From: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
To: bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: andrii@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
kernel-team@fb.com, yhs@fb.com,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 20/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/spin_lock converted to inline assembly
Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2023 20:42:30 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230421174234.2391278-21-eddyz87@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230421174234.2391278-1-eddyz87@gmail.com>
Test verifier/spin_lock automatically converted to use inline assembly.
Signed-off-by: Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
---
.../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c | 2 +
.../selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c | 533 ++++++++++++++++++
.../selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c | 447 ---------------
3 files changed, 535 insertions(+), 447 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c
delete mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
index 60bcff62d968..0ea88282859d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/verifier.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@
#include "verifier_search_pruning.skel.h"
#include "verifier_sock.skel.h"
#include "verifier_spill_fill.skel.h"
+#include "verifier_spin_lock.skel.h"
#include "verifier_stack_ptr.skel.h"
#include "verifier_uninit.skel.h"
#include "verifier_value_adj_spill.skel.h"
@@ -144,6 +145,7 @@ void test_verifier_runtime_jit(void) { RUN(verifier_runtime_jit); }
void test_verifier_search_pruning(void) { RUN(verifier_search_pruning); }
void test_verifier_sock(void) { RUN(verifier_sock); }
void test_verifier_spill_fill(void) { RUN(verifier_spill_fill); }
+void test_verifier_spin_lock(void) { RUN(verifier_spin_lock); }
void test_verifier_stack_ptr(void) { RUN(verifier_stack_ptr); }
void test_verifier_uninit(void) { RUN(verifier_uninit); }
void test_verifier_value_adj_spill(void) { RUN(verifier_value_adj_spill); }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9c1aa69650f8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/verifier_spin_lock.c
@@ -0,0 +1,533 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/* Converted from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c */
+
+#include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
+#include "bpf_misc.h"
+
+struct val {
+ int cnt;
+ struct bpf_spin_lock l;
+};
+
+struct {
+ __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_ARRAY);
+ __uint(max_entries, 1);
+ __type(key, int);
+ __type(value, struct val);
+} map_spin_lock SEC(".maps");
+
+SEC("cgroup/skb")
+__description("spin_lock: test1 success")
+__success __failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("")
+__retval(0)
+__naked void spin_lock_test1_success(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l0_%=: r6 = r0; \
+ r1 = r0; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+ r1 = r6; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r6 + 0); \
+ call %[bpf_spin_unlock]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_lock),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_unlock),
+ __imm_addr(map_spin_lock)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/skb")
+__description("spin_lock: test2 direct ld/st")
+__failure __msg("cannot be accessed directly")
+__failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("")
+__naked void lock_test2_direct_ld_st(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l0_%=: r6 = r0; \
+ r1 = r0; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+ r1 = r6; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r1 + 0); \
+ call %[bpf_spin_unlock]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_lock),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_unlock),
+ __imm_addr(map_spin_lock)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/skb")
+__description("spin_lock: test3 direct ld/st")
+__failure __msg("cannot be accessed directly")
+__failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void lock_test3_direct_ld_st(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l0_%=: r6 = r0; \
+ r1 = r0; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+ r1 = r6; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r6 + 1); \
+ call %[bpf_spin_unlock]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_lock),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_unlock),
+ __imm_addr(map_spin_lock)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/skb")
+__description("spin_lock: test4 direct ld/st")
+__failure __msg("cannot be accessed directly")
+__failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("")
+__flag(BPF_F_ANY_ALIGNMENT)
+__naked void lock_test4_direct_ld_st(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l0_%=: r6 = r0; \
+ r1 = r0; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+ r1 = r6; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ r0 = *(u16*)(r6 + 3); \
+ call %[bpf_spin_unlock]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_lock),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_unlock),
+ __imm_addr(map_spin_lock)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/skb")
+__description("spin_lock: test5 call within a locked region")
+__failure __msg("calls are not allowed")
+__failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("")
+__naked void call_within_a_locked_region(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l0_%=: r6 = r0; \
+ r1 = r0; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+ call %[bpf_get_prandom_u32]; \
+ r1 = r6; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_unlock]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_get_prandom_u32),
+ __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_lock),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_unlock),
+ __imm_addr(map_spin_lock)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/skb")
+__description("spin_lock: test6 missing unlock")
