All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com" <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
To: "'fenghua.yu@intel.com'" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"'reinette.chatre@intel.com'" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	'James Morse' <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com" <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>
Subject: RE: About add an A64FX cache control function into resctrl
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:37:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OSAPR01MB214657641D532FB8D112DD528B479@OSAPR01MB2146.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OSAPR01MB214600C7923AEF7C35B02E648B739@OSAPR01MB2146.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,

Ping... any comments&advice about add an A64FX cache control function into resctrl?

Best regards
Tan Shaopeng

> Hello
> 
> 
> I'm Tan Shaopeng from Fujitsu Limited.
> 
> I’m trying to implement Fujitsu A64FX’s cache related features.
> It is a cache partitioning function we called sector cache function that using
> the value of the tag that is upper 8 bits of the 64bit address and the value of the
> sector cache register to control virtual cache capacity of the L1D&L2 cache.
> 
> A few days ago, when I sent a driver that realizes this function to
> ARM64 kernel community, Will Deacon and Arnd Bergmann suggested an idea
> to add the sector cache function of A64FX into resctrl.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAK8P3a2pFcNTw9NpRtQfYr7A5Oc
> Z=As2kM0D_sbfFcGQ_J2Q+Q@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Based on my study, I think the sector cache function of A64FX can be added
> into the allocation features of resctrl after James' resctrl rework has finished.
> But, in order to implement this function, more interfaces for resctrl are need.
> The details are as follow, and could you give me some advice?
> 
> [Sector cache function]
> The sector cache function split cache into multiple sectors and control them
> separately. It is implemented on the L1D cache and
> L2 cache in the A64FX processor and can be controlled individually for L1D
> cache and L2 cache. A64FX has no L3 cache. Each L1D cache and L2 cache
> has 4 sectors. Which L1D sector is used is specified by the value of [57:56] bits
> of address, how many ways of sector are specified by the value of register
> (IMP_SCCR_L1_EL0).
> Which L2 sector is used is specified by the value of [56] bits of address, and
> how many ways of sector are specified by value of register
> (IMP_SCCR_ASSIGN_EL1, IMP_SCCR_SET0_L2_EL1,
> IMP_SCCR_SET1_L2_EL1).
> 
> For more details of sector cache function, see A64FX HPC extension
> specification (1.2. Sector cache) in https://github.com/fujitsu/A64FX
> 
> [Difference between resctrl(CAT) and this sector cache function]
> L2/L3 CAT (Cache Allocation Technology) enables the user to specify some
> physical partition of cache space that an application can fill.
> A64FX's L1D/L2 cache has 4 sectors and 16ways. This sector function enables
> a user to specify number of ways each sector uses.
> Therefore, for CAT it is enough to specify a cache portion for each cache_id
> (socket). On the other hand, sector cache needs to specify cache portion of
> each sector for each cache_id, and following extension to resctrl interface is
> needed to support sector cache.
> 
> [Idear for A64FX sector cache function control interface (schemata file
> details)]
> L1:<cache_id0>=<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>;<cache_id1>=<cw
> bm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>;…
> L2:<cache_id0>=>=<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>;<cache_id1>=
> <cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>;…
> 
> ・L1: Add a new interface to control the L1D cache.
> ・<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>:Specify the number of ways for each
> sector.
> ・cwbm:Specify the number of ways in each sector as a bitmap (percentage),
>   but the bitmap does not indicate the location of the cache.
> * In the sector cache function, L2 sector cache way setting register is
>   shared among PEs (Processor Element) in shared domain. If two PEs
>   which share L2 cache belongs to different resource groups, one resource
>   group's L2 setting will affect to other resource group's L2 setting.
> * Since A64FX does not support MPAM, it is not necessary to consider
>   how to switch between MPAM and sector cache function now.
> 
> Some questions:
> 1.I'm still studying about RDT, could you tell me whether RDT has
>   the similar mechanism with sector cache function?
> 2.In RDT, L3 cache is shared among cores in socket. If two cores which
>   share L3 cache belongs to different resource groups, one resource
>   group's L3 setting will affect to other resource group's L3 setting?
> 3.Is this approach acceptable? could you give me some advice?
> 
> 
> Best regards
> Tan Shaopeng


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com" <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
To: "'fenghua.yu@intel.com'" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	"'reinette.chatre@intel.com'" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
Cc: "'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"'linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org'"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	'James Morse' <james.morse@arm.com>,
	"misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com" <misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com>
Subject: RE: About add an A64FX cache control function into resctrl
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2021 08:37:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <OSAPR01MB214657641D532FB8D112DD528B479@OSAPR01MB2146.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OSAPR01MB214600C7923AEF7C35B02E648B739@OSAPR01MB2146.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>

Hi,

Ping... any comments&advice about add an A64FX cache control function into resctrl?

