bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <ast@fb.com>,
	<daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>, <kernel-team@fb.com>,
	Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: add bpf_link pinning/unpinning
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 14:39:47 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200228223948.360936-3-andriin@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200228223948.360936-1-andriin@fb.com>

With bpf_link abstraction supported by kernel explicitly, add
pinning/unpinning API for links. Also allow to create (open) bpf_link from BPF
FS file.

This API allows to have an "ephemeral" FD-based BPF links (like raw tracepoint
or fexit/freplace attachments) surviving user process exit, by pinning them in
a BPF FS, which is an important use case for long-running BPF programs.

As part of this, expose underlying FD for bpf_link. While legacy bpf_link's
might not have a FD associated with them (which will be expressed as
a bpf_link with fd=-1), kernel's abstraction is based around FD-based usage,
so match it closely. This, subsequently, allows to have a generic
pinning/unpinning API for generalized bpf_link. For some types of bpf_links
kernel might not support pinning, in which case bpf_link__pin() will return
error.

With FD being part of generic bpf_link, also get rid of bpf_link_fd in favor
of using vanialla bpf_link.

Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c   | 131 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h   |   5 ++
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map |   5 ++
 3 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
index 996162801f7a..f8c4042e5855 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
@@ -6931,6 +6931,8 @@ int bpf_prog_load_xattr(const struct bpf_prog_load_attr *attr,
 struct bpf_link {
 	int (*detach)(struct bpf_link *link);
 	int (*destroy)(struct bpf_link *link);
+	char *pin_path;		/* NULL, if not pinned */
+	int fd;			/* hook FD, -1 if not applicable */
 	bool disconnected;
 };
 
@@ -6960,26 +6962,109 @@ int bpf_link__destroy(struct bpf_link *link)
 		err = link->detach(link);
 	if (link->destroy)
 		link->destroy(link);
+	if (link->pin_path)
+		free(link->pin_path);
 	free(link);
 
 	return err;
 }
 
-struct bpf_link_fd {
-	struct bpf_link link; /* has to be at the top of struct */
-	int fd; /* hook FD */
-};
+int bpf_link__fd(const struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+	return link->fd;
+}
+
+const char *bpf_link__pin_path(const struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+	return link->pin_path;
+}
+
+static int bpf_link__detach_fd(struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+	return close(link->fd);
+}
+
+struct bpf_link *bpf_link__open(const char *path)
+{
+	struct bpf_link *link;
+	int fd;
+
+	fd = bpf_obj_get(path);
+	if (fd < 0) {
+		fd = -errno;
+		pr_warn("failed to open link at %s: %d\n", path, fd);
+		return ERR_PTR(fd);
+	}
+
+	link = calloc(1, sizeof(*link));
+	if (!link) {
+		close(fd);
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
+	link->detach = &bpf_link__detach_fd;
+	link->fd = fd;
+
+	link->pin_path = strdup(path);
+	if (!link->pin_path) {
+		bpf_link__destroy(link);
+		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+	}
+
+	return link;
+}
+
+int bpf_link__pin(struct bpf_link *link, const char *path)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (link->pin_path)
+		return -EBUSY;
+	err = make_parent_dir(path);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+	err = check_path(path);
+	if (err)
+		return err;
+
+	link->pin_path = strdup(path);
+	if (!link->pin_path)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	if (bpf_obj_pin(link->fd, link->pin_path)) {
+		err = -errno;
+		zfree(&link->pin_path);
+		return err;
+	}
+
+	pr_debug("link fd=%d: pinned at %s\n", link->fd, link->pin_path);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+int bpf_link__unpin(struct bpf_link *link)
+{
+	int err;
+
+	if (!link->pin_path)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	err = unlink(link->pin_path);
+	if (err != 0)
+		return -errno;
+
+	pr_debug("link fd=%d: unpinned from %s\n", link->fd, link->pin_path);
+	zfree(&link->pin_path);
+	return 0;
+}
 
 static int bpf_link__detach_perf_event(struct bpf_link *link)
 {
-	struct bpf_link_fd *l = (void *)link;
 	int err;
 
-	err = ioctl(l->fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, 0);
+	err = ioctl(link->fd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_DISABLE, 0);
 	if (err)
 		err = -errno;
 
-	close(l->fd);
+	close(link->fd);
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -6987,7 +7072,7 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_perf_event(struct bpf_program *prog,
 						int pfd)
 {
 	char errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
-	struct bpf_link_fd *link;
+	struct bpf_link *link;
 	int prog_fd, err;
 
 	if (pfd < 0) {
@@ -7005,7 +7090,7 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_perf_event(struct bpf_program *prog,
 	link = calloc(1, sizeof(*link));
 	if (!link)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	link->link.detach = &bpf_link__detach_perf_event;
+	link->detach = &bpf_link__detach_perf_event;
 	link->fd = pfd;
 
 	if (ioctl(pfd, PERF_EVENT_IOC_SET_BPF, prog_fd) < 0) {
@@ -7024,7 +7109,7 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_perf_event(struct bpf_program *prog,
 			   libbpf_strerror_r(err, errmsg, sizeof(errmsg)));
 		return ERR_PTR(err);
 	}
-	return (struct bpf_link *)link;
+	return link;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -7312,18 +7397,11 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_tp(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec,
 	return link;
 }
 
