Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add herobrine-r1

[Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>]

Quoting Douglas Anderson (2022-01-25 14:44:22)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine-herobrine-r1.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine-herobrine-r1.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f95273052da0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine-herobrine-r1.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,313 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Google Herobrine board device tree source
> + *
> + * Copyright 2022 Google LLC.
> + */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "sc7280-herobrine.dtsi"
> +
> +/ {
> +       model = "Google Herobrine (rev1+)";
> +       compatible = "google,herobrine", "qcom,sc7280";

Can we stop adding "qcom,sc7280" to the board compatible string? It
looks out of place. It's the compatible for the SoC and should really be
the compatible for the /soc node.

> +};
> +
> +/* ADDITIONS TO NODES DEFINED IN PARENT DEVICE TREE FILES */
> +
> +&ap_spi_fp {
> +       status = "okay";
> +};
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..24c34ddebd18
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280-herobrine.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,778 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> +/*
> + * Google Herobrine baseboard device tree source
> + *
[...]
> +
> +               vin-supply = <&ppvar_sys>;
> +       };
> +
> +       pp3300_codec: pp3300-codec-regulator {
> +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +               regulator-name = "pp3300_codec";
> +
> +               regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> +               regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> +
> +               gpio = <&tlmm 105 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> +               enable-active-high;
> +               pinctrl-names = "default";
> +               pinctrl-0 = <&en_pp3300_codec>;
> +
> +               vin-supply = <&pp3300_z1>;
> +       };
> +
> +       pp3300_left_in_mlb: pp3300-left-in-mlb {

Sometimes '-regulator' is left out. Is that intentional? I suppose it
would be better if every node had regulator postfix, but it may be too
long of a node name?

> +               compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> +               regulator-name = "pp3300_left_in_mlb";
> +
> +               regulator-min-microvolt = <3300000>;
> +               regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> +
> +               gpio = <&tlmm 80 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;