From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Amit Singh Tomar <amittomer25@gmail.com>
Cc: andre.przywara@arm.com, vkoul@kernel.org, afaerber@suse.de,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/8] dmaengine: Actions: get rid of bit fields from dma descriptor
Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 21:21:59 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200510155159.GA27924@Mani-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1588761371-9078-2-git-send-email-amittomer25@gmail.com>
Hi,
On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 04:06:03PM +0530, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
> At the moment, Driver uses bit fields to describe registers of the DMA
> descriptor structure that makes it less portable and maintainable, and
> Andre suugested(and even sketched important bits for it) to make use of
> array to describe this DMA descriptors instead. It gives the flexibility
> while extending support for other platform such as Actions S700.
>
> This commit removes the "owl_dma_lli_hw" (that includes bit-fields) and
> uses array to describe DMA descriptor.
>
I'm in favor of getting rid of bitfields due to its not so defined way of
working (and forgive me for using it in first place) but I don't quite like
the current approach.
Rather I'd like to have custom bitmasks (S900/S700/S500?) for writing to those
fields.
Thanks,
Mani
> Suggested-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Singh Tomar <amittomer25@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/dma/owl-dma.c | 77 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c b/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c
> index c683051257fd..b0d80a2fa383 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/owl-dma.c
> @@ -120,30 +120,18 @@
> #define BIT_FIELD(val, width, shift, newshift) \
> ((((val) >> (shift)) & ((BIT(width)) - 1)) << (newshift))
>
> -/**
> - * struct owl_dma_lli_hw - Hardware link list for dma transfer
> - * @next_lli: physical address of the next link list
> - * @saddr: source physical address
> - * @daddr: destination physical address
> - * @flen: frame length
> - * @fcnt: frame count
> - * @src_stride: source stride
> - * @dst_stride: destination stride
> - * @ctrla: dma_mode and linklist ctrl config
> - * @ctrlb: interrupt config
> - * @const_num: data for constant fill
> - */
> -struct owl_dma_lli_hw {
> - u32 next_lli;
> - u32 saddr;
> - u32 daddr;
> - u32 flen:20;
> - u32 fcnt:12;
> - u32 src_stride;
> - u32 dst_stride;
> - u32 ctrla;
> - u32 ctrlb;
> - u32 const_num;
> +/* Describe DMA descriptor, hardware link list for dma transfer */
> +enum owl_dmadesc_offsets {
> + OWL_DMADESC_NEXT_LLI = 0,
> + OWL_DMADESC_SADDR,
> + OWL_DMADESC_DADDR,
> + OWL_DMADESC_FLEN,
> + OWL_DMADESC_SRC_STRIDE,
> + OWL_DMADESC_DST_STRIDE,
> + OWL_DMADESC_CTRLA,
> + OWL_DMADESC_CTRLB,
> + OWL_DMADESC_CONST_NUM,
> + OWL_DMADESC_SIZE
> };
>
> /**
> @@ -153,7 +141,7 @@ struct owl_dma_lli_hw {
> * @node: node for txd's lli_list
> */
> struct owl_dma_lli {
> - struct owl_dma_lli_hw hw;
> + u32 hw[OWL_DMADESC_SIZE];
> dma_addr_t phys;
> struct list_head node;
> };
> @@ -351,8 +339,9 @@ static struct owl_dma_lli *owl_dma_add_lli(struct owl_dma_txd *txd,
> list_add_tail(&next->node, &txd->lli_list);
>
> if (prev) {
> - prev->hw.next_lli = next->phys;
> - prev->hw.ctrla |= llc_hw_ctrla(OWL_DMA_MODE_LME, 0);
> + prev->hw[OWL_DMADESC_NEXT_LLI] = next->phys;
> + prev->hw[OWL_DMADESC_CTRLA] |=
> + llc_hw_ctrla(OWL_DMA_MODE_LME, 0);
> }
>
> return next;
> @@ -365,8 +354,7 @@ static inline int owl_dma_cfg_lli(struct owl_dma_vchan *vchan,
> struct dma_slave_config *sconfig,
> bool is_cyclic)
> {
> - struct owl_dma_lli_hw *hw = &lli->hw;
> - u32 mode;
> + u32 mode, ctrlb;
>
> mode = OWL_DMA_MODE_PW(0);
>
> @@ -407,22 +395,22 @@ static inline int owl_dma_cfg_lli(struct owl_dma_vchan *vchan,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - hw->next_lli = 0; /* One link list by default */
> - hw->saddr = src;
> - hw->daddr = dst;
> -
> - hw->fcnt = 1; /* Frame count fixed as 1 */
> - hw->flen = len; /* Max frame length is 1MB */
> - hw->src_stride = 0;
> - hw->dst_stride = 0;
> - hw->ctrla = llc_hw_ctrla(mode,
> - OWL_DMA_LLC_SAV_LOAD_NEXT |
> - OWL_DMA_LLC_DAV_LOAD_NEXT);
> + lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_CTRLA] = llc_hw_ctrla(mode,
> + OWL_DMA_LLC_SAV_LOAD_NEXT |
> + OWL_DMA_LLC_DAV_LOAD_NEXT);
>
> if (is_cyclic)
> - hw->ctrlb = llc_hw_ctrlb(OWL_DMA_INTCTL_BLOCK);
> + ctrlb = llc_hw_ctrlb(OWL_DMA_INTCTL_BLOCK);
> else
> - hw->ctrlb = llc_hw_ctrlb(OWL_DMA_INTCTL_SUPER_BLOCK);
> + ctrlb = llc_hw_ctrlb(OWL_DMA_INTCTL_SUPER_BLOCK);
> +
> + lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_NEXT_LLI] = 0;
> + lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_SADDR] = src;
> + lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_DADDR] = dst;
> + lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_SRC_STRIDE] = 0;
> + lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_DST_STRIDE] = 0;
> + lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_FLEN] = len | 1 << 20;
> + lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_CTRLB] = ctrlb;
>
> return 0;
> }
> @@ -754,7 +742,8 @@ static u32 owl_dma_getbytes_chan(struct owl_dma_vchan *vchan)
> /* Start from the next active node */
> if (lli->phys == next_lli_phy) {
> list_for_each_entry(lli, &txd->lli_list, node)
> - bytes += lli->hw.flen;
> + bytes += lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_FLEN] &
> + GENMASK(19, 0);
> break;
> }
> }
> @@ -785,7 +774,7 @@ static enum dma_status owl_dma_tx_status(struct dma_chan *chan,
> if (vd) {
> txd = to_owl_txd(&vd->tx);
> list_for_each_entry(lli, &txd->lli_list, node)
> - bytes += lli->hw.flen;
> + bytes += lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_FLEN] & GENMASK(19, 0);
> } else {
> bytes = owl_dma_getbytes_chan(vchan);
> }
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-10 15:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1588761371-9078-1-git-send-email-amittomer25@gmail.com>
2020-05-06 10:36 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] dmaengine: Actions: get rid of bit fields from dma descriptor Amit Singh Tomar
2020-05-10 15:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2020-05-11 10:45 ` Amit Tomer
2020-05-11 11:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-05-11 11:44 ` André Przywara
2020-05-11 12:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-05-11 12:48 ` André Przywara
2020-05-11 15:29 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-05-06 10:36 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] dmaengine: Actions: Add support for S700 DMA engine Amit Singh Tomar
2020-05-06 11:12 ` André Przywara
2020-05-06 12:54 ` Amit Tomer
2020-05-06 13:04 ` André Przywara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200510155159.GA27924@Mani-XPS-13-9360 \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=amittomer25@gmail.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-actions@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).