From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
To: Storage Performance Development Kit <spdk@lists.01.org>
Cc: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>, Brandon Lo <blo@iol.unh.edu>,
Lincoln Lavoie <lylavoie@iol.unh.edu>,
"dpdklab@iol.unh.edu" <dpdklab@iol.unh.edu>,
"ci@dpdk.org" <ci@dpdk.org>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [SPDK] Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:12:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wY4hHo0rt=gZ9Jr9qao6xuoUx40OyJyojW2mHgRfHgkg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB4220748A0C219E31BB33B2BDEE8B9@DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:18 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz
<tomasz.zawadzki@intel.com> wrote:
> On SPDK side rte_net was included in default compilation with vhost component, but since vhost is disabled in the UNH lab tests with SPDK it showed up as missing. A fix for that is now submitted to SPDK:
> https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6398
> I'll let you know when it makes it's way to the v21.01.x branch.
Rather than maintain dpdk internal dependencies on SPDK side, would it
be possible to use pkg-config?
--
David Marchand
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: David Marchand <david.marchand at redhat.com>
To: spdk@lists.01.org
Subject: [SPDK] Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021 10:12:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJFAV8wY4hHo0rt=gZ9Jr9qao6xuoUx40OyJyojW2mHgRfHgkg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: DM6PR11MB4220748A0C219E31BB33B2BDEE8B9@DM6PR11MB4220.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 547 bytes --]
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 10:18 AM Zawadzki, Tomasz
<tomasz.zawadzki(a)intel.com> wrote:
> On SPDK side rte_net was included in default compilation with vhost component, but since vhost is disabled in the UNH lab tests with SPDK it showed up as missing. A fix for that is now submitted to SPDK:
> https://review.spdk.io/gerrit/c/spdk/spdk/+/6398
> I'll let you know when it makes it's way to the v21.01.x branch.
Rather than maintain dpdk internal dependencies on SPDK side, would it
be possible to use pkg-config?
--
David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-02-15 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-02-08 15:21 [dpdk-dev] [CI] SPDK compilation failures @ DPDK community lab Aaron Conole
2021-02-08 15:21 ` [SPDK] " Aaron Conole
2021-02-08 16:03 ` [dpdk-dev] " Zawadzki, Tomasz
2021-02-08 16:03 ` [SPDK] " Zawadzki, Tomasz
2021-02-08 16:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] " Lincoln Lavoie
2021-02-08 16:21 ` [SPDK] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] " Lincoln Lavoie
2021-02-08 17:17 ` Zawadzki, Tomasz
2021-02-09 15:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] " Aaron Conole
2021-02-09 15:13 ` [SPDK] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] " Aaron Conole
2021-02-09 16:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] " Brandon Lo
2021-02-09 16:07 ` [SPDK] Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] " Brandon Lo
2021-02-09 17:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] " Brandon Lo
2021-02-09 17:55 ` [SPDK] Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] " Brandon Lo
2021-02-11 14:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] " Aaron Conole
2021-02-11 14:02 ` [SPDK] Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] " Aaron Conole
2021-02-11 16:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] " Brandon Lo
2021-02-11 16:25 ` [SPDK] Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] " Brandon Lo
2021-02-12 9:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] " Zawadzki, Tomasz
2021-02-12 9:18 ` [SPDK] Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] " Zawadzki, Tomasz
2021-02-12 17:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] " Brandon Lo
2021-02-12 17:40 ` [SPDK] Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] " Brandon Lo
2021-02-15 15:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] " Aaron Conole
2021-02-15 15:28 ` [SPDK] Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] " Aaron Conole
2021-02-17 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] " Zawadzki, Tomasz
2021-02-17 16:06 ` [SPDK] Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] " Zawadzki, Tomasz
2021-02-18 13:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] " Brandon Lo
2021-02-18 13:58 ` [SPDK] Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] [dpdk-dev] " Brandon Lo
2021-02-15 9:12 ` David Marchand [this message]
2021-02-15 9:12 ` David Marchand
2021-02-15 9:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [SPDK] Re: [dpdklab] Re: [dpdk-ci] " Nick Connolly
2021-02-15 9:56 ` [SPDK] Re: [dpdk-dev] " Nick Connolly
2021-02-15 10:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [SPDK] " David Marchand
2021-02-15 10:16 ` [SPDK] Re: [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAJFAV8wY4hHo0rt=gZ9Jr9qao6xuoUx40OyJyojW2mHgRfHgkg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=aconole@redhat.com \
--cc=blo@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=ci@dpdk.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dpdklab@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=lylavoie@iol.unh.edu \
--cc=spdk@lists.01.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.