dri-devel.lists.freedesktop.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning
@ 2017-11-22 21:05 Woody Suwalski
  2017-12-13 21:25 ` Sinclair Yeh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Woody Suwalski @ 2017-11-22 21:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sinclair Yeh; +Cc: DRI mailing list, LKML, Dave Airlie

The 4.15 vmwgfx driver shows a warning during boot (32 bit x86)
It is caused by a mismatch between the result of vmw_enable_vblank() and 
what the drm_atomic_helper expects:
    /...
    ret = drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
    WARN_ONCE(ret != -EINVAL, "driver forgot to call 
drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");
    /...

Signed-off by: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c    2017-11-22 
15:29:46.511674079 -0500
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c    2017-11-22 
15:30:35.344559592 -0500
@@ -1869,7 +1869,7 @@ u32 vmw_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_de
   */
  int vmw_enable_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
  {
-    return -ENOSYS;
+    return -EINVAL;
  }

  /**

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning
  2017-11-22 21:05 [PATCH] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning Woody Suwalski
@ 2017-12-13 21:25 ` Sinclair Yeh
  2017-12-16  0:01   ` Woody Suwalski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sinclair Yeh @ 2017-12-13 21:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Woody Suwalski; +Cc: DRI mailing list, LKML, Dave Airlie

Hi Woody,

On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 04:05:50PM -0500, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> The 4.15 vmwgfx driver shows a warning during boot (32 bit x86)
> It is caused by a mismatch between the result of vmw_enable_vblank() and
> what the drm_atomic_helper expects:
>    /...
>    ret = drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
>    WARN_ONCE(ret != -EINVAL, "driver forgot to call
> drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");

This doesn't apply to us because we don't have vblank support, and so
-ENOSYS seems to be the right error.

In the commit message for 84014b0a39ee, it does state a check for this
condition, but the check itself is based on dev->irq_enabled.

Is there another way to check for vblank support?



>    /...
> 
> Signed-off by: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>
> 
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c    2017-11-22 15:29:46.511674079
> -0500
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c    2017-11-22 15:30:35.344559592
> -0500
> @@ -1869,7 +1869,7 @@ u32 vmw_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_de
>   */
>  int vmw_enable_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
>  {
> -    return -ENOSYS;
> +    return -EINVAL;
>  }
> 
>  /**
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning
  2017-12-13 21:25 ` Sinclair Yeh
@ 2017-12-16  0:01   ` Woody Suwalski
  2017-12-19  0:26     ` [PATCH v.2] " Woody Suwalski
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Woody Suwalski @ 2017-12-16  0:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sinclair Yeh; +Cc: DRI mailing list, LKML, Dave Airlie, Daniel Vetter

Sinclair Yeh wrote:
> Hi Woody,
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 04:05:50PM -0500, Woody Suwalski wrote:
>> The 4.15 vmwgfx driver shows a warning during boot (32 bit x86)
>> It is caused by a mismatch between the result of vmw_enable_vblank() and
>> what the drm_atomic_helper expects:
>>     /...
>>     ret = drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
>>     WARN_ONCE(ret != -EINVAL, "driver forgot to call
>> drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");
> This doesn't apply to us because we don't have vblank support, and so
> -ENOSYS seems to be the right error.
>
> In the commit message for 84014b0a39ee, it does state a check for this
> condition, but the check itself is based on dev->irq_enabled.
>
> Is there another way to check for vblank support?
>
>
>
>>     /...
>>
>> Signed-off by: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>
>>
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c    2017-11-22 15:29:46.511674079
>> -0500
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c    2017-11-22 15:30:35.344559592
>> -0500
>> @@ -1869,7 +1869,7 @@ u32 vmw_get_vblank_counter(struct drm_de
>>    */
>>   int vmw_enable_vblank(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned int pipe)
>>   {
>> -    return -ENOSYS;
>> +    return -EINVAL;
>>   }
>>
>>   /**
>>
Sinclair, it is a valid stand, so I guess it is time to ask Daniel...

