All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:07:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXYmtTf=e++fArH4K=vUtRxFd6=toD8An5KxrkRDkkOwg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220617144031.2549432-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>

Hi Olek,

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 6:51 PM Alexander Lobakin
<alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> wrote:
> While I was working on converting some structure fields from a fixed
> type to a bitmap, I started observing code size increase not only in
> places where the code works with the converted structure fields, but
> also where the converted vars were on the stack. That said, the
> following code:
>
>         DECLARE_BITMAP(foo, BITS_PER_LONG) = { }; // -> unsigned long foo[1];
>         unsigned long bar = BIT(BAR_BIT);
>         unsigned long baz = 0;
>
>         __set_bit(FOO_BIT, foo);
>         baz |= BIT(BAZ_BIT);
>
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(test_bit(FOO_BIT, foo));
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(bar & BAR_BIT));
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(baz & BAZ_BIT));
>
> triggers the first assertion on x86_64, which means that the
> compiler is unable to evaluate it to a compile-time initializer
> when the architecture-specific bitop is used even if it's obvious.
> I found that this is due to that many architecture-specific
> non-atomic bitop implementations use inline asm or other hacks which
> are faster or more robust when working with "real" variables (i.e.
> fields from the structures etc.), but the compilers have no clue how
> to optimize them out when called on compile-time constants.
>
> So, in order to let the compiler optimize out such cases, expand the
> test_bit() and __*_bit() definitions with a compile-time condition
> check, so that they will pick the generic C non-atomic bitop
> implementations when all of the arguments passed are compile-time
> constants, which means that the result will be a compile-time
> constant as well and the compiler will produce more efficient and
> simple code in 100% cases (no changes when there's at least one
> non-compile-time-constant argument).
> The condition itself:
>
> if (
> __builtin_constant_p(nr) &&     /* <- bit position is constant */
> __builtin_constant_p(!!addr) && /* <- compiler knows bitmap addr is
>                                       always either NULL or not */
> addr &&                         /* <- bitmap addr is not NULL */
> __builtin_constant_p(*addr)     /* <- compiler knows the value of
>                                       the target bitmap */
> )
>         /* then pick the generic C variant
> else
>         /* old code path, arch-specific
>
> I also tried __is_constexpr() as suggested by Andy, but it was
> always returning 0 ('not a constant') for the 2,3 and 4th
> conditions.
>
> The savings are architecture, compiler and compiler flags dependent,
> for example, on x86_64 -O2:
>
> GCC 12: add/remove: 78/29 grow/shrink: 332/525 up/down: 31325/-61560 (-30235)
> LLVM 13: add/remove: 79/76 grow/shrink: 184/537 up/down: 55076/-141892 (-86816)
> LLVM 14: add/remove: 10/3 grow/shrink: 93/138 up/down: 3705/-6992 (-3287)
>
> and ARM64 (courtesy of Mark[0]):
>
> GCC 11: add/remove: 92/29 grow/shrink: 933/2766 up/down: 39340/-82580 (-43240)
> LLVM 14: add/remove: 21/11 grow/shrink: 620/651 up/down: 12060/-15824 (-3764)
>
> And the following:
>
>         DECLARE_BITMAP(flags, __IP_TUNNEL_FLAG_NUM) = { };
>         __be16 flags;
>
>         __set_bit(IP_TUNNEL_CSUM_BIT, flags);
>
>         tun_flags = cpu_to_be16(*flags & U16_MAX);
>
>         if (test_bit(IP_TUNNEL_VTI_BIT, flags))
>                 tun_flags |= VTI_ISVTI;
>
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(tun_flags));
>
> doesn't blow up anymore (which is being checked now at build time),
> so that we can now e.g. use fixed bitmaps in compile-time assertions
> etc.
>
> The series has been in intel-next for a while with no reported issues.
>
> From v2[1]:
> * collect several Reviewed-bys (Andy, Yury);
> * add a comment to generic_test_bit() that it is atomic-safe and
>   must always stay like that (the first version of this series
>   errorneously tried to change this) (Andy, Marco);
> * unify the way how architectures define platform-specific bitops,
>   both supporting instrumentation and not: now they define only
>   'arch_' versions and asm-generic includes take care of the rest;
> * micro-optimize the diffstat of 0004/0007 (__check_bitop_pr())
>   (Andy);
> * add compile-time tests to lib/test_bitmap to make sure everything
>   works as expected on any setup (Yury).

Thanks for the update!