+__failure __msg("unlock is missing")
+__failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("")
+__naked void spin_lock_test6_missing_unlock(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l0_%=: r6 = r0; \
+ r1 = r0; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+ r1 = r6; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r6 + 0); \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l1_%=; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_unlock]; \
+l1_%=: r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_lock),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_unlock),
+ __imm_addr(map_spin_lock)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/skb")
+__description("spin_lock: test7 unlock without lock")
+__failure __msg("without taking a lock")
+__failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("")
+__naked void lock_test7_unlock_without_lock(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l0_%=: r6 = r0; \
+ r1 = r0; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ if r1 != 0 goto l1_%=; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+l1_%=: r1 = r6; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r6 + 0); \
+ call %[bpf_spin_unlock]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_lock),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_unlock),
+ __imm_addr(map_spin_lock)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/skb")
+__description("spin_lock: test8 double lock")
+__failure __msg("calls are not allowed")
+__failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("")
+__naked void spin_lock_test8_double_lock(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l0_%=: r6 = r0; \
+ r1 = r0; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+ r1 = r6; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+ r1 = r6; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ r0 = *(u32*)(r6 + 0); \
+ call %[bpf_spin_unlock]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_lock),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_unlock),
+ __imm_addr(map_spin_lock)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/skb")
+__description("spin_lock: test9 different lock")
+__failure __msg("unlock of different lock")
+__failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("")
+__naked void spin_lock_test9_different_lock(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l0_%=: r6 = r0; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l1_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l1_%=: r7 = r0; \
+ r1 = r6; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+ r1 = r7; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_unlock]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_lock),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_unlock),
+ __imm_addr(map_spin_lock)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("cgroup/skb")
+__description("spin_lock: test10 lock in subprog without unlock")
+__failure __msg("unlock is missing")
+__failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("")
+__naked void lock_in_subprog_without_unlock(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l0_%=: r6 = r0; \
+ r1 = r0; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call lock_in_subprog_without_unlock__1; \
+ r1 = r6; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_unlock]; \
+ r0 = 1; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_unlock),
+ __imm_addr(map_spin_lock)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+static __naked __noinline __attribute__((used))
+void lock_in_subprog_without_unlock__1(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_spin_lock)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__description("spin_lock: test11 ld_abs under lock")
+__failure __msg("inside bpf_spin_lock")
+__naked void test11_ld_abs_under_lock(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r6 = r1; \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r1; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l0_%=: r7 = r0; \
+ r1 = r0; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+ r0 = *(u8*)skb[0]; \
+ r1 = r7; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_unlock]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_lock),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_unlock),
+ __imm_addr(map_spin_lock)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+SEC("tc")
+__description("spin_lock: regsafe compare reg->id for map value")
+__failure __msg("bpf_spin_unlock of different lock")
+__flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
+__naked void reg_id_for_map_value(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r6 = r1; \
+ r6 = *(u32*)(r6 + %[__sk_buff_mark]); \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ r9 = r1; \
+ r2 = 0; \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r2; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l0_%=: r7 = r0; \
+ r1 = r9; \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 != 0 goto l1_%=; \
+ exit; \
+l1_%=: r8 = r0; \
+ r1 = r7; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+ if r6 == 0 goto l2_%=; \
+ goto l3_%=; \
+l2_%=: r7 = r8; \
+l3_%=: r1 = r7; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_unlock]; \
+ r0 = 0; \
+ exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_lock),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_unlock),
+ __imm_addr(map_spin_lock),
+ __imm_const(__sk_buff_mark, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark))
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+/* Make sure that regsafe() compares ids for spin lock records using
+ * check_ids():
+ * 1: r9 = map_lookup_elem(...) ; r9.id == 1
+ * 2: r8 = map_lookup_elem(...) ; r8.id == 2
+ * 3: r7 = ktime_get_ns()
+ * 4: r6 = ktime_get_ns()
+ * 5: if r6 > r7 goto <9>
+ * 6: spin_lock(r8)
+ * 7: r9 = r8
+ * 8: goto <10>
+ * 9: spin_lock(r9)
+ * 10: spin_unlock(r9) ; r9.id == 1 || r9.id == 2 and lock is active,
+ * ; second visit to (10) should be considered safe
+ * ; if check_ids() is used.
