From: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com>
To: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
Cc: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org,
martin.lau@linux.dev, song@kernel.org, yhs@fb.com,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@google.com,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, quentin@isovalent.com,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 bpf-next 01/11] bpf: Support ->fill_link_info for kprobe_multi
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2023 16:05:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAEf4BzY8Vi4Y6kf7hOmhWQkKOV=R7tBzb4dgCuicni3bBFWb9A@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230608103523.102267-2-laoar.shao@gmail.com>
On Thu, Jun 8, 2023 at 3:35 AM Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> With the addition of support for fill_link_info to the kprobe_multi link,
> users will gain the ability to inspect it conveniently using the
> `bpftool link show` command. This enhancement provides valuable information
> to the user, including the count of probed functions and their respective
> addresses. It's important to note that if the kptr_restrict setting is set
> to 2, the probed addresses will not be exposed, ensuring security.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yafang Shao <laoar.shao@gmail.com>
> ---
> include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++
> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h | 5 +++++
> 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index a7b5e91..d99cc16 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -6438,6 +6438,11 @@ struct bpf_link_info {
> __s32 priority;
> __u32 flags;
> } netfilter;
> + struct {
> + __aligned_u64 addrs; /* in/out: addresses buffer ptr */
> + __u32 count;
> + __u8 retprobe;
from kernel API side it's probably better to just expose flags?
retprobe is determined by BPF_F_KPROBE_MULTI_RETURN flag
> + } kprobe_multi;
> };
> } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> index 2bc41e6..738efcf 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> +++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
> @@ -2548,9 +2548,39 @@ static void bpf_kprobe_multi_link_dealloc(struct bpf_link *link)
> kfree(kmulti_link);
> }
>
> +static int bpf_kprobe_multi_link_fill_link_info(const struct bpf_link *link,
> + struct bpf_link_info *info)
> +{
> + u64 __user *uaddrs = u64_to_user_ptr(info->kprobe_multi.addrs);
> + struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link *kmulti_link;
> + u32 ucount = info->kprobe_multi.count;
> +
> + if (!uaddrs ^ !ucount)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + kmulti_link = container_of(link, struct bpf_kprobe_multi_link, link);
> + if (!uaddrs) {
> + info->kprobe_multi.count = kmulti_link->cnt;
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + if (!ucount)
> + return 0;
> + if (ucount != kmulti_link->cnt)
> + return -EINVAL;
should this just check that kmulti_link->cnt is <= ucount?...
> + info->kprobe_multi.retprobe = kmulti_link->fp.exit_handler ?
> + true : false;
> + if (kptr_restrict == 2)
> + return 0;
use kallsyms_show_value() instead of hard-coding this?
> + if (copy_to_user(uaddrs, kmulti_link->addrs, ucount * sizeof(u64)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct bpf_link_ops bpf_kprobe_multi_link_lops = {
> .release = bpf_kprobe_multi_link_release,
> .dealloc = bpf_kprobe_multi_link_dealloc,
> + .fill_link_info = bpf_kprobe_multi_link_fill_link_info,
> };
>
> static void bpf_kprobe_multi_cookie_swap(void *a, void *b, int size, const void *priv)
> diff --git a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> index a7b5e91..d99cc16 100644
> --- a/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> +++ b/tools/include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
> @@ -6438,6 +6438,11 @@ struct bpf_link_info {
> __s32 priority;
> __u32 flags;
> } netfilter;
> + struct {
> + __aligned_u64 addrs; /* in/out: addresses buffer ptr */
> + __u32 count;
> + __u8 retprobe;
> + } kprobe_multi;
> };
> } __attribute__((aligned(8)));
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-08 23:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-08 10:35 [PATCH v2 bpf-next 00/11] bpf: Support ->fill_link_info for kprobe_multi and perf_event links Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 01/11] bpf: Support ->fill_link_info for kprobe_multi Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 23:05 ` Andrii Nakryiko [this message]
2023-06-09 9:13 ` Yafang Shao
2023-06-09 18:25 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-10 2:19 ` Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 02/11] bpftool: Add address filtering in kernel_syms_load() Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 03/11] bpftool: Show probed function in kprobe_multi link info Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 23:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-09 9:15 ` Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 04/11] bpf: Protect probed address based on kptr_restrict setting Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 23:08 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-09 9:16 ` Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 05/11] bpf: Clear the probe_addr for uprobe Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 06/11] bpf: Expose symbol addresses for precise identification Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 07/11] bpf: Add a common helper bpf_copy_to_user() Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 08/11] bpf: Support ->fill_link_info for perf_event Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 23:12 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-09 9:53 ` Yafang Shao
2023-06-09 9:56 ` Yafang Shao
2023-06-09 18:26 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-10 2:21 ` Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 09/11] libbpf: Add perf event names Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 23:14 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2023-06-09 4:36 ` Song Liu
2023-06-10 2:22 ` Yafang Shao
2023-06-10 20:34 ` Quentin Monnet
2023-06-11 15:52 ` Yafang Shao
2023-06-10 22:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-06-10 22:43 ` Jiri Olsa
2023-06-11 15:55 ` Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 10/11] bpftool: Move get_prog_info() into do_show_link() Yafang Shao
2023-06-08 10:35 ` [PATCH v2 bpf-next 11/11] bpftool: Show probed function in perf_event link info Yafang Shao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAEf4BzY8Vi4Y6kf7hOmhWQkKOV=R7tBzb4dgCuicni3bBFWb9A@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=andrii.nakryiko@gmail.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=laoar.shao@gmail.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=quentin@isovalent.com \
--cc=sdf@google.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).