract_r45(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 {
-	int i;
-	u16 v;
 	u16 il0mac_offset;
 
 	if (out->revision == 4)
 		il0mac_offset = SSB_SPROM4_IL0MAC;
 	else
 		il0mac_offset = SSB_SPROM5_IL0MAC;
-	/* extract the MAC address */
-	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
-		v = in[SPOFF(il0mac_offset) + i];
-		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
-	}
+
+	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SPOFF(il0mac_offset)]);
+
 	SPEX(et0phyaddr, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY_ET0A, 0);
 	SPEX(et1phyaddr, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY_ET1A,
 	     SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY_ET1A_SHIFT);
@@ -530,7 +524,7 @@ static void sprom_extract_r45(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 static void sprom_extract_r8(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 {
 	int i;
-	u16 v, o;
+	u16 o;
 	u16 pwr_info_offset[] = {
 		SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE0, SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE1,
 		SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE2, SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE3
@@ -539,10 +533,8 @@ static void sprom_extract_r8(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
 			ARRAY_SIZE(out->core_pwr_info));
 
 	/* extract the MAC address */
-	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
-		v = in[SPOFF(SSB_SPROM8_IL0MAC) + i];
-		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
-	}
+	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SPOFF(SSB_SPROM8_IL0MAC)]);
+
 	SPEX(board_rev, SSB_SPROM8_BOARDREV, 0xFFFF, 0);
 	SPEX(alpha2[0], SSB_SPROM8_CCODE, 0xff00, 8);
 	SPEX(alpha2[1], SSB_SPROM8_CCODE, 0x00ff, 0);
-- 
1.8.1.2.459.gbcd45b4.dirty




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/2] ssb: Convert ssb_printk to ssb_<level>
  2013-02-20 19:17         ` Hauke Mehrtens
  2013-02-20 20:11           ` Joe Perches
@ 2013-02-20 20:16           ` Joe Perches
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Joe Perches @ 2013-02-20 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hauke Mehrtens
  Cc: Larry Finger, Rafał Miłecki, linville, linux-wireless

Use a more current logging style.

Convert ssb_dbprint to ssb_dbg too.

Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
---
 drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon.c     |  2 +-
 drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c | 41 +++++++++++++---------------
 drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c       | 25 ++++++++---------
 drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c        | 15 +++++------
 drivers/ssb/embedded.c              |  5 ++--
 drivers/ssb/main.c                  | 51 +++++++++++++++--------------------
 drivers/ssb/pci.c                   | 53 +++++++++++++++++--------------------
 drivers/ssb/pcmcia.c                | 46 ++++++++++++++------------------
 drivers/ssb/scan.c                  | 31 ++++++++--------------
 drivers/ssb/sprom.c                 |  4 +--
 drivers/ssb/ssb_private.h           | 19 ++++++++++---
 11 files changed, 135 insertions(+), 157 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon.c b/drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon.c
index 71098a7..7cb7d2c 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon.c
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@ void ssb_chipcommon_init(struct ssb_chipcommon *cc)
 
 	if (cc->dev->id.revision >= 11)
 		cc->status = chipco_read32(cc, SSB_CHIPCO_CHIPSTAT);
-	ssb_dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX "chipcommon status is 0x%x\n", cc->status);
+	ssb_dbg("chipcommon status is 0x%x\n", cc->status);
 
 	if (cc->dev->id.revision >= 20) {
 		chipco_write32(cc, SSB_CHIPCO_GPIOPULLUP, 0);
diff --git a/drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c b/drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
index a43415a..a45d20b 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/driver_chipcommon_pmu.c
@@ -110,8 +110,8 @@ static void ssb_pmu0_pllinit_r0(struct ssb_chipcommon *cc,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	ssb_printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Programming PLL to %u.%03u MHz\n",
-		   (crystalfreq / 1000), (crystalfreq % 1000));
+	ssb_info("Programming PLL to %u.%03u MHz\n",
+		 crystalfreq / 1000, crystalfreq % 1000);
 
 	/* First turn the PLL off. */
 	switch (bus->chip_id) {
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ static void ssb_pmu0_pllinit_r0(struct ssb_chipcommon *cc,
 	}
 	tmp = chipco_read32(cc, SSB_CHIPCO_CLKCTLST);
 	if (tmp & SSB_CHIPCO_CLKCTLST_HAVEHT)
-		ssb_printk(KERN_EMERG PFX "Failed to turn the PLL off!\n");
+		ssb_emerg("Failed to turn the PLL off!\n");
 
 	/* Set PDIV in PLL control 0. */
 	pllctl = ssb_chipco_pll_read(cc, SSB_PMU0_PLLCTL0);
@@ -249,8 +249,8 @@ static void ssb_pmu1_pllinit_r0(struct ssb_chipcommon *cc,
 		return;
 	}
 
-	ssb_printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Programming PLL to %u.%03u MHz\n",
-		   (crystalfreq / 1000), (crystalfreq % 1000));
+	ssb_info("Programming PLL to %u.%03u MHz\n",
+		 crystalfreq / 1000, crystalfreq % 1000);
 
 	/* First turn the PLL off. */
 	switch (bus->chip_id) {
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@ static void ssb_pmu1_pllinit_r0(struct ssb_chipcommon *cc,
 	}
 	tmp = chipco_read32(cc, SSB_CHIPCO_CLKCTLST);
 	if (tmp & SSB_CHIPCO_CLKCTLST_HAVEHT)
-		ssb_printk(KERN_EMERG PFX "Failed to turn the PLL off!\n");
+		ssb_emerg("Failed to turn the PLL off!\n");
 
 	/* Set p1div and p2div. */
 	pllctl = ssb_chipco_pll_read(cc, SSB_PMU1_PLLCTL0);
@@ -349,9 +349,8 @@ static void ssb_pmu_pll_init(struct ssb_chipcommon *cc)
 	case 43222:
 		break;
 	default:
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX
-			   "ERROR: PLL init unknown for device %04X\n",
-			   bus->chip_id);
+		ssb_err("ERROR: PLL init unknown for device %04X\n",
+			bus->chip_id);
 	}
 }
 
@@ -472,9 +471,8 @@ static void ssb_pmu_resources_init(struct ssb_chipcommon *cc)
 		max_msk = 0xFFFFF;
 		break;
 	default:
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX
-			   "ERROR: PMU resource config unknown for device %04X\n",
-			   bus->chip_id);
+		ssb_err("ERROR: PMU resource config unknown for device %04X\n",
+			bus->chip_id);
 	}
 
 	if (updown_tab) {
@@ -526,8 +524,8 @@ void ssb_pmu_init(struct ssb_chipcommon *cc)
 	pmucap = chipco_read32(cc, SSB_CHIPCO_PMU_CAP);
 	cc->pmu.rev = (pmucap & SSB_CHIPCO_PMU_CAP_REVISION);
 
