Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] More PolarFire SoC Fixes for 5.18

[Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>]

On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 14:10:55 PDT (-0700), mail@conchuod.ie wrote:
>
>
> On 22/04/2022 22:00, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> Quoting Conor Dooley (2022-04-22 12:59:09)
>>> On 22/04/2022 20:39, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.  These generally look good to me, but I don't see acks from everyone.  I'm perfectly fine treating these as fixes and taking them through the RISC-V tree, but looks like it's mostly clk stuff so
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
>>>
>>> Ye, hopefully they go via clk. Stephen replied to v1 or 2 so
>>> I figure they're in his queue :)
>>
>> It helps to be explicit in the cover letter. It's in my queue but I put
>> it on hold because the cover letter didn't clarify what tree it was
>> intended for nor the priority of what is being fixed.
>
> Ah right, my bad. The coordinating things between trees stuff is
> still pretty new to me. If you could take the lot via clk, that'd
> be great?

No problem, the multi-tree stuff is always tricky.  It ended up in my 
queue too, but I fast-forward to the latest version of each set as I 
stumble into earlier ones so I guess I got here quickly.

Having these go through clk is better for me, I'll ignore them.

Thanks!

>> Is boot broken? Do I need to send these up to Linus next week as part of
>> fixes for this merge window?
>
> Boot is not broken, I was hoping this would go into 5.18 to avoid
> having to deal with two different sorts of reference clock DT
> entries - 5.18 where the DT provides the mss pll & 5.18+n where
> the DT provides the input to the mss pll.
>
> So, not next week urgent, but as fixes for this window please.
>
> Thanks,
> Conor.

_______________________________________________
linux-riscv mailing list
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv