All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Intel Graphics" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <maxime@cerno.tech>,
	"José Expósito" <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the origin tree
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 10:29:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3ZvffZiR+SgtY6h@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116105702.746ce3cf@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:57:02AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   682f99b8ae88 ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Take our lock to reset the link")
> 
> from the origin tree and commits:
> 
>   d218750805a3 ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Pass vc4_hdmi to vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling()")
>   0a99962c0dbf ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Fix pointer dereference before check")
> 
> from the drm-misc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> index d7fcc7a4c082,6b223a5fcf6f..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> @@@ -349,12 -348,9 +348,13 @@@ static int vc4_hdmi_reset_link(struct d
>   	if (!crtc_state->active)
>   		return 0;
>   
>  +	mutex_lock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
>  +
> - 	if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(encoder)) {
> + 	vc4_hdmi = connector_to_vc4_hdmi(connector);
>  -	if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(vc4_hdmi))
> ++	if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(vc4_hdmi)) {
>  +		mutex_unlock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
>   		return 0;
>  +	}
>   
>   	scrambling_needed = vc4_hdmi_mode_needs_scrambling(&vc4_hdmi->saved_adjusted_mode,
>   							   vc4_hdmi->output_bpc,

This resolution is not quite right, as pointed out by clang:

    drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c:351:14: error: variable 'vc4_hdmi' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
            mutex_lock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
                        ^~~~~~~~
    ./include/linux/mutex.h:187:44: note: expanded from macro 'mutex_lock'
    #define mutex_lock(lock) mutex_lock_nested(lock, 0)
                                               ^~~~
    drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c:322:27: note: initialize the variable 'vc4_hdmi' to silence this warning
            struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi;
                                     ^
                                      = NULL
    1 error generated.

Obviously, the assignment of vc4_hdmi should be before mutex_lock().

Cheers,
Nathan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Intel Graphics" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"José Expósito" <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <maxime@cerno.tech>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the origin tree
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 10:29:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3ZvffZiR+SgtY6h@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116105702.746ce3cf@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:57:02AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   682f99b8ae88 ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Take our lock to reset the link")
> 
> from the origin tree and commits:
> 
>   d218750805a3 ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Pass vc4_hdmi to vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling()")
>   0a99962c0dbf ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Fix pointer dereference before check")
> 
> from the drm-misc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> index d7fcc7a4c082,6b223a5fcf6f..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> @@@ -349,12 -348,9 +348,13 @@@ static int vc4_hdmi_reset_link(struct d
>   	if (!crtc_state->active)
>   		return 0;
>   
>  +	mutex_lock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
>  +
> - 	if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(encoder)) {
> + 	vc4_hdmi = connector_to_vc4_hdmi(connector);
>  -	if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(vc4_hdmi))
> ++	if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(vc4_hdmi)) {
>  +		mutex_unlock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
>   		return 0;
>  +	}
>   
>   	scrambling_needed = vc4_hdmi_mode_needs_scrambling(&vc4_hdmi->saved_adjusted_mode,
>   							   vc4_hdmi->output_bpc,

This resolution is not quite right, as pointed out by clang:

    drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c:351:14: error: variable 'vc4_hdmi' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
            mutex_lock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
                        ^~~~~~~~
    ./include/linux/mutex.h:187:44: note: expanded from macro 'mutex_lock'
    #define mutex_lock(lock) mutex_lock_nested(lock, 0)
                                               ^~~~
    drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c:322:27: note: initialize the variable 'vc4_hdmi' to silence this warning
            struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi;
                                     ^
                                      = NULL
    1 error generated.

Obviously, the assignment of vc4_hdmi should be before mutex_lock().

Cheers,
Nathan

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	"Intel Graphics" <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Maxime Ripard" <maxime@cerno.tech>,
	"José Expósito" <jose.exposito89@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the origin tree
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2022 10:29:33 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y3ZvffZiR+SgtY6h@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221116105702.746ce3cf@canb.auug.org.au>

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:57:02AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the drm-misc tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   682f99b8ae88 ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Take our lock to reset the link")
> 
> from the origin tree and commits:
> 
>   d218750805a3 ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Pass vc4_hdmi to vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling()")
>   0a99962c0dbf ("drm/vc4: hdmi: Fix pointer dereference before check")
> 
> from the drm-misc tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> index d7fcc7a4c082,6b223a5fcf6f..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c
> @@@ -349,12 -348,9 +348,13 @@@ static int vc4_hdmi_reset_link(struct d
>   	if (!crtc_state->active)
>   		return 0;
>   
>  +	mutex_lock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
>  +
> - 	if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(encoder)) {
> + 	vc4_hdmi = connector_to_vc4_hdmi(connector);
>  -	if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(vc4_hdmi))
> ++	if (!vc4_hdmi_supports_scrambling(vc4_hdmi)) {
>  +		mutex_unlock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
>   		return 0;
>  +	}
>   
>   	scrambling_needed = vc4_hdmi_mode_needs_scrambling(&vc4_hdmi->saved_adjusted_mode,
>   							   vc4_hdmi->output_bpc,

This resolution is not quite right, as pointed out by clang:

    drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c:351:14: error: variable 'vc4_hdmi' is uninitialized when used here [-Werror,-Wuninitialized]
            mutex_lock(&vc4_hdmi->mutex);
                        ^~~~~~~~
    ./include/linux/mutex.h:187:44: note: expanded from macro 'mutex_lock'
    #define mutex_lock(lock) mutex_lock_nested(lock, 0)
                                               ^~~~
    drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_hdmi.c:322:27: note: initialize the variable 'vc4_hdmi' to silence this warning
            struct vc4_hdmi *vc4_hdmi;
                                     ^
                                      = NULL
    1 error generated.

Obviously, the assignment of vc4_hdmi should be before mutex_lock().

Cheers,
Nathan

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-17 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-15 23:57 linux-next: manual merge of the drm-misc tree with the origin tree Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-15 23:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-15 23:57 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-17 17:29 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2022-11-17 17:29   ` [Intel-gfx] " Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-17 17:29   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-17 22:06   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-17 22:06     ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-17 22:06     ` [Intel-gfx] " Stephen Rothwell
2022-11-18  0:01     ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-18  0:01       ` [Intel-gfx] " Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-18  0:01       ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-11-18  9:20       ` Maxime Ripard
2022-11-18  9:20         ` [Intel-gfx] " Maxime Ripard
2022-11-18  9:20         ` Maxime Ripard
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-11-07 22:31 Stephen Rothwell
2021-11-07 22:31 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y3ZvffZiR+SgtY6h@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jose.exposito89@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.