-	ssb_dprintk(KERN_DEBUG PFX "Found rev %u PMU (capabilities 0x%08X)\n",
-		    cc->pmu.rev, pmucap);
+	ssb_dbg("Found rev %u PMU (capabilities 0x%08X)\n",
+		cc->pmu.rev, pmucap);
 
 	if (cc->pmu.rev == 1)
 		chipco_mask32(cc, SSB_CHIPCO_PMU_CTL,
@@ -638,9 +636,8 @@ u32 ssb_pmu_get_alp_clock(struct ssb_chipcommon *cc)
 	case 0x5354:
 		ssb_pmu_get_alp_clock_clk0(cc);
 	default:
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX
-			   "ERROR: PMU alp clock unknown for device %04X\n",
-			   bus->chip_id);
+		ssb_err("ERROR: PMU alp clock unknown for device %04X\n",
+			bus->chip_id);
 		return 0;
 	}
 }
@@ -654,9 +651,8 @@ u32 ssb_pmu_get_cpu_clock(struct ssb_chipcommon *cc)
 		/* 5354 chip uses a non programmable PLL of frequency 240MHz */
 		return 240000000;
 	default:
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX
-			   "ERROR: PMU cpu clock unknown for device %04X\n",
-			   bus->chip_id);
+		ssb_err("ERROR: PMU cpu clock unknown for device %04X\n",
+			bus->chip_id);
 		return 0;
 	}
 }
@@ -669,9 +665,8 @@ u32 ssb_pmu_get_controlclock(struct ssb_chipcommon *cc)
 	case 0x5354:
 		return 120000000;
 	default:
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX
-			   "ERROR: PMU controlclock unknown for device %04X\n",
-			   bus->chip_id);
+		ssb_err("ERROR: PMU controlclock unknown for device %04X\n",
+			bus->chip_id);
 		return 0;
 	}
 }
diff --git a/drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c b/drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c
index 33b37da..fa385a3 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/driver_mipscore.c
@@ -167,21 +167,22 @@ static void set_irq(struct ssb_device *dev, unsigned int irq)
 		irqflag |= (ipsflag & ~ipsflag_irq_mask[irq]);
 		ssb_write32(mdev, SSB_IPSFLAG, irqflag);
 	}
-	ssb_dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX
-		    "set_irq: core 0x%04x, irq %d => %d\n",
-		    dev->id.coreid, oldirq+2, irq+2);
+	ssb_dbg("set_irq: core 0x%04x, irq %d => %d\n",
+		dev->id.coreid, oldirq+2, irq+2);
 }
 
 static void print_irq(struct ssb_device *dev, unsigned int irq)
 {
-	int i;
 	static const char *irq_name[] = {"2(S)", "3", "4", "5", "6", "D", "I"};
-	ssb_dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX
-		"core 0x%04x, irq :", dev->id.coreid);
-	for (i = 0; i <= 6; i++) {
-		ssb_dprintk(" %s%s", irq_name[i], i==irq?"*":" ");
-	}
-	ssb_dprintk("\n");
+	ssb_dbg("core 0x%04x, irq : %s%s %s%s %s%s %s%s %s%s %s%s %s%s\n",
+		dev->id.coreid,
+		irq_name[0], irq == 0 ? "*" : " ",
+		irq_name[1], irq == 1 ? "*" : " ",
+		irq_name[2], irq == 2 ? "*" : " ",
+		irq_name[3], irq == 3 ? "*" : " ",
+		irq_name[4], irq == 4 ? "*" : " ",
+		irq_name[5], irq == 5 ? "*" : " ",
+		irq_name[6], irq == 6 ? "*" : " ");
 }
 
 static void dump_irq(struct ssb_bus *bus)
@@ -286,7 +287,7 @@ void ssb_mipscore_init(struct ssb_mipscore *mcore)
 	if (!mcore->dev)
 		return; /* We don't have a MIPS core */
 
-	ssb_dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX "Initializing MIPS core...\n");
+	ssb_dbg("Initializing MIPS core...\n");
 
 	bus = mcore->dev->bus;
 	hz = ssb_clockspeed(bus);
@@ -334,7 +335,7 @@ void ssb_mipscore_init(struct ssb_mipscore *mcore)
 			break;
 		}
 	}
-	ssb_dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX "after irq reconfiguration\n");
+	ssb_dbg("after irq reconfiguration\n");
 	dump_irq(bus);
 
 	ssb_mips_serial_init(mcore);
diff --git a/drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c b/drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c
index 59801d2..d75b72b 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/driver_pcicore.c
@@ -263,8 +263,7 @@ int ssb_pcicore_plat_dev_init(struct pci_dev *d)
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 
-	ssb_printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Fixing up device %s\n",
-		   pci_name(d));
+	ssb_info("PCI: Fixing up device %s\n", pci_name(d));
 
 	/* Fix up interrupt lines */
 	d->irq = ssb_mips_irq(extpci_core->dev) + 2;
@@ -285,12 +284,12 @@ static void ssb_pcicore_fixup_pcibridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
 	if (dev->bus->number != 0 || PCI_SLOT(dev->devfn) != 0)
 		return;
 
-	ssb_printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Fixing up bridge %s\n", pci_name(dev));
+	ssb_info("PCI: Fixing up bridge %s\n", pci_name(dev));
 
 	/* Enable PCI bridge bus mastering and memory space */
 	pci_set_master(dev);
 	if (pcibios_enable_device(dev, ~0) < 0) {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR "PCI: SSB bridge enable failed\n");
+		ssb_err("PCI: SSB bridge enable failed\n");
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -299,8 +298,8 @@ static void ssb_pcicore_fixup_pcibridge(struct pci_dev *dev)
 
 	/* Make sure our latency is high enough to handle the devices behind us */
 	lat = 168;
-	ssb_printk(KERN_INFO "PCI: Fixing latency timer of device %s to %u\n",
-		   pci_name(dev), lat);
+	ssb_info("PCI: Fixing latency timer of device %s to %u\n",
+		 pci_name(dev), lat);
 	pci_write_config_byte(dev, PCI_LATENCY_TIMER, lat);
 }
 DECLARE_PCI_FIXUP_EARLY(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, ssb_pcicore_fixup_pcibridge);
@@ -323,7 +322,7 @@ static void ssb_pcicore_init_hostmode(struct ssb_pcicore *pc)
 		return;
 	extpci_core = pc;
 
-	ssb_dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX "PCIcore in host mode found\n");
+	ssb_dbg("PCIcore in host mode found\n");
 	/* Reset devices on the external PCI bus */
 	val = SSB_PCICORE_CTL_RST_OE;
 	val |= SSB_PCICORE_CTL_CLK_OE;
@@ -338,7 +337,7 @@ static void ssb_pcicore_init_hostmode(struct ssb_pcicore *pc)
 	udelay(1); /* Assertion time demanded by the PCI standard */
 
 	if (pc->dev->bus->has_cardbus_slot) {
-		ssb_dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX "CardBus slot detected\n");
+		ssb_dbg("CardBus slot detected\n");
 		pc->cardbusmode = 1;
 		/* GPIO 1 resets the bridge */
 		ssb_gpio_out(pc->dev->bus, 1, 1);
diff --git a/drivers/ssb/embedded.c b/drivers/ssb/embedded.c
index bb18d76..55e1011 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/embedded.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/embedded.c
@@ -57,9 +57,8 @@ int ssb_watchdog_register(struct ssb_bus *bus)
 					     bus->busnumber, &wdt,
 					     sizeof(wdt));
 	if (IS_ERR(pdev)) {
-		ssb_dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX
-			    "can not register watchdog device, err: %li\n",
-			    PTR_ERR(pdev));
+		ssb_dbg("can not register watchdog device, err: %li\n",
+			PTR_ERR(pdev));
 		return PTR_ERR(pdev);
 	}
 