Best regards
Tan Shaopeng

> Hello
> 
> 
> I'm Tan Shaopeng from Fujitsu Limited.
> 
> I’m trying to implement Fujitsu A64FX’s cache related features.
> It is a cache partitioning function we called sector cache function that using
> the value of the tag that is upper 8 bits of the 64bit address and the value of the
> sector cache register to control virtual cache capacity of the L1D&L2 cache.
> 
> A few days ago, when I sent a driver that realizes this function to
> ARM64 kernel community, Will Deacon and Arnd Bergmann suggested an idea
> to add the sector cache function of A64FX into resctrl.
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/CAK8P3a2pFcNTw9NpRtQfYr7A5Oc
> Z=As2kM0D_sbfFcGQ_J2Q+Q@mail.gmail.com/
> 
> Based on my study, I think the sector cache function of A64FX can be added
> into the allocation features of resctrl after James' resctrl rework has finished.
> But, in order to implement this function, more interfaces for resctrl are need.
> The details are as follow, and could you give me some advice?
> 
> [Sector cache function]
> The sector cache function split cache into multiple sectors and control them
> separately. It is implemented on the L1D cache and
> L2 cache in the A64FX processor and can be controlled individually for L1D
> cache and L2 cache. A64FX has no L3 cache. Each L1D cache and L2 cache
> has 4 sectors. Which L1D sector is used is specified by the value of [57:56] bits
> of address, how many ways of sector are specified by the value of register
> (IMP_SCCR_L1_EL0).
> Which L2 sector is used is specified by the value of [56] bits of address, and
> how many ways of sector are specified by value of register
> (IMP_SCCR_ASSIGN_EL1, IMP_SCCR_SET0_L2_EL1,
> IMP_SCCR_SET1_L2_EL1).
> 
> For more details of sector cache function, see A64FX HPC extension
> specification (1.2. Sector cache) in https://github.com/fujitsu/A64FX
> 
> [Difference between resctrl(CAT) and this sector cache function]
> L2/L3 CAT (Cache Allocation Technology) enables the user to specify some
> physical partition of cache space that an application can fill.
> A64FX's L1D/L2 cache has 4 sectors and 16ways. This sector function enables
> a user to specify number of ways each sector uses.
> Therefore, for CAT it is enough to specify a cache portion for each cache_id
> (socket). On the other hand, sector cache needs to specify cache portion of
> each sector for each cache_id, and following extension to resctrl interface is
> needed to support sector cache.
> 
> [Idear for A64FX sector cache function control interface (schemata file
> details)]
> L1:<cache_id0>=<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>;<cache_id1>=<cw
> bm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>;…
> L2:<cache_id0>=>=<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>;<cache_id1>=
> <cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>;…
> 
> ・L1: Add a new interface to control the L1D cache.
> ・<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>,<cwbm>:Specify the number of ways for each
> sector.
> ・cwbm:Specify the number of ways in each sector as a bitmap (percentage),
>   but the bitmap does not indicate the location of the cache.
> * In the sector cache function, L2 sector cache way setting register is
>   shared among PEs (Processor Element) in shared domain. If two PEs
>   which share L2 cache belongs to different resource groups, one resource
>   group's L2 setting will affect to other resource group's L2 setting.
> * Since A64FX does not support MPAM, it is not necessary to consider
>   how to switch between MPAM and sector cache function now.
> 
> Some questions:
> 1.I'm still studying about RDT, could you tell me whether RDT has
>   the similar mechanism with sector cache function?
> 2.In RDT, L3 cache is shared among cores in socket. If two cores which
>   share L3 cache belongs to different resource groups, one resource
>   group's L3 setting will affect to other resource group's L3 setting?
> 3.Is this approach acceptable? could you give me some advice?
> 
> 
> Best regards
> Tan Shaopeng


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-21  8:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-09  5:46 About add an A64FX cache control function into resctrl tan.shaopeng
2021-04-09  5:46 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-04-21  8:37 ` tan.shaopeng [this message]
2021-04-21  8:37   ` tan.shaopeng
2021-04-21 16:39   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-04-21 16:39     ` Reinette Chatre
2021-04-23  8:10     ` tan.shaopeng
2021-04-23  8:10       ` tan.shaopeng
2021-04-28  8:16     ` tan.shaopeng
2021-04-28  8:16       ` tan.shaopeng
2021-04-29 17:42       ` Reinette Chatre
2021-04-29 17:42         ` Reinette Chatre
2021-04-29 17:50         ` Luck, Tony
2021-04-29 17:50           ` Luck, Tony
2021-04-30 11:46           ` Catalin Marinas
2021-04-30 11:46             ` Catalin Marinas
2021-05-17  8:29             ` tan.shaopeng
2021-05-17  8:29               ` tan.shaopeng
2021-05-17  8:31         ` tan.shaopeng
2021-05-17  8:31           ` tan.shaopeng
2021-05-21 17:44           ` Reinette Chatre
2021-05-21 17:44             ` Reinette Chatre
2021-05-25  8:45             ` tan.shaopeng
2021-05-25  8:45               ` tan.shaopeng
2021-05-26 17:36               ` Reinette Chatre
2021-05-26 17:36                 ` Reinette Chatre
2021-05-27  8:45                 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-05-27  8:45                   ` tan.shaopeng
2021-07-07 11:26                 ` tan.shaopeng
2021-07-07 11:26                   ` tan.shaopeng
2021-07-16  0:49                   ` tan.shaopeng
2021-07-16  0:49                     ` tan.shaopeng
2021-07-19 23:25                   ` Reinette Chatre
2021-07-19 23:25                     ` Reinette Chatre
2021-07-21  8:10                     ` tan.shaopeng
2021-07-21  8:10                       ` tan.shaopeng
2021-07-21 23:39                       ` Reinette Chatre
2021-07-21 23:39                         ` Reinette Chatre
2021-05-17  8:37     ` tan.shaopeng
2021-05-17  8:37       ` tan.shaopeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=OSAPR01MB214657641D532FB8D112DD528B479@OSAPR01MB2146.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=misono.tomohiro@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.