From: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>, "Santosh Shilimkar" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>, "Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>, "Ivaylo Dimitrov" <ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com>, "Sebastian Reichel" <sre@debian.org>, "Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:27:16 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAL_JsqK-9L6vLJSUuQDsNuHQOxahDM0uuQPtyq6XyuoBh5xDcg@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20140618214752.GL32514@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 03:46:19PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Also I still did not know why DT kernel does not report Revision >> > number which is passed by bootloader via atags. Any idea? >> >> Probably because no one cared until now and revision info for every >> SOC is different. I would like to see revision info set in the DT in a >> standard way and remove the various SOC specific kernel >> implementations. > > Except... that's not what it is. What that revision field was originally > invented for was the Netwinder to indicate the _platform_ revision. Okay. DT describes the platform, so having a top-level revision in the DT could be similar, but... > > From what I've seen, almost everyone else sets this to zero in their > boot loaders - it is /very/ rarely used. However, I think OMAP (ab)uses > it by putting the SoC revision into it at kernel boot time. That's > not what it is supposed to be used for. it could suffer the same abuse as the ATAG. Perhaps if Revision in cpuinfo is never going to be set for DT based platforms, then we should remove it from cpuinfo in that case. > Others have already solved the problem of exporting SoC specific > information, such as SoC name, SoC revision, etc, if only people would > use it - drivers/base/soc.c. This gives machine, family, soc_id and > SoC revision information in a standard place - it /might/ have been > a good idea if the creation of that also contained documentation for > what was expected in each of the fields, rather than leaving it > open... The problem with soc-device is it is optional and at the whim of the platform to add. Adding it also causes the the platform devices to change paths because people make the soc device the bus parent. Sysfs paths to devices are not considered part of the ABI, but still this is a silly reason to change the path. If we want soc-device to be used, then it should always exist and have a default version. Rob
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: robherring2@gmail.com (Rob Herring) To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: [PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:27:16 -0500 [thread overview] Message-ID: <CAL_JsqK-9L6vLJSUuQDsNuHQOxahDM0uuQPtyq6XyuoBh5xDcg@mail.gmail.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20140618214752.GL32514@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 03:46:19PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:22 PM, Pali Roh?r <pali.rohar@gmail.com> wrote: >> > Also I still did not know why DT kernel does not report Revision >> > number which is passed by bootloader via atags. Any idea? >> >> Probably because no one cared until now and revision info for every >> SOC is different. I would like to see revision info set in the DT in a >> standard way and remove the various SOC specific kernel >> implementations. > > Except... that's not what it is. What that revision field was originally > invented for was the Netwinder to indicate the _platform_ revision. Okay. DT describes the platform, so having a top-level revision in the DT could be similar, but... > > From what I've seen, almost everyone else sets this to zero in their > boot loaders - it is /very/ rarely used. However, I think OMAP (ab)uses > it by putting the SoC revision into it at kernel boot time. That's > not what it is supposed to be used for. it could suffer the same abuse as the ATAG. Perhaps if Revision in cpuinfo is never going to be set for DT based platforms, then we should remove it from cpuinfo in that case. > Others have already solved the problem of exporting SoC specific > information, such as SoC name, SoC revision, etc, if only people would > use it - drivers/base/soc.c. This gives machine, family, soc_id and > SoC revision information in a standard place - it /might/ have been > a good idea if the creation of that also contained documentation for > what was expected in each of the fields, rather than leaving it > open... The problem with soc-device is it is optional and at the whim of the platform to add. Adding it also causes the the platform devices to change paths because people make the soc device the bus parent. Sysfs paths to devices are not considered part of the ABI, but still this is a silly reason to change the path. If we want soc-device to be used, then it should always exist and have a default version. Rob
