bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>
To: magnus.karlsson@intel.com, bjorn@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
	daniel@iogearbox.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com, ciara.loftus@intel.com
Cc: jonathan.lemon@gmail.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 07/13] selftests: xsk: fix missing initialization
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 09:56:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210922075613.12186-8-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210922075613.12186-1-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com>

From: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>

Fix missing initialization of the member rx_pkt_nb in the packet
stream. This leads to some tests declaring success too early as the
test thought all packets had already been received.

Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c | 7 +++++++
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
index 127bcde06c86..97591e2a69f7 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/xdpxceiver.c
@@ -445,6 +445,12 @@ static void test_spec_set_name(struct test_spec *test, const char *name)
 	strncpy(test->name, name, MAX_TEST_NAME_SIZE);
 }
 
+static void pkt_stream_reset(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream)
+{
+	if (pkt_stream)
+		pkt_stream->rx_pkt_nb = 0;
+}
+
 static struct pkt *pkt_stream_get_pkt(struct pkt_stream *pkt_stream, u32 pkt_nb)
 {
 	if (pkt_nb >= pkt_stream->nb_pkts)
@@ -1032,6 +1038,7 @@ static void testapp_validate_traffic(struct test_spec *test)
 		exit_with_error(errno);
 
 	test->current_step++;
+	pkt_stream_reset(ifobj_rx->pkt_stream);
 
 	/*Spawn RX thread */
 	pthread_create(&t0, NULL, ifobj_rx->func_ptr, test);
-- 
2.29.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-09-22  7:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-22  7:56 [PATCH bpf-next 00/13] xsk: i40e: ice: introduce batching for Rx buffer allocation Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22  7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/13] xsk: get rid of unused entry in struct xdp_buff_xsk Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22  7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/13] xsk: batched buffer allocation for the pool Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22  7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/13] ice: use xdp_buf instead of rx_buf for xsk zero-copy Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22  7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/13] ice: use the xsk batched rx allocation interface Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22  7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/13] i40e: " Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22  7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/13] xsk: optimize for aligned case Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-28 23:15   ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-09-29  5:52     ` Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-29 15:33   ` kernel test robot
2021-09-22  7:56 ` Magnus Karlsson [this message]
2021-09-22  7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/13] selftests: xsk: put the same buffer only once in the fill ring Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22  7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/13] selftests: xsk: fix socket creation retry Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22  7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/13] selftests: xsk: introduce pacing of traffic Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22  7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/13] selftests: xsk: add single packet test Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22  7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/13] selftests: xsk: change interleaving of packets in unaligned mode Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-22  7:56 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/13] selftests: xsk: add frame_headroom test Magnus Karlsson
2021-09-27 22:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/13] xsk: i40e: ice: introduce batching for Rx buffer allocation patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210922075613.12186-8-magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
    --to=magnus.karlsson@gmail.com \
    --cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bjorn@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).