All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de
Cc: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>,
	Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com>,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org, x86@kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, prarit@redhat.com, feng.tang@intel.com,
	Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 09/11] x86/tsc: prepare for early sched_clock
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2018 17:29:35 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGM2reYQx769omkWVweEcTMy8WNrKOiuUVo4OFWNh4zW-rc4pg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1806232210110.8650@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>

> So you forgot to answer this question. I did not find a system yet, which
> actually exposes this behaviour on mainline.
>
> Is this an artifact of your early sched clock thing?
>

Yes, it is. Let me explain how it happens.

So, the problem is introduced in patch "sched: early boot clock" by this change:

-       if (unlikely(!sched_clock_running))
-               return 0ull;
+       /* Use early clock until sched_clock_init_late() */
+       if (unlikely(sched_clock_running < 2))
+               return sched_clock() + __sched_clock_offset;

As soon as sched_clock() starts output non-zero values, we start
output time without correcting the output as it is done in
sched_clock_local() where unstable TSC and backward motion are
detected. But, since early in boot interrupts are disabled, we cannot
really correct invalid time, and therefore must rely on sched_clock()
to provide us with a contiguous and sane time. In earlier versions of
this project, I was solving this problem by adjusting
__sched_clock_offset every time sched_clock()'s continuity was changed
by using a callback function into sched/clock.c. But, Peter was
against that approach.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-23 21:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-21 21:25 [PATCH v12 00/11] Early boot time stamps for x86 Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 01/11] x86: text_poke() may access uninitialized struct pages Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:37   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-06-25  8:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25  8:39     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-25  9:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25  9:18         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-25  9:22           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25 12:32             ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25 13:48               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25 14:06                 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 02/11] x86: initialize static branching early Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23  9:16   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-06-23 13:11     ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 03/11] x86/tsc: redefine notsc to behave as tsc=unstable Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 13:32   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 04/11] kvm/x86: remove kvm memblock dependency Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 13:36   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-05 16:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-06  9:24     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-06  9:36       ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-06  9:45         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-06 10:08           ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-06 10:44             ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-06 10:50               ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-06 15:03                 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-06 15:09                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 05/11] s390/time: add read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset() Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25  7:07   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-06-25 12:45     ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 06/11] time: replace read_boot_clock64() with read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset() Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 13:49   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 07/11] s390/time: remove read_boot_clock64() Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 08/11] ARM/time: " Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 13:52   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 09/11] x86/tsc: prepare for early sched_clock Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 16:50   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 18:49     ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 20:11     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 21:29       ` Pavel Tatashin [this message]
2018-06-23 23:38         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-24  2:43           ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-24  7:30             ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-26 15:42           ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-26 18:42             ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-26 19:47               ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-28  7:31               ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-28 10:43                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-28 11:46                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-28 12:27                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-28 19:42                   ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-29  7:30                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-29  8:57                       ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-03 20:59                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-02 17:18                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-06-29 14:30                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-06-29 17:50                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-09 23:16                   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 10/11] sched: early boot clock Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25  8:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25 12:44     ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25 19:23     ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-26  9:00       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 11:27         ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-26 11:51           ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-26 15:07           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 11/11] x86/tsc: use tsc early Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 16:56   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 21:38     ` Pavel Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGM2reYQx769omkWVweEcTMy8WNrKOiuUVo4OFWNh4zW-rc4pg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.