+ * 11: exit(0)
+ */
+
+SEC("cgroup/skb")
+__description("spin_lock: regsafe() check_ids() similar id mappings")
+__success __msg("29: safe")
+__failure_unpriv __msg_unpriv("")
+__log_level(2) __retval(0) __flag(BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ)
+__naked void check_ids_similar_id_mappings(void)
+{
+ asm volatile (" \
+ r1 = 0; \
+ *(u32*)(r10 - 4) = r1; \
+ /* r9 = map_lookup_elem(...) */ \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 == 0 goto l0_%=; \
+ r9 = r0; \
+ /* r8 = map_lookup_elem(...) */ \
+ r2 = r10; \
+ r2 += -4; \
+ r1 = %[map_spin_lock] ll; \
+ call %[bpf_map_lookup_elem]; \
+ if r0 == 0 goto l1_%=; \
+ r8 = r0; \
+ /* r7 = ktime_get_ns() */ \
+ call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \
+ r7 = r0; \
+ /* r6 = ktime_get_ns() */ \
+ call %[bpf_ktime_get_ns]; \
+ r6 = r0; \
+ /* if r6 > r7 goto +5 ; no new information about the state is derived from\
+ * ; this check, thus produced verifier states differ\
+ * ; only in 'insn_idx' \
+ * spin_lock(r8) \
+ * r9 = r8 \
+ * goto unlock \
+ */ \
+ if r6 > r7 goto l2_%=; \
+ r1 = r8; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+ r9 = r8; \
+ goto l3_%=; \
+l2_%=: /* spin_lock(r9) */ \
+ r1 = r9; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_lock]; \
+l3_%=: /* spin_unlock(r9) */ \
+ r1 = r9; \
+ r1 += 4; \
+ call %[bpf_spin_unlock]; \
+l0_%=: /* exit(0) */ \
+ r0 = 0; \
+l1_%=: exit; \
+" :
+ : __imm(bpf_ktime_get_ns),
+ __imm(bpf_map_lookup_elem),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_lock),
+ __imm(bpf_spin_unlock),
+ __imm_addr(map_spin_lock)
+ : __clobber_all);
+}
+
+char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c
deleted file mode 100644
index eaf114f07e2e..000000000000
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/verifier/spin_lock.c
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,447 +0,0 @@
-{
- "spin_lock: test1 success",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 3 },
- .result = ACCEPT,
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
-},
-{
- "spin_lock: test2 direct ld/st",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 3 },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "cannot be accessed directly",
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
-},
-{
- "spin_lock: test3 direct ld/st",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 1),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 3 },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "cannot be accessed directly",
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
- "spin_lock: test4 direct ld/st",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_H, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 3),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 3 },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "cannot be accessed directly",
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
- .flags = F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS,
-},
-{
- "spin_lock: test5 call within a locked region",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_get_prandom_u32),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 3 },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "calls are not allowed",
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
-},
-{
- "spin_lock: test6 missing unlock",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 0),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 3 },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "unlock is missing",
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
-},
-{
- "spin_lock: test7 unlock without lock",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_1, 0, 1),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 3 },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "without taking a lock",
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
-},
-{
- "spin_lock: test8 double lock",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_0, BPF_REG_6, 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 3 },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "calls are not allowed",
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
-},
-{
- "spin_lock: test9 different lock",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 3, 11 },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "unlock of different lock",
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
-},
-{
- "spin_lock: test10 lock in subprog without unlock",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 1, 0, 5),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_6),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 3 },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "unlock is missing",
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
-},
-{
- "spin_lock: test11 ld_abs under lock",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_LD_ABS(BPF_B, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 4 },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "inside bpf_spin_lock",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
-},
-{
- "spin_lock: regsafe compare reg->id for map value",
- .insns = {
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_1),
- BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_6, offsetof(struct __sk_buff, mark)),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_1),
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_9),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JNE, BPF_REG_0, 0, 1),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_6, 0, 1),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JA, 0, 0, 1),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_8),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_7),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_RAW_INSN(BPF_JMP | BPF_CALL, 0, 0, 0, BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 2 },
- .result = REJECT,
- .errstr = "bpf_spin_unlock of different lock",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS,
- .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
-},
-/* Make sure that regsafe() compares ids for spin lock records using
- * check_ids():
- * 1: r9 = map_lookup_elem(...) ; r9.id == 1
- * 2: r8 = map_lookup_elem(...) ; r8.id == 2
- * 3: r7 = ktime_get_ns()
- * 4: r6 = ktime_get_ns()
- * 5: if r6 > r7 goto <9>
- * 6: spin_lock(r8)
- * 7: r9 = r8
- * 8: goto <10>
- * 9: spin_lock(r9)
- * 10: spin_unlock(r9) ; r9.id == 1 || r9.id == 2 and lock is active,
- * ; second visit to (10) should be considered safe
- * ; if check_ids() is used.
