All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: Clean up disabled warnings
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:07:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8ff7ced-3e5e-603f-6e59-915c97a8f88d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdk2mLem4w05o5cdr0Mz62M2CWeW+5LFnKE5L+pMPqa7WA@mail.gmail.com>

On 8/25/2021 4:03 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 4:23 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> i915 enables a wider set of warnings with '-Wall -Wextra' then disables
>> several with cc-disable-warning. If an unknown flag gets added to
>> KBUILD_CFLAGS when building with clang, all subsequent calls to
>> cc-{disable-warning,option} will fail, meaning that all of these
>> warnings do not get disabled [1].
>>
>> A separate series will address the root cause of the issue by not adding
>> these flags when building with clang [2]; however, the symptom of these
>> extra warnings appearing can be addressed separately by just removing
>> the calls to cc-disable-warning, which makes the build ever so slightly
>> faster because the compiler does not need to be called as much before
>> building.
>>
>> The following warnings are supported by GCC 4.9 and clang 10.0.1, which
>> are the minimum supported versions of these compilers so the call to
>> cc-disable-warning is not necessary. Masahiro cleaned this up for the
>> reset of the kernel in commit 4c8dd95a723d ("kbuild: add some extra
>> warning flags unconditionally").
>>
>> * -Wmissing-field-initializers
>> * -Wsign-compare
>> * -Wtype-limits
>> * -Wunused-parameter
>>
>> -Wunused-but-set-variable was implemented in clang 13.0.0 and
>> -Wframe-address was implemented in clang 12.0.0 so the
>> cc-disable-warning calls are kept for these two warnings.
>>
>> Lastly, -Winitializer-overrides is clang's version of -Woverride-init,
>> which is disabled for the specific files that are problematic. clang
>> added a compatibility alias in clang 8.0.0 so -Winitializer-overrides
>> can be removed.
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202108210311.CBtcgoUL-lkp@intel.com/
>> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210824022640.2170859-1-nathan@kernel.org/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks for the patch! Do you need to re-ping, rebase, or resend that
> other series?
> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>

I assume you mean the series below rather than above? I sent this patch 
right after that series and it has one set of reviews so I am hoping the 
i915 maintainers will pick them up soon so this one can be applied 
afterwards or resent.

Thank you for the review!

Cheers,
Nathan

>> ---
>>
>> NOTE: This is based on my series to enable -Wsometimes-initialized here:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210824225427.2065517-1-nathan@kernel.org/
>>
>> I sent it separately as this can go into whatever release but I would
>> like for that series to go into 5.15.
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 10 ++++------
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
>> index 335ba9f43d8f..6b38547543b1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
>> @@ -13,13 +13,11 @@
>>   # will most likely get a sudden build breakage... Hopefully we will fix
>>   # new warnings before CI updates!
>>   subdir-ccflags-y := -Wall -Wextra
>> -subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-parameter)
>> -subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, type-limits)
>> -subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, missing-field-initializers)
>> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-unused-parameter
>> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-type-limits
>> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-missing-field-initializers
>> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-sign-compare
>>   subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-but-set-variable)
>> -# clang warnings
>> -subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, sign-compare)
>> -subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, initializer-overrides)
>>   subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, frame-address)
>>   subdir-ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_I915_WERROR) += -Werror
>>
>>
>> base-commit: fb43ebc83e069625cfeeb2490efc3ffa0013bfa4
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 31c28450ed7e8785dce967a16db6d52eff3d7d6d
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 372dfa0e07249f207acc1942ab0e39b13ff229b2
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 1a585fa6cda50c32ad1e3ac8235d3cff1b599978
>> --
>> 2.33.0
>>
> 
> 

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
	Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>,
	Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>,
	intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Clean up disabled warnings
Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 16:07:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8ff7ced-3e5e-603f-6e59-915c97a8f88d@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdk2mLem4w05o5cdr0Mz62M2CWeW+5LFnKE5L+pMPqa7WA@mail.gmail.com>

