All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>,
	steven.sistare@oracle.com, daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com,
	linux@armlinux.org.uk, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com,
	heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, john.stultz@linaro.org,
	sboyd@codeaurora.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	prarit@redhat.com, feng.tang@intel.com, pmladek@suse.com,
	gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 04/11] kvm/x86: remove kvm memblock dependency
Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2018 11:24:25 +0200 (CEST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.1807061101040.1664@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fc67276e-643d-8a78-29e3-273c6dc79275@redhat.com>

On Thu, 5 Jul 2018, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 21/06/2018 23:25, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> > KVM clock is initialized later compared to other hypervisor because it has
> > dependency on memblock allocator.
> > 
> > Lets bring it inline with other hypervisors by removing this dependency by
> > using memory from BSS instead of allocating it.
> > 
> > The benefits:
> > - remove ifdef from common code
> > - earlier availability of TSC.
> > - remove dependency on memblock, and reduce code
> > - earlier kvm sched_clock()
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com>
> 
> The reason for this is to avoid wasting a lot of BSS memory when KVM is
> not in use.  Thomas is going to send his take on this!

Got it working with per cpu variables, but there is a different subtle
issue with that.

The pvclock data is mapped into the VDSO as well, i.e. as a full page.

Right now with the linear array, which is forced to be page sized at least
this only maps pvclock data or zeroed data (after the last CPU) into the
VDSO.

With PER CPU variables this would map arbitraty other per cpu data which
happens to be in the same page into the VDSO. Not really what we want.

That means to utilize PER CPU data this requires to allocate page sized
pvclock data space for each CPU to prevent leaking arbitrary stuff.

As this data is allocated on demand, i.e. only if kvmclock is used, this
might be tolerable, but I'm not so sure.

Thanks,

	tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-06  9:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 69+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-21 21:25 [PATCH v12 00/11] Early boot time stamps for x86 Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 01/11] x86: text_poke() may access uninitialized struct pages Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:37   ` Randy Dunlap
2018-06-25  8:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25  8:39     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-25  9:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25  9:18         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-25  9:22           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25 12:32             ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25 13:48               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25 14:06                 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 02/11] x86: initialize static branching early Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23  9:16   ` Borislav Petkov
2018-06-23 13:11     ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 03/11] x86/tsc: redefine notsc to behave as tsc=unstable Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 13:32   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 04/11] kvm/x86: remove kvm memblock dependency Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 13:36   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-05 16:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-06  9:24     ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2018-07-06  9:36       ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-06  9:45         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-06 10:08           ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-06 10:44             ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-06 10:50               ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-06 15:03                 ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-06 15:09                   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 05/11] s390/time: add read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset() Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25  7:07   ` Martin Schwidefsky
2018-06-25 12:45     ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 06/11] time: replace read_boot_clock64() with read_persistent_wall_and_boot_offset() Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 13:49   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 07/11] s390/time: remove read_boot_clock64() Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 08/11] ARM/time: " Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 13:52   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 09/11] x86/tsc: prepare for early sched_clock Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 16:50   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 18:49     ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 20:11     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 21:29       ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 23:38         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-24  2:43           ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-24  7:30             ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-26 15:42           ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-26 18:42             ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-26 19:47               ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-28  7:31               ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-28 10:43                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-28 11:46                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-28 12:27                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-28 19:42                   ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-29  7:30                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-29  8:57                       ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-07-03 20:59                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-07-02 17:18                       ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-06-29 14:30                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-06-29 17:50                     ` Andy Shevchenko
2018-07-09 23:16                   ` Boris Ostrovsky
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 10/11] sched: early boot clock Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25  8:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-25 12:44     ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-25 19:23     ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-26  9:00       ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-26 11:27         ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-26 11:51           ` Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-26 15:07           ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-06-21 21:25 ` [PATCH v12 11/11] x86/tsc: use tsc early Pavel Tatashin
2018-06-23 16:56   ` Thomas Gleixner
2018-06-23 21:38     ` Pavel Tatashin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.21.1807061101040.1664@nanos.tec.linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=daniel.m.jordan@oracle.com \
    --cc=douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=gnomes@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@oracle.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=prarit@redhat.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.