amd-gfx.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
To: "Zhu, Changfeng" <Changfeng.Zhu-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org"
	<amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org>,
	"Xiao, Jack" <Jack.Xiao-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	"Zhou1, Tao" <Tao.Zhou1-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	"Koenig,
	Christian" <Christian.Koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>,
	"Huang, Shimmer" <Xinmei.Huang-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: invalidate mmhub semphore workaround in gmc9/gmc10
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:16:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR12MB3309945017F3C27E347ACE6BEC490@MN2PR12MB3309.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191121154715.19874-1-changfeng.zhu-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>

[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:47:15PM +0800, Zhu, Changfeng wrote:
> From: changzhu <Changfeng.Zhu@amd.com>
> 
> It may lose gpuvm invalidate acknowldege state across power-gating off
> cycle. To avoid this issue in gmc9/gmc10 invalidation, add semaphore acquire
> before invalidation and semaphore release after invalidation.
> 
> After adding semaphore acquire before invalidation, the semaphore
> register become read-only if another process try to acquire semaphore.
> Then it will not be able to release this semaphore. Then it may cause
> deadlock problem. If this deadlock problem happens, it needs a semaphore
> firmware fix.
> 
> Change-Id: I9942a2f451265c1f1038ccfe2f70042c7c8118af

Please remove the chang-id, we don't do gerrit review.

> Signed-off-by: changzhu <Changfeng.Zhu@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c  | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.h     |  4 +-
>  3 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
> index af2615ba52aa..e0104b985c42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,27 @@ static void gmc_v10_0_flush_vm_hub(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
>  	const unsigned eng = 17;
>  	unsigned int i;
>  
> +	spin_lock(&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock);
> +	/*
> +	 * It may lose gpuvm invalidate acknowldege state across power-gating
> +	 * off cycle, add semaphore acquire before invalidation and semaphore
> +	 * release after invalidation to avoid entering power gated state
> +	 * to WA the Issue
> +	 */

Please add the TODO here, and mention you will continue working on
debugging with semaphore for GFXHUB as well. And remove the checking once
you addressed the issue with CP designer.

And the comments should be added before all checking here for "MMHUB".

With that fixed, the patch is Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>

