All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@tj.kylinos.cn>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:31:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOnJCUJq5e7W1UXkFFMkKje_BTedekoUT=32ia6t+Sc4UVDhEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mhng-94c90991-c4e8-49fe-a225-854ae0343d8d@palmerdabbelt-glaptop>

On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 12:51 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:02:19 PST (-0800), atishp@atishpatra.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 4:39 PM Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> >> code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> >> it again.
> >>
> >> RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> >> modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> >>
> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> >>
> >> This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> >> It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> >> This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> >> as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> >> maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> >> I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> >>
> >> # numactl --hardware
> >> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> >> node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> >> node 0 size: 486 MB
> >> node 0 free: 470 MB
> >> node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> >> node 1 size: 424 MB
> >> node 1 free: 408 MB
> >> node distances:
> >> node   0   1
> >>   0:  10  20
> >>   1:  20  10
> >> # numactl -show
> >> policy: default
> >> preferred node: current
> >> physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> >> cpubind: 0 1
> >> nodebind: 0 1
> >> membind: 0 1
> >>
> >> The patches are also available at
> >> https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.11_numa_unified_v5
> >>
> >> For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> >>
> >> Testing:
> >> RISC-V:
> >> Tested in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> >>
> >> ARM64:
> >> 2 socket kunpeng920 (4 nodes around 250G a node)
> >> Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Changes from v4->v5:
> >> 1. Added by Acked-by & Reviewed-by tags.
> >> 2. Swapped patch 1 & 2 in v4 version.
> >>
> >> Changes from v3->v4:
> >> 1. Removed redundant duplicate header.
> >> 2. Added Reviewed-by tags.
> >>
> >> Changes from v2->v3:
> >> 1. Added Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags.
> >> 2. Replaced asm/acpi.h with linux/acpi.h
> >> 3. Defined arch_acpi_numa_init as static.
> >>
> >> Changes from v1->v2:
> >> 1. Replaced ARM64 specific compile time protection with ACPI specific ones.
> >> 2. Dropped common pcibus_to_node changes. Added required changes in RISC-V.
> >> 3. Fixed few typos.
> >>
> >> Atish Patra (4):
> >> arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic
> >> numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> >> riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> >> riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> >>
> >> Greentime Hu (1):
> >> riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> >> CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> >>
> >> arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> >> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 48 +----------------
> >> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 12 -----
> >> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> >> arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> >> arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 ++++++++++-
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 +++++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> >> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 +++-
> >> arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> >> arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> >> drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> >> drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> >> .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 27 ++++++++--
> >> include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> >> rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (96%)
> >> create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> linux-riscv mailing list
> >> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >
> > Hey Palmer,
> > I did not see this series in for-next. Let me know if you need
> > anything else to be done for this series.
>
> Sorry about that.  It's on for-next, with Randy's comment addressed.  There was
> one merge conflict: we don't have resource_init() in for-next yet (which I
> think means I missed something else).

resource_init is changed to init_resource and moved to setup.c in the
following patch which was merged in 5.11 MW.
00ab027a3b82 RISC-V: Add kernel image sections to the resource tree

IDK if that's necessary for the NUMA
> stuff, I just dropped it.  I haven't tested this yet.



-- 
Regards,
Atish

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@tj.kylinos.cn>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:31:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOnJCUJq5e7W1UXkFFMkKje_BTedekoUT=32ia6t+Sc4UVDhEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mhng-94c90991-c4e8-49fe-a225-854ae0343d8d@palmerdabbelt-glaptop>