- * 11: exit(0)
- */
-{
- "spin_lock: regsafe() check_ids() similar id mappings",
- .insns = {
- BPF_ST_MEM(BPF_W, BPF_REG_10, -4, 0),
- /* r9 = map_lookup_elem(...) */
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 24),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_0),
- /* r8 = map_lookup_elem(...) */
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_10),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_2, -4),
- BPF_LD_MAP_FD(BPF_REG_1,
- 0),
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_map_lookup_elem),
- BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, BPF_REG_0, 0, 18),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_8, BPF_REG_0),
- /* r7 = ktime_get_ns() */
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_7, BPF_REG_0),
- /* r6 = ktime_get_ns() */
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_ktime_get_ns),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_0),
- /* if r6 > r7 goto +5 ; no new information about the state is derived from
- * ; this check, thus produced verifier states differ
- * ; only in 'insn_idx'
- * spin_lock(r8)
- * r9 = r8
- * goto unlock
- */
- BPF_JMP_REG(BPF_JGT, BPF_REG_6, BPF_REG_7, 5),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_8),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_9, BPF_REG_8),
- BPF_JMP_A(3),
- /* spin_lock(r9) */
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_9),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_spin_lock),
- /* spin_unlock(r9) */
- BPF_MOV64_REG(BPF_REG_1, BPF_REG_9),
- BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_ADD, BPF_REG_1, 4),
- BPF_EMIT_CALL(BPF_FUNC_spin_unlock),
- /* exit(0) */
- BPF_MOV64_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 0),
- BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
- },
- .fixup_map_spin_lock = { 3, 10 },
- .result = VERBOSE_ACCEPT,
- .errstr = "28: safe",
- .result_unpriv = REJECT,
- .errstr_unpriv = "",
- .prog_type = BPF_PROG_TYPE_CGROUP_SKB,
- .flags = BPF_F_TEST_STATE_FREQ,
-},
--
2.40.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-21 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-21 17:42 [PATCH bpf-next 00/24] Second set of verifier/*.c migrated to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 01/24] selftests/bpf: Add notion of auxiliary programs for test_loader Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 02/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/bounds converted to inline assembly Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 03/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/bpf_get_stack " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 04/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/btf_ctx_access " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 05/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/ctx " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 06/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/d_path " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 07/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/direct_packet_access " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 08/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/jeq_infer_not_null " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 09/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/loops1 " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 10/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/lwt " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 11/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_in_map " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 12/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/map_ptr_mixing " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 13/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/precise " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 14/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/prevent_map_lookup " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 15/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/ref_tracking " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 16/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/regalloc " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 17/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/runtime_jit " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 18/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/search_pruning " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 19/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/sock " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` Eduard Zingerman [this message]
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 21/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/subreg " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 22/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/unpriv " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 23/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_illegal_alu " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 17:42 ` [PATCH bpf-next 24/24] selftests/bpf: verifier/value_ptr_arith " Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 19:40 ` [PATCH bpf-next 00/24] Second set of verifier/*.c migrated " patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2023-04-21 19:49 ` Eduard Zingerman
2023-04-21 19:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-21 19:48 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2023-04-21 20:00 ` Eduard Zingerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230421174234.2391278-21-eddyz87@gmail.com \
--to=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).