All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kun Yi <kunyi@google.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: jdelvare@suse.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	"Venkatesh, Supreeth" <supreeth.venkatesh@amd.com>,
	OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux hwmon-next v4 1/3] hwmon: (sbtsi) Add basic support for SB-TSI sensors
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:57:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGMNF6VwzAR8qe3oYGfn7pb9sKMe5dtWBBrRowNRK63pH-mkeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201203013748.GA228752@roeck-us.net>

Thanks Guenter for reviewing!

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 5:37 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 08:55:59AM -0800, Kun Yi wrote:
> > SB Temperature Sensor Interface (SB-TSI) is an SMBus compatible
> > interface that reports AMD SoC's Ttcl (normalized temperature),
> > and resembles a typical 8-pin remote temperature sensor's I2C interface
> > to BMC.
> >
> > This commit adds basic support using this interface to read CPU
> > temperature, and read/write high/low CPU temp thresholds.
> >
> > To instantiate this driver on an AMD CPU with SB-TSI
> > support, the i2c bus number would be the bus connected from the board
> > management controller (BMC) to the CPU. The i2c address is specified in
> > Section 6.3.1 of the spec [1]: The SB-TSI address is normally 98h for
> > socket 0 and 90h for socket 1, but it could vary based on hardware address
> > select pins.
> >
> > [1]: https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/56255_OSRR.pdf
> >
> > Test status: tested reading temp1_input, and reading/writing
> > temp1_max/min.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kun Yi <kunyi@google.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/hwmon/Kconfig      |  10 ++
> >  drivers/hwmon/Makefile     |   1 +
> >  drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c | 265 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 276 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> > index 3c059fc23cd6..3d6a809700ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> > @@ -1522,6 +1522,16 @@ config SENSORS_SL28CPLD
> >         This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module
> >         will be called sl28cpld-hwmon.
> >
> > +config SENSORS_SBTSI
> > +     tristate "Emulated SB-TSI temperature sensor"
> > +     depends on I2C
> > +     help
> > +       If you say yes here you get support for emulated temperature
> > +       sensors on AMD SoCs with SB-TSI interface connected to a BMC device.
> > +
> > +       This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will
> > +       be called sbtsi_temp.
> > +
> >  config SENSORS_SHT15
> >       tristate "Sensiron humidity and temperature sensors. SHT15 and compat."
> >       depends on GPIOLIB || COMPILE_TEST
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> > index 01ca5d3fbad4..ee8c037919da 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> > @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_POWR1220)  += powr1220.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PWM_FAN)        += pwm-fan.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_RASPBERRYPI_HWMON)      += raspberrypi-hwmon.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_S3C)    += s3c-hwmon.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SBTSI)  += sbtsi_temp.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH56XX_COMMON)+= sch56xx-common.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH5627)        += sch5627.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH5636)        += sch5636.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c b/drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..6b0a7b9df1f3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > +/*
> > + * sbtsi_temp.c - hwmon driver for a SBI Temperature Sensor Interface (SB-TSI)
> > + *                compliant AMD SoC temperature device.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2020, Google Inc.
> > + * Copyright (c) 2020, Kun Yi <kunyi@google.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/hwmon.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * SB-TSI registers only support SMBus byte data access. "_INT" registers are
> > + * the integer part of a temperature value or limit, and "_DEC" registers are
> > + * corresponding decimal parts.
> > + */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_INT           0x01 /* RO */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_STATUS             0x02 /* RO */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_CONFIG             0x03 /* RO */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_INT              0x07 /* RW */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_INT               0x08 /* RW */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_DEC           0x10 /* RW */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_DEC              0x13 /* RW */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_DEC               0x14 /* RW */
> > +
> > +#define SBTSI_CONFIG_READ_ORDER_SHIFT        5
> > +
> > +#define SBTSI_TEMP_MIN       0
> > +#define SBTSI_TEMP_MAX       255875
> > +
> > +/* Each client has this additional data */
> > +struct sbtsi_data {
> > +     struct i2c_client *client;
> > +     struct mutex lock;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * From SB-TSI spec: CPU temperature readings and limit registers encode the
> > + * temperature in increments of 0.125 from 0 to 255.875. The "high byte"
> > + * register encodes the base-2 of the integer portion, and the upper 3 bits of
> > + * the "low byte" encode in base-2 the decimal portion.
> > + *
> > + * e.g. INT=0x19, DEC=0x20 represents 25.125 degrees Celsius
> > + *
> > + * Therefore temperature in millidegree Celsius =
> > + *   (INT + DEC / 256) * 1000 = (INT * 8 + DEC / 32) * 125
> > + */
> > +static inline int sbtsi_reg_to_mc(s32 integer, s32 decimal)
> > +{
> > +     return ((integer << 3) + (decimal >> 5)) * 125;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Inversely, given temperature in millidegree Celsius
> > + *   INT = (TEMP / 125) / 8
> > + *   DEC = ((TEMP / 125) % 8) * 32
> > + * Caller have to make sure temp doesn't exceed 255875, the max valid value.
> > + */
> > +static inline void sbtsi_mc_to_reg(s32 temp, u8 *integer, u8 *decimal)
> > +{
> > +     temp /= 125;
> > +     *integer = temp >> 3;
> > +     *decimal = (temp & 0x7) << 5;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int sbtsi_read(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > +                   u32 attr, int channel, long *val)
> > +{
> > +     struct sbtsi_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +     s32 temp_int, temp_dec;
> > +     int err, reg_int, reg_dec;
> > +     bool reading_input;
> > +
> > +     if (type != hwmon_temp)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
>
> Unnecessary check.

