All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Yazen Ghannam <Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] x86/mce: Get rid of machine_check_vector
Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2021 21:57:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YUgUpXHciLMn4X20@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210917105355.2368-3-bp@alien8.de>

On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 12:53:53PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> @@ -126,7 +123,9 @@ struct mca_config {
>  	      ser			: 1,
>  	      recovery			: 1,
>  	      bios_cmci_threshold	: 1,
> -	      __reserved		: 59;
> +	      /* Proper #MC exception handler is set */
> +	      initialized		: 1,
> +	      __reserved		: 58;

Does this __reserved field do anything useful? It seems to
just be an annoyance that must be updated each time a new
bit is added. Surely the compiler will see that these bitfields
are in a "u64" and do the math and skip to the right boundary
without this.

-Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-20  4:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-17 10:53 [PATCH 0/4] x86/mce: Remove indirect calls Borislav Petkov
2021-09-17 10:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] x86/mce: Get rid of the mce_severity function pointer Borislav Petkov
2021-09-17 10:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86/mce: Get rid of machine_check_vector Borislav Petkov
2021-09-20  4:57   ` Luck, Tony [this message]
2021-09-20  7:42     ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-09-20  8:15       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-09-20  8:12     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-09-20 16:04       ` Luck, Tony
2021-09-20 16:32         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-09-17 10:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/mce: Get rid of msr_ops Borislav Petkov
2021-09-20  4:47   ` Luck, Tony
2021-09-20  8:32     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-09-22 12:16       ` Borislav Petkov
2021-09-22 13:23         ` Luck, Tony
2021-09-22 13:55           ` Borislav Petkov
2021-09-22 15:22             ` Luck, Tony
2021-09-22 15:57               ` Borislav Petkov
2021-09-17 10:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86/mce: Get rid of the ->quirk_no_way_out() indirect call Borislav Petkov
2021-09-20  5:06   ` Luck, Tony
2021-09-20  8:34     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-09-23 14:51   ` Yazen Ghannam
2021-09-23 15:11     ` Borislav Petkov
2021-09-24 20:04       ` Yazen Ghannam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YUgUpXHciLMn4X20@agluck-desk2.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=Yazen.Ghannam@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.