From: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
To: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Cc: bpf <bpf@vger.kernel.org>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"Peter Ziljstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
"Daniel Borkmann" <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
"john fastabend" <john.fastabend@gmail.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org>,
"Kernel Team" <Kernel-team@fb.com>,
"haoluo@google.com" <haoluo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: add non-BPF_LSM test for task local storage
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2021 22:49:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CC251082-A193-44FD-80BD-C8D0431C7798@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4eac4156-9c81-ff4d-46f5-d45d9d575a16@fb.com>
> On Jan 11, 2021, at 9:30 AM, Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/8/21 3:19 PM, Song Liu wrote:
>> Task local storage is enabled for tracing programs. Add a test for it
>> without CONFIG_BPF_LSM.
>> Signed-off-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
>> ---
>> .../bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_storage.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++
>> .../selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_storage.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_storage.c
>> create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_storage.c
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_storage.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000000..7de7a154ebbe6
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/test_task_local_storage.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */
>
> 2020 -> 2021
>
>> +
>> +#include <sys/types.h>
>> +#include <unistd.h>
>> +#include <test_progs.h>
>> +#include "task_local_storage.skel.h"
>> +
>> +static unsigned int duration;
>> +
>> +void test_test_task_local_storage(void)
>> +{
>> + struct task_local_storage *skel;
>> + const int count = 10;
>> + int i, err;
>> +
>> + skel = task_local_storage__open_and_load();
>> +
>
> Extra line is unnecessary here.
>
>> + if (CHECK(!skel, "skel_open_and_load", "skeleton open and load failed\n"))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + err = task_local_storage__attach(skel);
>> +
>
> ditto.
>
>> + if (CHECK(err, "skel_attach", "skeleton attach failed\n"))
>> + goto out;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < count; i++)
>> + usleep(1000);
>
> Does a smaller usleep value will work? If it is, recommend to have a smaller value here to reduce test_progs running time.
I thought 10ms total was acceptable. But yeah, smaller value should still work.
>
>> + CHECK(skel->bss->value < count, "task_local_storage_value",
>> + "task local value too small\n");
>> +
>> +out:
>> + task_local_storage__destroy(skel);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_storage.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_storage.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000000..807255c5c162d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/task_local_storage.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/* Copyright (c) 2020 Facebook */
>
> 2020 -> 2021
>
>> +
>> +#include "vmlinux.h"
>> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h>
>> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h>
>> +
>> +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL";
>> +
>> +struct local_data {
>> + __u64 val;
>> +};
>> +
>> +struct {
>> + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_TASK_STORAGE);
>> + __uint(map_flags, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
>> + __type(key, int);
>> + __type(value, struct local_data);
>> +} task_storage_map SEC(".maps");
>> +
>> +int value = 0;
>> +
>> +SEC("tp_btf/sched_switch")
>> +int BPF_PROG(on_switch, bool preempt, struct task_struct *prev,
>> + struct task_struct *next)
>> +{
>> + struct local_data *storage;
>
> If it possible that we do some filtering based on test_progs pid
> so below bpf_task_storage_get is only called for test_progs process?
> This is more targeted and can avoid counter contributions from
> other unrelated processes and make test_task_local_storage.c result
> comparison more meaningful.
Make sense. Will fix in the next version.
>
>> +
>> + storage = bpf_task_storage_get(&task_storage_map,
>> + next, 0,
>> + BPF_LOCAL_STORAGE_GET_F_CREATE);
>> + if (storage) {
>> + storage->val++;
>> + value = storage->val;
>> + }
>> + return 0;
>> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-12 0:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20210108231950.3844417-1-songliubraving@fb.com>
[not found] ` <20210108231950.3844417-2-songliubraving@fb.com>
2021-01-11 6:27 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/4] bpf: enable task local storage for tracing programs Yonghong Song
2021-01-11 10:17 ` KP Singh
2021-01-11 15:56 ` Yonghong Song
2021-01-11 10:14 ` KP Singh
2021-01-11 23:16 ` Song Liu
2021-01-11 17:16 ` Yonghong Song
2021-01-11 18:56 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2021-01-11 21:35 ` KP Singh
2021-01-11 21:58 ` Martin KaFai Lau
2021-01-11 23:45 ` Song Liu
2021-01-12 16:32 ` Yonghong Song
2021-01-12 16:53 ` KP Singh
2021-01-15 23:34 ` Song Liu
2021-01-16 0:55 ` Yonghong Song
2021-01-16 1:12 ` Song Liu
2021-01-16 1:50 ` Yonghong Song
2021-01-11 23:41 ` Song Liu
2021-01-12 18:21 ` Martin KaFai Lau
[not found] ` <20210108231950.3844417-4-songliubraving@fb.com>
2021-01-11 17:37 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/4] bpf: runqslower: prefer use local vmlinux Yonghong Song
[not found] ` <20210108231950.3844417-5-songliubraving@fb.com>
2021-01-11 17:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/4] bpf: runqslower: use task local storage Yonghong Song
2021-01-11 22:54 ` Song Liu
2021-01-12 3:24 ` Yonghong Song
2021-01-12 7:14 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2021-01-12 7:33 ` Yonghong Song
[not found] ` <20210108231950.3844417-3-songliubraving@fb.com>
2021-01-11 17:30 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/4] selftests/bpf: add non-BPF_LSM test for " Yonghong Song
2021-01-11 17:44 ` KP Singh
2021-01-11 22:50 ` Song Liu
2021-01-11 22:49 ` Song Liu [this message]
2021-01-12 7:06 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CC251082-A193-44FD-80BD-C8D0431C7798@fb.com \
--to=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kpsingh@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yhs@fb.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).