> +	if (vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < adev->usec_timeout; i++) {
> +			/* a read return value of 1 means semaphore acuqire */
> +			tmp = RREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng);
> +			if (tmp & 0x1)
> +				break;
> +			udelay(1);
> +		}
> +
> +		if (i >= adev->usec_timeout)
> +			DRM_ERROR("Timeout waiting for sem acquire in VM flush!\n");
> +	}
> +
>  	WREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_req + eng, tmp);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -253,6 +274,16 @@ static void gmc_v10_0_flush_vm_hub(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
>  		udelay(1);
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * add semaphore release after invalidation,
> +	 * write with 0 means semaphore release
> +	 */
> +	if (vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> +		WREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng, 0);
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock);
> +
>  	if (i < adev->usec_timeout)
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -338,6 +369,19 @@ static uint64_t gmc_v10_0_emit_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>  	uint32_t req = gmc_v10_0_get_invalidate_req(vmid, 0);
>  	unsigned eng = ring->vm_inv_eng;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * It may lose gpuvm invalidate acknowldege state across power-gating
> +	 * off cycle, add semaphore acquire before invalidation and semaphore
> +	 * release after invalidation to avoid entering power gated state
> +	 * to WA the Issue
> +	 */
> +
> +	/* a read return value of 1 means semaphore acuqire */
> +	if (ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> +		amdgpu_ring_emit_reg_wait(ring,
> +					  hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng, 0x1, 0x1);
> +
>  	amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, hub->ctx0_ptb_addr_lo32 + (2 * vmid),
>  			      lower_32_bits(pd_addr));
>  
> @@ -348,6 +392,14 @@ static uint64_t gmc_v10_0_emit_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>  					    hub->vm_inv_eng0_ack + eng,
>  					    req, 1 << vmid);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * add semaphore release after invalidation,
> +	 * write with 0 means semaphore release
> +	 */
> +	if (ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> +		amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng, 0);
> +
>  	return pd_addr;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> index b7f2b184e9b8..816fdd602c85 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> @@ -455,6 +455,27 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
>  	}
>  
>  	spin_lock(&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * It may lose gpuvm invalidate acknowldege state across power-gating
> +	 * off cycle, add semaphore acquire before invalidation and semaphore
> +	 * release after invalidation to avoid entering power gated state
> +	 * to WA the Issue
> +	 */
> +	if (vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1) {
> +		for (j = 0; j < adev->usec_timeout; j++) {
> +			/* a read return value of 1 means semaphore acuqire */
> +			tmp = RREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng);
> +			if (tmp & 0x1)
> +				break;
> +			udelay(1);
> +		}
> +
> +		if (j >= adev->usec_timeout)
> +			DRM_ERROR("Timeout waiting for sem acquire in VM flush!\n");
> +	}
> +
>  	WREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_req + eng, tmp);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -470,7 +491,17 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
>  			break;
>  		udelay(1);
>  	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * add semaphore release after invalidation,
> +	 * write with 0 means semaphore release
> +	 */
> +	if (vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> +		WREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng, 0);
> +
>  	spin_unlock(&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock);
> +
>  	if (j < adev->usec_timeout)
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -485,6 +516,19 @@ static uint64_t gmc_v9_0_emit_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>  	uint32_t req = gmc_v9_0_get_invalidate_req(vmid, 0);
>  	unsigned eng = ring->vm_inv_eng;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * It may lose gpuvm invalidate acknowldege state across power-gating
> +	 * off cycle, add semaphore acquire before invalidation and semaphore
> +	 * release after invalidation to avoid entering power gated state
> +	 * to WA the Issue
> +	 */
> +
> +	/* a read return value of 1 means semaphore acuqire */
> +	if (ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> +		amdgpu_ring_emit_reg_wait(ring,
> +					  hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng, 0x1, 0x1);
> +
>  	amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, hub->ctx0_ptb_addr_lo32 + (2 * vmid),
>  			      lower_32_bits(pd_addr));
>  
> @@ -495,6 +539,14 @@ static uint64_t gmc_v9_0_emit_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>  					    hub->vm_inv_eng0_ack + eng,
>  					    req, 1 << vmid);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * add semaphore release after invalidation,
> +	 * write with 0 means semaphore release
> +	 */
> +	if (ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> +		amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng, 0);
> +
>  	return pd_addr;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.h
> index 344280b869c4..d0fb7a67c1a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.h
> @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@
>  #include "nbio_v7_0.h"
>  #include "nbio_v7_4.h"
>  
> -#define SOC15_FLUSH_GPU_TLB_NUM_WREG		4
> -#define SOC15_FLUSH_GPU_TLB_NUM_REG_WAIT	1
> +#define SOC15_FLUSH_GPU_TLB_NUM_WREG		6
> +#define SOC15_FLUSH_GPU_TLB_NUM_REG_WAIT	3
>  
>  extern const struct amd_ip_funcs soc15_common_ip_funcs;
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: "Huang, Ray" <Ray.Huang@amd.com>
To: "Zhu, Changfeng" <Changfeng.Zhu@amd.com>
Cc: "amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org" <amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Xiao, Jack" <Jack.Xiao@amd.com>,
	"Zhou1, Tao" <Tao.Zhou1@amd.com>,
	"Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@amd.com>,
	"Huang, Shimmer" <Xinmei.Huang@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: invalidate mmhub semphore workaround in gmc9/gmc10
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 09:16:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <MN2PR12MB3309945017F3C27E347ACE6BEC490@MN2PR12MB3309.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20191122091611.FsOmWY2dTTI1OkReIj0tuhnBAO-Mp_bCzNk3bkFA-mE@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191121154715.19874-1-changfeng.zhu@amd.com>

[AMD Official Use Only - Internal Distribution Only]

On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 11:47:15PM +0800, Zhu, Changfeng wrote:
> From: changzhu <Changfeng.Zhu@amd.com>
> 
> It may lose gpuvm invalidate acknowldege state across power-gating off
> cycle. To avoid this issue in gmc9/gmc10 invalidation, add semaphore acquire
> before invalidation and semaphore release after invalidation.
> 
> After adding semaphore acquire before invalidation, the semaphore
> register become read-only if another process try to acquire semaphore.
> Then it will not be able to release this semaphore. Then it may cause
> deadlock problem. If this deadlock problem happens, it needs a semaphore
> firmware fix.
> 
> Change-Id: I9942a2f451265c1f1038ccfe2f70042c7c8118af

Please remove the chang-id, we don't do gerrit review.