Removed.

>
> > +
> > +     reading_input = false;
> > +     switch (attr) {
> > +     case hwmon_temp_input:
> > +             reading_input = true;
> > +             /*
> > +              * ReadOrder bit specifies the reading order of integer and
> > +              * decimal part of CPU temp for atomic reads. If bit == 0,
> > +              * reading integer part triggers latching of the decimal part,
> > +              * so integer part should be read first. If bit == 1, read
> > +              * order should be reversed.
> > +              */
> > +             err = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, SBTSI_REG_CONFIG);
> > +             if (err < 0)
> > +                     return err;
> > +
> > +             mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> > +             if (err & BIT(SBTSI_CONFIG_READ_ORDER_SHIFT)) {
> > +                     temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client,
> > +                                                         SBTSI_REG_TEMP_DEC);
> > +                     temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client,
> > +                                                         SBTSI_REG_TEMP_INT);
> > +             } else {
> > +                     temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client,
> > +                                                         SBTSI_REG_TEMP_INT);
> > +                     temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client,
> > +                                                         SBTSI_REG_TEMP_DEC);
> > +             }
> > +             mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> > +             break;
> > +     case hwmon_temp_max:
> > +             reg_int = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_INT;
> > +             reg_dec = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_DEC;
> > +             break;
> > +     case hwmon_temp_min:
> > +             reg_int = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_INT;
> > +             reg_dec = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_DEC;
> > +             break;
> > +     default:
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (!reading_input) {
> > +             temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, reg_int);
> > +             temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, reg_dec);
> > +     }
>
> This adds unnecessary complexity. I would suggest to move the calls
> to the case statements and drop reading_input as well as reg_int,
> reg_dec.

Done.

>
> Also, I just realized that the mutex is needed here as well, since
> the values might be written while being read, which could result in
> inconsistent read values. Example: Limit is changed from 100 to 99.75.
> Since the integer value is written first, it is possible that 99.0
> is returned.

That's a good catch. Modified.

