driverdev-devel.linuxdriverproject.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@redhat.com>
To: Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com,
	Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>,
	Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net
Subject: Re: [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 01/11] Staging: rtl8188eu: hal_com: Add space around operators
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2020 02:04:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200323020425.62dbeebb@elisabeth> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f2b4f7f38a8a490ffc917f7199099ac95656c8c2.camel@gmail.com>

Hi Shreeya,

On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 04:48:08 +0530
Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 2020-03-22 at 08:09 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2020-03-22 at 12:27 +0100, Greg KH wrote:  
> 
> Hi Greg and Joe,
> 
> > > On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 03:51:13AM +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote:  
> > > > Add space around operators for improving the code
> > > > readability.
> > > > Reported by checkpatch.pl
> > > > 
> > > > git diff -w shows no difference.
> > > > diff of the .o files before and after the changes shows no
> > > > difference.  
> > > 
> > > There is no need to have these two lines on every changelog comment
> > > in
> > > this series :(  
> >   
> Yes I get that.
> 
> > In my opinion, there's no need for a series here.
> > 
> > Whitespace only changes _should_ be done all at once.
> > 
> > Whitespace changes _could_ have changed string constants.
> > 
> > So noting that the patch in only whitespace and that
> > there isn't a difference in object files is useful as
> > it shows any change has been compiled and tested.
> >   
> 
> Joe, I feel the same thing, there is no need of a patch series
> for it but I was given a suggestion that it becomes difficult for the
> reviewers to review the patch so it is good to send a patchset instead.

In this case, reviewing the 224 lines you're touching in one shot feels
the same as reviewing them over 11 patches, as the change is always of
the same type. Maybe a single patch is actually even a bit quicker to
review.

Are you sure the suggestion was referring to this, and it wasn't about
different type of changes in the same patch?

-- 
Stefano

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@linuxdriverproject.org
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/driverdev-devel

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-23  1:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-21 22:19 [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 00/11] Staging: rtl8188eu: hal: Add space around operators Shreeya Patel
2020-03-21 22:21 ` [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 01/11] Staging: rtl8188eu: hal_com: " Shreeya Patel
2020-03-22 11:27   ` Greg KH
2020-03-22 15:09     ` Joe Perches
2020-03-22 23:18       ` Shreeya Patel
2020-03-23  1:04         ` Stefano Brivio [this message]
2020-03-23 10:10           ` Shreeya Patel
2020-03-21 22:22 ` [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 02/11] Staging: rtl8188eu: odm: " Shreeya Patel
2020-03-21 22:23 ` [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 03/11] Staging: rtl8188eu: odm_hwconfig: " Shreeya Patel
2020-03-21 22:24 ` [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 04/11] Staging: rtl8188eu: phy: " Shreeya Patel
2020-03-21 22:25 ` [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 05/11] Staging: rtl8188eu: pwrseqcmd: " Shreeya Patel
2020-03-21 22:25 ` [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 06/11] Staging: rtl8188eu: rf: " Shreeya Patel
2020-03-21 22:26 ` [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 07/11] Staging: rtl8188eu: rf_cfg: " Shreeya Patel
2020-03-21 22:27 ` [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 08/11] Staging: rtl8188eu: rtl8188e_cmd: " Shreeya Patel
2020-03-21 22:28 ` [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 09/11] Staging: rtl8188eu: rtl8188e_hal_init: " Shreeya Patel
2020-03-21 22:29 ` [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 10/11] Staging: rtl8188eu: rtl8188e_rxdesc: " Shreeya Patel
2020-03-21 22:30 ` [Outreachy kernel] [PATCH 11/11] Staging: rtl8188eu: rtl8188eu_xmit: " Shreeya Patel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200323020425.62dbeebb@elisabeth \
    --to=sbrivio@redhat.com \
    --cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=joe@perches.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=outreachy-kernel@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=shreeya.patel23498@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).