> Signed-off-by: changzhu <Changfeng.Zhu@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c  | 52 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.h     |  4 +-
>  3 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
> index af2615ba52aa..e0104b985c42 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v10_0.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,27 @@ static void gmc_v10_0_flush_vm_hub(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
>  	const unsigned eng = 17;
>  	unsigned int i;
>  
> +	spin_lock(&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock);
> +	/*
> +	 * It may lose gpuvm invalidate acknowldege state across power-gating
> +	 * off cycle, add semaphore acquire before invalidation and semaphore
> +	 * release after invalidation to avoid entering power gated state
> +	 * to WA the Issue
> +	 */

Please add the TODO here, and mention you will continue working on
debugging with semaphore for GFXHUB as well. And remove the checking once
you addressed the issue with CP designer.

And the comments should be added before all checking here for "MMHUB".

With that fixed, the patch is Acked-by: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>

> +	if (vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1) {
> +		for (i = 0; i < adev->usec_timeout; i++) {
> +			/* a read return value of 1 means semaphore acuqire */
> +			tmp = RREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng);
> +			if (tmp & 0x1)
> +				break;
> +			udelay(1);
> +		}
> +
> +		if (i >= adev->usec_timeout)
> +			DRM_ERROR("Timeout waiting for sem acquire in VM flush!\n");
> +	}
> +
>  	WREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_req + eng, tmp);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -253,6 +274,16 @@ static void gmc_v10_0_flush_vm_hub(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
>  		udelay(1);
>  	}
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * add semaphore release after invalidation,
> +	 * write with 0 means semaphore release
> +	 */
> +	if (vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> +		WREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng, 0);
> +
> +	spin_unlock(&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock);
> +
>  	if (i < adev->usec_timeout)
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -338,6 +369,19 @@ static uint64_t gmc_v10_0_emit_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>  	uint32_t req = gmc_v10_0_get_invalidate_req(vmid, 0);
>  	unsigned eng = ring->vm_inv_eng;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * It may lose gpuvm invalidate acknowldege state across power-gating
> +	 * off cycle, add semaphore acquire before invalidation and semaphore
> +	 * release after invalidation to avoid entering power gated state
> +	 * to WA the Issue
> +	 */
> +
> +	/* a read return value of 1 means semaphore acuqire */
> +	if (ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> +		amdgpu_ring_emit_reg_wait(ring,
> +					  hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng, 0x1, 0x1);
> +
>  	amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, hub->ctx0_ptb_addr_lo32 + (2 * vmid),
>  			      lower_32_bits(pd_addr));
>  
> @@ -348,6 +392,14 @@ static uint64_t gmc_v10_0_emit_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>  					    hub->vm_inv_eng0_ack + eng,
>  					    req, 1 << vmid);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * add semaphore release after invalidation,
> +	 * write with 0 means semaphore release
> +	 */
> +	if (ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> +		amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng, 0);
> +
>  	return pd_addr;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> index b7f2b184e9b8..816fdd602c85 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/gmc_v9_0.c
> @@ -455,6 +455,27 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
>  	}
>  
>  	spin_lock(&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * It may lose gpuvm invalidate acknowldege state across power-gating
> +	 * off cycle, add semaphore acquire before invalidation and semaphore
> +	 * release after invalidation to avoid entering power gated state
> +	 * to WA the Issue
> +	 */
> +	if (vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1) {
> +		for (j = 0; j < adev->usec_timeout; j++) {