>
> > +
> > +     if (temp_int < 0)
> > +             return temp_int;
> > +     if (temp_dec < 0)
> > +             return temp_dec;
> > +
> > +     *val = sbtsi_reg_to_mc(temp_int, temp_dec);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int sbtsi_write(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > +                    u32 attr, int channel, long val)
> > +{
> > +     struct sbtsi_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +     int reg_int, reg_dec, err;
> > +     u8 temp_int, temp_dec;
> > +
> > +     if (type != hwmon_temp)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
>
> This check is really unnecessary.
Removed.
>
> > +
> > +     switch (attr) {
> > +     case hwmon_temp_max:
> > +             reg_int = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_INT;
> > +             reg_dec = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_DEC;
> > +             break;
> > +     case hwmon_temp_min:
> > +             reg_int = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_INT;
> > +             reg_dec = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_DEC;
> > +             break;
> > +     default:
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     val = clamp_val(val, SBTSI_TEMP_MIN, SBTSI_TEMP_MAX);
> > +     mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> > +     sbtsi_mc_to_reg(val, &temp_int, &temp_dec);
> > +     err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client, reg_int, temp_int);
> > +     if (err)
> > +             goto exit;
> > +
> > +     err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client, reg_dec, temp_dec);
> > +exit:
> > +     mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> > +     return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static umode_t sbtsi_is_visible(const void *data,
> > +                             enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > +                             u32 attr, int channel)
> > +{
> > +     switch (type) {
> > +     case hwmon_temp:
> > +             switch (attr) {
> > +             case hwmon_temp_input:
> > +                     return 0444;
> > +             case hwmon_temp_min:
> > +                     return 0644;
> > +             case hwmon_temp_max:
> > +                     return 0644;
> > +             }
> > +             break;
> > +     default:
> > +             break;
> > +     }
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct hwmon_channel_info *sbtsi_info[] = {
> > +     HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(chip,
> > +                        HWMON_C_REGISTER_TZ),
> > +     HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(temp,
> > +                        HWMON_T_INPUT | HWMON_T_MIN | HWMON_T_MAX),
> > +     NULL
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct hwmon_ops sbtsi_hwmon_ops = {
> > +     .is_visible = sbtsi_is_visible,
> > +     .read = sbtsi_read,
> > +     .write = sbtsi_write,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct hwmon_chip_info sbtsi_chip_info = {
> > +     .ops = &sbtsi_hwmon_ops,
> > +     .info = sbtsi_info,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int sbtsi_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > +                    const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> > +{
> > +     struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> > +     struct device *hwmon_dev;
> > +     struct sbtsi_data *data;
> > +
> > +     data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct sbtsi_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     if (!data)
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +     data->client = client;
> > +     mutex_init(&data->lock);
> > +
> > +     hwmon_dev =
> > +             devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info(dev, client->name, data,
>
> Line length limit is now 100 columns, so the above line split is unnecessary.
Wow I didn't know.. Thanks! Adjusted a couple other lines based on the 100 cols.
>
> > +                                                  &sbtsi_chip_info, NULL);
> > +
> > +     return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(hwmon_dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct i2c_device_id sbtsi_id[] = {
> > +     {"sbtsi", 0},
> > +     {}
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, sbtsi_id);
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused sbtsi_of_match[] = {
> > +     {
> > +             .compatible = "amd,sbtsi",
> > +     },
> > +     { },
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sbtsi_of_match);
> > +
> > +static struct i2c_driver sbtsi_driver = {
> > +     .class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
> > +     .driver = {
> > +             .name = "sbtsi",
> > +             .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(sbtsi_of_match),
> > +     },
> > +     .probe = sbtsi_probe,
> > +     .id_table = sbtsi_id,
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_i2c_driver(sbtsi_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Kun Yi <kunyi@google.com>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Hwmon driver for AMD SB-TSI emulated sensor");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > --
> > 2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
> >



-- 
Regards,
Kun

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kun Yi <kunyi@google.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
	jdelvare@suse.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, "Venkatesh,
	Supreeth" <supreeth.venkatesh@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux hwmon-next v4 1/3] hwmon: (sbtsi) Add basic support for SB-TSI sensors
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2020 13:57:04 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGMNF6VwzAR8qe3oYGfn7pb9sKMe5dtWBBrRowNRK63pH-mkeA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201203013748.GA228752@roeck-us.net>

Thanks Guenter for reviewing!

