bpf.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
	kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
	Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 10/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/lwt converted to inline assembly
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 20:42:20 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230421174234.2391278-11-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230421174234.2391278-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>

Test verifier/lwt automatically converted to use inline assembly.

Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c       |   2 +
 .../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c        | 234 ++++++++++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c    | 189 --------------
 3 files changed, 236 insertions(+), 189 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c
 delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 33a50dbc2321..54c30fe1b693 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #include "verifier_ld_ind.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_leak_ptr.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_loops1.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_lwt.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_map_ptr.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_map_ret_val.skel.h"
 #include "verifier_masking.skel.h"
@@ -115,6 +116,7 @@ void test_verifier_jeq_infer_not_null(void)   { RUN(verifier_jeq_infer_not_null)
 void test_verifier_ld_ind(void)               { RUN(verifier_ld_ind); }
 void test_verifier_leak_ptr(void)             { RUN(verifier_leak_ptr); }
 void test_verifier_loops1(void)               { RUN(verifier_loops1); }
+void test_verifier_lwt(void)                  { RUN(verifier_lwt); }
 void test_verifier_map_ptr(void)              { RUN(verifier_map_ptr); }
 void test_verifier_map_ret_val(void)          { RUN(verifier_map_ret_val); }
 void test_verifier_masking(void)              { RUN(verifier_masking); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..5ab746307309
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_lwt.c
@@ -0,0 +1,234 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Converted from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+SEC("lwt_in")
+__description("invalid direct packet write for LWT_IN")
+__failure __msg("cannot write into packet")
+__naked void packet_write_for_lwt_in(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]);		\
+	r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]);	\
+	r0 = r2;					\
+	r0 += 8;					\
+	if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	*(u8*)(r2 + 0) = r2;				\
+l0_%=:	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+	  __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_out")
+__description("invalid direct packet write for LWT_OUT")
+__failure __msg("cannot write into packet")
+__naked void packet_write_for_lwt_out(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]);		\
+	r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]);	\
+	r0 = r2;					\
+	r0 += 8;					\
+	if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	*(u8*)(r2 + 0) = r2;				\
+l0_%=:	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+	  __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_xmit")
+__description("direct packet write for LWT_XMIT")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void packet_write_for_lwt_xmit(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]);		\
+	r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]);	\
+	r0 = r2;					\
+	r0 += 8;					\
+	if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	*(u8*)(r2 + 0) = r2;				\
+l0_%=:	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+	  __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_in")
+__description("direct packet read for LWT_IN")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void packet_read_for_lwt_in(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]);		\
+	r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]);	\
+	r0 = r2;					\
+	r0 += 8;					\
+	if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r0 = *(u8*)(r2 + 0);				\
+l0_%=:	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+	  __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_out")
+__description("direct packet read for LWT_OUT")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void packet_read_for_lwt_out(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]);		\
+	r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]);	\
+	r0 = r2;					\
+	r0 += 8;					\
+	if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r0 = *(u8*)(r2 + 0);				\
+l0_%=:	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+	  __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_xmit")
+__description("direct packet read for LWT_XMIT")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void packet_read_for_lwt_xmit(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]);		\
+	r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]);	\
+	r0 = r2;					\
+	r0 += 8;					\
+	if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r0 = *(u8*)(r2 + 0);				\
+l0_%=:	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+	  __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_xmit")
+__description("overlapping checks for direct packet access")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void checks_for_direct_packet_access(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r2 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data]);		\
+	r3 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_data_end]);	\
+	r0 = r2;					\
+	r0 += 8;					\
+	if r0 > r3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r1 = r2;					\
+	r1 += 6;					\
+	if r1 > r3 goto l0_%=;				\
+	r0 = *(u16*)(r2 + 6);				\
+l0_%=:	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(__sk_buff_data, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
+	  __imm_const(__sk_buff_data_end, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_xmit")
+__description("make headroom for LWT_XMIT")
+__success __retval(0)
+__naked void make_headroom_for_lwt_xmit(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r6 = r1;					\
+	r2 = 34;					\
+	r3 = 0;						\
+	call %[bpf_skb_change_head];			\
+	/* split for s390 to succeed */			\
+	r1 = r6;					\
+	r2 = 42;					\
+	r3 = 0;						\
+	call %[bpf_skb_change_head];			\
+	r0 = 0;						\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm(bpf_skb_change_head)
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_IN")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void tc_classid_for_lwt_in(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_tc_classid]);	\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(__sk_buff_tc_classid, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_OUT")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void tc_classid_for_lwt_out(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_tc_classid]);	\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(__sk_buff_tc_classid, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("socket")
+__description("invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_XMIT")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__failure_unpriv
+__naked void tc_classid_for_lwt_xmit(void)
+{
+	asm volatile ("					\