Still seeing
add/remove: 49/13 grow/shrink: 280/137 up/down: 6464/-3328 (3136)

on m68k atari_defconfig (i.e.CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y)
with gcc version 9.4.0 (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-m68k <linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>,
	Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	sparclinux <sparclinux@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux-Arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 12:07:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXYmtTf=e++fArH4K=vUtRxFd6=toD8An5KxrkRDkkOwg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220617144031.2549432-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>

Hi Olek,

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 6:51 PM Alexander Lobakin
<alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> wrote:
> While I was working on converting some structure fields from a fixed
> type to a bitmap, I started observing code size increase not only in
> places where the code works with the converted structure fields, but
> also where the converted vars were on the stack. That said, the
> following code:
>
>         DECLARE_BITMAP(foo, BITS_PER_LONG) = { }; // -> unsigned long foo[1];
>         unsigned long bar = BIT(BAR_BIT);
>         unsigned long baz = 0;
>
>         __set_bit(FOO_BIT, foo);
>         baz |= BIT(BAZ_BIT);
>
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(test_bit(FOO_BIT, foo));
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(bar & BAR_BIT));
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(baz & BAZ_BIT));
>
> triggers the first assertion on x86_64, which means that the
> compiler is unable to evaluate it to a compile-time initializer
> when the architecture-specific bitop is used even if it's obvious.
> I found that this is due to that many architecture-specific
> non-atomic bitop implementations use inline asm or other hacks which
> are faster or more robust when working with "real" variables (i.e.
> fields from the structures etc.), but the compilers have no clue how
> to optimize them out when called on compile-time constants.
>
> So, in order to let the compiler optimize out such cases, expand the
> test_bit() and __*_bit() definitions with a compile-time condition
> check, so that they will pick the generic C non-atomic bitop
> implementations when all of the arguments passed are compile-time
> constants, which means that the result will be a compile-time
> constant as well and the compiler will produce more efficient and
> simple code in 100% cases (no changes when there's at least one
> non-compile-time-constant argument).
> The condition itself:
>
> if (
> __builtin_constant_p(nr) &&     /* <- bit position is constant */
> __builtin_constant_p(!!addr) && /* <- compiler knows bitmap addr is
>                                       always either NULL or not */
> addr &&                         /* <- bitmap addr is not NULL */
> __builtin_constant_p(*addr)     /* <- compiler knows the value of
>                                       the target bitmap */
> )
>         /* then pick the generic C variant
> else
>         /* old code path, arch-specific
>
> I also tried __is_constexpr() as suggested by Andy, but it was
> always returning 0 ('not a constant') for the 2,3 and 4th
> conditions.
>
> The savings are architecture, compiler and compiler flags dependent,
> for example, on x86_64 -O2:
>
> GCC 12: add/remove: 78/29 grow/shrink: 332/525 up/down: 31325/-61560 (-30235)
> LLVM 13: add/remove: 79/76 grow/shrink: 184/537 up/down: 55076/-141892 (-86816)
> LLVM 14: add/remove: 10/3 grow/shrink: 93/138 up/down: 3705/-6992 (-3287)
>
> and ARM64 (courtesy of Mark[0]):
>
> GCC 11: add/remove: 92/29 grow/shrink: 933/2766 up/down: 39340/-82580 (-43240)
> LLVM 14: add/remove: 21/11 grow/shrink: 620/651 up/down: 12060/-15824 (-3764)
>
> And the following:
>
>         DECLARE_BITMAP(flags, __IP_TUNNEL_FLAG_NUM) = { };
>         __be16 flags;
>
>         __set_bit(IP_TUNNEL_CSUM_BIT, flags);
>
>         tun_flags = cpu_to_be16(*flags & U16_MAX);
>
>         if (test_bit(IP_TUNNEL_VTI_BIT, flags))
>                 tun_flags |= VTI_ISVTI;
>
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(tun_flags));
>
> doesn't blow up anymore (which is being checked now at build time),
> so that we can now e.g. use fixed bitmaps in compile-time assertions
> etc.
>
> The series has been in intel-next for a while with no reported issues.
>
> From v2[1]:
> * collect several Reviewed-bys (Andy, Yury);
> * add a comment to generic_test_bit() that it is atomic-safe and
>   must always stay like that (the first version of this series
>   errorneously tried to change this) (Andy, Marco);
> * unify the way how architectures define platform-specific bitops,
>   both supporting instrumentation and not: now they define only
>   'arch_' versions and asm-generic includes take care of the rest;
> * micro-optimize the diffstat of 0004/0007 (__check_bitop_pr())
>   (Andy);
> * add compile-time tests to lib/test_bitmap to make sure everything
>   works as expected on any setup (Yury).

