From: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
To: Amit Tomer <amittomer25@gmail.com>
Cc: "Andre Przywara" <andre.przywara@arm.com>,
vkoul@kernel.org, "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com,
dmaengine@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-actions@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 1/8] dmaengine: Actions: get rid of bit fields from dma descriptor
Date: Mon, 11 May 2020 16:50:14 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200511112014.GA3322@Mani-XPS-13-9360> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABHD4K_h7wc1gc3wvya1PRTRjMRkDPW==yrAWSk7cCF9ghkUjg@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 04:15:57PM +0530, Amit Tomer wrote:
> Hi
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> > I'm in favor of getting rid of bitfields due to its not so defined way of
> > working (and forgive me for using it in first place) but I don't quite like
> > the current approach.
>
> Because , its less readable the way we are writing to those different fields ?
> But this can be made more verbose by adding some comments around .
>
I don't like the way the hw linked lists are accessed (using an array with
enums).
> > Rather I'd like to have custom bitmasks (S900/S700/S500?) for writing to those
> > fields.
> >
> I think S900 and S500 are same as pointed out by Cristian. and I didn't get by
> creating custom bitmasks for it ?
>
> Did you mean function like:
>
> lli->hw[OWL_DMADESC_FLEN]= llc_hw_FLEN(len, FCNT_VALUE, FCNT_SHIFT);
>
I meant to keep using old struct for accessing the linked list and replacing
bitfields with masks as below:
struct owl_dma_lli_hw {
...
u32 flen;
u32 fcnt;
...
};
hw->flen = len & OWL_S900_DMA_FLEN_MASK;
hw->fcnt = 1 & OWL_S900_DMA_FCNT_MASK;
Then you can use different masks for S700/S900 based on the compatible.
Thanks,
Mani
> Thanks
> -Amit
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-11 11:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1588761371-9078-1-git-send-email-amittomer25@gmail.com>
2020-05-06 10:36 ` [PATCH RFC 1/8] dmaengine: Actions: get rid of bit fields from dma descriptor Amit Singh Tomar
2020-05-10 15:51 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-05-11 10:45 ` Amit Tomer
2020-05-11 11:20 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam [this message]
2020-05-11 11:44 ` André Przywara
2020-05-11 12:04 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-05-11 12:48 ` André Przywara
2020-05-11 15:29 ` Manivannan Sadhasivam
2020-05-06 10:36 ` [PATCH RFC 2/8] dmaengine: Actions: Add support for S700 DMA engine Amit Singh Tomar
2020-05-06 11:12 ` André Przywara
2020-05-06 12:54 ` Amit Tomer
2020-05-06 13:04 ` André Przywara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200511112014.GA3322@Mani-XPS-13-9360 \
--to=manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=amittomer25@gmail.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=cristian.ciocaltea@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-actions@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).