* [PATCH v3 01/12] ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-03-27 12:08 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (12 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-03-27 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb, rui.zhang, bhelgaas
Cc: Xiaofei Tan, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-pci, linuxarm
Fix the following coding style issue reported by checkpatch.pl.
WARNING: Block comments should align the * on each line
+/**
+* Create platform device during acpi scan attach handle.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
index 39359ce..0ec5b3f 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c
@@ -176,10 +176,10 @@ static const struct apd_device_desc hip08_spi_desc = {
#endif
-/**
-* Create platform device during acpi scan attach handle.
-* Return value > 0 on success of creating device.
-*/
+/*
+ * Create platform device during acpi scan attach handle.
+ * Return value > 0 on success of creating device.
+ */
static int acpi_apd_create_device(struct acpi_device *adev,
const struct acpi_device_id *id)
{
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 02/12] ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-03-27 12:08 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function Xiaofei Tan
` (11 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-03-27 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb, rui.zhang, bhelgaas
Cc: Xiaofei Tan, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-pci, linuxarm
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including
following types:
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
WARNING: labels should not be indented
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 18 +++++-------------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
index fc89f3a..2d5bd2a 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
@@ -25,10 +25,7 @@
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct acpi_processor *, processors);
EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(processors);
-/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Errata Handling
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
-
+/* Errata Handling */
struct acpi_processor_errata errata __read_mostly;
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(errata);
@@ -151,10 +148,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_errata(void)
return result;
}
-/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Initialization
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
-
+/* Initialization */
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
int __weak acpi_map_cpu(acpi_handle handle,
phys_cpuid_t physid, u32 acpi_id, int *pcpu)
@@ -306,6 +300,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
*/
if (invalid_logical_cpuid(pr->id) || !cpu_present(pr->id)) {
int ret = acpi_processor_hotadd_init(pr);
+
if (ret)
return ret;
}
@@ -431,10 +426,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_add(struct acpi_device *device,
}
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_CPU
-/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Removal
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
-
+/* Removal */
static void acpi_processor_remove(struct acpi_device *device)
{
struct acpi_processor *pr;
@@ -892,7 +884,7 @@ int acpi_processor_evaluate_cst(acpi_handle handle, u32 cpu,
info->count = last_index;
- end:
+end:
kfree(buffer.pointer);
return ret;
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 03/12] ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-03-27 12:08 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations Xiaofei Tan
` (10 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-03-27 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb, rui.zhang, bhelgaas
Cc: Xiaofei Tan, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-pci, linuxarm
Remove useless return statement for void function, reported by
checkpatch.pl.
WARNING: void function return statements are not generally useful
FILE: drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c:482:
+ return;
+}
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
index 9d6c0fc..bbd00d9 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c
@@ -478,7 +478,6 @@ static void ipmi_register_bmc(int iface, struct device *dev)
ipmi_dev_release(ipmi_device);
err_ref:
put_device(smi_data.dev);
- return;
}
static void ipmi_bmc_gone(int iface)
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 04/12] ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-03-27 12:08 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ACPI: acpi_pad: " Xiaofei Tan
` (9 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-03-27 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb, rui.zhang, bhelgaas
Cc: Xiaofei Tan, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-pci, linuxarm
Add a missed blank line after declarations, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
index be73974..ca742f1 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c
@@ -377,6 +377,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_lpss_device_ids[] = {
static int is_memory(struct acpi_resource *res, void *not_used)
{
struct resource r;
+
return !acpi_dev_resource_memory(res, &r);
}
@@ -1200,6 +1201,7 @@ static int acpi_lpss_poweroff_noirq(struct device *dev)
if (pdata->dev_desc->resume_from_noirq) {
/* This is analogous to the acpi_lpss_suspend_noirq() case. */