Thanks for the update!

Still seeing
add/remove: 49/13 grow/shrink: 280/137 up/down: 6464/-3328 (3136)

on m68k atari_defconfig (i.e.CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y)
with gcc version 9.4.0 (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
To: Alexander Lobakin <alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Yury Norov <yury.norov@gmail.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Matt Turner <mattst88@gmail.com>, Brian Cain <bcain@quicinc.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>,
	Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com>,
	Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	alpha <linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org>,
	"open list:QUALCOMM HEXAGON..." <linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:07:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXYmtTf=e++fArH4K=vUtRxFd6=toD8An5KxrkRDkkOwg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220617144031.2549432-1-alexandr.lobakin@intel.com>

Hi Olek,

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 6:51 PM Alexander Lobakin
<alexandr.lobakin@intel.com> wrote:
> While I was working on converting some structure fields from a fixed
> type to a bitmap, I started observing code size increase not only in
> places where the code works with the converted structure fields, but
> also where the converted vars were on the stack. That said, the
> following code:
>
>         DECLARE_BITMAP(foo, BITS_PER_LONG) = { }; // -> unsigned long foo[1];
>         unsigned long bar = BIT(BAR_BIT);
>         unsigned long baz = 0;
>
>         __set_bit(FOO_BIT, foo);
>         baz |= BIT(BAZ_BIT);
>
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(test_bit(FOO_BIT, foo));
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(bar & BAR_BIT));
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(baz & BAZ_BIT));
>
> triggers the first assertion on x86_64, which means that the
> compiler is unable to evaluate it to a compile-time initializer
> when the architecture-specific bitop is used even if it's obvious.
> I found that this is due to that many architecture-specific
> non-atomic bitop implementations use inline asm or other hacks which
> are faster or more robust when working with "real" variables (i.e.
> fields from the structures etc.), but the compilers have no clue how
> to optimize them out when called on compile-time constants.
>
> So, in order to let the compiler optimize out such cases, expand the
> test_bit() and __*_bit() definitions with a compile-time condition
> check, so that they will pick the generic C non-atomic bitop
> implementations when all of the arguments passed are compile-time
> constants, which means that the result will be a compile-time
> constant as well and the compiler will produce more efficient and
> simple code in 100% cases (no changes when there's at least one
> non-compile-time-constant argument).
> The condition itself:
>
> if (
> __builtin_constant_p(nr) &&     /* <- bit position is constant */
> __builtin_constant_p(!!addr) && /* <- compiler knows bitmap addr is
>                                       always either NULL or not */
> addr &&                         /* <- bitmap addr is not NULL */
> __builtin_constant_p(*addr)     /* <- compiler knows the value of
>                                       the target bitmap */
> )
>         /* then pick the generic C variant
> else
>         /* old code path, arch-specific
>
> I also tried __is_constexpr() as suggested by Andy, but it was
> always returning 0 ('not a constant') for the 2,3 and 4th
> conditions.
>
> The savings are architecture, compiler and compiler flags dependent,
> for example, on x86_64 -O2:
>
> GCC 12: add/remove: 78/29 grow/shrink: 332/525 up/down: 31325/-61560 (-30235)
> LLVM 13: add/remove: 79/76 grow/shrink: 184/537 up/down: 55076/-141892 (-86816)
> LLVM 14: add/remove: 10/3 grow/shrink: 93/138 up/down: 3705/-6992 (-3287)
>
> and ARM64 (courtesy of Mark[0]):
>
> GCC 11: add/remove: 92/29 grow/shrink: 933/2766 up/down: 39340/-82580 (-43240)
> LLVM 14: add/remove: 21/11 grow/shrink: 620/651 up/down: 12060/-15824 (-3764)
>
> And the following:
>
>         DECLARE_BITMAP(flags, __IP_TUNNEL_FLAG_NUM) = { };
>         __be16 flags;
>
>         __set_bit(IP_TUNNEL_CSUM_BIT, flags);
>
>         tun_flags = cpu_to_be16(*flags & U16_MAX);
>
>         if (test_bit(IP_TUNNEL_VTI_BIT, flags))
>                 tun_flags |= VTI_ISVTI;
>
>         BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(tun_flags));
>
> doesn't blow up anymore (which is being checked now at build time),
> so that we can now e.g. use fixed bitmaps in compile-time assertions
> etc.
>
> The series has been in intel-next for a while with no reported issues.
>
> From v2[1]:
> * collect several Reviewed-bys (Andy, Yury);
> * add a comment to generic_test_bit() that it is atomic-safe and
>   must always stay like that (the first version of this series
>   errorneously tried to change this) (Andy, Marco);
> * unify the way how architectures define platform-specific bitops,
>   both supporting instrumentation and not: now they define only
>   'arch_' versions and asm-generic includes take care of the rest;
> * micro-optimize the diffstat of 0004/0007 (__check_bitop_pr())
>   (Andy);
> * add compile-time tests to lib/test_bitmap to make sure everything
>   works as expected on any setup (Yury).