diff --git a/drivers/ssb/main.c b/drivers/ssb/main.c
index 3b645b8..812775a 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/main.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/main.c
@@ -275,8 +275,8 @@ int ssb_devices_thaw(struct ssb_freeze_context *ctx)
 
 		err = sdrv->probe(sdev, &sdev->id);
 		if (err) {
-			ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Failed to thaw device %s\n",
-				   dev_name(sdev->dev));
+			ssb_err("Failed to thaw device %s\n",
+				dev_name(sdev->dev));
 			result = err;
 		}
 		ssb_device_put(sdev);
@@ -447,10 +447,9 @@ void ssb_bus_unregister(struct ssb_bus *bus)
 
 	err = ssb_gpio_unregister(bus);
 	if (err == -EBUSY)
-		ssb_dprintk(KERN_ERR PFX "Some GPIOs are still in use.\n");
+		ssb_dbg("Some GPIOs are still in use\n");
 	else if (err)
-		ssb_dprintk(KERN_ERR PFX
-			    "Can not unregister GPIO driver: %i\n", err);
+		ssb_dbg("Can not unregister GPIO driver: %i\n", err);
 
 	ssb_buses_lock();
 	ssb_devices_unregister(bus);
@@ -497,8 +496,7 @@ static int ssb_devices_register(struct ssb_bus *bus)
 
 		devwrap = kzalloc(sizeof(*devwrap), GFP_KERNEL);
 		if (!devwrap) {
-			ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX
-				   "Could not allocate device\n");
+			ssb_err("Could not allocate device\n");
 			err = -ENOMEM;
 			goto error;
 		}
@@ -537,9 +535,7 @@ static int ssb_devices_register(struct ssb_bus *bus)
 		sdev->dev = dev;
 		err = device_register(dev);
 		if (err) {
-			ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX
-				   "Could not register %s\n",
-				   dev_name(dev));
+			ssb_err("Could not register %s\n", dev_name(dev));
 			/* Set dev to NULL to not unregister
 			 * dev on error unwinding. */
 			sdev->dev = NULL;
@@ -825,10 +821,9 @@ static int ssb_bus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 	ssb_mipscore_init(&bus->mipscore);
 	err = ssb_gpio_init(bus);
 	if (err == -ENOTSUPP)
-		ssb_dprintk(KERN_DEBUG PFX "GPIO driver not activated\n");
+		ssb_dbg("GPIO driver not activated\n");
 	else if (err)
-		ssb_dprintk(KERN_ERR PFX
-			   "Error registering GPIO driver: %i\n", err);
+		ssb_dbg("Error registering GPIO driver: %i\n", err);
 	err = ssb_fetch_invariants(bus, get_invariants);
 	if (err) {
 		ssb_bus_may_powerdown(bus);
@@ -878,11 +873,11 @@ int ssb_bus_pcibus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct pci_dev *host_pci)
 
 	err = ssb_bus_register(bus, ssb_pci_get_invariants, 0);
 	if (!err) {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Sonics Silicon Backplane found on "
-			   "PCI device %s\n", dev_name(&host_pci->dev));
+		ssb_info("Sonics Silicon Backplane found on PCI device %s\n",
+			 dev_name(&host_pci->dev));
 	} else {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Failed to register PCI version"
-			   " of SSB with error %d\n", err);
+		ssb_err("Failed to register PCI version of SSB with error %d\n",
+			err);
 	}
 
 	return err;
@@ -903,8 +898,8 @@ int ssb_bus_pcmciabus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 
 	err = ssb_bus_register(bus, ssb_pcmcia_get_invariants, baseaddr);
 	if (!err) {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Sonics Silicon Backplane found on "
-			   "PCMCIA device %s\n", pcmcia_dev->devname);
+		ssb_info("Sonics Silicon Backplane found on PCMCIA device %s\n",
+			 pcmcia_dev->devname);
 	}
 
 	return err;
@@ -925,8 +920,8 @@ int ssb_bus_sdiobus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct sdio_func *func,
 
 	err = ssb_bus_register(bus, ssb_sdio_get_invariants, ~0);
 	if (!err) {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Sonics Silicon Backplane found on "
-			   "SDIO device %s\n", sdio_func_id(func));
+		ssb_info("Sonics Silicon Backplane found on SDIO device %s\n",
+			 sdio_func_id(func));
 	}
 
 	return err;
@@ -944,8 +939,8 @@ int ssb_bus_ssbbus_register(struct ssb_bus *bus, unsigned long baseaddr,
 
 	err = ssb_bus_register(bus, get_invariants, baseaddr);
 	if (!err) {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Sonics Silicon Backplane found at "
-			   "address 0x%08lX\n", baseaddr);
+		ssb_info("Sonics Silicon Backplane found at address 0x%08lX\n",
+			 baseaddr);
 	}
 
 	return err;
@@ -1339,7 +1334,7 @@ out:
 #endif
 	return err;
 error:
-	ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Bus powerdown failed\n");
+	ssb_err("Bus powerdown failed\n");
 	goto out;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ssb_bus_may_powerdown);
@@ -1362,7 +1357,7 @@ int ssb_bus_powerup(struct ssb_bus *bus, bool dynamic_pctl)
 
 	return 0;
 error:
-	ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Bus powerup failed\n");
+	ssb_err("Bus powerup failed\n");
 	return err;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(ssb_bus_powerup);
@@ -1470,15 +1465,13 @@ static int __init ssb_modinit(void)
 
 	err = b43_pci_ssb_bridge_init();
 	if (err) {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR "Broadcom 43xx PCI-SSB-bridge "
-			   "initialization failed\n");
+		ssb_err("Broadcom 43xx PCI-SSB-bridge initialization failed\n");
 		/* don't fail SSB init because of this */
 		err = 0;
 	}
 	err = ssb_gige_init();
 	if (err) {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR "SSB Broadcom Gigabit Ethernet "
-			   "driver initialization failed\n");
+		ssb_err("SSB Broadcom Gigabit Ethernet driver initialization failed\n");
 		/* don't fail SSB init because of this */
 		err = 0;
 	}
diff --git a/drivers/ssb/pci.c b/drivers/ssb/pci.c
index 4ec0bdb..6d6e7b9 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/pci.c
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ int ssb_pci_switch_coreidx(struct ssb_bus *bus, u8 coreidx)
 	}
 	return 0;
 error:
-	ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Failed to switch to core %u\n", coreidx);
+	ssb_err("Failed to switch to core %u\n", coreidx);
 	return -ENODEV;
 }
 
@@ -67,10 +67,9 @@ int ssb_pci_switch_core(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 	unsigned long flags;
 
 #if SSB_VERBOSE_PCICORESWITCH_DEBUG
-	ssb_printk(KERN_INFO PFX
-		   "Switching to %s core, index %d\n",
-		   ssb_core_name(dev->id.coreid),
-		   dev->core_index);
+	ssb_info("Switching to %s core, index %d\n",
+		 ssb_core_name(dev->id.coreid),
+		 dev->core_index);
 #endif
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&bus->bar_lock, flags);
@@ -287,7 +286,7 @@ static int sprom_do_write(struct ssb_bus *bus, const u16 *sprom)
 	u32 spromctl;
 	u16 size = bus->sprom_size;
 