On 8/25/2021 4:03 PM, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 4:23 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>> i915 enables a wider set of warnings with '-Wall -Wextra' then disables
>> several with cc-disable-warning. If an unknown flag gets added to
>> KBUILD_CFLAGS when building with clang, all subsequent calls to
>> cc-{disable-warning,option} will fail, meaning that all of these
>> warnings do not get disabled [1].
>>
>> A separate series will address the root cause of the issue by not adding
>> these flags when building with clang [2]; however, the symptom of these
>> extra warnings appearing can be addressed separately by just removing
>> the calls to cc-disable-warning, which makes the build ever so slightly
>> faster because the compiler does not need to be called as much before
>> building.
>>
>> The following warnings are supported by GCC 4.9 and clang 10.0.1, which
>> are the minimum supported versions of these compilers so the call to
>> cc-disable-warning is not necessary. Masahiro cleaned this up for the
>> reset of the kernel in commit 4c8dd95a723d ("kbuild: add some extra
>> warning flags unconditionally").
>>
>> * -Wmissing-field-initializers
>> * -Wsign-compare
>> * -Wtype-limits
>> * -Wunused-parameter
>>
>> -Wunused-but-set-variable was implemented in clang 13.0.0 and
>> -Wframe-address was implemented in clang 12.0.0 so the
>> cc-disable-warning calls are kept for these two warnings.
>>
>> Lastly, -Winitializer-overrides is clang's version of -Woverride-init,
>> which is disabled for the specific files that are problematic. clang
>> added a compatibility alias in clang 8.0.0 so -Winitializer-overrides
>> can be removed.
>>
>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/202108210311.CBtcgoUL-lkp@intel.com/
>> [2]: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210824022640.2170859-1-nathan@kernel.org/
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
> 
> Thanks for the patch! Do you need to re-ping, rebase, or resend that
> other series?
> Reviewed-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>

I assume you mean the series below rather than above? I sent this patch 
right after that series and it has one set of reviews so I am hoping the 
i915 maintainers will pick them up soon so this one can be applied 
afterwards or resent.

Thank you for the review!

Cheers,
Nathan

>> ---
>>
>> NOTE: This is based on my series to enable -Wsometimes-initialized here:
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210824225427.2065517-1-nathan@kernel.org/
>>
>> I sent it separately as this can go into whatever release but I would
>> like for that series to go into 5.15.
>>
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 10 ++++------
>>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
>> index 335ba9f43d8f..6b38547543b1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
>> @@ -13,13 +13,11 @@
>>   # will most likely get a sudden build breakage... Hopefully we will fix
>>   # new warnings before CI updates!
>>   subdir-ccflags-y := -Wall -Wextra
>> -subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-parameter)
>> -subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, type-limits)
>> -subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, missing-field-initializers)
>> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-unused-parameter
>> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-type-limits
>> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-missing-field-initializers
>> +subdir-ccflags-y += -Wno-sign-compare
>>   subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, unused-but-set-variable)
>> -# clang warnings
>> -subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, sign-compare)
>> -subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, initializer-overrides)
>>   subdir-ccflags-y += $(call cc-disable-warning, frame-address)
>>   subdir-ccflags-$(CONFIG_DRM_I915_WERROR) += -Werror
>>
>>
>> base-commit: fb43ebc83e069625cfeeb2490efc3ffa0013bfa4
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 31c28450ed7e8785dce967a16db6d52eff3d7d6d
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 372dfa0e07249f207acc1942ab0e39b13ff229b2
>> prerequisite-patch-id: 1a585fa6cda50c32ad1e3ac8235d3cff1b599978
>> --
>> 2.33.0
>>
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-08-25 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-08-24 23:22 [PATCH] drm/i915: Clean up disabled warnings Nathan Chancellor
2021-08-24 23:22 ` [Intel-gfx] " Nathan Chancellor
2021-08-25 13:12 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.BUILD: failure for " Patchwork
2021-08-25 23:03 ` [PATCH] " Nick Desaulniers
2021-08-25 23:03   ` [Intel-gfx] " Nick Desaulniers
2021-08-25 23:03   ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-08-25 23:07   ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2021-08-25 23:07     ` [Intel-gfx] " Nathan Chancellor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b8ff7ced-3e5e-603f-6e59-915c97a8f88d@kernel.org \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=rodrigo.vivi@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.