From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org>, Rob Herring <rob.herring-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>, Mike Turquette <mturquette-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>, "devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" <devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org>, Simon Horman <horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org>, "linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" <linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Tomasz Figa <t.figa-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Thomas P Abraham <thomas.ab-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>, "linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" <linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>, Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>, Sachin Kamat <spk.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>, Michal Simek <michal.simek-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0, V2 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:18:05 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAKohpo=HKUkGRK4NX7E59z5QthcKbZKETB-DuP10xj3x+vdHaQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomKzK8pMJs1gv+uXxhd17HtCQyfjSnVYw9KpGz6FwbgDA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> On 18 July 2014 09:47, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> wrote: >> Before I apply anything in this area, I need a clear statement from the ARM >> people as a group on what the approach is going to be. @Rafael: The only patch which has blocked this set is: cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0 This is about finding which CPUs share clock line.. Other patches are sort of independent of this one and cpufreq-cpu0 would continue to work for existing platforms if we apply these patches. I was wondering if you would like to apply other patches leaving this one? I will then rebase stuff again and send non-controversial patches for 3.17. So, that we get something in 3.17 and the last change can be merged during rc's as well once we finalize on bindings.. > Mike/Rob/Stephen: I believe Atleast three of you should express your views > now :) Any idea on how can we get some temporary solution for 3.17 as we didn't conclude anything yet on bindings ? -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>, Rob Herring <rob.herring@linaro.org>, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> Cc: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>, "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org>, Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>, "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Thomas P Abraham <thomas.ab@samsung.com>, "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Arvind Chauhan <arvind.chauhan@arm.com>, Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@gmail.com>, Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0, V2 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 16:18:05 +0530 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAKohpo=HKUkGRK4NX7E59z5QthcKbZKETB-DuP10xj3x+vdHaQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <CAKohpomKzK8pMJs1gv+uXxhd17HtCQyfjSnVYw9KpGz6FwbgDA@mail.gmail.com> On 18 July 2014 09:47, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote: >> Before I apply anything in this area, I need a clear statement from the ARM >> people as a group on what the approach is going to be. @Rafael: The only patch which has blocked this set is: cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0 This is about finding which CPUs share clock line.. Other patches are sort of independent of this one and cpufreq-cpu0 would continue to work for existing platforms if we apply these patches. I was wondering if you would like to apply other patches leaving this one? I will then rebase stuff again and send non-controversial patches for 3.17. So, that we get something in 3.17 and the last change can be merged during rc's as well once we finalize on bindings.. > Mike/Rob/Stephen: I believe Atleast three of you should express your views > now :) Any idea on how can we get some temporary solution for 3.17 as we didn't conclude anything yet on bindings ? -- viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-24 10:48 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-07-01 16:32 [PATCH 00/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0, V2 Viresh Kumar 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 01/14] of: Create of_property_match() Viresh Kumar 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 02/14] clk: Create of_clk_shared_by_cpus() Viresh Kumar 2014-07-01 18:00 ` Stephen Boyd 2014-07-02 1:57 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-09 14:38 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 14:38 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 15:20 ` Viresh Kumar [not found] ` <5f7164d789e87c62d722b575980c92dfd0504334.1404231535.git.viresh.kumar@linar o.org> 2014-07-28 14:01 ` Grant Likely 2014-07-28 14:01 ` Grant Likely 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 03/14] cpufreq: Add support for per-policy driver data Viresh Kumar 2014-07-09 14:33 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 14:33 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 15:07 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 04/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Add Module Author Viresh Kumar 2014-07-09 14:42 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 14:42 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 15:08 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-09 15:24 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 05/14] cpufreq: cpu0: don't validate clock on clk_put() Viresh Kumar 2014-07-09 14:42 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 14:42 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 06/14] cpufreq: cpu0: defer probe if clock isn't registered yet Viresh Kumar 2014-07-02 5:53 ` Shawn Guo 2014-07-02 5:53 ` Shawn Guo 2014-07-02 5:55 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-02 11:32 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-03 0:38 ` Stephen Boyd 2014-07-03 2:19 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-09 14:43 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 14:43 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 07/14] cpufreq: cpu0: OPPs can be populated at runtime Viresh Kumar 2014-07-01 18:02 ` Stephen Boyd 2014-07-02 2:03 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-02 4:03 ` [PATCH V2 Resend " Viresh Kumar 2014-07-09 14:44 ` [PATCH " Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 14:44 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 15:09 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-10 11:19 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-10 12:39 ` Nishanth Menon 2014-07-10 13:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-10 13:36 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 08/14] cpufreq: cpu0: use dev_{err|warn|dbg} instead of pr_{err|warn|debug} Viresh Kumar 2014-07-09 14:45 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 14:45 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 09/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Move per-cluster initialization code to ->init() Viresh Kumar 2014-07-03 0:43 ` Stephen Boyd 2014-07-03 2:11 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-09 14:53 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 14:53 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 15:17 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-09 15:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 15:27 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-09 15:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar 2014-07-09 15:33 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 10/14] cpufreq: cpu0: try regulators with name "cpu-supply" Viresh Kumar 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 11/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Make allocate_resources() work for any CPU Viresh Kumar 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 12/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0 Viresh Kumar 2014-07-02 4:03 ` [PATCH V2 Resend " Viresh Kumar 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 13/14] cpufreq: cpu0: rename driver and internals to 'cpufreq_generic' Viresh Kumar 2014-07-01 16:32 ` [PATCH 14/14] cpufreq: generic: set platform_{driver|device} '.name' to 'cpufreq-generic' Viresh Kumar 2014-07-02 4:12 ` [PATCH 00/14] cpufreq: cpu0: Extend support beyond CPU0, V2 Viresh Kumar 2014-07-03 1:24 ` Stephen Boyd 2014-07-03 2:44 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-03 22:16 ` Mike Turquette 2014-07-04 4:21 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-08 4:50 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-09 17:41 ` Stephen Boyd 2014-07-16 16:01 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-16 17:28 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2014-07-16 21:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2014-07-16 21:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2014-07-17 0:28 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-17 7:35 ` Thomas Petazzoni 2014-07-17 7:41 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-18 1:02 ` Rafael J. Wysocki 2014-07-18 4:17 ` Viresh Kumar [not found] ` <CAKohpomKzK8pMJs1gv+uXxhd17HtCQyfjSnVYw9KpGz6FwbgDA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2014-07-24 10:48 ` Viresh Kumar [this message] 2014-07-24 10:48 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-25 14:29 ` Rob Herring [not found] ` <CAL_JsqKqCeU0zs+rS1vxsOeh=Kuw_-gaVHtGU76Lb6TchCTytw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org> 2014-07-25 14:34 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-25 14:34 ` Viresh Kumar 2014-07-25 15:41 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to='CAKohpo=HKUkGRK4NX7E59z5QthcKbZKETB-DuP10xj3x+vdHaQ@mail.gmail.com' \ --to=viresh.kumar-qsej5fyqhm4dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \ --cc=arvind.chauhan-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org \ --cc=devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=horms-/R6kz+dDXgpPR4JQBCEnsQ@public.gmane.org \ --cc=kgene.kim-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linaro-kernel-cunTk1MwBs8s++Sfvej+rw@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-arm-msm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=michal.simek-gjFFaj9aHVfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=mturquette-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \ --cc=nm-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org \ --cc=rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org \ --cc=rob.herring-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org \ --cc=sboyd-sgV2jX0FEOL9JmXXK+q4OQ@public.gmane.org \ --cc=spk.linux-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org \ --cc=t.figa-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \ --cc=thomas.ab-Sze3O3UU22JBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org \ --cc=thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.