-	ssb_printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX "Writing SPROM. Do NOT turn off the power! Please stand by...\n");
+	ssb_notice("Writing SPROM. Do NOT turn off the power! Please stand by...\n");
 	err = pci_read_config_dword(pdev, SSB_SPROMCTL, &spromctl);
 	if (err)
 		goto err_ctlreg;
@@ -295,17 +294,17 @@ static int sprom_do_write(struct ssb_bus *bus, const u16 *sprom)
 	err = pci_write_config_dword(pdev, SSB_SPROMCTL, spromctl);
 	if (err)
 		goto err_ctlreg;
-	ssb_printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX "[ 0%%");
+	ssb_notice("[ 0%%");
 	msleep(500);
 	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
 		if (i == size / 4)
-			ssb_printk("25%%");
+			ssb_cont("25%%");
 		else if (i == size / 2)
-			ssb_printk("50%%");
+			ssb_cont("50%%");
 		else if (i == (size * 3) / 4)
-			ssb_printk("75%%");
+			ssb_cont("75%%");
 		else if (i % 2)
-			ssb_printk(".");
+			ssb_cont(".");
 		writew(sprom[i], bus->mmio + bus->sprom_offset + (i * 2));
 		mmiowb();
 		msleep(20);
@@ -318,12 +317,12 @@ static int sprom_do_write(struct ssb_bus *bus, const u16 *sprom)
 	if (err)
 		goto err_ctlreg;
 	msleep(500);
-	ssb_printk("100%% ]\n");
-	ssb_printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX "SPROM written.\n");
+	ssb_cont("100%% ]\n");
+	ssb_notice("SPROM written\n");
 
 	return 0;
 err_ctlreg:
-	ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Could not access SPROM control register.\n");
+	ssb_err("Could not access SPROM control register.\n");
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -735,7 +734,7 @@ static int sprom_extract(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct ssb_sprom *out,
 	memset(out, 0, sizeof(*out));
 
 	out->revision = in[size - 1] & 0x00FF;
-	ssb_dprintk(KERN_DEBUG PFX "SPROM revision %d detected.\n", out->revision);
+	ssb_dbg("SPROM revision %d detected\n", out->revision);
 	memset(out->et0mac, 0xFF, 6);		/* preset et0 and et1 mac */
 	memset(out->et1mac, 0xFF, 6);
 
@@ -744,7 +743,7 @@ static int sprom_extract(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct ssb_sprom *out,
 		 * number stored in the SPROM.
 		 * Always extract r1. */
 		out->revision = 1;
-		ssb_dprintk(KERN_DEBUG PFX "SPROM treated as revision %d\n", out->revision);
+		ssb_dbg("SPROM treated as revision %d\n", out->revision);
 	}
 
 	switch (out->revision) {
@@ -761,9 +760,8 @@ static int sprom_extract(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct ssb_sprom *out,
 		sprom_extract_r8(out, in);
 		break;
 	default:
-		ssb_printk(KERN_WARNING PFX "Unsupported SPROM"
-			   " revision %d detected. Will extract"
-			   " v1\n", out->revision);
+		ssb_warn("Unsupported SPROM revision %d detected. Will extract v1\n",
+			 out->revision);
 		out->revision = 1;
 		sprom_extract_r123(out, in);
 	}
@@ -783,7 +781,7 @@ static int ssb_pci_sprom_get(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 	u16 *buf;
 
 	if (!ssb_is_sprom_available(bus)) {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX "No SPROM available!\n");
+		ssb_err("No SPROM available!\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
 	if (bus->chipco.dev) {	/* can be unavailable! */
@@ -802,7 +800,7 @@ static int ssb_pci_sprom_get(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 	} else {
 		bus->sprom_offset = SSB_SPROM_BASE1;
 	}
-	ssb_dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX "SPROM offset is 0x%x\n", bus->sprom_offset);
+	ssb_dbg("SPROM offset is 0x%x\n", bus->sprom_offset);
 
 	buf = kcalloc(SSB_SPROMSIZE_WORDS_R123, sizeof(u16), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!buf)
@@ -827,18 +825,15 @@ static int ssb_pci_sprom_get(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 			 * available for this device in some other storage */
 			err = ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback(bus, sprom);
 			if (err) {
-				ssb_printk(KERN_WARNING PFX "WARNING: Using"
-					   " fallback SPROM failed (err %d)\n",
-					   err);
+				ssb_warn("WARNING: Using fallback SPROM failed (err %d)\n",
+					 err);
 			} else {
-				ssb_dprintk(KERN_DEBUG PFX "Using SPROM"
-					    " revision %d provided by"
-					    " platform.\n", sprom->revision);
+				ssb_dbg("Using SPROM revision %d provided by platform\n",
+					sprom->revision);
 				err = 0;
 				goto out_free;
 			}
-			ssb_printk(KERN_WARNING PFX "WARNING: Invalid"
-				   " SPROM CRC (corrupt SPROM)\n");
+			ssb_warn("WARNING: Invalid SPROM CRC (corrupt SPROM)\n");
 		}
 	}
 	err = sprom_extract(bus, sprom, buf, bus->sprom_size);
diff --git a/drivers/ssb/pcmcia.c b/drivers/ssb/pcmcia.c
index fbafed5..b413e01 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/pcmcia.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/pcmcia.c
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ int ssb_pcmcia_switch_coreidx(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 
 	return 0;
 error:
-	ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Failed to switch to core %u\n", coreidx);
+	ssb_err("Failed to switch to core %u\n", coreidx);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -153,10 +153,9 @@ int ssb_pcmcia_switch_core(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 	int err;
 
 #if SSB_VERBOSE_PCMCIACORESWITCH_DEBUG
-	ssb_printk(KERN_INFO PFX
-		   "Switching to %s core, index %d\n",
-		   ssb_core_name(dev->id.coreid),
-		   dev->core_index);
+	ssb_info("Switching to %s core, index %d\n",
+		 ssb_core_name(dev->id.coreid),
+		 dev->core_index);
 #endif
 
 	err = ssb_pcmcia_switch_coreidx(bus, dev->core_index);
@@ -192,7 +191,7 @@ int ssb_pcmcia_switch_segment(struct ssb_bus *bus, u8 seg)
 
 	return 0;
 error:
-	ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Failed to switch pcmcia segment\n");
+	ssb_err("Failed to switch pcmcia segment\n");
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -549,44 +548,39 @@ static int ssb_pcmcia_sprom_write_all(struct ssb_bus *bus, const u16 *sprom)
 	bool failed = 0;
 	size_t size = SSB_PCMCIA_SPROM_SIZE;
 