On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 5:37 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 02, 2020 at 08:55:59AM -0800, Kun Yi wrote:
> > SB Temperature Sensor Interface (SB-TSI) is an SMBus compatible
> > interface that reports AMD SoC's Ttcl (normalized temperature),
> > and resembles a typical 8-pin remote temperature sensor's I2C interface
> > to BMC.
> >
> > This commit adds basic support using this interface to read CPU
> > temperature, and read/write high/low CPU temp thresholds.
> >
> > To instantiate this driver on an AMD CPU with SB-TSI
> > support, the i2c bus number would be the bus connected from the board
> > management controller (BMC) to the CPU. The i2c address is specified in
> > Section 6.3.1 of the spec [1]: The SB-TSI address is normally 98h for
> > socket 0 and 90h for socket 1, but it could vary based on hardware address
> > select pins.
> >
> > [1]: https://www.amd.com/system/files/TechDocs/56255_OSRR.pdf
> >
> > Test status: tested reading temp1_input, and reading/writing
> > temp1_max/min.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kun Yi <kunyi@google.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/hwmon/Kconfig      |  10 ++
> >  drivers/hwmon/Makefile     |   1 +
> >  drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c | 265 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  3 files changed, 276 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> > index 3c059fc23cd6..3d6a809700ae 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Kconfig
> > @@ -1522,6 +1522,16 @@ config SENSORS_SL28CPLD
> >         This driver can also be built as a module.  If so, the module
> >         will be called sl28cpld-hwmon.
> >
> > +config SENSORS_SBTSI
> > +     tristate "Emulated SB-TSI temperature sensor"
> > +     depends on I2C
> > +     help
> > +       If you say yes here you get support for emulated temperature
> > +       sensors on AMD SoCs with SB-TSI interface connected to a BMC device.
> > +
> > +       This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module will
> > +       be called sbtsi_temp.
> > +
> >  config SENSORS_SHT15
> >       tristate "Sensiron humidity and temperature sensors. SHT15 and compat."
> >       depends on GPIOLIB || COMPILE_TEST
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> > index 01ca5d3fbad4..ee8c037919da 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/Makefile
> > @@ -160,6 +160,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_POWR1220)  += powr1220.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_PWM_FAN)        += pwm-fan.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_RASPBERRYPI_HWMON)      += raspberrypi-hwmon.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_S3C)    += s3c-hwmon.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SBTSI)  += sbtsi_temp.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH56XX_COMMON)+= sch56xx-common.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH5627)        += sch5627.o
> >  obj-$(CONFIG_SENSORS_SCH5636)        += sch5636.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c b/drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..6b0a7b9df1f3
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/sbtsi_temp.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,265 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
> > +/*
> > + * sbtsi_temp.c - hwmon driver for a SBI Temperature Sensor Interface (SB-TSI)
> > + *                compliant AMD SoC temperature device.
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (c) 2020, Google Inc.
> > + * Copyright (c) 2020, Kun Yi <kunyi@google.com>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/err.h>
> > +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> > +#include <linux/init.h>
> > +#include <linux/hwmon.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/of.h>
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * SB-TSI registers only support SMBus byte data access. "_INT" registers are
> > + * the integer part of a temperature value or limit, and "_DEC" registers are
> > + * corresponding decimal parts.
> > + */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_INT           0x01 /* RO */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_STATUS             0x02 /* RO */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_CONFIG             0x03 /* RO */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_INT              0x07 /* RW */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_INT               0x08 /* RW */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_DEC           0x10 /* RW */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_DEC              0x13 /* RW */
> > +#define SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_DEC               0x14 /* RW */
> > +
> > +#define SBTSI_CONFIG_READ_ORDER_SHIFT        5
> > +
> > +#define SBTSI_TEMP_MIN       0
> > +#define SBTSI_TEMP_MAX       255875
> > +
> > +/* Each client has this additional data */
> > +struct sbtsi_data {
> > +     struct i2c_client *client;
> > +     struct mutex lock;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * From SB-TSI spec: CPU temperature readings and limit registers encode the
> > + * temperature in increments of 0.125 from 0 to 255.875. The "high byte"
> > + * register encodes the base-2 of the integer portion, and the upper 3 bits of
> > + * the "low byte" encode in base-2 the decimal portion.
> > + *
> > + * e.g. INT=0x19, DEC=0x20 represents 25.125 degrees Celsius
> > + *
> > + * Therefore temperature in millidegree Celsius =
> > + *   (INT + DEC / 256) * 1000 = (INT * 8 + DEC / 32) * 125
> > + */
> > +static inline int sbtsi_reg_to_mc(s32 integer, s32 decimal)
> > +{
> > +     return ((integer << 3) + (decimal >> 5)) * 125;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Inversely, given temperature in millidegree Celsius
> > + *   INT = (TEMP / 125) / 8
> > + *   DEC = ((TEMP / 125) % 8) * 32
> > + * Caller have to make sure temp doesn't exceed 255875, the max valid value.
> > + */
> > +static inline void sbtsi_mc_to_reg(s32 temp, u8 *integer, u8 *decimal)
> > +{
> > +     temp /= 125;
> > +     *integer = temp >> 3;
> > +     *decimal = (temp & 0x7) << 5;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int sbtsi_read(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > +                   u32 attr, int channel, long *val)
> > +{
> > +     struct sbtsi_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +     s32 temp_int, temp_dec;
> > +     int err, reg_int, reg_dec;
> > +     bool reading_input;
> > +
> > +     if (type != hwmon_temp)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
>
> Unnecessary check.

