From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
Cc: magnus.karlsson@intel.com, bjorn@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, ciara.loftus@intel.com,
jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 00/13] xsk: i40e: ice: introduce batching for Rx buffer allocation
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 22:30:10 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <163278181036.23478.12354330232651957432.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210922075613.12186-1-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
Hello:
This series was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:56:00 +0200 you wrote:
> This patch set introduces a batched interface for Rx buffer allocation
> in AF_XDP buffer pool. Instead of using xsk_buff_alloc(*pool), drivers
> can now use xsk_buff_alloc_batch(*pool, **xdp_buff_array,
> max). Instead of returning a pointer to an xdp_buff, it returns the
> number of xdp_buffs it managed to allocate up to the maximum value of
> the max parameter in the function call. Pointers to the allocated
> xdp_buff:s are put in the xdp_buff_array supplied in the call. This
> could be a SW ring that already exists in the driver or a new
> structure that the driver has allocated.
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- [bpf-next,01/13] xsk: get rid of unused entry in struct xdp_buff_xsk
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/10a5e009b93a
- [bpf-next,02/13] xsk: batched buffer allocation for the pool
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/47e4075df300
- [bpf-next,03/13] ice: use xdp_buf instead of rx_buf for xsk zero-copy
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/57f7f8b6bc0b
- [bpf-next,04/13] ice: use the xsk batched rx allocation interface
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/db804cfc21e9
- [bpf-next,05/13] i40e: use the xsk batched rx allocation interface
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/6aab0bb0c5cd
- [bpf-next,06/13] xsk: optimize for aligned case
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/94033cd8e73b
- [bpf-next,07/13] selftests: xsk: fix missing initialization
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/5b132056123d
- [bpf-next,08/13] selftests: xsk: put the same buffer only once in the fill ring
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/872a1184dbf2
- [bpf-next,09/13] selftests: xsk: fix socket creation retry
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/89013b8a2928
- [bpf-next,10/13] selftests: xsk: introduce pacing of traffic
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/1bf3649688c1
- [bpf-next,11/13] selftests: xsk: add single packet test
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/96a40678ce53
- [bpf-next,12/13] selftests: xsk: change interleaving of packets in unaligned mode
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e4e9baf06a6e
- [bpf-next,13/13] selftests: xsk: add frame_headroom test
https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/e34087fc00f4
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-27 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-22 7:56 [PATCH bpf-next 00/13] xsk: i40e: ice: introduce batching for Rx buffer allocation Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22 7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/13] xsk: get rid of unused entry in struct xdp_buff_xsk Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22 7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/13] xsk: batched buffer allocation for the pool Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22 7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/13] ice: use xdp_buf instead of rx_buf for xsk zero-copy Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22 7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/13] ice: use the xsk batched rx allocation interface Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22 7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/13] i40e: " Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22 7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/13] xsk: optimize for aligned case Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-28 23:15 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-09-29 5:52 ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-29 15:33 ` kernel test robot
2021-09-22 7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/13] selftests: xsk: fix missing initialization Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22 7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/13] selftests: xsk: put the same buffer only once in the fill ring Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22 7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/13] selftests: xsk: fix socket creation retry Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22 7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/13] selftests: xsk: introduce pacing of traffic Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22 7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/13] selftests: xsk: add single packet test Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22 7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/13] selftests: xsk: change interleaving of packets in unaligned mode Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22 7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/13] selftests: xsk: add frame_headroom test Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-27 22:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=163278181036.23478.12354330232651957432.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
--to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
--cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
--cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).