-	ssb_printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX
-		   "Writing SPROM. Do NOT turn off the power! "
-		   "Please stand by...\n");
+	ssb_notice("Writing SPROM. Do NOT turn off the power! Please stand by...\n");
 	err = ssb_pcmcia_sprom_command(bus, SSB_PCMCIA_SPROMCTL_WRITEEN);
 	if (err) {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX
-			   "Could not enable SPROM write access.\n");
+		ssb_notice("Could not enable SPROM write access\n");
 		return -EBUSY;
 	}
-	ssb_printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX "[ 0%%");
+	ssb_notice("[ 0%%");
 	msleep(500);
 	for (i = 0; i < size; i++) {
 		if (i == size / 4)
-			ssb_printk("25%%");
+			ssb_cont("25%%");
 		else if (i == size / 2)
-			ssb_printk("50%%");
+			ssb_cont("50%%");
 		else if (i == (size * 3) / 4)
-			ssb_printk("75%%");
+			ssb_cont("75%%");
 		else if (i % 2)
-			ssb_printk(".");
+			ssb_cont(".");
 		err = ssb_pcmcia_sprom_write(bus, i, sprom[i]);
 		if (err) {
-			ssb_printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX
-				   "Failed to write to SPROM.\n");
+			ssb_notice("Failed to write to SPROM\n");
 			failed = 1;
 			break;
 		}
 	}
 	err = ssb_pcmcia_sprom_command(bus, SSB_PCMCIA_SPROMCTL_WRITEDIS);
 	if (err) {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX
-			   "Could not disable SPROM write access.\n");
+		ssb_notice("Could not disable SPROM write access\n");
 		failed = 1;
 	}
 	msleep(500);
 	if (!failed) {
-		ssb_printk("100%% ]\n");
-		ssb_printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX "SPROM written.\n");
+		ssb_cont("100%% ]\n");
+		ssb_notice("SPROM written\n");
 	}
 
 	return failed ? -EBUSY : 0;
@@ -700,7 +694,7 @@ static int ssb_pcmcia_do_get_invariants(struct pcmcia_device *p_dev,
 	return -ENOSPC; /* continue with next entry */
 
 error:
-	ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX
+	ssb_err(
 		   "PCMCIA: Failed to fetch device invariants: %s\n",
 		   error_description);
 	return -ENODEV;
@@ -722,7 +716,7 @@ int ssb_pcmcia_get_invariants(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 	res = pcmcia_loop_tuple(bus->host_pcmcia, CISTPL_FUNCE,
 				ssb_pcmcia_get_mac, sprom);
 	if (res != 0) {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX
+		ssb_err(
 			"PCMCIA: Failed to fetch MAC address\n");
 		return -ENODEV;
 	}
@@ -733,7 +727,7 @@ int ssb_pcmcia_get_invariants(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 	if ((res == 0) || (res == -ENOSPC))
 		return 0;
 
-	ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX
+	ssb_err(
 			"PCMCIA: Failed to fetch device invariants\n");
 	return -ENODEV;
 }
@@ -843,6 +837,6 @@ int ssb_pcmcia_init(struct ssb_bus *bus)
 
 	return 0;
 error:
-	ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX "Failed to initialize PCMCIA host device\n");
+	ssb_err("Failed to initialize PCMCIA host device\n");
 	return err;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/ssb/scan.c b/drivers/ssb/scan.c
index ab4627c..b9429df 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/scan.c
@@ -125,8 +125,7 @@ static u16 pcidev_to_chipid(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
 		chipid_fallback = 0x4401;
 		break;
 	default:
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX
-			   "PCI-ID not in fallback list\n");
+		ssb_err("PCI-ID not in fallback list\n");
 	}
 
 	return chipid_fallback;
@@ -152,8 +151,7 @@ static u8 chipid_to_nrcores(u16 chipid)
 	case 0x4704:
 		return 9;
 	default:
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX
-			   "CHIPID not in nrcores fallback list\n");
+		ssb_err("CHIPID not in nrcores fallback list\n");
 	}
 
 	return 1;
@@ -320,15 +318,13 @@ int ssb_bus_scan(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 			bus->chip_package = 0;
 		}
 	}
-	ssb_printk(KERN_INFO PFX "Found chip with id 0x%04X, rev 0x%02X and "
-		   "package 0x%02X\n", bus->chip_id, bus->chip_rev,
-		   bus->chip_package);
+	ssb_info("Found chip with id 0x%04X, rev 0x%02X and package 0x%02X\n",
+		 bus->chip_id, bus->chip_rev, bus->chip_package);
 	if (!bus->nr_devices)
 		bus->nr_devices = chipid_to_nrcores(bus->chip_id);
 	if (bus->nr_devices > ARRAY_SIZE(bus->devices)) {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX
-			   "More than %d ssb cores found (%d)\n",
-			   SSB_MAX_NR_CORES, bus->nr_devices);
+		ssb_err("More than %d ssb cores found (%d)\n",
+			SSB_MAX_NR_CORES, bus->nr_devices);
 		goto err_unmap;
 	}
 	if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_SSB) {
@@ -370,8 +366,7 @@ int ssb_bus_scan(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 			nr_80211_cores++;
 			if (nr_80211_cores > 1) {
 				if (!we_support_multiple_80211_cores(bus)) {
-					ssb_dprintk(KERN_INFO PFX "Ignoring additional "
-						    "802.11 core\n");
+					ssb_dbg("Ignoring additional 802.11 core\n");
 					continue;
 				}
 			}
@@ -379,8 +374,7 @@ int ssb_bus_scan(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 		case SSB_DEV_EXTIF:
 #ifdef CONFIG_SSB_DRIVER_EXTIF
 			if (bus->extif.dev) {
-				ssb_printk(KERN_WARNING PFX
-					   "WARNING: Multiple EXTIFs found\n");
+				ssb_warn("WARNING: Multiple EXTIFs found\n");
 				break;
 			}
 			bus->extif.dev = dev;
@@ -388,8 +382,7 @@ int ssb_bus_scan(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 			break;
 		case SSB_DEV_CHIPCOMMON:
 			if (bus->chipco.dev) {
-				ssb_printk(KERN_WARNING PFX
-					   "WARNING: Multiple ChipCommon found\n");
+				ssb_warn("WARNING: Multiple ChipCommon found\n");
 				break;
 			}
 			bus->chipco.dev = dev;
@@ -398,8 +391,7 @@ int ssb_bus_scan(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 		case SSB_DEV_MIPS_3302:
 #ifdef CONFIG_SSB_DRIVER_MIPS
 			if (bus->mipscore.dev) {
-				ssb_printk(KERN_WARNING PFX
-					   "WARNING: Multiple MIPS cores found\n");
+				ssb_warn("WARNING: Multiple MIPS cores found\n");
 				break;
 			}
 			bus->mipscore.dev = dev;
@@ -420,8 +412,7 @@ int ssb_bus_scan(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 				}
 			}
 			if (bus->pcicore.dev) {
-				ssb_printk(KERN_WARNING PFX
-					   "WARNING: Multiple PCI(E) cores found\n");
+				ssb_warn("WARNING: Multiple PCI(E) cores found\n");
 				break;
 			}
 			bus->pcicore.dev = dev;
diff --git a/drivers/ssb/sprom.c b/drivers/ssb/sprom.c
index 80d366f..a3b2364 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/sprom.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/sprom.c
@@ -127,13 +127,13 @@ ssize_t ssb_attr_sprom_store(struct ssb_bus *bus,
 		goto out_kfree;
 	err = ssb_devices_freeze(bus, &freeze);
 	if (err) {
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX "SPROM write: Could not freeze all devices\n");
+		ssb_err("SPROM write: Could not freeze all devices\n");
 		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 	res = sprom_write(bus, sprom);
 	err = ssb_devices_thaw(&freeze);
 	if (err)
-		ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX "SPROM write: Could not thaw all devices\n");
+		ssb_err("SPROM write: Could not thaw all devices\n");
 out_unlock:
 	mutex_unlock(&bus->sprom_mutex);
 out_kfree:
diff --git a/drivers/ssb/ssb_private.h b/drivers/ssb/ssb_private.h
index 466171b..4671f17 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/ssb_private.h
+++ b/drivers/ssb/ssb_private.h
@@ -9,16 +9,27 @@
 #define PFX	"ssb: "
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SSB_SILENT
-# define ssb_printk(fmt, x...)	do { /* nothing */ } while (0)
+# define ssb_printk(fmt, ...)					\
+	do { if (0) printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
 #else
-# define ssb_printk		printk
+# define ssb_printk(fmt, ...)					\
+	printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #endif /* CONFIG_SSB_SILENT */
 
