From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
nsaenz@kernel.org, jim2101024@gmail.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
robh@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: brcmstb: Declare a bitmap as a bitmap, not as a plain 'unsigned long'
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:44:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3dafb74-8cb4-5336-b8af-8ea04570973f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6d9da2112aab2939d1507b90962d07bfd735b4c.1636273671.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
On 11/7/21 1:32 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The 'used' field of 'struct brcm_msi' is used as a bitmap. So it should
> be declared as so (i.e. unsigned long *).
>
> This fixes an harmless Coverity warning about array vs singleton usage.
>
> This bitmap can be BRCM_INT_PCI_MSI_LEGACY_NR or BRCM_INT_PCI_MSI_NR long.
> So, while at it, document it, should it help someone in the future.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: "Out-of-bounds access (ARRAY_VS_SINGLETON)"
> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Wilczynski <kw@linux.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
nsaenz@kernel.org, jim2101024@gmail.com,
bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
robh@kernel.org, kw@linux.com, bhelgaas@google.com
Cc: linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: brcmstb: Declare a bitmap as a bitmap, not as a plain 'unsigned long'
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 15:44:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3dafb74-8cb4-5336-b8af-8ea04570973f@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e6d9da2112aab2939d1507b90962d07bfd735b4c.1636273671.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
On 11/7/21 1:32 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The 'used' field of 'struct brcm_msi' is used as a bitmap. So it should
> be declared as so (i.e. unsigned long *).
>
> This fixes an harmless Coverity warning about array vs singleton usage.
>
> This bitmap can be BRCM_INT_PCI_MSI_LEGACY_NR or BRCM_INT_PCI_MSI_NR long.
> So, while at it, document it, should it help someone in the future.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: "Out-of-bounds access (ARRAY_VS_SINGLETON)"
> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Wilczynski <kw@linux.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-08 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-07 8:32 [PATCH] PCI: brcmstb: Declare a bitmap as a bitmap, not as a plain 'unsigned long' Christophe JAILLET
2021-11-07 8:32 ` Christophe JAILLET
2021-11-08 1:34 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-11-08 1:34 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-11-08 16:28 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-11-08 16:28 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-11-08 19:51 ` Christophe JAILLET
2021-11-08 19:51 ` Christophe JAILLET
2021-11-08 23:30 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-11-08 23:30 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-11-08 23:45 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-11-08 23:45 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-11-08 23:55 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-11-08 23:55 ` Krzysztof Wilczyński
2021-11-08 23:44 ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2021-11-08 23:44 ` Florian Fainelli
2021-11-29 13:11 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-11-29 13:11 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-11-30 17:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-11-30 17:04 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2021-12-03 11:02 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-12-03 11:02 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c3dafb74-8cb4-5336-b8af-8ea04570973f@gmail.com \
--to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=jim2101024@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=nsaenz@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.