From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com> To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, "Kuogee Hsieh" <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>, <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, "Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch> Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] drm/msm/dp: fix panel bridge attachment Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:25:55 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <a219b978-21a8-a2d6-62c0-69c451b10c09@quicinc.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <a1b1d3ef-4131-b8a9-5300-89092bce271b@linaro.org> On 2/18/2022 6:26 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 19/02/2022 02:56, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-02-11 14:40:02) >>> In commit 8a3b4c17f863 ("drm/msm/dp: employ bridge mechanism for display >>> enable and disable") the DP driver received a drm_bridge instance, which >>> is always attached to the encoder as a root bridge. However it conflicts >>> with the panel_bridge support for eDP panels. The panel bridge attaches >>> to the encoder before the "dp" bridge has a chace to do so. Change >> >> s/chace/chance/ >> >>> panel_bridge attachment to come after dp_bridge attachment. >> >> s/panel_bridge/panel bridge/ possibly? And maybe clarify that dp_bridge >> is the "DP driver's drm_bridge instance created in >> msm_dp_bridge_init()"? >> >> My understanding is that we want to pass the bridge created in >> msm_dp_bridge_init() as the 'previous' bridge so that it attaches the >> panel bridge to the output of the DP bridge that's attached to the >> encoder. > > Thanks! I'll update the commit log when pushing the patches. Please correct if i am missing something here. You are right that the eDP panel's panel bridge attaches to the encoder in dp_drm_connector_init() which happens before msm_dp_bridge_init() and hence it will attach directly to the encoder. But we are talking about different encoders here. DP's dp_display has a different encoder compared to the EDP's dp_display. So DP's bridge will still be attached to its encoder's root. So what are we achieving with this change? > >> >>> >>> Fixes: 8a3b4c17f863 ("drm/msm/dp: employ bridge mechanism for display >>> enable and disable") >>> Cc: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> >>> --- >> >> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> >> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c | 21 +++++++++++---------- >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c >>> index d4d360d19eba..26ef41a4c1b6 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c >>> @@ -169,16 +169,6 @@ struct drm_connector >>> *dp_drm_connector_init(struct msm_dp *dp_display) >>> >>> drm_connector_attach_encoder(connector, dp_display->encoder); >>> >>> - if (dp_display->panel_bridge) { >>> - ret = drm_bridge_attach(dp_display->encoder, >>> - dp_display->panel_bridge, NULL, >>> - DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR); >>> - if (ret < 0) { >>> - DRM_ERROR("failed to attach panel bridge: >>> %d\n", ret); >>> - return ERR_PTR(ret); >>> - } >>> - } >>> - >>> return connector; >>> } >>> >>> @@ -246,5 +236,16 @@ struct drm_bridge *msm_dp_bridge_init(struct >>> msm_dp *dp_display, struct drm_devi >>> return ERR_PTR(rc); >>> } >>> >>> + if (dp_display->panel_bridge) { >>> + rc = drm_bridge_attach(dp_display->encoder, >>> + dp_display->panel_bridge, >>> bridge, >>> + DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR); >>> + if (rc < 0) { >>> + DRM_ERROR("failed to attach panel bridge: >>> %d\n", rc); >>> + drm_bridge_remove(bridge); >>> + return ERR_PTR(rc); >>> + } >>> + } >>> + >>> return bridge; >> >> Not a problem with this patch, but what is this pointer used for? I see >> it's assigned to priv->bridges and num_bridges is incremented but nobody >> seems to look at that. > > > That's on my todo list. to remove connectors array and to destroy > created bridges during drm device destruction. >
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com> To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>, Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org>, Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>, "Kuogee Hsieh" <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com>, Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [Freedreno] [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] drm/msm/dp: fix panel bridge attachment Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 10:25:55 -0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <a219b978-21a8-a2d6-62c0-69c451b10c09@quicinc.com> (raw) In-Reply-To: <a1b1d3ef-4131-b8a9-5300-89092bce271b@linaro.org> On 2/18/2022 6:26 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > On 19/02/2022 02:56, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> Quoting Dmitry Baryshkov (2022-02-11 14:40:02) >>> In commit 8a3b4c17f863 ("drm/msm/dp: employ bridge mechanism for display >>> enable and disable") the DP driver received a drm_bridge instance, which >>> is always attached to the encoder as a root bridge. However it conflicts >>> with the panel_bridge support for eDP panels. The panel bridge attaches >>> to the encoder before the "dp" bridge has a chace to do so. Change >> >> s/chace/chance/ >> >>> panel_bridge attachment to come after dp_bridge attachment. >> >> s/panel_bridge/panel bridge/ possibly? And maybe clarify that dp_bridge >> is the "DP driver's drm_bridge instance created in >> msm_dp_bridge_init()"? >> >> My understanding is that we want to pass the bridge created in >> msm_dp_bridge_init() as the 'previous' bridge so that it attaches the >> panel bridge to the output of the DP bridge that's attached to the >> encoder. > > Thanks! I'll update the commit log when pushing the patches. Please correct if i am missing something here. You are right that the eDP panel's panel bridge attaches to the encoder in dp_drm_connector_init() which happens before msm_dp_bridge_init() and hence it will attach directly to the encoder. But we are talking about different encoders here. DP's dp_display has a different encoder compared to the EDP's dp_display. So DP's bridge will still be attached to its encoder's root. So what are we achieving with this change? > >> >>> >>> Fixes: 8a3b4c17f863 ("drm/msm/dp: employ bridge mechanism for display >>> enable and disable") >>> Cc: Kuogee Hsieh <quic_khsieh@quicinc.com> >>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org> >>> --- >> >> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@chromium.org> >> >>> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c | 21 +++++++++++---------- >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c >>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c >>> index d4d360d19eba..26ef41a4c1b6 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c >>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_drm.c >>> @@ -169,16 +169,6 @@ struct drm_connector >>> *dp_drm_connector_init(struct msm_dp *dp_display) >>> >>> drm_connector_attach_encoder(connector, dp_display->encoder); >>> >>> - if (dp_display->panel_bridge) { >>> - ret = drm_bridge_attach(dp_display->encoder, >>> - dp_display->panel_bridge, NULL, >>> - DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR); >>> - if (ret < 0) { >>> - DRM_ERROR("failed to attach panel bridge: >>> %d\n", ret); >>> - return ERR_PTR(ret); >>> - } >>> - } >>> - >>> return connector; >>> } >>> >>> @@ -246,5 +236,16 @@ struct drm_bridge *msm_dp_bridge_init(struct >>> msm_dp *dp_display, struct drm_devi >>> return ERR_PTR(rc); >>> } >>> >>> + if (dp_display->panel_bridge) { >>> + rc = drm_bridge_attach(dp_display->encoder, >>> + dp_display->panel_bridge, >>> bridge, >>> + DRM_BRIDGE_ATTACH_NO_CONNECTOR); >>> + if (rc < 0) { >>> + DRM_ERROR("failed to attach panel bridge: >>> %d\n", rc); >>> + drm_bridge_remove(bridge); >>> + return ERR_PTR(rc); >>> + } >>> + } >>> + >>> return bridge; >> >> Not a problem with this patch, but what is this pointer used for? I see >> it's assigned to priv->bridges and num_bridges is incremented but nobody >> seems to look at that. > > > That's on my todo list. to remove connectors array and to destroy > created bridges during drm device destruction. >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-24 18:26 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2022-02-11 22:40 [RFC PATCH v2 0/5] Simplify and correct msm/dp bridge implementation Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-11 22:40 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-11 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] drm/msm/dp: fix panel bridge attachment Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-11 22:40 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-18 21:14 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-18 21:14 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-18 23:56 ` Stephen Boyd 2022-02-18 23:56 ` Stephen Boyd 2022-02-19 2:26 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-19 2:26 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-24 18:25 ` Abhinav Kumar [this message] 2022-02-24 18:25 ` [Freedreno] " Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-24 20:41 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-24 20:41 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-25 2:01 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-25 2:01 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-25 4:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-25 4:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-25 4:45 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-25 4:45 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-25 9:04 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-25 9:04 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-25 17:11 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-25 17:11 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-25 17:25 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-25 17:25 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-11 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/5] drm/msm/dp: support attaching bridges to the DP encoder Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-11 22:40 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-18 21:28 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-18 21:28 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-18 21:31 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-18 21:31 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-18 23:38 ` Stephen Boyd 2022-02-18 23:38 ` Stephen Boyd 2022-02-23 17:47 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-23 17:47 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-24 19:56 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-24 19:56 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-11 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/5] drm/msm/dp: support finding next bridge even for DP interfaces Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-11 22:40 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-18 21:29 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-18 21:29 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-19 0:34 ` Stephen Boyd 2022-02-19 0:34 ` Stephen Boyd 2022-02-24 20:13 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-24 20:13 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-24 20:49 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-24 20:49 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-24 21:09 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-24 21:09 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-11 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] drm/msm/dp: replace dp_connector with drm_bridge_connector Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-11 22:40 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-18 21:31 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-18 21:31 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-18 21:52 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-18 21:52 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-18 22:32 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-18 22:32 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-19 0:55 ` Stephen Boyd 2022-02-19 0:55 ` Stephen Boyd 2022-02-19 2:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-19 2:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-23 17:21 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-23 17:21 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-23 18:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-23 18:22 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-23 18:27 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-23 18:27 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-23 18:45 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-23 18:45 ` Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-23 21:33 ` Stephen Boyd 2022-02-23 21:33 ` Stephen Boyd 2022-02-24 0:40 ` Kuogee Hsieh 2022-02-24 0:40 ` Kuogee Hsieh [not found] ` <64a5ae1a-df65-b0a5-5d0d-cfb1d4da3bf7@quicinc.com> 2022-03-16 16:45 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC) 2022-03-16 16:45 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC) 2022-04-14 20:17 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-04-14 20:17 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-02-11 22:40 ` [RFC PATCH v2 5/5] drm/msm/dp: remove extra wrappers and public functions Dmitry Baryshkov 2022-02-11 22:40 ` Dmitry Baryshkov [not found] ` <26549f55-6195-a7ec-5896-de5f986ad716@quicinc.com> 2022-03-16 16:31 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC) 2022-03-16 16:31 ` Sankeerth Billakanti (QUIC) 2022-04-14 20:17 ` Abhinav Kumar 2022-04-14 20:17 ` Abhinav Kumar
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=a219b978-21a8-a2d6-62c0-69c451b10c09@quicinc.com \ --to=quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com \ --cc=airlied@linux.ie \ --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \ --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \ --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \ --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \ --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=quic_khsieh@quicinc.com \ --cc=robdclark@gmail.com \ --cc=sean@poorly.run \ --cc=swboyd@chromium.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.