+#define ssb_emerg(fmt, ...)	ssb_printk(KERN_EMERG PFX fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define ssb_err(fmt, ...)	ssb_printk(KERN_ERR PFX fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define ssb_warn(fmt, ...)	ssb_printk(KERN_WARNING PFX fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define ssb_notice(fmt, ...)	ssb_printk(KERN_NOTICE PFX fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define ssb_info(fmt, ...)	ssb_printk(KERN_INFO PFX fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define ssb_cont(fmt, ...)	ssb_printk(KERN_CONT fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
 /* dprintk: Debugging printk; vanishes for non-debug compilation */
 #ifdef CONFIG_SSB_DEBUG
-# define ssb_dprintk(fmt, x...)	ssb_printk(fmt , ##x)
+# define ssb_dbg(fmt, ...)					\
+	ssb_printk(KERN_DEBUG PFX fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
 #else
-# define ssb_dprintk(fmt, x...)	do { /* nothing */ } while (0)
+# define ssb_dbg(fmt, ...)					\
+	do { if (0) printk(KERN_DEBUG PFX fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
 #endif
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SSB_DEBUG
-- 
1.8.1.2.459.gbcd45b4.dirty




^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-02-20 20:11           ` Joe Perches
@ 2013-02-21  3:34             ` Larry Finger
  2013-03-09 23:02               ` Rafał Miłecki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2013-02-21  3:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Joe Perches
  Cc: Hauke Mehrtens, Rafał Miłecki, linville, linux-wireless

On 02/20/2013 02:11 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 20:17 +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>> On 02/20/2013 07:29 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 11:56 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>>>> On 02/20/2013 11:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 17:09 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>>>> 2013/2/16 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>:
>>>>>>> The mac address should be aligned to u16 to prevent an unaligned access
>>>>>>> in drivers/ssb/pci.c where it is casted to __be16.
>>>>> []
>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
>>>>> []
>>>>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct ssb_sprom_core_pwr_info {
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>    struct ssb_sprom {
>>>>>>>           u8 revision;
>>>>>>> +       u8 country_code;        /* Country Code */
>>>>>>>           u8 il0mac[6];           /* MAC address for 802.11b/g */
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It looks a little hacky to me too, it's easy to forget about that
>>>>>> requirement and break that again in the future.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What about not casting il0mac to u16 at all? Maybe we should just fill
>>>>>> it as u8 (which it is)?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Perhaps this?
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.
>>
>> ...
>>
>>>> I like the looks of sprom_get_mac() over that ugly *(((__be16 *)out->il0mac)
>>>> construct, but this patch breaks ssb. The resulting MAC address is all ones. I
>>>> have not yet figured out the problem.
>>>
>>> Dunno, I must have done something stupid.
>>>
>>> I don't have one of these but the transform
>>> looked correct when I did  it.
>>>
>>> I'm not sure it's the best solution anyway
>>> because some of the other ether address
>>> functions like compare_ether_addr also
>>> require 2 byte alignment and cast to u16.
>>
>> Your patch looks good (haven't tested it), but as you said we should
>> still align the mac addresses to u16 so functions like
>> compare_ether_addr work with them.
>>
>> There is also a v2 of my patch:
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg103628.html
>
> Seems OK to me, though I suggest using ETH_ALEN
> instead of 6.
>
> Maybe using both patches would be better still.
>
> And as long as I'm futzing with ssb, there's another
> logging cleanup to go with it.
>
> Here's a V2 with the missing SPOFF fixed.
>
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address
> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>
> Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> ---
>
> V2: Add missing SPOFF

Tested-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>

Larry

>
>   drivers/ssb/pci.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ssb/pci.c b/drivers/ssb/pci.c
> index e9d9496..4ec0bdb 100644
> --- a/drivers/ssb/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/ssb/pci.c
> @@ -231,6 +231,15 @@ static inline u8 ssb_crc8(u8 crc, u8 data)
>   	return t[crc ^ data];
>   }
>
> +static void sprom_get_mac(char *mac, const u16 *in)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> +		*mac++ = in[i];
> +		*mac++ = in[i] >> 8;
> +	}
> +}
> +
>   static u8 ssb_sprom_crc(const u16 *sprom, u16 size)
>   {
>   	int word;
> @@ -341,8 +350,6 @@ static s8 r123_extract_antgain(u8 sprom_revision, const u16 *in,
>
>   static void sprom_extract_r123(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>   {
> -	int i;
> -	u16 v;
>   	u16 loc[3];
>
>   	if (out->revision == 3)			/* rev 3 moved MAC */
> @@ -352,19 +359,10 @@ static void sprom_extract_r123(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>   		loc[1] = SSB_SPROM1_ET0MAC;
>   		loc[2] = SSB_SPROM1_ET1MAC;
>   	}
> -	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> -		v = in[SPOFF(loc[0]) + i];
> -		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
> -	}
> +	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SPOFF(loc[0])]);
>   	if (out->revision < 3) { 	/* only rev 1-2 have et0, et1 */
> -		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> -			v = in[SPOFF(loc[1]) + i];
> -			*(((__be16 *)out->et0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
> -		}
> -		for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> -			v = in[SPOFF(loc[2]) + i];
> -			*(((__be16 *)out->et1mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
> -		}
> +		sprom_get_mac(out->et0mac, &in[SPOFF(loc[1])]);
> +		sprom_get_mac(out->et1mac, &in[SPOFF(loc[2])]);
>   	}
>   	SPEX(et0phyaddr, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY_ET0A, 0);
>   	SPEX(et1phyaddr, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM1_ETHPHY_ET1A,
> @@ -454,19 +452,15 @@ static void sprom_extract_r458(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>
>   static void sprom_extract_r45(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>   {
> -	int i;
> -	u16 v;
>   	u16 il0mac_offset;
>
>   	if (out->revision == 4)
>   		il0mac_offset = SSB_SPROM4_IL0MAC;
>   	else
>   		il0mac_offset = SSB_SPROM5_IL0MAC;
> -	/* extract the MAC address */
> -	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> -		v = in[SPOFF(il0mac_offset) + i];
> -		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
> -	}
> +
> +	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SPOFF(il0mac_offset)]);
> +
>   	SPEX(et0phyaddr, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY_ET0A, 0);
>   	SPEX(et1phyaddr, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY, SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY_ET1A,
>   	     SSB_SPROM4_ETHPHY_ET1A_SHIFT);
> @@ -530,7 +524,7 @@ static void sprom_extract_r45(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>   static void sprom_extract_r8(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>   {
>   	int i;
> -	u16 v, o;
> +	u16 o;
>   	u16 pwr_info_offset[] = {
>   		SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE0, SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE1,
>   		SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE2, SSB_SROM8_PWR_INFO_CORE3
> @@ -539,10 +533,8 @@ static void sprom_extract_r8(struct ssb_sprom *out, const u16 *in)
>   			ARRAY_SIZE(out->core_pwr_info));
>
>   	/* extract the MAC address */
> -	for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
> -		v = in[SPOFF(SSB_SPROM8_IL0MAC) + i];
> -		*(((__be16 *)out->il0mac) + i) = cpu_to_be16(v);
> -	}
> +	sprom_get_mac(out->il0mac, &in[SPOFF(SSB_SPROM8_IL0MAC)]);
> +
>   	SPEX(board_rev, SSB_SPROM8_BOARDREV, 0xFFFF, 0);
>   	SPEX(alpha2[0], SSB_SPROM8_CCODE, 0xff00, 8);
>   	SPEX(alpha2[1], SSB_SPROM8_CCODE, 0x00ff, 0);
>


