All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	rafael@kernel.org, Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>, Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
	Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@gmail.com>,
	Laurentiu Tudor <laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>, Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] Fix BUG_ON in vfio_iommu_group_notifier()
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 17:37:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlBWrE7kxX9vraOD@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220408141747.GZ2120790@nvidia.com>

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 11:17:47AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> You might consider using a linear tree instead of the topic branches,
> topics are tricky and I'm not sure it helps a small subsystem so much.
> Conflicts between topics are a PITA for everyone, and it makes
> handling conflicts with rc much harder than it needs to be.

I like the concept of a branch per driver, because with that I can just
exclude that branch from my next-merge when there are issues with it.
Conflicts between branches happen too, but they are quite manageable
when the branches have the same base.

Overall I am thinking of reorganizing the IOMMU tree, but it will likely
not end up to be a single-branch tree, although the number of patches
per cycle _could_ just be carried in a single branch.

> At least I haven't felt a need for topics while running larger trees,
> and would find it stressful to try and squeeze the entire patch flow
> into only 3 weeks out of the 7 week cycle.

Yeah, so it is 4 weeks in an 9 weeks cycle :) The merge window is 2
weeks and not a lot happens. The 2 weeks after are for stabilization and
I usually only pick up fixes. Then come the 4 weeks were new code gets
into the tree. In the last week everything gets testing in linux-next to
be ready for the merge window. I will pickup fixes in that week, of
course.

> In any event, I'd like this on a branch so Alex can pull it too, I
> guess it means Alex has to merge rc3 to VFIO as well?

Sure, I can put these patches in a separate branch for Alex to pull into
the VFIO tree.

Regards,

	Joerg

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@gmail.com>,
	rafael@kernel.org, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
	Diana Craciun <diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com>,
	Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Li Yang <leoyang.li@nxp.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/11] Fix BUG_ON in vfio_iommu_group_notifier()
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 17:37:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YlBWrE7kxX9vraOD@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220408141747.GZ2120790@nvidia.com>

On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 11:17:47AM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> You might consider using a linear tree instead of the topic branches,
> topics are tricky and I'm not sure it helps a small subsystem so much.
> Conflicts between topics are a PITA for everyone, and it makes
> handling conflicts with rc much harder than it needs to be.

I like the concept of a branch per driver, because with that I can just
exclude that branch from my next-merge when there are issues with it.
Conflicts between branches happen too, but they are quite manageable
when the branches have the same base.

Overall I am thinking of reorganizing the IOMMU tree, but it will likely
not end up to be a single-branch tree, although the number of patches
per cycle _could_ just be carried in a single branch.

> At least I haven't felt a need for topics while running larger trees,
> and would find it stressful to try and squeeze the entire patch flow
> into only 3 weeks out of the 7 week cycle.

Yeah, so it is 4 weeks in an 9 weeks cycle :) The merge window is 2
weeks and not a lot happens. The 2 weeks after are for stabilization and
I usually only pick up fixes. Then come the 4 weeks were new code gets
into the tree. In the last week everything gets testing in linux-next to
be ready for the merge window. I will pickup fixes in that week, of
course.

> In any event, I'd like this on a branch so Alex can pull it too, I
> guess it means Alex has to merge rc3 to VFIO as well?

Sure, I can put these patches in a separate branch for Alex to pull into
the VFIO tree.

Regards,

	Joerg
_______________________________________________
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

  reply	other threads:[~2022-04-08 15:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-08  5:44 [PATCH v8 00/11] Fix BUG_ON in vfio_iommu_group_notifier() Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44 ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44 ` [PATCH v8 01/11] iommu: Add DMA ownership management interfaces Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44   ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-08 13:37   ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-08 13:37     ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-08  5:44 ` [PATCH v8 02/11] driver core: Add dma_cleanup callback in bus_type Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44   ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44 ` [PATCH v8 03/11] amba: Stop sharing platform_dma_configure() Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44   ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44 ` [PATCH v8 04/11] bus: platform, amba, fsl-mc, PCI: Add device DMA ownership management Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44   ` [PATCH v8 04/11] bus: platform,amba,fsl-mc,PCI: " Lu Baolu
2022-03-08 13:39   ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-08 13:39     ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-08  5:44 ` [PATCH v8 05/11] PCI: pci_stub: Set driver_managed_dma Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44   ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44 ` [PATCH v8 06/11] PCI: portdrv: " Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44   ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44 ` [PATCH v8 07/11] vfio: Set DMA ownership for VFIO devices Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44   ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44 ` [PATCH v8 08/11] vfio: Remove use of vfio_group_viable() Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44   ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44 ` [PATCH v8 09/11] vfio: Delete the unbound_list Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44   ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44 ` [PATCH v8 10/11] vfio: Remove iommu group notifier Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44   ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44 ` [PATCH v8 11/11] iommu: Remove iommu group changes notifier Lu Baolu
2022-03-08  5:44   ` Lu Baolu
2022-03-10  9:46 ` [PATCH v8 00/11] Fix BUG_ON in vfio_iommu_group_notifier() Eric Auger
2022-03-10  9:46   ` Eric Auger
2022-03-15  0:21 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-03-15  0:21   ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-04-08  7:57   ` Joerg Roedel
2022-04-08  7:57     ` Joerg Roedel
2022-04-08 12:22     ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-08 12:22       ` Lu Baolu
2022-04-08 12:23       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 12:23         ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-04-08 14:00         ` Joerg Roedel
2022-04-08 14:00           ` Joerg Roedel
2022-04-08 14:17           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 14:17             ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu
2022-04-08 15:37             ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2022-04-08 15:37               ` Joerg Roedel
2022-04-08 15:59               ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-08 15:59                 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2022-04-08 16:07                 ` Alex Williamson
2022-04-08 16:07                   ` Alex Williamson
2022-04-08 20:24                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-04-08 20:24                     ` Jason Gunthorpe via iommu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YlBWrE7kxX9vraOD@8bytes.org \
    --to=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=diana.craciun@oss.nxp.com \
    --cc=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kch@nvidia.com \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=laurentiu.tudor@nxp.com \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=stuyoder@gmail.com \
    --cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.