Removed.

>
> > +
> > +     reading_input = false;
> > +     switch (attr) {
> > +     case hwmon_temp_input:
> > +             reading_input = true;
> > +             /*
> > +              * ReadOrder bit specifies the reading order of integer and
> > +              * decimal part of CPU temp for atomic reads. If bit == 0,
> > +              * reading integer part triggers latching of the decimal part,
> > +              * so integer part should be read first. If bit == 1, read
> > +              * order should be reversed.
> > +              */
> > +             err = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, SBTSI_REG_CONFIG);
> > +             if (err < 0)
> > +                     return err;
> > +
> > +             mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> > +             if (err & BIT(SBTSI_CONFIG_READ_ORDER_SHIFT)) {
> > +                     temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client,
> > +                                                         SBTSI_REG_TEMP_DEC);
> > +                     temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client,
> > +                                                         SBTSI_REG_TEMP_INT);
> > +             } else {
> > +                     temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client,
> > +                                                         SBTSI_REG_TEMP_INT);
> > +                     temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client,
> > +                                                         SBTSI_REG_TEMP_DEC);
> > +             }
> > +             mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> > +             break;
> > +     case hwmon_temp_max:
> > +             reg_int = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_INT;
> > +             reg_dec = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_DEC;
> > +             break;
> > +     case hwmon_temp_min:
> > +             reg_int = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_INT;
> > +             reg_dec = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_DEC;
> > +             break;
> > +     default:
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     if (!reading_input) {
> > +             temp_int = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, reg_int);
> > +             temp_dec = i2c_smbus_read_byte_data(data->client, reg_dec);
> > +     }
>
> This adds unnecessary complexity. I would suggest to move the calls
> to the case statements and drop reading_input as well as reg_int,
> reg_dec.

Done.

>
> Also, I just realized that the mutex is needed here as well, since
> the values might be written while being read, which could result in
> inconsistent read values. Example: Limit is changed from 100 to 99.75.
> Since the integer value is written first, it is possible that 99.0
> is returned.

That's a good catch. Modified.

