Re: Bare repositories in the working tree are a security risk

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Glen Choo <chooglen@google.com> writes:

> Martin observed that, viability aside, there's another approach that I
> haven't discussed:
>
>   == 5 Disable bare repo discovery
>
>   We could introduce a config value that disables bare repo discovery
>   altogether. This would only disable _discovery_; a user can still use
>   the bare repo by specifying the gitdir (e.g. via `--git-dir=.` or
>   GIT_DIR).

Does it or does it not count as "allowing discovery to do its job"
if you go to the directory, knowing that the directory is a bare
one, and expect Git to work in it?

I am guessing that your definition of "discovery" is not even
consider if the current directory is a repository and always force
the user to tell us with --git-dir or GIT_DIR.  I am not sure that
is realistically feasible (I am thinking of cases like "git fetch"
going to the remote repository on the local disk that is bare to run
"git upload-pack"), but if the fallout is not too bad, it may be a
good heuristics.