kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com>
To: Halil Pasic <pasic@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, freude@linux.ibm.com,
	borntraeger@de.ibm.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
	mjrosato@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, kwankhede@nvidia.com,
	jjherne@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/10] s390: vfio-ap: filter CRYCB bits for unavailable queue devices
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 10:24:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3c81ae10-79fc-d845-571f-66cb84e1227a@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190919123434.28a29c00.pasic@linux.ibm.com>

On 9/19/19 6:34 AM, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 17:26:52 -0400
> Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
>> +static void vfio_ap_mdev_get_crycb_matrix(struct ap_matrix_mdev *matrix_mdev)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long apid, apqi;
>> +	unsigned long masksz = BITS_TO_LONGS(AP_DEVICES) *
>> +			       sizeof(unsigned long);
>> +
>> +	memset(matrix_mdev->crycb.apm, 0, masksz);
>> +	memset(matrix_mdev->crycb.apm, 0, masksz);
>> +	memcpy(matrix_mdev->crycb.adm, matrix_mdev->matrix.adm, masksz);
>> +
>> +	for_each_set_bit_inv(apid, matrix_mdev->matrix.apm,
>> +			     matrix_mdev->matrix.apm_max + 1) {
>> +		for_each_set_bit_inv(apqi, matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm,
>> +				     matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm_max + 1) {
>> +			if (vfio_ap_find_queue(AP_MKQID(apid, apqi))) {
>> +				if (!test_bit_inv(apid, matrix_mdev->crycb.apm))
>> +					set_bit_inv(apid,
>> +						    matrix_mdev->crycb.apm);
>> +				if (!test_bit_inv(apqi, matrix_mdev->crycb.aqm))
>> +					set_bit_inv(apqi,
>> +						    matrix_mdev->crycb.aqm);
>> +			}
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +}
> 
> Even with the discussed typo fixed (zero crycb.aqm) this procedure does
> not make sense to me. :(
> 
> If in doubt please consider the following example:
> matrix_mdev->matrix.apm and matrix_mdev->matrix.aqm have both just bits
> 0 and 1 set (i.e. first byte 0xC0 the rest of the bytes 0x0). Queues
> bound to the vfio_ap driver (0,0), (0,1), (1,0); not bound to vfio_ap is
> however (1,1). If I read this correctly this filtering logic would grant
> access to (1,1) which seems to contradict with the stated intention.

Yep, I see your point. I'll have to rework this code.

> 
> Regards,
> Halil
> 
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2019-09-20 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-09-13 21:26 [PATCH v6 00/10] s390: vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 01/10] s390: vfio-ap: Refactor vfio_ap driver probe and remove callbacks Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 02/10] s390: vfio-ap: allow assignment of unavailable AP resources to mdev device Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 03/10] s390: vfio-ap: allow hot plug/unplug of AP resources using " Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 04/10] s390: vfio-ap: filter CRYCB bits for unavailable queue devices Tony Krowiak
2019-09-18 17:04   ` Halil Pasic
2019-09-18 21:22     ` Tony Krowiak
2019-09-19 10:34   ` Halil Pasic
2019-09-20 14:24     ` Tony Krowiak [this message]
2019-09-20 15:44       ` Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 05/10] s390: vfio-ap: sysfs attribute to display the guest CRYCB Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 06/10] s390: vfio-ap: update guest CRYCB in vfio_ap probe and remove callbacks Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 07/10] s390: zcrypt: driver callback to indicate resource in use Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 08/10] s390: vfio-ap: implement in-use callback for vfio_ap driver Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 09/10] s390: vfio-ap: added versioning to vfio_ap module Tony Krowiak
2019-09-13 21:26 ` [PATCH v6 10/10] s390: vfio-ap: update documentation Tony Krowiak
2019-10-08 10:48 ` [PATCH v6 00/10] s390: vfio-ap: dynamic configuration support Halil Pasic
2019-10-08 12:57   ` Pierre Morel
2019-10-15 20:33     ` Tony Krowiak
2019-10-15 20:27   ` Tony Krowiak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3c81ae10-79fc-d845-571f-66cb84e1227a@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=freude@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kwankhede@nvidia.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).