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-02-21  3:34             ` Larry Finger
@ 2013-03-09 23:02               ` Rafał Miłecki
  2013-03-09 23:31                 ` Larry Finger
  2013-03-09 23:56                 ` Larry Finger
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2013-03-09 23:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Larry Finger; +Cc: Joe Perches, Hauke Mehrtens, linville, linux-wireless

2013/2/21 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>:
> On 02/20/2013 02:11 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 20:17 +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/20/2013 07:29 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 11:56 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/20/2013 11:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 17:09 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/2/16 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The mac address should be aligned to u16 to prevent an unaligned
>>>>>>>> access
>>>>>>>> in drivers/ssb/pci.c where it is casted to __be16.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> []
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
>>>>>>
>>>>>> []
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct ssb_sprom_core_pwr_info {
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>    struct ssb_sprom {
>>>>>>>>           u8 revision;
>>>>>>>> +       u8 country_code;        /* Country Code */
>>>>>>>>           u8 il0mac[6];           /* MAC address for 802.11b/g */
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It looks a little hacky to me too, it's easy to forget about that
>>>>>>> requirement and break that again in the future.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What about not casting il0mac to u16 at all? Maybe we should just
>>>>>>> fill
>>>>>>> it as u8 (which it is)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.
>>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>>> I like the looks of sprom_get_mac() over that ugly *(((__be16
>>>>> *)out->il0mac)
>>>>> construct, but this patch breaks ssb. The resulting MAC address is all
>>>>> ones. I
>>>>> have not yet figured out the problem.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Dunno, I must have done something stupid.
>>>>
>>>> I don't have one of these but the transform
>>>> looked correct when I did  it.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not sure it's the best solution anyway
>>>> because some of the other ether address
>>>> functions like compare_ether_addr also
>>>> require 2 byte alignment and cast to u16.
>>>
>>>
>>> Your patch looks good (haven't tested it), but as you said we should
>>> still align the mac addresses to u16 so functions like
>>> compare_ether_addr work with them.
>>>
>>> There is also a v2 of my patch:
>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg103628.html
>>
>>
>> Seems OK to me, though I suggest using ETH_ALEN
>> instead of 6.
>>
>> Maybe using both patches would be better still.
>>
>> And as long as I'm futzing with ssb, there's another
>> logging cleanup to go with it.
>>
>> Here's a V2 with the missing SPOFF fixed.
>>
>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address
>> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>>
>> Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>> ---
>>
>> V2: Add missing SPOFF
>
>
> Tested-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>

I didn't confirm my issue to be related to this patch, but with recent
kernels my MAC has changed from
00:11:22:33:44:55
to
11:00:33:22:55:44

Larry: did you verify MAC didn't change for you?

-- 
Rafał

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-03-09 23:02               ` Rafał Miłecki
@ 2013-03-09 23:31                 ` Larry Finger
  2013-03-09 23:56                 ` Larry Finger
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2013-03-09 23:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafał Miłecki
  Cc: Joe Perches, Hauke Mehrtens, linville, linux-wireless

On 03/09/2013 05:02 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2013/2/21 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>:
>>> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> V2: Add missing SPOFF
>>
>>
>> Tested-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
>
> I didn't confirm my issue to be related to this patch, but with recent
> kernels my MAC has changed from
> 00:11:22:33:44:55
> to
> 11:00:33:22:55:44
>
> Larry: did you verify MAC didn't change for you?

I just checked it on PowerPC and it changed it the same way as yours did.

The problem is that the MAC is stored in the SPROM in big-endian order, thus the 
sequence

+       for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+               *mac++ = in[i];
+               *mac++ = in[i] >> 8;
+       }

needs to be changed to

+       for (i = 0; i < 3; i++) {
+               *mac++ = in[i] >> 8;
+               *mac++ = in[i];
+       }

After that change, it is OK, at least on the PPC.

BTW, that patch is not yet in my copy of wireless-testing.

Larry


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-03-09 23:02               ` Rafał Miłecki
  2013-03-09 23:31                 ` Larry Finger
@ 2013-03-09 23:56                 ` Larry Finger
  2013-03-10 11:36                   ` Rafał Miłecki
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2013-03-09 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafał Miłecki
  Cc: Joe Perches, Hauke Mehrtens, linville, linux-wireless

On 03/09/2013 05:02 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> 2013/2/21 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>:
>> On 02/20/2013 02:11 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 20:17 +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 02/20/2013 07:29 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 11:56 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 02/20/2013 11:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 17:09 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2013/2/16 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The mac address should be aligned to u16 to prevent an unaligned
>>>>>>>>> access
>>>>>>>>> in drivers/ssb/pci.c where it is casted to __be16.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> []
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> []
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct ssb_sprom_core_pwr_info {
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>     struct ssb_sprom {
>>>>>>>>>            u8 revision;
>>>>>>>>> +       u8 country_code;        /* Country Code */
>>>>>>>>>            u8 il0mac[6];           /* MAC address for 802.11b/g */
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It looks a little hacky to me too, it's easy to forget about that
>>>>>>>> requirement and break that again in the future.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What about not casting il0mac to u16 at all? Maybe we should just
>>>>>>>> fill
>>>>>>>> it as u8 (which it is)?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Perhaps this?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>>>> I like the looks of sprom_get_mac() over that ugly *(((__be16
>>>>>> *)out->il0mac)
>>>>>> construct, but this patch breaks ssb. The resulting MAC address is all
>>>>>> ones. I
>>>>>> have not yet figured out the problem.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Dunno, I must have done something stupid.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't have one of these but the transform
>>>>> looked correct when I did  it.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not sure it's the best solution anyway
>>>>> because some of the other ether address
>>>>> functions like compare_ether_addr also
>>>>> require 2 byte alignment and cast to u16.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Your patch looks good (haven't tested it), but as you said we should
>>>> still align the mac addresses to u16 so functions like
>>>> compare_ether_addr work with them.
>>>>
>>>> There is also a v2 of my patch:
>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg103628.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Seems OK to me, though I suggest using ETH_ALEN
>>> instead of 6.
>>>
>>> Maybe using both patches would be better still.
>>>
>>> And as long as I'm futzing with ssb, there's another
>>> logging cleanup to go with it.
>>>
>>> Here's a V2 with the missing SPOFF fixed.
>>>
>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address
>>> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>>>
>>> Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>>> ---
>>>
>>> V2: Add missing SPOFF
>>
>>
>> Tested-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
>
> I didn't confirm my issue to be related to this patch, but with recent
> kernels my MAC has changed from
> 00:11:22:33:44:55
> to
> 11:00:33:22:55:44
>
> Larry: did you verify MAC didn't change for you?

