From: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>, Ondrej Jirman <megous@megous.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: add PineTab new panel DT binding Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:18:41 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <d0afbf23472f0e62517433eb273576937df65427.camel@aosc.io> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201216130012.jah7ubzbjx5g632n@gilmour> 在 2020-12-16星期三的 14:00 +0100,Maxime Ripard写道: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 06:59:33AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > 于 2020年12月14日 GMT+08:00 下午6:37:04, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech > > > 写到: > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 04:42:32PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > > Early adopters' PineTabs (and all further releases) will have a > > > > new > > > LCD > > > > panel different with the one that is used when in development > > > (because > > > > the old panel's supply discontinued). > > > > > > > > Add a new DT compatible for it. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 5 +++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > > > > index 6db32fbf813f..73a6c8421172 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > > > > @@ -700,6 +700,11 @@ properties: > > > > - const: pine64,pinetab > > > > - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64 > > > > > > > > + - description: Pine64 PineTab with new LCD panel > > > > + items: > > > > + - const: pine64,pinetab-new-panel > > > > + - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64 > > > > + > > > > > > We're on the right track, but new panel seems a bit too vague. > > > What is > > > going to happen when they will change the panel again? > > > > > > pinetab-early-adopter seems more robust there > > > > This name will only match a batch. > > Look, I know the situation sucks. Can we actually move forward? Descriptive name will match more things. I think we should still have something descriptive, even if "new panel" is too generic. > > Maxime
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> To: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech> Cc: Ondrej Jirman <megous@megous.com>, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@siol.net>, linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [linux-sunxi] Re: [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: add PineTab new panel DT binding Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2020 21:18:41 +0800 [thread overview] Message-ID: <d0afbf23472f0e62517433eb273576937df65427.camel@aosc.io> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20201216130012.jah7ubzbjx5g632n@gilmour> 在 2020-12-16星期三的 14:00 +0100,Maxime Ripard写道: > On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 06:59:33AM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > 于 2020年12月14日 GMT+08:00 下午6:37:04, Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech > > > 写到: > > > On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 04:42:32PM +0800, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > > > > Early adopters' PineTabs (and all further releases) will have a > > > > new > > > LCD > > > > panel different with the one that is used when in development > > > (because > > > > the old panel's supply discontinued). > > > > > > > > Add a new DT compatible for it. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.io> > > > > --- > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml | 5 +++++ > > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > > > > index 6db32fbf813f..73a6c8421172 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunxi.yaml > > > > @@ -700,6 +700,11 @@ properties: > > > > - const: pine64,pinetab > > > > - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64 > > > > > > > > + - description: Pine64 PineTab with new LCD panel > > > > + items: > > > > + - const: pine64,pinetab-new-panel > > > > + - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64 > > > > + > > > > > > We're on the right track, but new panel seems a bit too vague. > > > What is > > > going to happen when they will change the panel again? > > > > > > pinetab-early-adopter seems more robust there > > > > This name will only match a batch. > > Look, I know the situation sucks. Can we actually move forward? Descriptive name will match more things. I think we should still have something descriptive, even if "new panel" is too generic. > > Maxime _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-16 13:20 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2020-12-10 8:37 [PATCH 0/3] PineTab with new panel DT Icenowy Zheng 2020-12-10 8:37 ` Icenowy Zheng 2020-12-10 8:42 ` [PATCH 1/3] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: add PineTab new panel DT binding Icenowy Zheng 2020-12-10 8:42 ` Icenowy Zheng 2020-12-11 3:39 ` Rob Herring 2020-12-11 3:39 ` Rob Herring 2020-12-14 10:37 ` Maxime Ripard 2020-12-14 10:37 ` Maxime Ripard 2020-12-14 22:59 ` [linux-sunxi] " Icenowy Zheng 2020-12-14 22:59 ` Icenowy Zheng 2020-12-16 13:00 ` Maxime Ripard 2020-12-16 13:00 ` Maxime Ripard 2020-12-16 13:18 ` Icenowy Zheng [this message] 2020-12-16 13:18 ` Icenowy Zheng 2020-12-10 8:44 ` [PATCH 2/3] arm64: allwinner: dts: a64: add DT for PineTab with new LCD panel Icenowy Zheng 2020-12-10 8:44 ` Icenowy Zheng 2020-12-10 8:45 ` [PATCH 3/3] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: note that old PineTab compatible has old panel Icenowy Zheng 2020-12-10 8:45 ` Icenowy Zheng 2020-12-11 3:39 ` Rob Herring 2020-12-11 3:39 ` Rob Herring 2020-12-14 10:39 ` Maxime Ripard 2020-12-14 10:39 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=d0afbf23472f0e62517433eb273576937df65427.camel@aosc.io \ --to=icenowy@aosc.io \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=jernej.skrabec@siol.net \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com \ --cc=maxime@cerno.tech \ --cc=megous@megous.com \ --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=wens@csie.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.