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-06-18 22:27 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 197+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2014-06-18 16:54 [PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible Pali Rohár 2014-06-18 16:54 ` Pali Rohár 2014-06-18 19:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-06-18 19:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-06-18 19:09 ` Pali Rohár 2014-06-18 19:09 ` Pali Rohár 2014-06-18 19:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-06-18 19:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-06-19 8:21 ` Pavel Machek 2014-06-19 8:21 ` Pavel Machek 2014-07-11 19:31 ` Pavel Machek 2014-07-11 19:31 ` Pavel Machek 2014-06-18 19:07 ` Rob Herring 2014-06-18 19:07 ` Rob Herring 2014-06-18 19:22 ` Pali Rohár 2014-06-18 19:22 ` Pali Rohár 2014-06-18 20:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-06-18 20:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-06-18 20:20 ` Pali Rohár 2014-06-18 20:20 ` Pali Rohár 2014-06-18 21:53 ` Fabio Estevam 2014-06-18 21:53 ` Fabio Estevam 2014-11-24 22:16 ` Pali Rohár 2014-11-24 22:16 ` Pali Rohár 2014-06-18 20:46 ` Rob Herring 2014-06-18 20:46 ` Rob Herring 2014-06-18 21:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-06-18 21:47 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-06-18 22:27 ` Rob Herring [this message] 2014-06-18 22:27 ` Rob Herring 2014-06-18 23:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-06-18 23:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-11-24 22:19 ` Pali Rohár 2014-11-24 22:19 ` Pali Rohár 2014-12-04 0:33 ` Rob Herring 2014-12-04 0:33 ` Rob Herring 2014-12-04 0:48 ` Pali Rohár 2014-12-04 0:48 ` Pali Rohár 2014-12-04 16:49 ` Rob Herring 2014-12-04 16:49 ` Rob Herring 2014-12-04 17:57 ` Pali Rohár 2014-12-04 17:57 ` Pali Rohár 2014-12-04 18:10 ` Rob Herring 2014-12-04 18:10 ` Rob Herring 2015-01-26 19:09 ` [PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT: Add support for Revision Pali Rohár 2015-01-26 19:09 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-26 20:22 ` Rob Herring 2015-01-26 20:22 ` Rob Herring 2015-01-30 14:14 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-30 14:14 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-30 21:03 ` Rob Herring 2015-01-30 21:03 ` Rob Herring 2015-02-27 15:45 ` Pali Rohár 2015-02-27 15:45 ` Pali Rohár 2015-02-27 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Pali Rohár 2015-02-27 15:55 ` Pali Rohár 2015-02-27 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arm: devtree: Set system_rev from DT revision Pali Rohár 2015-02-27 15:55 ` Pali Rohár 2015-02-27 15:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] arm: boot: convert ATAG_REVISION to DT revision field Pali Rohár 2015-02-27 15:55 ` Pali Rohár 2015-03-02 11:28 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT: Add support for Revision Pavel Machek 2015-03-02 11:28 ` Pavel Machek 2015-03-16 15:44 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-03-16 15:44 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-03-16 16:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-03-16 16:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-03-16 16:43 ` Nicolas Pitre 2015-03-16 16:43 ` Nicolas Pitre 2015-03-16 19:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-03-16 19:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-03-16 18:10 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-03-16 18:10 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-03-16 19:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-03-16 19:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-03-16 20:54 ` Pali Rohár 2015-03-16 20:54 ` Pali Rohár 2015-03-16 20:59 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-03-16 20:59 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-01-26 22:34 ` [PATCH] " Andreas Färber 2015-01-26 22:34 ` Andreas Färber 2015-02-27 15:56 ` Pali Rohár 2015-02-27 15:56 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-26 19:16 ` [PATCH] ARM: /proc/atags: Export also for DT Pali Rohár 2015-01-26 19:16 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-26 20:33 ` Rob Herring 2015-01-26 20:33 ` Rob Herring 2015-01-27 13:21 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-27 13:21 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-27 14:16 ` Rob Herring 2015-01-27 14:16 ` Rob Herring 2015-01-27 14:24 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-27 14:24 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-27 14:32 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-27 14:32 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-27 17:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-27 17:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-27 20:03 ` Nicolas Pitre 2015-01-27 20:03 ` Nicolas Pitre 2015-01-27 21:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-27 21:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-27 21:34 ` Nicolas Pitre 2015-01-27 21:34 ` Nicolas Pitre 