>
> > +
> > +     if (temp_int < 0)
> > +             return temp_int;
> > +     if (temp_dec < 0)
> > +             return temp_dec;
> > +
> > +     *val = sbtsi_reg_to_mc(temp_int, temp_dec);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int sbtsi_write(struct device *dev, enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > +                    u32 attr, int channel, long val)
> > +{
> > +     struct sbtsi_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +     int reg_int, reg_dec, err;
> > +     u8 temp_int, temp_dec;
> > +
> > +     if (type != hwmon_temp)
> > +             return -EINVAL;
>
> This check is really unnecessary.
Removed.
>
> > +
> > +     switch (attr) {
> > +     case hwmon_temp_max:
> > +             reg_int = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_INT;
> > +             reg_dec = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_HIGH_DEC;
> > +             break;
> > +     case hwmon_temp_min:
> > +             reg_int = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_INT;
> > +             reg_dec = SBTSI_REG_TEMP_LOW_DEC;
> > +             break;
> > +     default:
> > +             return -EINVAL;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     val = clamp_val(val, SBTSI_TEMP_MIN, SBTSI_TEMP_MAX);
> > +     mutex_lock(&data->lock);
> > +     sbtsi_mc_to_reg(val, &temp_int, &temp_dec);
> > +     err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client, reg_int, temp_int);
> > +     if (err)
> > +             goto exit;
> > +
> > +     err = i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(data->client, reg_dec, temp_dec);
> > +exit:
> > +     mutex_unlock(&data->lock);
> > +     return err;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static umode_t sbtsi_is_visible(const void *data,
> > +                             enum hwmon_sensor_types type,
> > +                             u32 attr, int channel)
> > +{
> > +     switch (type) {
> > +     case hwmon_temp:
> > +             switch (attr) {
> > +             case hwmon_temp_input:
> > +                     return 0444;
> > +             case hwmon_temp_min:
> > +                     return 0644;
> > +             case hwmon_temp_max:
> > +                     return 0644;
> > +             }
> > +             break;
> > +     default:
> > +             break;
> > +     }
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct hwmon_channel_info *sbtsi_info[] = {
> > +     HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(chip,
> > +                        HWMON_C_REGISTER_TZ),
> > +     HWMON_CHANNEL_INFO(temp,
> > +                        HWMON_T_INPUT | HWMON_T_MIN | HWMON_T_MAX),
> > +     NULL
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct hwmon_ops sbtsi_hwmon_ops = {
> > +     .is_visible = sbtsi_is_visible,
> > +     .read = sbtsi_read,
> > +     .write = sbtsi_write,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct hwmon_chip_info sbtsi_chip_info = {
> > +     .ops = &sbtsi_hwmon_ops,
> > +     .info = sbtsi_info,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int sbtsi_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > +                    const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> > +{
> > +     struct device *dev = &client->dev;
> > +     struct device *hwmon_dev;
> > +     struct sbtsi_data *data;
> > +
> > +     data = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct sbtsi_data), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +     if (!data)
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +     data->client = client;
> > +     mutex_init(&data->lock);
> > +
> > +     hwmon_dev =
> > +             devm_hwmon_device_register_with_info(dev, client->name, data,
>
> Line length limit is now 100 columns, so the above line split is unnecessary.
Wow I didn't know.. Thanks! Adjusted a couple other lines based on the 100 cols.
>
> > +                                                  &sbtsi_chip_info, NULL);
> > +
> > +     return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(hwmon_dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct i2c_device_id sbtsi_id[] = {
> > +     {"sbtsi", 0},
> > +     {}
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, sbtsi_id);
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused sbtsi_of_match[] = {
> > +     {
> > +             .compatible = "amd,sbtsi",
> > +     },
> > +     { },
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sbtsi_of_match);
> > +
> > +static struct i2c_driver sbtsi_driver = {
> > +     .class = I2C_CLASS_HWMON,
> > +     .driver = {
> > +             .name = "sbtsi",
> > +             .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(sbtsi_of_match),
> > +     },
> > +     .probe = sbtsi_probe,
> > +     .id_table = sbtsi_id,
> > +};
> > +
> > +module_i2c_driver(sbtsi_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Kun Yi <kunyi@google.com>");
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Hwmon driver for AMD SB-TSI emulated sensor");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> > --
> > 2.29.2.454.gaff20da3a2-goog
> >



-- 
Regards,
Kun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-11 22:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-02 16:55 [PATCH linux hwmon-next v4 0/3] SB-TSI hwmon driver v4 Kun Yi
2020-12-02 16:55 ` Kun Yi
2020-12-02 16:55 ` [PATCH linux hwmon-next v4 1/3] hwmon: (sbtsi) Add basic support for SB-TSI sensors Kun Yi
2020-12-02 16:55   ` Kun Yi
2020-12-03  1:37   ` Guenter Roeck
2020-12-03 18:06     ` Chatradhi, Naveen Krishna
2020-12-03 18:06       ` Chatradhi, Naveen Krishna
2020-12-11 21:57     ` Kun Yi [this message]
2020-12-11 21:57       ` Kun Yi
2020-12-09 20:13   ` Supreeth Venkatesh
2020-12-09 20:13     ` Supreeth Venkatesh
2020-12-02 16:56 ` [PATCH linux hwmon-next v4 2/3] hwmon: (sbtsi) Add documentation Kun Yi
2020-12-02 16:56   ` Kun Yi
2020-12-02 16:56 ` [PATCH linux hwmon-next v4 3/3] dt-bindings: (hwmon/sbtsi_tmep) Add SB-TSI hwmon driver bindings Kun Yi
2020-12-02 16:56   ` Kun Yi
2020-12-09 20:06   ` Rob Herring
2020-12-09 20:06     ` Rob Herring

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAGMNF6VwzAR8qe3oYGfn7pb9sKMe5dtWBBrRowNRK63pH-mkeA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=kunyi@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=supreeth.venkatesh@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.