Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 4/9] arm: pmu: Check Required Event Support

[Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 12:25:05PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> If event counters are implemented check the common events
> required by the PMUv3 are implemented.
> 
> Some are unconditionally required (SW_INCR, CPU_CYCLES,
> either INST_RETIRED or INST_SPEC). Some others only are
> required if the implementation implements some other features.
> 
> Check those wich are unconditionally required.
> 
> This test currently fails on TCG as neither INST_RETIRED
> or INST_SPEC are supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> - fix is_event_supported()
> - fix boolean condition for PMU v4
> - fix PMCEID0 definition
> 
> RFC ->v1:
> - add a comment to explain the PMCEID0/1 splits
> ---
>  arm/pmu.c         | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arm/unittests.cfg |  6 +++++
>  2 files changed, 68 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arm/pmu.c b/arm/pmu.c
> index d24857e..4a26a76 100644
> --- a/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -101,6 +101,10 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr)
>  	: [pmcr] "r" (pmcr), [z] "r" (0)
>  	: "cc");
>  }
> +
> +/* event counter tests only implemented for aarch64 */
> +static void test_event_introspection(void) {}
> +
>  #elif defined(__aarch64__)
>  #define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_SHIFT 8
>  #define ID_AA64DFR0_PERFMON_MASK  0xf
> @@ -139,6 +143,61 @@ static inline void precise_instrs_loop(int loop, uint32_t pmcr)
>  	: [pmcr] "r" (pmcr)
>  	: "cc");
>  }
> +
> +#define PMCEID1_EL0 sys_reg(3, 3, 9, 12, 7)
> +
> +static bool is_event_supported(uint32_t n, bool warn)
> +{
> +	uint64_t pmceid0 = read_sysreg(pmceid0_el0);
> +	uint64_t pmceid1 = read_sysreg_s(PMCEID1_EL0);
> +	bool supported;
> +	uint64_t reg;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The low 32-bits of PMCEID0/1 respectly describe
> +	 * event support for events 0-31/32-63. Their High
> +	 * 32-bits describe support for extended events
> +	 * starting at 0x4000, using the same split.
> +	 */
> +	if (n >= 0x0  && n <= 0x3F)
> +		reg = (pmceid0 & 0xFFFFFFFF) | ((pmceid1 & 0xFFFFFFFF) << 32);

Maybe it's time to add

#define upper_32_bits(n) ((u32)(((n) >> 16) >> 16))
#define lower_32_bits(n) ((u32)(n))

to the kvm-unit-tests framework.

> +	else if  (n >= 0x4000 && n <= 0x403F)
> +		reg = (pmceid0 >> 32) | ((pmceid1 >> 32) << 32);
> +	else
> +		abort();

assert(0) ensure we get a dump_stack() (although I haven't fixed
dump_stack for arm64 yet...). Could also do the assert first

assert((n >= 0x0  && n <= 0x3F) || (n >= 0x4000 && n <= 0x403F))
if (n <= 0x3F)
 ...
else
 ...

What about defines for these hex numbers?


> +
> +	supported =  reg & (1UL << (n & 0x3F));
                   ^ extra space

> +
> +	if (!supported && warn)
> +		report_info("event %d is not supported", n);
> +	return supported;
> +}
> +
> +static void test_event_introspection(void)
> +{
> +	bool required_events;
> +
> +	if (!pmu.nb_implemented_counters) {
> +		report_skip("No event counter, skip ...");
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* PMUv3 requires an implementation includes some common events */
> +	required_events = is_event_supported(0x0, true) /* SW_INCR */ &&
> +			  is_event_supported(0x11, true) /* CPU_CYCLES */ &&
> +			  (is_event_supported(0x8, true) /* INST_RETIRED */ ||
> +			   is_event_supported(0x1B, true) /* INST_PREC */);

If defines are created then the comments can go away

	required_events = is_event_supported(SW_INCR, true) &&
			  is_event_supported(CPU_CYCLES, true) &&
			  (is_event_supported(INST_RETIRED, true) ||
			   is_event_supported(INST_PREC, true));


> +
> +	if (pmu.version == 0x4) {
> +		/* ARMv8.1 PMU: STALL_FRONTEND and STALL_BACKEND are required */
> +		required_events = required_events &&
> +				  is_event_supported(0x23, true) &&
> +				  is_event_supported(0x24, true);
> +	}
> +
> +	report(required_events, "Check required events are implemented");
> +}
> +
>  #endif
>  
>  /*
> @@ -326,6 +385,9 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>  		       "Monotonically increasing cycle count");
>  		report(check_cpi(cpi), "Cycle/instruction ratio");
>  		pmccntr64_test();
> +	} else if (strcmp(argv[1], "event-introspection") == 0) {
> +		report_prefix_push(argv[1]);
> +		test_event_introspection();

prefix pop

>  	} else {
>  		report_abort("Unknown sub-test '%s'", argv[1]);
>  	}
> diff --git a/arm/unittests.cfg b/arm/unittests.cfg
> index 79f0d7a..4433ef3 100644
> --- a/arm/unittests.cfg
> +++ b/arm/unittests.cfg
> @@ -66,6 +66,12 @@ file = pmu.flat
>  groups = pmu
>  extra_params = -append 'cycle-counter 0'
>  
> +[pmu-event-introspection]
> +file = pmu.flat
> +groups = pmu
> +arch = arm64
> +extra_params = -append 'event-introspection'
> +
>  # Test PMU support (TCG) with -icount IPC=1
>  #[pmu-tcg-icount-1]
>  #file = pmu.flat
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 
>

Thanks,
drew 

_______________________________________________
kvmarm mailing list
kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu
https://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/kvmarm