From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] shmem: fix negative rss in memcg memory.stat Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:15:54 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1207111048410.1797@eggly.anvils> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120710124107.GE1779@cmpxchg.org> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > I couldn't see anything wrong with shmem_replace_page(), either, but > maybe the comment in its error path could be updated as the callsite > does not rely on page_private alone anymore to confirm correct swap. I went in to make an incremental fix to update that comment as you suggest, but found that actually the comment should stay as is. We're dealing with two different radix trees here: shmem_confirm_swap() and shmem_add_to_page_cache() are operating on the tmpfs file radix tree, but shmem_replace_page() is using shmem_radix_tree_replace() to operate on the "swapper_space" radix tree, exchanging the page pointer there. The preliminary page_private test (under page lock) should indeed be guaranteeing that the page pointer found in the swapper_space radix tree at that (swp_entry_t) offset is the one we expect there, as before. Whereas the new shmem_confirm_swap() test doesn't help to guarantee that part at all: it's for confirming that the swap entry is still being used for the offset in the file that we're interested in. The comment I would like to change is the "nice clean interface" one! While it does make for a nice old-page-in/new-page-out interface to that function, I've come to feel that it would be much better not to mess with the swapcache at all there - leave the old page in the swapcache, and remove it at the same time as inserting the new page into filecache. But I'm also reluctant to mess with what's working: I'm in no rush to change that around, I'd be sure to screw it up at first. > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Thanks, Hugh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] shmem: fix negative rss in memcg memory.stat Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2012 11:15:54 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview] Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.00.1207111048410.1797@eggly.anvils> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20120710124107.GE1779@cmpxchg.org> On Tue, 10 Jul 2012, Johannes Weiner wrote: > > I couldn't see anything wrong with shmem_replace_page(), either, but > maybe the comment in its error path could be updated as the callsite > does not rely on page_private alone anymore to confirm correct swap. I went in to make an incremental fix to update that comment as you suggest, but found that actually the comment should stay as is. We're dealing with two different radix trees here: shmem_confirm_swap() and shmem_add_to_page_cache() are operating on the tmpfs file radix tree, but shmem_replace_page() is using shmem_radix_tree_replace() to operate on the "swapper_space" radix tree, exchanging the page pointer there. The preliminary page_private test (under page lock) should indeed be guaranteeing that the page pointer found in the swapper_space radix tree at that (swp_entry_t) offset is the one we expect there, as before. Whereas the new shmem_confirm_swap() test doesn't help to guarantee that part at all: it's for confirming that the swap entry is still being used for the offset in the file that we're interested in. The comment I would like to change is the "nice clean interface" one! While it does make for a nice old-page-in/new-page-out interface to that function, I've come to feel that it would be much better not to mess with the swapcache at all there - leave the old page in the swapcache, and remove it at the same time as inserting the new page into filecache. But I'm also reluctant to mess with what's working: I'm in no rush to change that around, I'd be sure to screw it up at first. > Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Thanks, Hugh -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-11 18:16 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2012-07-09 22:35 [PATCH 0/3] shmem/tmpfs: three late patches Hugh Dickins 2012-07-09 22:35 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-07-09 22:41 ` [PATCH 1/3] tmpfs: revert SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE Hugh Dickins 2012-07-09 22:41 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-07-11 6:07 ` Cong Wang 2012-07-11 6:07 ` Cong Wang 2012-07-11 18:55 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-07-11 18:55 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-07-11 23:01 ` Dave Chinner 2012-07-11 23:01 ` Dave Chinner 2012-07-12 2:50 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-07-12 2:50 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-07-12 3:21 ` Jeff Liu 2012-07-12 3:21 ` Jeff Liu 2012-07-16 9:28 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-07-16 9:28 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-07-17 6:15 ` Jeff Liu 2012-07-17 6:15 ` Jeff Liu 2012-07-31 14:30 ` Jim Meyering 2012-07-31 14:42 ` Jim Meyering 2012-08-08 2:08 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-08-14 17:03 ` Paul Eggert 2012-07-09 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] shmem: fix negative rss in memcg memory.stat Hugh Dickins 2012-07-09 22:44 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-07-10 12:41 ` Johannes Weiner 2012-07-10 12:41 ` Johannes Weiner 2012-07-11 18:15 ` Hugh Dickins [this message] 2012-07-11 18:15 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-07-09 22:46 ` [PATCH 3/3] shmem: cleanup shmem_add_to_page_cache Hugh Dickins 2012-07-09 22:46 ` Hugh Dickins 2012-07-10 13:01 ` Johannes Weiner 2012-07-10 13:01 ` Johannes Weiner 2012-07-09 23:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] shmem/tmpfs: three late patches Andrew Morton 2012-07-09 23:39 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=alpine.LSU.2.00.1207111048410.1797@eggly.anvils \ --to=hughd@google.com \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \ --cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.