+	r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_tc_classid]);	\
+	exit;						\
+"	:
+	: __imm_const(__sk_buff_tc_classid, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("lwt_in")
+__description("check skb->tc_classid half load not permitted for lwt prog")
+__failure __msg("invalid bpf_context access")
+__naked void not_permitted_for_lwt_prog(void)
+{
+	asm volatile (
+	"r0 = 0;"
+#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
+	"r0 = *(u16*)(r1 + %[__sk_buff_tc_classid]);"
+#else
+	"r0 = *(u16*)(r1 + %[__imm_0]);"
+#endif
+	"exit;"
+	:
+	: __imm_const(__imm_0, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid) + 2),
+	  __imm_const(__sk_buff_tc_classid, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid))
+	: __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c
deleted file mode 100644
index 5c8944d0b091..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/lwt.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,189 +0,0 @@
-{
-	"invalid direct packet write for LWT_IN",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
-	BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.errstr = "cannot write into packet",
-	.result = REJECT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN,
-},
-{
-	"invalid direct packet write for LWT_OUT",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
-	BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.errstr = "cannot write into packet",
-	.result = REJECT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT,
-},
-{
-	"direct packet write for LWT_XMIT",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
-	BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_2, 0),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT,
-},
-{
-	"direct packet read for LWT_IN",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN,
-},
-{
-	"direct packet read for LWT_OUT",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_OUT,
-},
-{
-	"direct packet read for LWT_XMIT",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 1),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_B, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 0),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT,
-},
-{
-	"overlapping checks for direct packet access",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data)),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_3, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, data_end)),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_0, 8),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_3, 4),
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_2),
-	BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 6),
-	BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_3, 1),
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_2, 6),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT,
-},
-{
-	"make headroom for LWT_XMIT",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 34),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
-	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_skb_change_head),
-	/* split for s390 to succeed */
-	BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 42),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_3, 0),
-	BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_skb_change_head),
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = ACCEPT,
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_XMIT,
-},
-{
-	"invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_IN",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid)),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = REJECT,
-	.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
-},
-{
-	"invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_OUT",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid)),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = REJECT,
-	.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
-},
-{
-	"invalid access of tc_classid for LWT_XMIT",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid)),
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = REJECT,
-	.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
-},
-{
-	"check skb->tc_classid half load not permitted for lwt prog",
-	.insns = {
-	BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
-#if __BYTE_ORDER__ == __ORDER_LITTLE_ENDIAN__
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid)),
-#else
-	BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1,
-		    offsetof(struct __sk_buff, tc_classid) + 2),
-#endif
-	BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
-	},
-	.result = REJECT,
-	.errstr = "invalid bpf_context access",
-	.prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN,
-},
-- 
2.40.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-04-21 17:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-21 17:42 [PATCH bpf-next 00/24] Second set of verifier/*.c migrated to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/24] selftests/bpf: Add notion of auxiliary programs for test_loader Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds converted to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/bpf_get_stack " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/btf_ctx_access " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/ctx " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/d_path " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/direct_packet_access " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/jeq_infer_not_null " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/loops1 " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_in_map " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ptr_mixing " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/precise " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/prevent_map_lookup " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/ref_tracking " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/regalloc " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/runtime_jit " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/search_pruning " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 19/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/sock " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 20/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/spin_lock " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 21/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/subreg " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 22/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/unpriv " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 23/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_illegal_alu " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 24/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_ptr_arith " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 19:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/24] Second set of verifier/*.c migrated " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-04-21 19:49   ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 19:53     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-21 19:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-21 20:00   ` Eduard Zingerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230421174234.2391278-11-eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=yhs@fb.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).