Thanks for the update!

Still seeing
add/remove: 49/13 grow/shrink: 280/137 up/down: 6464/-3328 (3136)

on m68k atari_defconfig (i.e.CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y)
with gcc version 9.4.0 (Ubuntu 9.4.0-1ubuntu1~20.04).

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-20 12:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-19  9:20 [alobakin:bitops 3/7] block/elevator.c:222:9: sparse: sparse: cast from restricted req_flags_t kernel test robot
2022-06-17 14:40 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40   ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40   ` [PATCH v3 1/7] ia64, processor: fix -Wincompatible-pointer-types in ia64_get_irr() Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40   ` [PATCH v3 2/7] bitops: always define asm-generic non-atomic bitops Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20  9:49     ` Marco Elver
2022-06-20  9:49       ` Marco Elver
2022-06-20  9:49       ` Marco Elver
2022-06-17 14:40   ` [PATCH v3 3/7] bitops: unify non-atomic bitops prototypes across architectures Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 10:02     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 10:02       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 10:02       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-07-06 10:07     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-06 10:07       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-07-06 10:07       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-17 14:40   ` [PATCH v3 4/7] bitops: define const_*() versions of the non-atomics Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20  9:49     ` Marco Elver
2022-06-20  9:49       ` Marco Elver
2022-06-20  9:49       ` Marco Elver
2022-06-20 10:03     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 10:03       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 10:03       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-17 14:40   ` [PATCH v3 5/7] bitops: wrap non-atomic bitops with a transparent macro Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20  9:50     ` Marco Elver
2022-06-20  9:50       ` Marco Elver
2022-06-20  9:50       ` Marco Elver
2022-06-20 10:08     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 10:08       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 10:08       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-17 14:40   ` [PATCH v3 6/7] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20  9:51     ` Marco Elver
2022-06-20  9:51       ` Marco Elver
2022-06-20  9:51       ` Marco Elver
2022-06-20 10:05     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 10:05       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 10:05       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 13:12       ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 13:12         ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 13:12         ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40   ` [PATCH v3 7/7] lib: test_bitmap: add compile-time optimization/evaluations assertions Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-17 14:40     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 10:07     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 10:07       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 10:07       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 12:07   ` Geert Uytterhoeven [this message]
2022-06-20 12:07     ` [PATCH v3 0/7] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-20 12:07     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2022-06-20 13:22     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 13:22       ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 13:22       ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 13:51   ` [alobakin:bitops 3/7] block/elevator.c:222:9: sparse: sparse: cast from restricted req_flags_t Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 13:51     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 13:51     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 15:18     ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 15:18       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 15:18       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 15:18       ` Andy Shevchenko
2022-06-20 15:27       ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 15:27         ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 15:27         ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 19:21     ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2022-06-20 19:21       ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2022-06-20 19:21       ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2022-06-20 19:21       ` Luc Van Oostenryck
2022-06-20 14:19   ` [PATCH v3 0/7] bitops: let optimize out non-atomic bitops on compile-time constants Mark Rutland
2022-06-20 14:19     ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-20 14:19     ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-20 15:08     ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 15:08       ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-20 15:08       ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-21  6:03       ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-21  6:03         ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-21  6:03         ` Mark Rutland
2022-06-21 17:39       ` Yury Norov
2022-06-21 17:39         ` Yury Norov
2022-06-21 17:39         ` Yury Norov
2022-06-21 18:51         ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-21 18:51           ` Alexander Lobakin
2022-06-21 18:51           ` Alexander Lobakin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMuHMdXYmtTf=e++fArH4K=vUtRxFd6=toD8An5KxrkRDkkOwg@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=alexandr.lobakin@intel.com \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bcain@quicinc.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dalias@libc.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=elver@google.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mattst88@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=ysato@users.sourceforge.jp \
    --cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.