-static int bpf_link__detach_fd(struct bpf_link *link)
-{
-	struct bpf_link_fd *l = (void *)link;
-
-	return close(l->fd);
-}
-
 struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint(struct bpf_program *prog,
 						    const char *tp_name)
 {
 	char errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
-	struct bpf_link_fd *link;
+	struct bpf_link *link;
 	int prog_fd, pfd;
 
 	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog);
@@ -7336,7 +7414,7 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint(struct bpf_program *prog,
 	link = calloc(1, sizeof(*link));
 	if (!link)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	link->link.detach = &bpf_link__detach_fd;
+	link->detach = &bpf_link__detach_fd;
 
 	pfd = bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(tp_name, prog_fd);
 	if (pfd < 0) {
@@ -7348,7 +7426,7 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint(struct bpf_program *prog,
 		return ERR_PTR(pfd);
 	}
 	link->fd = pfd;
-	return (struct bpf_link *)link;
+	return link;
 }
 
 static struct bpf_link *attach_raw_tp(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec,
@@ -7362,7 +7440,7 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_raw_tp(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec,
 struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_trace(struct bpf_program *prog)
 {
 	char errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
-	struct bpf_link_fd *link;
+	struct bpf_link *link;
 	int prog_fd, pfd;
 
 	prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(prog);
@@ -7375,7 +7453,7 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_trace(struct bpf_program *prog)
 	link = calloc(1, sizeof(*link));
 	if (!link)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
-	link->link.detach = &bpf_link__detach_fd;
+	link->detach = &bpf_link__detach_fd;
 
 	pfd = bpf_raw_tracepoint_open(NULL, prog_fd);
 	if (pfd < 0) {
@@ -7409,10 +7487,9 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach(struct bpf_program *prog)
 
 static int bpf_link__detach_struct_ops(struct bpf_link *link)
 {
-	struct bpf_link_fd *l = (void *)link;
 	__u32 zero = 0;
 
-	if (bpf_map_delete_elem(l->fd, &zero))
+	if (bpf_map_delete_elem(link->fd, &zero))
 		return -errno;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -7421,7 +7498,7 @@ static int bpf_link__detach_struct_ops(struct bpf_link *link)
 struct bpf_link *bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(struct bpf_map *map)
 {
 	struct bpf_struct_ops *st_ops;
-	struct bpf_link_fd *link;
+	struct bpf_link *link;
 	__u32 i, zero = 0;
 	int err;
 
@@ -7453,10 +7530,10 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(struct bpf_map *map)
 		return ERR_PTR(err);
 	}
 
-	link->link.detach = bpf_link__detach_struct_ops;
+	link->detach = bpf_link__detach_struct_ops;
 	link->fd = map->fd;
 
-	return (struct bpf_link *)link;
+	return link;
 }
 
 enum bpf_perf_event_ret
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
index 02fc58a21a7f..d38d7a629417 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
@@ -219,6 +219,11 @@ LIBBPF_API void bpf_program__unload(struct bpf_program *prog);
 
 struct bpf_link;
 
+LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *bpf_link__open(const char *path);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_link__fd(const struct bpf_link *link);
+LIBBPF_API const char *bpf_link__pin_path(const struct bpf_link *link);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_link__pin(struct bpf_link *link, const char *path);
+LIBBPF_API int bpf_link__unpin(struct bpf_link *link);
 LIBBPF_API void bpf_link__disconnect(struct bpf_link *link);
 LIBBPF_API int bpf_link__destroy(struct bpf_link *link);
 
diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
index 7b014c8cdece..5129283c0284 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
@@ -238,5 +238,10 @@ LIBBPF_0.0.7 {
 
 LIBBPF_0.0.8 {
 	global:
+		bpf_link__fd;
+		bpf_link__open;
+		bpf_link__pin;
+		bpf_link__pin_path;
+		bpf_link__unpin;
 		bpf_program__set_attach_target;
 } LIBBPF_0.0.7;
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-02-28 22:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-02-28 22:39 [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] Introduce pinnable bpf_link kernel abstraction Andrii Nakryiko
2020-02-28 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/3] bpf: introduce pinnable bpf_link abstraction Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-02 10:13   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-02 18:06     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-02 21:40       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-02 23:37         ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-03  2:50   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-03  4:18     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-02-28 22:39 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2020-03-02 10:16   ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/3] libbpf: add bpf_link pinning/unpinning Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-02 18:09     ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-02 21:45       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-02-28 22:39 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/3] selftests/bpf: add link pinning selftests Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-02 10:11 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/3] Introduce pinnable bpf_link kernel abstraction Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-02 18:05   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-02 22:24     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-02 23:35       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-03  8:12         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-03  8:12       ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-03-03 15:46         ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-03 19:23           ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-03-03 19:46             ` Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-03 20:24               ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-03 20:53                 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-03-03 22:01                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-03 22:27                     ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-04  4:36                       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-04  7:47                         ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-04 15:47                           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-05 10:37                             ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-05 16:34                               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-05 22:34                                 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-03-05 22:50                                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-05 23:42                                     ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-03-06  8:31                                       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-06 10:25                                         ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-03-06 10:42                                           ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-06 18:09                                           ` David Ahern
2020-03-04 19:41                         ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-04 20:45                           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-04 21:24                             ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-05  1:07                               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-05  8:16                                 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-05 11:05                                   ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-05 18:13                                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-09 11:41                                       ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-09 18:50                                         ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-03-10 12:22                                           ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2020-03-05 16:39                                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-03-03 22:40                 ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200228223948.360936-3-andriin@fb.com \
    --to=andriin@fb.com \
    --cc=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
    --cc=ast@fb.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).