bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	luto@amacapital.net, davem@davemloft.net, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@fb.com, linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/3] bpf: implement CAP_BPF
Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 10:30:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190829173034.up5g74onaekp53zd@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ed8796f5-eaea-c87d-ddd9-9d624059e5ee@iogearbox.net>

On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 05:32:27PM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 8/29/19 7:12 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> > Implement permissions as stated in uapi/linux/capability.h
> > 
> > Note that CAP_SYS_ADMIN is replaced with CAP_BPF.
> > All existing applications that use BPF do not drop all caps
> > and keep only CAP_SYS_ADMIN before doing bpf() syscall.
> > Hence it's highly unlikely that existing code will break.
> > If there will be reports of breakage then CAP_SYS_ADMIN
> > would be allowed as well with "it's usage is deprecated" message
> > similar to commit ee24aebffb75 ("cap_syslog: accept CAP_SYS_ADMIN for now")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
> [...]
> > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> > index 22066a62c8c9..f459315625ac 100644
> > --- a/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> > +++ b/kernel/bpf/hashtab.c
> > @@ -244,9 +244,9 @@ static int htab_map_alloc_check(union bpf_attr *attr)
> >   	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct htab_elem, fnode.next) !=
> >   		     offsetof(struct htab_elem, hash_node.pprev));
> > -	if (lru && !capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> > +	if (lru && !capable(CAP_BPF))
> >   		/* LRU implementation is much complicated than other
> > -		 * maps.  Hence, limit to CAP_SYS_ADMIN for now.
> > +		 * maps.  Hence, limit to CAP_BPF.
> >   		 */
> >   		return -EPERM;
> I don't think this works, this is pretty much going to break use cases where
> orchestration daemons are deployed as containers that are explicitly granted
> specified cap set and right now this is CAP_SYS_ADMIN and not CAP_BPF for bpf().
> The former needs to be a superset of the latter in order for this to work and
> not break compatibility between kernel upgrades.
> 
> - https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/configure-pod-container/security-context/#set-capabilities-for-a-container
> - https://docs.docker.com/engine/reference/run/#runtime-privilege-and-linux-capabilities

These are the links that showing that k8 can delegates caps.
Are you saying that you know of folks who specifically
delegate cap_sys_admin and cap_net_admin _only_ to a container to run bpf in there?


  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-29 17:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-29  5:12 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/3] capability: introduce CAP_BPF and CAP_TRACING Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-29  5:12 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 2/3] bpf: implement CAP_BPF Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-29  6:04   ` Song Liu
2019-08-29 17:28     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-29 15:32   ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-08-29 17:30     ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2019-08-30 15:19       ` Nicolas Dichtel
2019-09-04  1:39         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-09-04 15:16           ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-09-04 15:21             ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-09-05  8:37               ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-09-05 22:00                 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-29  5:12 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 3/3] perf: implement CAP_TRACING Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-29  6:06   ` Song Liu
2019-08-29  6:00 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 1/3] capability: introduce CAP_BPF and CAP_TRACING Song Liu
2019-08-29  7:44 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-08-29 17:24   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-29 18:05     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-08-29 20:25       ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-08-29 21:10         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-29 13:36 ` Nicolas Dichtel
2019-08-29 17:25   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-08-29 15:47 ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-08-29 16:28   ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-08-30  4:16   ` Alexei Starovoitov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190829173034.up5g74onaekp53zd@ast-mbp.dhcp.thefacebook.com \
    --to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).