All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	bp@alien8.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 12:00:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgT+eHjtgrHl+wWw@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YgTdHfmubmk1rUi8@FVFF77S0Q05N>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 09:38:37AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:57:09PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 03:35:35PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > Note that PREEMPT_DYNAMIC is `def bool y`, so this will default to
> > > enabled.
> > 
> > It should probably be "def_bool y if HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE"...
> 
> Sure; I'm more than happy to fold that into patch 5.

For the moment I've made that:

	def_bool y if HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL

... since that fit more neatly with the other bits I had to add, and didn't
change the existing behaviour of 32-bit x86.

Please shout if you think that should be HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE specifically!

Thanks,
Mark.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	bp@alien8.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, james.morse@arm.com,
	joey.gouly@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	valentin.schneider@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2022 12:00:56 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YgT+eHjtgrHl+wWw@FVFF77S0Q05N> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YgTdHfmubmk1rUi8@FVFF77S0Q05N>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 09:38:37AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 08:57:09PM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 03:35:35PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > Note that PREEMPT_DYNAMIC is `def bool y`, so this will default to
> > > enabled.
> > 
> > It should probably be "def_bool y if HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE"...
> 
> Sure; I'm more than happy to fold that into patch 5.

For the moment I've made that:

	def_bool y if HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL

... since that fit more neatly with the other bits I had to add, and didn't
change the existing behaviour of 32-bit x86.

Please shout if you think that should be HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE specifically!

Thanks,
Mark.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-02-10 12:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-02-09 15:35 [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64 / sched/preempt: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC with static keys Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35 ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] sched/preempt: move PREEMPT_DYNAMIC logic later Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35   ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] sched/preempt: refactor sched_dynamic_update() Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35   ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] sched/preempt: simplify irqentry_exit_cond_resched() callers Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35   ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] sched/preempt: decouple HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC from GENERIC_ENTRY Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35   ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] sched/preempt: add PREEMPT_DYNAMIC using static keys Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35   ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 17:48   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-09 17:48     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-10 10:27     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-10 10:27       ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-10 15:59       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-10 15:59         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-09 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] arm64: entry: centralize premeption decision Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35   ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 18:10   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-02-09 18:10     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-02-10  9:19     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-10  9:19       ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] arm64: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 15:35   ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-09 18:13   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-02-09 18:13     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-02-09 19:57   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-09 19:57     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-10  9:38     ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-10  9:38       ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-10 12:00       ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2022-02-10 12:00         ` Mark Rutland
2022-02-10 15:58         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-10 15:58           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-09 19:58 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] arm64 / sched/preempt: support PREEMPT_DYNAMIC with static keys Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-09 19:58   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2022-02-10  9:29 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2022-02-10  9:29   ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YgT+eHjtgrHl+wWw@FVFF77S0Q05N \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.