Would it be OK to convert the WARN_ONCE statement in drm_atomic_helper 
to recognize ENOSYS as a valid error? Something like

WARN_ONCE((ret != -EINVAL && ret != _ENOSYS), "driver forgot to call 
drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");

Thanks, Woody

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v.2] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning
  2017-12-16  0:01   ` Woody Suwalski
@ 2017-12-19  0:26     ` Woody Suwalski
  2017-12-19 19:50       ` Sinclair Yeh
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Woody Suwalski @ 2017-12-19  0:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Daniel Vetter; +Cc: Sinclair Yeh, DRI mailing list, LKML, Dave Airlie

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1013 bytes --]

The 4.15 drm_atomic_helper driver shows a warning during boot (both 32 
and 64 bit x86)
It is caused by a mismatch between the result of vmw_enable_vblank() and 
what the drm_atomic_helper expects:
    /...
    ret = drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
    WARN_ONCE(ret != -EINVAL, "driver forgot to call 
drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");
    /...

Signed-off by: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c    2017-12-16 
09:55:33.853374561 -0500
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c    2017-12-16 
10:55:56.089090752 -0500
@@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ disable_outputs(struct drm_device *dev,
              continue;

          ret = drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
-        WARN_ONCE(ret != -EINVAL, "driver forgot to call 
drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");
+        WARN_ONCE((ret != -EINVAL && ret != -ENOSYS), "driver forgot to 
call drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");
          if (ret == 0)
              drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc);
      }


[-- Attachment #2: 040_drm_atomic_helper.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 498 bytes --]

--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c	2017-12-16 09:55:33.853374561 -0500
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c	2017-12-16 10:55:56.089090752 -0500
@@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ disable_outputs(struct drm_device *dev,
 			continue;
 
 		ret = drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
-		WARN_ONCE(ret != -EINVAL, "driver forgot to call drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");
+		WARN_ONCE((ret != -EINVAL && ret != -ENOSYS), "driver forgot to call drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");
 		if (ret == 0)
 			drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc);
 	}

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v.2] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning
  2017-12-19  0:26     ` [PATCH v.2] " Woody Suwalski
@ 2017-12-19 19:50       ` Sinclair Yeh
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Sinclair Yeh @ 2017-12-19 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Woody Suwalski; +Cc: Dave Airlie, Daniel Vetter, LKML, DRI mailing list

This looks okay to me.

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 07:26:03PM -0500, Woody Suwalski wrote:
> The 4.15 drm_atomic_helper driver shows a warning during boot (both 32 and
> 64 bit x86)
> It is caused by a mismatch between the result of vmw_enable_vblank() and
> what the drm_atomic_helper expects:
>    /...
>    ret = drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
>    WARN_ONCE(ret != -EINVAL, "driver forgot to call
> drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");
>    /...
> 
> Signed-off by: Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@gmail.com>
> 
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c    2017-12-16 09:55:33.853374561
> -0500
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c    2017-12-16 10:55:56.089090752
> -0500
> @@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ disable_outputs(struct drm_device *dev,
>              continue;
> 
>          ret = drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
> -        WARN_ONCE(ret != -EINVAL, "driver forgot to call
> drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");
> +        WARN_ONCE((ret != -EINVAL && ret != -ENOSYS), "driver forgot to
> call drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");
>          if (ret == 0)
>              drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc);
>      }
> 

> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c	2017-12-16 09:55:33.853374561 -0500
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c	2017-12-16 10:55:56.089090752 -0500
> @@ -889,7 +889,7 @@ disable_outputs(struct drm_device *dev,
>  			continue;
>  
>  		ret = drm_crtc_vblank_get(crtc);
> -		WARN_ONCE(ret != -EINVAL, "driver forgot to call drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");
> +		WARN_ONCE((ret != -EINVAL && ret != -ENOSYS), "driver forgot to call drm_crtc_vblank_off()\n");
>  		if (ret == 0)
>  			drm_crtc_vblank_put(crtc);
>  	}

_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2017-12-19 19:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-11-22 21:05 [PATCH] 4.15 vmgfx boot warning Woody Suwalski
2017-12-13 21:25 ` Sinclair Yeh
2017-12-16  0:01   ` Woody Suwalski
2017-12-19  0:26     ` [PATCH v.2] " Woody Suwalski
2017-12-19 19:50       ` Sinclair Yeh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).