int ret = acpi_lpss_do_poweroff_late(dev);
+
if (ret)
return ret;
}
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 05/12] ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-03-27 12:08 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (8 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-03-27 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb, rui.zhang, bhelgaas
Cc: Xiaofei Tan, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-pci, linuxarm
Add a missed blank line after declarations, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
index b84ab72..df4adeb 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
@@ -128,6 +128,7 @@ static void round_robin_cpu(unsigned int tsk_index)
static void exit_round_robin(unsigned int tsk_index)
{
struct cpumask *pad_busy_cpus = to_cpumask(pad_busy_cpus_bits);
+
cpumask_clear_cpu(tsk_in_cpu[tsk_index], pad_busy_cpus);
tsk_in_cpu[tsk_index] = -1;
}
@@ -265,6 +266,7 @@ static ssize_t rrtime_store(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
{
unsigned long num;
+
if (kstrtoul(buf, 0, &num))
return -EINVAL;
if (num < 1 || num >= 100)
@@ -286,6 +288,7 @@ static ssize_t idlepct_store(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
{
unsigned long num;
+
if (kstrtoul(buf, 0, &num))
return -EINVAL;
if (num < 1 || num >= 100)
@@ -307,6 +310,7 @@ static ssize_t idlecpus_store(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, const char *buf, size_t count)
{
unsigned long num;
+
if (kstrtoul(buf, 0, &num))
return -EINVAL;
mutex_lock(&isolated_cpus_lock);
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 06/12] ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ACPI: acpi_pad: " Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-03-27 12:08 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ACPI: button: " Xiaofei Tan
` (7 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-03-27 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb, rui.zhang, bhelgaas
Cc: Xiaofei Tan, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-pci, linuxarm
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including
following types:
WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
ERROR: spaces required around that '?' (ctx:WxV)
WARNING: Block comments should align the * on each line
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/battery.c | 63 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/battery.c b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
index b822f77..dae91f9 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/battery.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/battery.c
@@ -74,16 +74,17 @@ enum {
ACPI_BATTERY_XINFO_PRESENT,
ACPI_BATTERY_QUIRK_PERCENTAGE_CAPACITY,
/* On Lenovo Thinkpad models from 2010 and 2011, the power unit
- switches between mWh and mAh depending on whether the system
- is running on battery or not. When mAh is the unit, most
- reported values are incorrect and need to be adjusted by
- 10000/design_voltage. Verified on x201, t410, t410s, and x220.
- Pre-2010 and 2012 models appear to always report in mWh and
- are thus unaffected (tested with t42, t61, t500, x200, x300,
- and x230). Also, in mid-2012 Lenovo issued a BIOS update for
- the 2011 models that fixes the issue (tested on x220 with a
- post-1.29 BIOS), but as of Nov. 2012, no such update is
- available for the 2010 models. */
+ * switches between mWh and mAh depending on whether the system
+ * is running on battery or not. When mAh is the unit, most
+ * reported values are incorrect and need to be adjusted by
+ * 10000/design_voltage. Verified on x201, t410, t410s, and x220.
+ * Pre-2010 and 2012 models appear to always report in mWh and
+ * are thus unaffected (tested with t42, t61, t500, x200, x300,
+ * and x230). Also, in mid-2012 Lenovo issued a BIOS update for
+ * the 2011 models that fixes the issue (tested on x220 with a
+ * post-1.29 BIOS), but as of Nov. 2012, no such update is
+ * available for the 2010 models.
+ */
ACPI_BATTERY_QUIRK_THINKPAD_MAH,
/* for batteries reporting current capacity with design capacity
* on a full charge, but showing degradation in full charge cap.
@@ -371,9 +372,7 @@ static enum power_supply_property energy_battery_full_cap_broken_props[] = {
POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_SERIAL_NUMBER,
};
-/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Battery Management
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+/* Battery Management */
struct acpi_offsets {
size_t offset; /* offset inside struct acpi_sbs_battery */
u8 mode; /* int or string? */
@@ -431,6 +430,7 @@ static int extract_package(struct acpi_battery *battery,
{
int i;
union acpi_object *element;
+
if (package->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE)
return -EFAULT;
for (i = 0; i < num; ++i) {
@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ static int extract_package(struct acpi_battery *battery,
element = &package->package.elements[i];
if (offsets[i].mode) {
u8 *ptr = (u8 *)battery + offsets[i].offset;
+
if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_STRING ||
element->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER)
strncpy(ptr, element->string.pointer, 32);
@@ -497,10 +498,12 @@ static int extract_battery_info(const int use_bix,
battery->design_capacity_warning *
10000 / battery->design_voltage;
/* Curiously, design_capacity_low, unlike the rest of them,
- is correct. */
+ * is correct.