2015-01-27 21:58 ` Nicolas Pitre 2015-01-27 21:58 ` Nicolas Pitre 2015-01-27 22:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-27 22:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-28 2:07 ` Nicolas Pitre 2015-01-28 2:07 ` Nicolas Pitre 2015-01-28 6:21 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 2015-01-28 6:21 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 2015-01-28 7:19 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-28 7:19 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-28 8:06 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 2015-01-28 8:06 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 2015-01-28 8:25 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-28 8:25 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-28 7:18 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-28 7:18 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-28 13:38 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-28 13:38 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-27 23:10 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-27 23:10 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-28 0:50 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-01-28 0:50 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-01-28 13:58 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-28 13:58 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-28 14:33 ` Nicolas Pitre 2015-01-28 15:39 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-01-28 15:39 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-01-28 15:47 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-28 15:47 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-28 15:48 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-01-28 15:48 ` Tony Lindgren 2015-01-28 16:31 ` Jason Cooper 2015-01-28 16:31 ` Jason Cooper 2015-01-28 15:57 ` Rob Herring 2015-01-28 15:57 ` Rob Herring 2015-01-28 16:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-28 16:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-28 16:19 ` Will Deacon 2015-01-28 16:19 ` Will Deacon 2015-01-28 17:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-28 17:01 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-28 17:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-28 17:29 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-28 17:18 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-28 17:18 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-28 18:00 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 2015-01-28 18:00 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 2015-01-28 19:33 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-28 19:33 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-28 18:03 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-28 18:03 ` Pavel Machek 2015-01-28 19:27 ` Arnd Bergmann 2015-01-28 19:27 ` Arnd Bergmann 2015-01-28 14:46 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 2015-01-28 14:46 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD 2015-01-27 19:40 ` Nicolas Pitre 2015-01-27 19:40 ` Nicolas Pitre 2015-01-26 20:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-26 20:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2015-01-26 20:44 ` Pali Rohár 2015-01-26 20:44 ` Pali Rohár 2014-12-04 19:00 ` [PATCH] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: Use DT machine name when possible Pali Rohár 2014-12-04 19:00 ` Pali Rohár 2014-12-04 10:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-12-04 10:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-06-18 21:10 ` Aaro Koskinen 2014-06-18 21:10 ` Aaro Koskinen 2014-07-11 19:28 ` Pavel Machek 2014-07-11 19:28 ` Pavel Machek 2014-11-24 22:21 ` Pali Rohár 2014-11-24 22:21 ` Pali Rohár 2014-09-05 11:38 ` Pali Rohár 2014-09-05 11:38 ` Pali Rohár 2014-09-05 12:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-09-05 12:13 ` Russell King - ARM Linux 2014-09-10 12:46 ` Pavel Machek 2014-09-10 12:46 ` Pavel Machek 2014-11-24 22:23 ` Pali Rohár 2014-11-24 22:23 ` Pali Rohár 2014-09-05 13:45 ` Mark Rutland 2014-09-05 13:45 ` Mark Rutland 2014-09-05 13:52 ` Pali Rohár 2014-09-05 13:52 ` Pali Rohár 2014-09-05 13:58 ` Mark Rutland 2014-09-05 13:58 ` Mark Rutland 2014-11-24 22:25 ` Pali Rohár 2014-11-24 22:25 ` Pali Rohár 2014-09-05 13:58 ` Fabio Estevam 2014-09-05 13:58 ` Fabio Estevam 2014-11-24 22:27 ` Pali Rohár 2014-11-24 22:27 ` Pali Rohár 2014-09-06 15:34 ` Andreas Färber 2014-09-06 15:34 ` Andreas Färber 2014-11-24 22:29 ` Pali Rohár 2014-11-24 22:29 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=CAL_JsqK-9L6vLJSUuQDsNuHQOxahDM0uuQPtyq6XyuoBh5xDcg@mail.gmail.com \ --to=robherring2@gmail.com \ --cc=ivo.g.dimitrov.75@gmail.com \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \ --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \ --cc=pavel@ucw.cz \ --cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \ --cc=sre@debian.org \ --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.