All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] KVM: arm64: unify the tests for VMAs in memslots when MTE is enabled
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 15:47:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa621adb-d5ec-2c90-be1b-cf3d048afa0a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220810193033.1090251-6-pcc@google.com>

On 10/08/2022 20:30, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> Previously we allowed creating a memslot containing a private mapping that
> was not VM_MTE_ALLOWED, but would later reject KVM_RUN with -EFAULT. Now
> we reject the memory region at memslot creation time.
> 
> Since this is a minor tweak to the ABI (a VMM that created one of
> these memslots would fail later anyway), no VMM to my knowledge has
> MTE support yet, and the hardware with the necessary features is not
> generally available, we can probably make this ABI change at this point.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 750a69a97994..d54be80e31dd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1073,6 +1073,19 @@ static void sanitise_mte_tags(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static bool kvm_vma_mte_allowed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * VM_SHARED mappings are not allowed with MTE to avoid races
> +	 * when updating the PG_mte_tagged page flag, see
> +	 * sanitise_mte_tags for more details.
> +	 */
> +	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return vma->vm_flags & VM_MTE_ALLOWED;
> +}
> +
>  static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>  			  struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, unsigned long hva,
>  			  unsigned long fault_status)
> @@ -1249,9 +1262,8 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (fault_status != FSC_PERM && !device && kvm_has_mte(kvm)) {
> -		/* Check the VMM hasn't introduced a new VM_SHARED VMA */
> -		if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_MTE_ALLOWED) &&
> -		    !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
> +		/* Check the VMM hasn't introduced a new disallowed VMA */
> +		if (kvm_vma_mte_allowed(vma)) {
>  			sanitise_mte_tags(kvm, pfn, vma_pagesize);
>  		} else {
>  			ret = -EFAULT;
> @@ -1695,12 +1707,7 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		if (!vma)
>  			break;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * VM_SHARED mappings are not allowed with MTE to avoid races
> -		 * when updating the PG_mte_tagged page flag, see
> -		 * sanitise_mte_tags for more details.
> -		 */
> -		if (kvm_has_mte(kvm) && vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) {
> +		if (kvm_has_mte(kvm) && !kvm_vma_mte_allowed(vma)) {
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			break;
>  		}

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] KVM: arm64: unify the tests for VMAs in memslots when MTE is enabled
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 15:47:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa621adb-d5ec-2c90-be1b-cf3d048afa0a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220810193033.1090251-6-pcc@google.com>

On 10/08/2022 20:30, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> Previously we allowed creating a memslot containing a private mapping that
> was not VM_MTE_ALLOWED, but would later reject KVM_RUN with -EFAULT. Now
> we reject the memory region at memslot creation time.
> 
> Since this is a minor tweak to the ABI (a VMM that created one of
> these memslots would fail later anyway), no VMM to my knowledge has
> MTE support yet, and the hardware with the necessary features is not
> generally available, we can probably make this ABI change at this point.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 750a69a97994..d54be80e31dd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1073,6 +1073,19 @@ static void sanitise_mte_tags(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static bool kvm_vma_mte_allowed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * VM_SHARED mappings are not allowed with MTE to avoid races
> +	 * when updating the PG_mte_tagged page flag, see
> +	 * sanitise_mte_tags for more details.
> +	 */
> +	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return vma->vm_flags & VM_MTE_ALLOWED;
> +}
> +
>  static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>  			  struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, unsigned long hva,
>  			  unsigned long fault_status)
> @@ -1249,9 +1262,8 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (fault_status != FSC_PERM && !device && kvm_has_mte(kvm)) {
> -		/* Check the VMM hasn't introduced a new VM_SHARED VMA */
> -		if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_MTE_ALLOWED) &&
> -		    !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
> +		/* Check the VMM hasn't introduced a new disallowed VMA */
> +		if (kvm_vma_mte_allowed(vma)) {
>  			sanitise_mte_tags(kvm, pfn, vma_pagesize);
>  		} else {
>  			ret = -EFAULT;
> @@ -1695,12 +1707,7 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		if (!vma)
>  			break;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * VM_SHARED mappings are not allowed with MTE to avoid races
> -		 * when updating the PG_mte_tagged page flag, see
> -		 * sanitise_mte_tags for more details.
> -		 */
> -		if (kvm_has_mte(kvm) && vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) {
> +		if (kvm_has_mte(kvm) && !kvm_vma_mte_allowed(vma)) {
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			break;
>  		}


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
To: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@google.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/7] KVM: arm64: unify the tests for VMAs in memslots when MTE is enabled
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 15:47:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa621adb-d5ec-2c90-be1b-cf3d048afa0a@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220810193033.1090251-6-pcc@google.com>

