From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitriy Cherkasov <dmitriy@oss-tech.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Otto Sabart <ottosabart@seberm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT/RFC PATCH v3 2/5] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding.
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:16:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJCJOioe63oAJVS_=jBuwxTtE79xBnOzqscV4yY_6WfOA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190320234806.19748-3-atish.patra@wdc.com>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 6:48 PM Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
>
> cpu-map binding can be used to described cpu topology for both
> RISC-V & ARM. It makes more sense to move the binding to document
> to a common place.
>
> The relevant discussion can be found here.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/6/19
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
> .../topology.txt => cpu/cpu-topology.txt} | 82 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{arm/topology.txt => cpu/cpu-topology.txt} (86%)
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Dmitriy Cherkasov <dmitriy@oss-tech.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Otto Sabart <ottosabart@seberm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.>
Subject: Re: [RFT/RFC PATCH v3 2/5] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding.
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:16:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJCJOioe63oAJVS_=jBuwxTtE79xBnOzqscV4yY_6WfOA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190320234806.19748-3-atish.patra@wdc.com>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 6:48 PM Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
>
> cpu-map binding can be used to described cpu topology for both
> RISC-V & ARM. It makes more sense to move the binding to document
> to a common place.
>
> The relevant discussion can be found here.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/6/19
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
> .../topology.txt => cpu/cpu-topology.txt} | 82 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{arm/topology.txt => cpu/cpu-topology.txt} (86%)
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Dmitriy Cherkasov <dmitriy@oss-tech.org>,
Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra \(Intel\)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Otto Sabart <ottosabart@seberm.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFT/RFC PATCH v3 2/5] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding.
Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2019 16:16:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJCJOioe63oAJVS_=jBuwxTtE79xBnOzqscV4yY_6WfOA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190320234806.19748-3-atish.patra@wdc.com>
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 6:48 PM Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
>
> cpu-map binding can be used to described cpu topology for both
> RISC-V & ARM. It makes more sense to move the binding to document
> to a common place.
>
> The relevant discussion can be found here.
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/6/19
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> ---
> .../topology.txt => cpu/cpu-topology.txt} | 82 +++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> rename Documentation/devicetree/bindings/{arm/topology.txt => cpu/cpu-topology.txt} (86%)
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-24 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-20 23:48 [RFT/RFC PATCH v3 0/5] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` [RFT/RFC PATCH v3 1/5] Documentation: DT: arm: add support for sockets defining package boundaries Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` [RFT/RFC PATCH v3 2/5] dt-binding: cpu-topology: Move cpu-map to a common binding Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` Atish Patra
2019-03-24 21:16 ` Rob Herring [this message]
2019-03-24 21:16 ` Rob Herring
2019-03-24 21:16 ` Rob Herring
2019-03-20 23:48 ` [RFT/RFC PATCH v3 3/5] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to common code Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-15 15:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-15 15:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-15 15:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-15 22:08 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-15 22:08 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-15 22:08 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-16 13:23 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-16 13:23 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-16 13:23 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-16 18:54 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-16 18:54 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-16 18:54 ` Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` [RFT/RFC PATCH v3 4/5] arm: Use common cpu_topology Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-15 15:31 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-15 15:31 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-15 15:31 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-15 21:16 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-15 21:16 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-15 21:16 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-16 13:09 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-16 13:09 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-16 13:09 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-16 19:04 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-16 19:04 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-16 19:04 ` Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` [RFT/RFC PATCH v3 5/5] RISC-V: Parse cpu topology during boot Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` Atish Patra
2019-03-20 23:48 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-10 22:49 ` [RFT/RFC PATCH v3 0/5] Unify CPU topology across ARM & RISC-V Atish Patra
2019-04-10 22:49 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-10 22:49 ` Atish Patra
2019-04-12 17:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-12 17:27 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-04-12 17:27 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAL_JsqJCJOioe63oAJVS_=jBuwxTtE79xBnOzqscV4yY_6WfOA@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=robh+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dmitriy@oss-tech.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=ottosabart@seberm.com \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.