On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 12:51 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:02:19 PST (-0800), atishp@atishpatra.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 4:39 PM Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> >> code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> >> it again.
> >>
> >> RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> >> modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> >>
> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> >>
> >> This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> >> It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> >> This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> >> as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> >> maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> >> I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> >>
> >> # numactl --hardware
> >> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> >> node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> >> node 0 size: 486 MB
> >> node 0 free: 470 MB
> >> node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> >> node 1 size: 424 MB
> >> node 1 free: 408 MB
> >> node distances:
> >> node   0   1
> >>   0:  10  20
> >>   1:  20  10
> >> # numactl -show
> >> policy: default
> >> preferred node: current
> >> physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> >> cpubind: 0 1
> >> nodebind: 0 1
> >> membind: 0 1
> >>
> >> The patches are also available at
> >> https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.11_numa_unified_v5
> >>
> >> For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> >>
> >> Testing:
> >> RISC-V:
> >> Tested in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> >>
> >> ARM64:
> >> 2 socket kunpeng920 (4 nodes around 250G a node)
> >> Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Changes from v4->v5:
> >> 1. Added by Acked-by & Reviewed-by tags.
> >> 2. Swapped patch 1 & 2 in v4 version.
> >>
> >> Changes from v3->v4:
> >> 1. Removed redundant duplicate header.
> >> 2. Added Reviewed-by tags.
> >>
> >> Changes from v2->v3:
> >> 1. Added Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags.
> >> 2. Replaced asm/acpi.h with linux/acpi.h
> >> 3. Defined arch_acpi_numa_init as static.
> >>
> >> Changes from v1->v2:
> >> 1. Replaced ARM64 specific compile time protection with ACPI specific ones.
> >> 2. Dropped common pcibus_to_node changes. Added required changes in RISC-V.
> >> 3. Fixed few typos.
> >>
> >> Atish Patra (4):
> >> arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic
> >> numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> >> riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> >> riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> >>
> >> Greentime Hu (1):
> >> riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> >> CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> >>
> >> arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> >> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 48 +----------------
> >> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 12 -----
> >> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> >> arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> >> arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 ++++++++++-
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 +++++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> >> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 +++-
> >> arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> >> arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> >> drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> >> drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> >> .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 27 ++++++++--
> >> include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> >> rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (96%)
> >> create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> linux-riscv mailing list
> >> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >
> > Hey Palmer,
> > I did not see this series in for-next. Let me know if you need
> > anything else to be done for this series.
>
> Sorry about that.  It's on for-next, with Randy's comment addressed.  There was
> one merge conflict: we don't have resource_init() in for-next yet (which I
> think means I missed something else).

resource_init is changed to init_resource and moved to setup.c in the
following patch which was merged in 5.11 MW.
00ab027a3b82 RISC-V: Add kernel image sections to the resource tree

IDK if that's necessary for the NUMA
> stuff, I just dropped it.  I haven't tested this yet.



-- 
Regards,
Atish

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Atish Patra <atishp@atishpatra.org>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	"catalin.marinas@arm.com" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@wdc.com>,
	linux-riscv <linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
	"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	Zhengyuan Liu <liuzhengyuan@tj.kylinos.cn>,
	Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>, Anup Patel <anup@brainfault.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
	Greentime Hu <greentime.hu@sifive.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List"
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 11:31:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOnJCUJq5e7W1UXkFFMkKje_BTedekoUT=32ia6t+Sc4UVDhEQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mhng-94c90991-c4e8-49fe-a225-854ae0343d8d@palmerdabbelt-glaptop>