> +			/* a read return value of 1 means semaphore acuqire */
> +			tmp = RREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng);
> +			if (tmp & 0x1)
> +				break;
> +			udelay(1);
> +		}
> +
> +		if (j >= adev->usec_timeout)
> +			DRM_ERROR("Timeout waiting for sem acquire in VM flush!\n");
> +	}
> +
>  	WREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_req + eng, tmp);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -470,7 +491,17 @@ static void gmc_v9_0_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_device *adev, uint32_t vmid,
>  			break;
>  		udelay(1);
>  	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * add semaphore release after invalidation,
> +	 * write with 0 means semaphore release
> +	 */
> +	if (vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> +		WREG32_NO_KIQ(hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng, 0);
> +
>  	spin_unlock(&adev->gmc.invalidate_lock);
> +
>  	if (j < adev->usec_timeout)
>  		return;
>  
> @@ -485,6 +516,19 @@ static uint64_t gmc_v9_0_emit_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>  	uint32_t req = gmc_v9_0_get_invalidate_req(vmid, 0);
>  	unsigned eng = ring->vm_inv_eng;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * It may lose gpuvm invalidate acknowldege state across power-gating
> +	 * off cycle, add semaphore acquire before invalidation and semaphore
> +	 * release after invalidation to avoid entering power gated state
> +	 * to WA the Issue
> +	 */
> +
> +	/* a read return value of 1 means semaphore acuqire */
> +	if (ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> +		amdgpu_ring_emit_reg_wait(ring,
> +					  hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng, 0x1, 0x1);
> +
>  	amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, hub->ctx0_ptb_addr_lo32 + (2 * vmid),
>  			      lower_32_bits(pd_addr));
>  
> @@ -495,6 +539,14 @@ static uint64_t gmc_v9_0_emit_flush_gpu_tlb(struct amdgpu_ring *ring,
>  					    hub->vm_inv_eng0_ack + eng,
>  					    req, 1 << vmid);
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * add semaphore release after invalidation,
> +	 * write with 0 means semaphore release
> +	 */
> +	if (ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_0 ||
> +	    ring->funcs->vmhub == AMDGPU_MMHUB_1)
> +		amdgpu_ring_emit_wreg(ring, hub->vm_inv_eng0_sem + eng, 0);
> +
>  	return pd_addr;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.h
> index 344280b869c4..d0fb7a67c1a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/soc15.h
> @@ -28,8 +28,8 @@
>  #include "nbio_v7_0.h"
>  #include "nbio_v7_4.h"
>  
> -#define SOC15_FLUSH_GPU_TLB_NUM_WREG		4
> -#define SOC15_FLUSH_GPU_TLB_NUM_REG_WAIT	1
> +#define SOC15_FLUSH_GPU_TLB_NUM_WREG		6
> +#define SOC15_FLUSH_GPU_TLB_NUM_REG_WAIT	3
>  
>  extern const struct amd_ip_funcs soc15_common_ip_funcs;
>  
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 
_______________________________________________
amd-gfx mailing list
amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-22  9:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-21 15:47 [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: invalidate mmhub semphore workaround in gmc9/gmc10 Changfeng.Zhu
2019-11-21 15:47 ` Changfeng.Zhu
     [not found] ` <20191121154715.19874-1-changfeng.zhu-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org>
2019-11-22  9:16   ` Huang, Ray [this message]
2019-11-22  9:16     ` Huang, Ray
     [not found]     ` <MN2PR12MB3309945017F3C27E347ACE6BEC490-rweVpJHSKTpWdvXm18W95QdYzm3356FpvxpqHgZTriW3zl9H0oFU5g@public.gmane.org>
2019-11-22 10:12       ` Zhu, Changfeng
2019-11-22 10:12         ` Zhu, Changfeng
2020-01-18  0:28 ` Felix Kuehling

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=MN2PR12MB3309945017F3C27E347ACE6BEC490@MN2PR12MB3309.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=ray.huang-5c7gfcevmho@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Changfeng.Zhu-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Christian.Koenig-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Jack.Xiao-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Tao.Zhou1-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=Xinmei.Huang-5C7GfCeVMHo@public.gmane.org \
    --cc=amd-gfx-PD4FTy7X32lNgt0PjOBp9y5qC8QIuHrW@public.gmane.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).