From: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
To: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: [Intel-gfx] [CI 05/18] drm/i915/xehp: VDBOX/VEBOX fusing registers are enable-based
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2021 15:30:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210721223043.834562-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210721223043.834562-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
On Xe_HP the fusing register is renamed and changed to have the "enable"
semantics, but otherwise remains compatible (mmio address, bitmask
ranges) with older platforms.
To simplify things we do not add a new register definition but just stop
inverting the fusing masks before processing them.
Bspec: 52615
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Atwood <matthew.s.atwood@intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
index d561573ed98c..5cfeb91d1b7b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_engine_cs.c
@@ -468,7 +468,14 @@ static intel_engine_mask_t init_engine_mask(struct intel_gt *gt)
if (GRAPHICS_VER(i915) < 11)
return info->engine_mask;
- media_fuse = ~intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN11_GT_VEBOX_VDBOX_DISABLE);
+ /*
+ * On newer platforms the fusing register is called 'enable' and has
+ * enable semantics, while on older platforms it is called 'disable'
+ * and bits have disable semantices.
+ */
+ media_fuse = intel_uncore_read(uncore, GEN11_GT_VEBOX_VDBOX_DISABLE);
+ if (GRAPHICS_VER_FULL(i915) < IP_VER(12, 50))
+ media_fuse = ~media_fuse;
vdbox_mask = media_fuse & GEN11_GT_VDBOX_DISABLE_MASK;
vebox_mask = (media_fuse & GEN11_GT_VEBOX_DISABLE_MASK) >>
--
2.25.4
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-21 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-21 22:30 [Intel-gfx] [CI 00/18] CI pass for reviewed Xe_HP SDV and DG2 patches Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 01/18] drm/i915: Add XE_HP initial definitions Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 02/18] drm/i915/xehpsdv: add initial XeHP SDV definitions Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 03/18] drm/i915/dg2: add DG2 platform info Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 04/18] drm/i915: Fork DG1 interrupt handler Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` Matt Roper [this message]
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 06/18] drm/i915/gen12: Use fuse info to enable SFC Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 07/18] drm/i915/selftests: Allow for larger engine counts Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 08/18] drm/i915/xehp: Handle new device context ID format Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 09/18] drm/i915/xehp: New engine context offsets Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 10/18] drm/i915/dg2: Add fake PCH Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 11/18] drm/i915/dg2: Add cdclk table and reference clock Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 12/18] drm/i915/dg2: Skip shared DPLL handling Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 13/18] drm/i915/dg2: Don't wait for AUX power well enable ACKs Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 14/18] drm/i915/dg2: Setup display outputs Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 15/18] drm/i915/dg2: Add dbuf programming Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 16/18] drm/i915/dg2: Don't program BW_BUDDY registers Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 17/18] drm/i915/dg2: Don't read DRAM info Matt Roper
2021-07-21 22:30 ` [Intel-gfx] [CI 18/18] drm/i915/dg2: DG2 has fixed memory bandwidth Matt Roper
2021-07-22 0:06 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for CI pass for reviewed Xe_HP SDV and DG2 patches Patchwork
2021-07-22 0:08 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.SPARSE: " Patchwork
2021-07-22 0:37 ` [Intel-gfx] ✓ Fi.CI.BAT: success " Patchwork
2021-07-22 7:47 ` [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure " Patchwork
2021-07-22 16:42 ` Matt Roper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210721223043.834562-6-matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--to=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).