All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 07/16] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:56:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRznWDtF/doFRm0/@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210818105029.GC13828@willie-the-truck>

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:50:30AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 05:40:24PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 12:24:34PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > In preparation for replaying user affinity requests using a saved mask,
> > > split sched_setaffinity() up so that the initial task lookup and
> > > security checks are only performed when the request is coming directly
> > > from userspace.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Should not sched_setaffinity() update user_cpus_ptr when it isn't NULL,
> > such that the upcoming relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() preserve the
> > full user mask?
> 
> The idea is that force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() and
> relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() are used as a pair, with the former
> setting ->user_cpus_ptr and the latter restoring it. An intervening call
> to sched_setaffinity() must _clear_ the saved mask, as we discussed
> before at:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/YK53kDtczHIYumDC@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net

Clearly that deserves a comment somewhere, because I keep trying to make
it more consistent than it can be :/ I'll see if I can find a spot.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 07/16] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2021 12:56:24 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YRznWDtF/doFRm0/@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210818105029.GC13828@willie-the-truck>

On Wed, Aug 18, 2021 at 11:50:30AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 05:40:24PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 12:24:34PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > In preparation for replaying user affinity requests using a saved mask,
> > > split sched_setaffinity() up so that the initial task lookup and
> > > security checks are only performed when the request is coming directly
> > > from userspace.
> > > 
> > > Reviewed-by: Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@arm.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> > 
> > Should not sched_setaffinity() update user_cpus_ptr when it isn't NULL,
> > such that the upcoming relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() preserve the
> > full user mask?
> 
> The idea is that force_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() and
> relax_compatible_cpus_allowed_ptr() are used as a pair, with the former
> setting ->user_cpus_ptr and the latter restoring it. An intervening call
> to sched_setaffinity() must _clear_ the saved mask, as we discussed
> before at:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/YK53kDtczHIYumDC@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net

Clearly that deserves a comment somewhere, because I keep trying to make
it more consistent than it can be :/ I'll see if I can find a spot.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-18 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-30 11:24 [PATCH v11 00/16] Add support for 32-bit tasks on asymmetric AArch32 systems Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 01/16] sched: Introduce task_cpu_possible_mask() to limit fallback rq selection Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-08-23  9:26   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 02/16] cpuset: Don't use the cpu_possible_mask as a last resort for cgroup v1 Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-08-23  9:26   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 03/16] cpuset: Honour task_cpu_possible_mask() in guarantee_online_cpus() Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-08-23  9:26   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 04/16] cpuset: Cleanup cpuset_cpus_allowed_fallback() use in select_fallback_rq() Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-08-23  9:26   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 05/16] sched: Reject CPU affinity changes based on task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-08-23  9:26   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 06/16] sched: Introduce task_struct::user_cpus_ptr to track requested affinity Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-08-23  9:26   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 07/16] sched: Split the guts of sched_setaffinity() into a helper function Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-08-17 15:40   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-17 15:40     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-18 10:50     ` Will Deacon
2021-08-18 10:50       ` Will Deacon
2021-08-18 10:56       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-08-18 10:56         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-18 11:11         ` Will Deacon
2021-08-18 11:11           ` Will Deacon
2021-08-23  9:26   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 08/16] sched: Allow task CPU affinity to be restricted on asymmetric systems Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-08-17 15:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-17 15:10     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-18 10:42     ` Will Deacon
2021-08-18 10:42       ` Will Deacon
2021-08-18 10:56       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-18 10:56         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-18 11:53         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-18 11:53           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-18 12:19           ` Will Deacon
2021-08-18 12:19             ` Will Deacon
2021-08-18 11:06       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-18 11:06         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-17 15:41   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-17 15:41     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-08-18 10:43     ` Will Deacon
2021-08-18 10:43       ` Will Deacon
2021-08-23  9:26   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 09/16] sched: Introduce dl_task_check_affinity() to check proposed affinity Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-08-23  9:26   ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 10/16] arm64: Implement task_cpu_possible_mask() Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 11/16] arm64: exec: Adjust affinity for compat tasks with mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 12/16] arm64: Prevent offlining first CPU with 32-bit EL0 on mismatched system Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 13/16] arm64: Advertise CPUs capable of running 32-bit applications in sysfs Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 14/16] arm64: Hook up cmdline parameter to allow mismatched 32-bit EL0 Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 15/16] arm64: Remove logic to kill 32-bit tasks on 64-bit-only cores Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24 ` [PATCH v11 16/16] Documentation: arm64: describe asymmetric 32-bit support Will Deacon
2021-07-30 11:24   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YRznWDtF/doFRm0/@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.