On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 12:51 PM Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 17:02:19 PST (-0800), atishp@atishpatra.org wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 18, 2020 at 4:39 PM Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> This series attempts to move the ARM64 numa implementation to common
> >> code so that RISC-V can leverage that as well instead of reimplementing
> >> it again.
> >>
> >> RISC-V specific bits are based on initial work done by Greentime Hu [1] but
> >> modified to reuse the common implementation to avoid duplication.
> >>
> >> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/1/10/233
> >>
> >> This series has been tested on qemu with numa enabled for both RISC-V & ARM64.
> >> It would be great if somebody can test it on numa capable ARM64 hardware platforms.
> >> This patch series doesn't modify the maintainers list for the common code (arch_numa)
> >> as I am not sure if somebody from ARM64 community or Greg should take up the
> >> maintainership. Ganapatrao was the original author of the arm64 version.
> >> I would be happy to update that in the next revision once it is decided.
> >>
> >> # numactl --hardware
> >> available: 2 nodes (0-1)
> >> node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3
> >> node 0 size: 486 MB
> >> node 0 free: 470 MB
> >> node 1 cpus: 4 5 6 7
> >> node 1 size: 424 MB
> >> node 1 free: 408 MB
> >> node distances:
> >> node   0   1
> >>   0:  10  20
> >>   1:  20  10
> >> # numactl -show
> >> policy: default
> >> preferred node: current
> >> physcpubind: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
> >> cpubind: 0 1
> >> nodebind: 0 1
> >> membind: 0 1
> >>
> >> The patches are also available at
> >> https://github.com/atishp04/linux/tree/5.11_numa_unified_v5
> >>
> >> For RISC-V, the following qemu series is a pre-requisite(already available in upstream)
> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/list/?series=303313
> >>
> >> Testing:
> >> RISC-V:
> >> Tested in Qemu and 2 socket OmniXtend FPGA.
> >>
> >> ARM64:
> >> 2 socket kunpeng920 (4 nodes around 250G a node)
> >> Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> >>
> >> Changes from v4->v5:
> >> 1. Added by Acked-by & Reviewed-by tags.
> >> 2. Swapped patch 1 & 2 in v4 version.
> >>
> >> Changes from v3->v4:
> >> 1. Removed redundant duplicate header.
> >> 2. Added Reviewed-by tags.
> >>
> >> Changes from v2->v3:
> >> 1. Added Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags.
> >> 2. Replaced asm/acpi.h with linux/acpi.h
> >> 3. Defined arch_acpi_numa_init as static.
> >>
> >> Changes from v1->v2:
> >> 1. Replaced ARM64 specific compile time protection with ACPI specific ones.
> >> 2. Dropped common pcibus_to_node changes. Added required changes in RISC-V.
> >> 3. Fixed few typos.
> >>
> >> Atish Patra (4):
> >> arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic
> >> numa: Move numa implementation to common code
> >> riscv: Separate memory init from paging init
> >> riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform
> >>
> >> Greentime Hu (1):
> >> riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if
> >> CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING
> >>
> >> arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
> >> arch/arm64/include/asm/numa.h                 | 48 +----------------
> >> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c                 | 12 -----
> >> arch/arm64/mm/Makefile                        |  1 -
> >> arch/arm64/mm/init.c                          |  4 +-
> >> arch/riscv/Kconfig                            | 31 ++++++++++-
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h               | 13 +++++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h                 |  8 +++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/pci.h                  | 14 +++++
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/pgtable.h              | 21 ++++++++
> >> arch/riscv/kernel/setup.c                     | 11 +++-
> >> arch/riscv/kernel/smpboot.c                   | 12 ++++-
> >> arch/riscv/mm/init.c                          | 10 +++-
> >> drivers/base/Kconfig                          |  6 +++
> >> drivers/base/Makefile                         |  1 +
> >> .../mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c     | 27 ++++++++--
> >> include/asm-generic/numa.h                    | 52 +++++++++++++++++++
> >> 17 files changed, 200 insertions(+), 72 deletions(-)
> >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/mmzone.h
> >> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/include/asm/numa.h
> >> rename arch/arm64/mm/numa.c => drivers/base/arch_numa.c (96%)
> >> create mode 100644 include/asm-generic/numa.h
> >>
> >> --
> >> 2.25.1
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> linux-riscv mailing list
> >> linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
> >> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
> >
> > Hey Palmer,
> > I did not see this series in for-next. Let me know if you need
> > anything else to be done for this series.
>
> Sorry about that.  It's on for-next, with Randy's comment addressed.  There was
> one merge conflict: we don't have resource_init() in for-next yet (which I
> think means I missed something else).

resource_init is changed to init_resource and moved to setup.c in the
following patch which was merged in 5.11 MW.
00ab027a3b82 RISC-V: Add kernel image sections to the resource tree

IDK if that's necessary for the NUMA
> stuff, I just dropped it.  I haven't tested this yet.



-- 
Regards,
Atish

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-01-11 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-19  0:38 [PATCH v5 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38 ` Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38 ` Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38 ` [PATCH v5 1/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38   ` Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38   ` Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38 ` [PATCH v5 2/5] numa: Move numa implementation to common code Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38   ` Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38   ` Atish Patra
2020-11-19  1:12   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-19  1:12     ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-19  1:12     ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-19  0:38 ` [PATCH v5 3/5] riscv: Separate memory init from paging init Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38   ` Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38   ` Atish Patra
2021-03-10 16:41   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-03-10 16:41     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-03-10 16:41     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-03-12 15:50     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-03-12 15:50       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2021-03-12 15:50       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-11-19  0:38 ` [PATCH v5 4/5] riscv: Add support pte_protnone and pmd_protnone if CONFIG_NUMA_BALANCING Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38   ` Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38   ` Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38 ` [PATCH v5 5/5] riscv: Add numa support for riscv64 platform Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38   ` Atish Patra
2020-11-19  0:38   ` Atish Patra
2020-12-14  1:02 ` [PATCH v5 0/5] Unify NUMA implementation between ARM64 & RISC-V Atish Patra
2020-12-14  1:02   ` Atish Patra
2020-12-14  1:02   ` Atish Patra
2021-01-09 20:51   ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-01-09 20:51     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-01-09 20:51     ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-01-11 19:31     ` Atish Patra [this message]
2021-01-11 19:31       ` Atish Patra
2021-01-11 19:31       ` Atish Patra
2021-01-14  5:21       ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-01-14  5:21         ` Palmer Dabbelt
2021-01-14  5:21         ` Palmer Dabbelt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAOnJCUJq5e7W1UXkFFMkKje_BTedekoUT=32ia6t+Sc4UVDhEQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=atishp@atishpatra.org \
    --cc=Atish.Patra@wdc.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhe@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=greentime.hu@sifive.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=liuzhengyuan@tj.kylinos.cn \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.