All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Add additional consistency check
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:19:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jK1j3UWUakakFw=EfVwg+Rnovzst52+uZJYesLqLY+n5A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704111110130.24725@east.gentwo.org>

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
>>  static inline void *index_to_obj(struct kmem_cache *cache, struct page *page,
>> @@ -3813,14 +3818,18 @@ void kfree(const void *objp)
>>  {
>>       struct kmem_cache *c;
>>       unsigned long flags;
>> +     struct page *page;
>>
>>       trace_kfree(_RET_IP_, objp);
>>
>>       if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(objp)))
>>               return;
>> +     page = virt_to_head_page(obj);
>> +     if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(!PageSlab(page)))
>
> There is a flag SLAB_DEBUG_OBJECTS that is available for this check.
> Consistency checks are configuraable in the slab allocator.
>
> Mentioned that before and got this lecture about data consistency checks.

It seems that enabling the debug checks comes with a non-trivial
performance impact. I'd like to see consistency checks by default so
we can handle intentional heap corruption attacks better. This check
isn't expensive...

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Add additional consistency check
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2017 09:19:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jK1j3UWUakakFw=EfVwg+Rnovzst52+uZJYesLqLY+n5A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1704111110130.24725@east.gentwo.org>

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Apr 2017, Michal Hocko wrote:
>
>>  static inline void *index_to_obj(struct kmem_cache *cache, struct page *page,
>> @@ -3813,14 +3818,18 @@ void kfree(const void *objp)
>>  {
>>       struct kmem_cache *c;
>>       unsigned long flags;
>> +     struct page *page;
>>
>>       trace_kfree(_RET_IP_, objp);
>>
>>       if (unlikely(ZERO_OR_NULL_PTR(objp)))
>>               return;
>> +     page = virt_to_head_page(obj);
>> +     if (CHECK_DATA_CORRUPTION(!PageSlab(page)))
>
> There is a flag SLAB_DEBUG_OBJECTS that is available for this check.
> Consistency checks are configuraable in the slab allocator.
>
> Mentioned that before and got this lecture about data consistency checks.

It seems that enabling the debug checks comes with a non-trivial
performance impact. I'd like to see consistency checks by default so
we can handle intentional heap corruption attacks better. This check
isn't expensive...

-Kees

-- 
Kees Cook
Pixel Security

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-11 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-31 16:40 [PATCH] mm: Add additional consistency check Kees Cook
2017-03-31 16:40 ` Kees Cook
2017-03-31 21:33 ` Andrew Morton
2017-03-31 21:33   ` Andrew Morton
2017-04-01  0:04   ` Kees Cook
2017-04-01  0:04     ` Kees Cook
2017-04-03  3:40     ` Michael Ellerman
2017-04-03  3:40       ` Michael Ellerman
2017-04-03 14:03       ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-03 14:03         ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-03 14:53         ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-03 14:53           ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-04-04 11:30 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-04 11:30   ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-04 15:07   ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-04 15:07     ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-04 15:16     ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-04 15:16       ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-04 15:46       ` Kees Cook
2017-04-04 15:46         ` Kees Cook
2017-04-04 15:58         ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-04 15:58           ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-04 16:02           ` Kees Cook
2017-04-04 16:02             ` Kees Cook
2017-04-04 19:13       ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-04 19:13         ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-04 19:42         ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-04 19:42           ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-04 19:58           ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-04 19:58             ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-04 20:13             ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-04 20:13               ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11  4:58               ` Kees Cook
2017-04-11  4:58                 ` Kees Cook
2017-04-11 13:46                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 13:46                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 14:14                   ` Kees Cook
2017-04-11 14:14                     ` Kees Cook
2017-04-11 14:19                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 14:19                       ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 16:05                       ` Kees Cook
2017-04-11 16:05                         ` Kees Cook
2017-04-11 16:16                       ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 16:16                         ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 16:19                         ` Kees Cook [this message]
2017-04-11 16:19                           ` Kees Cook
2017-04-11 16:23                           ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 16:23                             ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 16:30                             ` Kees Cook
2017-04-11 16:30                               ` Kees Cook
2017-04-11 16:26                           ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 16:26                             ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 16:41                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 16:41                           ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 18:03                           ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 18:03                             ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 18:30                             ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 18:30                               ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 18:44                               ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 18:44                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 18:55                                 ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 18:55                                   ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 18:59                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 18:59                                     ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 19:39                                     ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 19:39                                       ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-17 15:22                                       ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-17 15:22                                         ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-18  6:41                                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-18  6:41                                           ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-18 13:31                                           ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-18 13:31                                             ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-18 13:37                                           ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-18 13:37                                             ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-28  1:11                       ` Kees Cook
2017-04-28  1:11                         ` Kees Cook
2017-04-28  6:16                         ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-28  6:16                           ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-27 12:06   ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-27 12:06     ` Michal Hocko
2017-04-11 18:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2017-04-11 18:30   ` Christoph Lameter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAGXu5jK1j3UWUakakFw=EfVwg+Rnovzst52+uZJYesLqLY+n5A@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=penberg@kernel.org \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.