On 10/08/2022 20:30, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
> Previously we allowed creating a memslot containing a private mapping that
> was not VM_MTE_ALLOWED, but would later reject KVM_RUN with -EFAULT. Now
> we reject the memory region at memslot creation time.
> 
> Since this is a minor tweak to the ABI (a VMM that created one of
> these memslots would fail later anyway), no VMM to my knowledge has
> MTE support yet, and the hardware with the necessary features is not
> generally available, we can probably make this ABI change at this point.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Collingbourne <pcc@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index 750a69a97994..d54be80e31dd 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -1073,6 +1073,19 @@ static void sanitise_mte_tags(struct kvm *kvm, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static bool kvm_vma_mte_allowed(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * VM_SHARED mappings are not allowed with MTE to avoid races
> +	 * when updating the PG_mte_tagged page flag, see
> +	 * sanitise_mte_tags for more details.
> +	 */
> +	if (vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	return vma->vm_flags & VM_MTE_ALLOWED;
> +}
> +
>  static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>  			  struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot, unsigned long hva,
>  			  unsigned long fault_status)
> @@ -1249,9 +1262,8 @@ static int user_mem_abort(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, phys_addr_t fault_ipa,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (fault_status != FSC_PERM && !device && kvm_has_mte(kvm)) {
> -		/* Check the VMM hasn't introduced a new VM_SHARED VMA */
> -		if ((vma->vm_flags & VM_MTE_ALLOWED) &&
> -		    !(vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED)) {
> +		/* Check the VMM hasn't introduced a new disallowed VMA */
> +		if (kvm_vma_mte_allowed(vma)) {
>  			sanitise_mte_tags(kvm, pfn, vma_pagesize);
>  		} else {
>  			ret = -EFAULT;
> @@ -1695,12 +1707,7 @@ int kvm_arch_prepare_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
>  		if (!vma)
>  			break;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * VM_SHARED mappings are not allowed with MTE to avoid races
> -		 * when updating the PG_mte_tagged page flag, see
> -		 * sanitise_mte_tags for more details.
> -		 */
> -		if (kvm_has_mte(kvm) && vma->vm_flags & VM_SHARED) {
> +		if (kvm_has_mte(kvm) && !kvm_vma_mte_allowed(vma)) {
>  			ret = -EINVAL;
>  			break;
>  		}


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-02 14:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 103+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-10 19:30 [PATCH v3 0/7] KVM: arm64: permit MAP_SHARED mappings with MTE enabled Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30 ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30 ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] arm64: mte: Fix/clarify the PG_mte_tagged semantics Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-01 15:49   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-01 15:49     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-01 15:49     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 10:26   ` Cornelia Huck
2022-09-02 10:26     ` Cornelia Huck
2022-09-02 10:26     ` Cornelia Huck
2022-09-02 14:47   ` Steven Price
2022-09-02 14:47     ` Steven Price
2022-09-02 14:47     ` Steven Price
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] KVM: arm64: Simplify the sanitise_mte_tags() logic Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-02 14:47   ` Steven Price
2022-09-02 14:47     ` Steven Price
2022-09-02 14:47     ` Steven Price
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mm: Add PG_arch_3 page flag Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-11  7:16   ` kernel test robot
2022-08-11  7:16     ` kernel test robot
2022-08-11  7:16     ` kernel test robot
2022-09-01 17:59     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-01 17:59       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-01 17:59       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-01 17:59       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-05 17:01       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-05 17:01         ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-05 17:01         ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-05 17:01         ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-19 18:12         ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-19 18:12           ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-19 18:12           ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-19 18:12           ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-20 15:39           ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-20 15:39             ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-20 15:39             ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-20 15:39             ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-20 16:33             ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-20 16:33               ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-20 16:33               ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-20 16:33               ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-20 16:58               ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-20 16:58                 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-20 16:58                 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-20 16:58                 ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-21  3:53                 ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-21  3:53                   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-21  3:53                   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-21  3:53                   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] arm64: mte: Lock a page for MTE tag initialisation Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-02 14:47   ` Steven Price
2022-09-02 14:47     ` Steven Price
2022-09-02 14:47     ` Steven Price
2022-09-02 16:28     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 16:28       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 16:28       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 16:58       ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 16:58         ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 16:58         ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-05  7:37         ` Steven Price
2022-09-05  7:37           ` Steven Price
2022-09-05  7:37           ` Steven Price
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] KVM: arm64: unify the tests for VMAs in memslots when MTE is enabled Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-02 13:41   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 13:41     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 13:41     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 14:47   ` Steven Price [this message]
2022-09-02 14:47     ` Steven Price
2022-09-02 14:47     ` Steven Price
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] KVM: arm64: permit all VM_MTE_ALLOWED mappings with MTE enabled Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-02 13:45   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 13:45     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 13:45     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 14:47     ` Steven Price
2022-09-02 14:47       ` Steven Price
2022-09-02 14:47       ` Steven Price
2022-09-12 16:23   ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-12 16:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-12 16:23     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-09-13  4:10     ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-13  4:10       ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-13  4:10       ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] Documentation: document the ABI changes for KVM_CAP_ARM_MTE Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-08-10 19:30   ` Peter Collingbourne
2022-09-02 13:49   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 13:49     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 13:49     ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 14:05 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] KVM: arm64: permit MAP_SHARED mappings with MTE enabled Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 14:05   ` Catalin Marinas
2022-09-02 14:05   ` Catalin Marinas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aa621adb-d5ec-2c90-be1b-cf3d048afa0a@arm.com \
    --to=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=eugenis@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=pcc@google.com \
    --cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.