I just checked on x86_64, and the bytes are swapped here too. Do you want to 
push the patch, or should I do it?

Larry



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-03-09 23:56                 ` Larry Finger
@ 2013-03-10 11:36                   ` Rafał Miłecki
  2013-03-10 17:35                     ` Larry Finger
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2013-03-10 11:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Larry Finger; +Cc: Joe Perches, Hauke Mehrtens, linville, linux-wireless

2013/3/10 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>:
> On 03/09/2013 05:02 PM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>
>> 2013/2/21 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>:
>>>
>>> On 02/20/2013 02:11 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 20:17 +0100, Hauke Mehrtens wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 02/20/2013 07:29 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 2013-02-20 at 11:56 -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 02/20/2013 11:31 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 17:09 +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2013/2/16 Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The mac address should be aligned to u16 to prevent an unaligned
>>>>>>>>>> access
>>>>>>>>>> in drivers/ssb/pci.c where it is casted to __be16.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> []
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> diff --git a/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h b/include/linux/ssb/ssb.h
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> []
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ struct ssb_sprom_core_pwr_info {
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>     struct ssb_sprom {
>>>>>>>>>>            u8 revision;
>>>>>>>>>> +       u8 country_code;        /* Country Code */
>>>>>>>>>>            u8 il0mac[6];           /* MAC address for 802.11b/g */
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It looks a little hacky to me too, it's easy to forget about that
>>>>>>>>> requirement and break that again in the future.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> What about not casting il0mac to u16 at all? Maybe we should just
>>>>>>>>> fill
>>>>>>>>> it as u8 (which it is)?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Perhaps this?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>>>>>>>> Subject: [PATCH] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
>>>>>>> I like the looks of sprom_get_mac() over that ugly *(((__be16
>>>>>>> *)out->il0mac)
>>>>>>> construct, but this patch breaks ssb. The resulting MAC address is
>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>> ones. I
>>>>>>> have not yet figured out the problem.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dunno, I must have done something stupid.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I don't have one of these but the transform
>>>>>> looked correct when I did  it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm not sure it's the best solution anyway
>>>>>> because some of the other ether address
>>>>>> functions like compare_ether_addr also
>>>>>> require 2 byte alignment and cast to u16.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Your patch looks good (haven't tested it), but as you said we should
>>>>> still align the mac addresses to u16 so functions like
>>>>> compare_ether_addr work with them.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is also a v2 of my patch:
>>>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg103628.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Seems OK to me, though I suggest using ETH_ALEN
>>>> instead of 6.
>>>>
>>>> Maybe using both patches would be better still.
>>>>
>>>> And as long as I'm futzing with ssb, there's another
>>>> logging cleanup to go with it.
>>>>
>>>> Here's a V2 with the missing SPOFF fixed.
>>>>
>>>> Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address
>>>> From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>>>>
>>>> Don't require alignment of mac addresses to u16.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> V2: Add missing SPOFF
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
>>
>>
>> I didn't confirm my issue to be related to this patch, but with recent
>> kernels my MAC has changed from
>> 00:11:22:33:44:55
>> to
>> 11:00:33:22:55:44
>>
>> Larry: did you verify MAC didn't change for you?
>
>
> I just checked on x86_64, and the bytes are swapped here too. Do you want to
> push the patch, or should I do it?

Feel free to fix. I've another 3 regressions to track...

-- 
Rafał

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-03-10 11:36                   ` Rafał Miłecki
@ 2013-03-10 17:35                     ` Larry Finger
  2013-03-10 20:57                       ` Rafał Miłecki
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 17+ messages in thread
From: Larry Finger @ 2013-03-10 17:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rafał Miłecki
  Cc: Joe Perches, Hauke Mehrtens, linville, linux-wireless

On 03/10/2013 06:36 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>
> Feel free to fix. I've another 3 regressions to track...

Upon further investigation, the flipping of the MAC bytes was not due to "ssb: 
pci: Standardize a function to get mac address", or "ssb: fix unaligned access 
to mac address". For other reasons, I had to run 3.8 today and found the 
flipping, even though neither patch was installed. Joe and Hauke are blameless - 
they merely reproduced the existing bug. I have no real desire to find out when 
that error was introduced as I am not an archeologist. Note that b43legacy does 
not have the problem, thus it was introduced after the split of those two variants.

I will submit the fix.

Larry




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address
  2013-03-10 17:35                     ` Larry Finger
@ 2013-03-10 20:57                       ` Rafał Miłecki
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 17+ messages in thread
From: Rafał Miłecki @ 2013-03-10 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Larry Finger; +Cc: Joe Perches, Hauke Mehrtens, linville, linux-wireless

2013/3/10 Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>:
> On 03/10/2013 06:36 AM, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>>
>>
>> Feel free to fix. I've another 3 regressions to track...
>
>
> Upon further investigation, the flipping of the MAC bytes was not due to
> "ssb: pci: Standardize a function to get mac address", or "ssb: fix
> unaligned access to mac address". For other reasons, I had to run 3.8 today
> and found the flipping, even though neither patch was installed. Joe and
> Hauke are blameless - they merely reproduced the existing bug. I have no
> real desire to find out when that error was introduced as I am not an
> archeologist. Note that b43legacy does not have the problem, thus it was
> introduced after the split of those two variants.

It's not about blaming anyone, just finish the bug :)

Reverting e5652756ff36ed9e1283121f788e6a17117efcab which is "ssb: pci:
Standardize a function to get mac address" fixes the MAC address issue
for me.

I'm reverting on top of c49141682cfa9713e67f515cc7faf6145720ec3d.

-- 
Rafał

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 17+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2013-03-10 20:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-02-16 13:25 [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address Hauke Mehrtens
2013-02-18 10:10 ` Johannes Berg
2013-02-18 16:09 ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-02-20 17:31   ` Joe Perches
2013-02-20 17:56     ` Larry Finger
2013-02-20 18:29       ` Joe Perches
2013-02-20 19:17         ` Hauke Mehrtens
2013-02-20 20:11           ` Joe Perches
2013-02-21  3:34             ` Larry Finger
2013-03-09 23:02               ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-03-09 23:31                 ` Larry Finger
2013-03-09 23:56                 ` Larry Finger
2013-03-10 11:36                   ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-03-10 17:35                     ` Larry Finger
2013-03-10 20:57                       ` Rafał Miłecki
2013-02-20 20:16           ` [PATCH 2/2] ssb: Convert ssb_printk to ssb_<level> Joe Perches
2013-02-20 19:07       ` [PATCH] ssb: fix unaligned access to mac address Joe Perches

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.