From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Cc: <hannes@cmpxchg.org>, <mhocko@kernel.org>,
<vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>, <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
<shakeelb@google.com>, <vbabka@suse.cz>, <willy@infradead.org>,
<songmuchun@bytedance.com>, <shy828301@gmail.com>,
<surenb@google.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<cgroups@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm/memcg: refine mem_cgroup_threshold_ary->current_threshold calculation
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:23:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yd3LLalWzPy17PmR@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220111010302.8864-4-richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 01:03:02AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
> mem_cgroup_threshold_ary->current_threshold points to the last entry
> who's threshold is less or equal to usage.
>
> Instead of iterating entries to get the correct index, we can leverage
> primary->current_threshold to get it. If the threshold added is less or
> equal to usage, current_threshold should increase by one. Otherwise, it
> doesn't change.
How big is usually an array of thresholds? If it's not huge, likely
any savings won't be really noticeable (it's not a hot path and there
is an rc_synchronize() below).
So I agree with Michal that a better justification is really needed.
Thanks!
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Roman Gushchin <guro-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org>
To: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org,
mhocko-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org,
vdavydov.dev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org,
shakeelb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
vbabka-AlSwsSmVLrQ@public.gmane.org,
willy-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org,
songmuchun-EC8Uxl6Npydl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org,
shy828301-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org,
surenb-hpIqsD4AKlfQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] mm/memcg: refine mem_cgroup_threshold_ary->current_threshold calculation
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 10:23:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yd3LLalWzPy17PmR@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220111010302.8864-4-richard.weiyang-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
On Tue, Jan 11, 2022 at 01:03:02AM +0000, Wei Yang wrote:
> mem_cgroup_threshold_ary->current_threshold points to the last entry
> who's threshold is less or equal to usage.
>
> Instead of iterating entries to get the correct index, we can leverage
> primary->current_threshold to get it. If the threshold added is less or
> equal to usage, current_threshold should increase by one. Otherwise, it
> doesn't change.
How big is usually an array of thresholds? If it's not huge, likely
any savings won't be really noticeable (it's not a hot path and there
is an rc_synchronize() below).
So I agree with Michal that a better justification is really needed.
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-11 18:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-11 1:02 [PATCH 1/4] mm/memcg: use NUMA_NO_NODE to indicate allocation from unspecified node Wei Yang
2022-01-11 1:02 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-11 1:03 ` [PATCH 2/4] mm/memcg: mem_cgroup_per_node is already set to 0 on allocation Wei Yang
2022-01-11 2:25 ` Muchun Song
2022-01-11 2:25 ` Muchun Song
2022-01-11 8:41 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-11 18:06 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-01-11 18:06 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-01-14 11:08 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-01-16 19:24 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-01-16 19:24 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-01-11 1:03 ` [PATCH 3/4] mm/memcg: retrieve parent memcg from css.parent Wei Yang
2022-01-11 1:03 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-11 3:12 ` Muchun Song
2022-01-11 3:12 ` Muchun Song
2022-01-11 8:43 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-11 18:09 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-01-11 18:09 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-01-12 0:24 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-12 0:24 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-16 19:54 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-01-16 19:54 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-01-11 1:03 ` [PATCH 4/4] mm/memcg: refine mem_cgroup_threshold_ary->current_threshold calculation Wei Yang
2022-01-11 1:03 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-11 8:44 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-11 18:23 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2022-01-11 18:23 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-01-12 0:25 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-12 0:25 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-11 2:23 ` [PATCH 1/4] mm/memcg: use NUMA_NO_NODE to indicate allocation from unspecified node Muchun Song
2022-01-11 2:23 ` Muchun Song
2022-01-11 8:40 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-11 8:40 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-12 0:46 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-12 0:46 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-12 8:56 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-12 8:56 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-14 0:29 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-14 0:29 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-14 8:51 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-14 8:51 ` Michal Hocko
2022-01-15 22:10 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-15 22:10 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-16 19:23 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-01-16 19:23 ` Shakeel Butt
2022-01-11 18:05 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-01-11 18:05 ` Roman Gushchin
2022-01-14 11:07 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-01-14 11:07 ` Mike Rapoport
2022-01-31 1:47 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-31 1:47 ` Wei Yang
2022-01-31 22:36 ` Andrew Morton
2022-01-31 22:36 ` Andrew Morton
2022-02-01 0:42 ` Wei Yang
2022-02-01 0:42 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yd3LLalWzPy17PmR@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.