All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, jianyong.wu@arm.com
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	seanjc@google.com, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>,
	justin.he@arm.com, Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 7/7] ptp: arm/arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 11:07:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWd5261ti-zKsroFLvWs0abaWa7G4DKefgPwFb3rEjnNw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210330145430.996981-8-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc, Jianyong,

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:56 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
>
> Currently, there is no mechanism to keep time sync between guest and host
> in arm/arm64 virtualization environment. Time in guest will drift compared
> with host after boot up as they may both use third party time sources
> to correct their time respectively. The time deviation will be in order
> of milliseconds. But in some scenarios,like in cloud environment, we ask
> for higher time precision.
>
> kvm ptp clock, which chooses the host clock source as a reference
> clock to sync time between guest and host, has been adopted by x86
> which takes the time sync order from milliseconds to nanoseconds.
>
> This patch enables kvm ptp clock for arm/arm64 and improves clock sync precision
> significantly.

> --- a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ config PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH
>  config PTP_1588_CLOCK_KVM
>         tristate "KVM virtual PTP clock"
>         depends on PTP_1588_CLOCK
> -       depends on KVM_GUEST && X86
> +       depends on (KVM_GUEST && X86) || (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY && ARM_ARCH_TIMER)

Why does this not depend on KVM_GUEST on ARM?
I.e. shouldn't the dependency be:

    KVM_GUEST && (X86 || (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY && ARM_ARCH_TIMER))

?

>         default y
>         help
>           This driver adds support for using kvm infrastructure as a PTP

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, jianyong.wu@arm.com
Cc: Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	justin.he@arm.com, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@arm.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	seanjc@google.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 7/7] ptp: arm/arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 11:07:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWd5261ti-zKsroFLvWs0abaWa7G4DKefgPwFb3rEjnNw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210330145430.996981-8-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc, Jianyong,

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:56 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
>
> Currently, there is no mechanism to keep time sync between guest and host
> in arm/arm64 virtualization environment. Time in guest will drift compared
> with host after boot up as they may both use third party time sources
> to correct their time respectively. The time deviation will be in order
> of milliseconds. But in some scenarios,like in cloud environment, we ask
> for higher time precision.
>
> kvm ptp clock, which chooses the host clock source as a reference
> clock to sync time between guest and host, has been adopted by x86
> which takes the time sync order from milliseconds to nanoseconds.
>
> This patch enables kvm ptp clock for arm/arm64 and improves clock sync precision
> significantly.

> --- a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ config PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH
>  config PTP_1588_CLOCK_KVM
>         tristate "KVM virtual PTP clock"
>         depends on PTP_1588_CLOCK
> -       depends on KVM_GUEST && X86
> +       depends on (KVM_GUEST && X86) || (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY && ARM_ARCH_TIMER)

Why does this not depend on KVM_GUEST on ARM?
I.e. shouldn't the dependency be:

    KVM_GUEST && (X86 || (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY && ARM_ARCH_TIMER))

?

>         default y
>         help
>           This driver adds support for using kvm infrastructure as a PTP

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, jianyong.wu@arm.com
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, Yangbo Lu <yangbo.lu@nxp.com>,
	 John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	 Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	seanjc@google.com,  Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	 Andre Przywara <Andre.Przywara@arm.com>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	 Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
	 Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	 Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Steve Capper <Steve.Capper@arm.com>,
	justin.he@arm.com, Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@android.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 7/7] ptp: arm/arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 11:07:59 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWd5261ti-zKsroFLvWs0abaWa7G4DKefgPwFb3rEjnNw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210330145430.996981-8-maz@kernel.org>

Hi Marc, Jianyong,

On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 4:56 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org> wrote:
> From: Jianyong Wu <jianyong.wu@arm.com>
>
> Currently, there is no mechanism to keep time sync between guest and host
> in arm/arm64 virtualization environment. Time in guest will drift compared
> with host after boot up as they may both use third party time sources
> to correct their time respectively. The time deviation will be in order
> of milliseconds. But in some scenarios,like in cloud environment, we ask
> for higher time precision.
>
> kvm ptp clock, which chooses the host clock source as a reference
> clock to sync time between guest and host, has been adopted by x86
> which takes the time sync order from milliseconds to nanoseconds.
>
> This patch enables kvm ptp clock for arm/arm64 and improves clock sync precision
> significantly.

> --- a/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/Kconfig
> @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ config PTP_1588_CLOCK_PCH
>  config PTP_1588_CLOCK_KVM
>         tristate "KVM virtual PTP clock"
>         depends on PTP_1588_CLOCK
> -       depends on KVM_GUEST && X86
> +       depends on (KVM_GUEST && X86) || (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY && ARM_ARCH_TIMER)

Why does this not depend on KVM_GUEST on ARM?
I.e. shouldn't the dependency be:

    KVM_GUEST && (X86 || (HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY && ARM_ARCH_TIMER))

?

>         default y
>         help
>           This driver adds support for using kvm infrastructure as a PTP

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11  9:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 75+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-30 14:54 [PATCH v19 0/7] KVM: arm64: Add host/guest KVM-PTP support Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54 ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54 ` [PATCH v19 1/7] arm/arm64: Probe for the presence of KVM hypervisor Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-17  9:49   ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-17  9:49     ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-17  9:49     ` Zenghui Yu
2021-03-30 14:54 ` [PATCH v19 2/7] KVM: arm64: Advertise KVM UID to guests via SMCCC Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54 ` [PATCH v19 3/7] ptp: Reorganize ptp_kvm.c to make it arch-independent Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-07  9:28   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-07  9:28     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-07  9:28     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-07 15:13     ` Richard Cochran
2021-04-07 15:13       ` Richard Cochran
2021-04-07 15:13       ` Richard Cochran
2021-04-07 15:31       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-07 15:31         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-07 15:31         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54 ` [PATCH v19 4/7] time: Add mechanism to recognize clocksource in time_get_snapshot Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-17  9:27   ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-17  9:27     ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-17  9:27     ` Zenghui Yu
2021-03-30 14:54 ` [PATCH v19 5/7] clocksource: Add clocksource id for arm arch counter Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54 ` [PATCH v19 6/7] KVM: arm64: Add support for the KVM PTP service Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-17  8:59   ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-17  8:59     ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-17  8:59     ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-17  9:10     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-17  9:10       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-17  9:10       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-17 10:24       ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-17 10:24         ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-17 10:24         ` Zenghui Yu
2021-03-30 14:54 ` [PATCH v19 7/7] ptp: arm/arm64: Enable ptp_kvm for arm/arm64 Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-03-30 14:54   ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-17  8:42   ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-17  8:42     ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-17  8:42     ` Zenghui Yu
2021-04-17  9:05     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-17  9:05       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-04-17  9:05       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-11  9:07   ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2021-05-11  9:07     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-05-11  9:07     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-05-11  9:13     ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-11  9:13       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-11  9:13       ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-26  7:52       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-05-26  7:52         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-05-26  7:52         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-05-26  8:01         ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-26  8:01           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-26  8:01           ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-26  8:18           ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-05-26  8:18             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-05-26  8:18             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-05-26  8:32             ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-26  8:32               ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-26  8:32               ` Marc Zyngier
2021-05-26  8:50               ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-05-26  8:50                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-05-26  8:50                 ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAMuHMdWd5261ti-zKsroFLvWs0abaWa7G4DKefgPwFb3rEjnNw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=Andre.Przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Steve.Capper@arm.com \
    --cc=jianyong.wu@arm.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=justin.he@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yangbo.lu@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.