+ */
/* capacity_granularity_* equal 1 on the systems tested, so
- it's impossible to tell if they would need an adjustment
- or not if their values were higher. */
+ * it's impossible to tell if they would need an adjustment
+ * or not if their values were higher.
+ */
}
if (test_bit(ACPI_BATTERY_QUIRK_DEGRADED_FULL_CHARGE, &battery->flags) &&
battery->capacity_now > battery->full_charge_capacity)
@@ -532,8 +535,8 @@ static int acpi_battery_get_info(struct acpi_battery *battery)
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
acpi_handle_info(battery->device->handle,
"%s evaluation failed: %s\n",
- use_bix ?"_BIX":"_BIF",
- acpi_format_exception(status));
+ use_bix ? "_BIX":"_BIF",
+ acpi_format_exception(status));
} else {
result = extract_battery_info(use_bix,
battery,
@@ -648,6 +651,7 @@ static ssize_t acpi_battery_alarm_show(struct device *dev,
char *buf)
{
struct acpi_battery *battery = to_acpi_battery(dev_get_drvdata(dev));
+
return sprintf(buf, "%d\n", battery->alarm * 1000);
}
@@ -657,6 +661,7 @@ static ssize_t acpi_battery_alarm_store(struct device *dev,
{
unsigned long x;
struct acpi_battery *battery = to_acpi_battery(dev_get_drvdata(dev));
+
if (sscanf(buf, "%lu\n", &x) == 1)
battery->alarm = x/1000;
if (acpi_battery_present(battery))
@@ -743,7 +748,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(battery_hook_register);
* This function gets called right after the battery sysfs
* attributes have been added, so that the drivers that
* define custom sysfs attributes can add their own.
-*/
+ */
static void battery_hook_add_battery(struct acpi_battery *battery)
{
struct acpi_battery_hook *hook_node, *tmp;
@@ -872,10 +877,12 @@ static void find_battery(const struct dmi_header *dm, void *private)
{
struct acpi_battery *battery = (struct acpi_battery *)private;
/* Note: the hardcoded offsets below have been extracted from
- the source code of dmidecode. */
+ * the source code of dmidecode.
+ */
if (dm->type == DMI_ENTRY_PORTABLE_BATTERY && dm->length >= 8) {
const u8 *dmi_data = (const u8 *)(dm + 1);
int dmi_capacity = get_unaligned((const u16 *)(dmi_data + 6));
+
if (dm->length >= 18)
dmi_capacity *= dmi_data[17];
if (battery->design_capacity * battery->design_voltage / 1000
@@ -917,6 +924,7 @@ static void acpi_battery_quirks(struct acpi_battery *battery)
if (battery->power_unit && dmi_name_in_vendors("LENOVO")) {
const char *s;
+
s = dmi_get_system_info(DMI_PRODUCT_VERSION);
if (s && !strncasecmp(s, "ThinkPad", 8)) {
dmi_walk(find_battery, battery);
@@ -1013,10 +1021,7 @@ static void acpi_battery_refresh(struct acpi_battery *battery)
sysfs_add_battery(battery);
}
-/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Driver Interface
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
-
+/* Driver Interface */
static void acpi_battery_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
{
struct acpi_battery *battery = acpi_driver_data(device);
@@ -1026,11 +1031,11 @@ static void acpi_battery_notify(struct acpi_device *device, u32 event)
return;
old = battery->bat;
/*
- * On Acer Aspire V5-573G notifications are sometimes triggered too
- * early. For example, when AC is unplugged and notification is
- * triggered, battery state is still reported as "Full", and changes to
- * "Discharging" only after short delay, without any notification.
- */
+ * On Acer Aspire V5-573G notifications are sometimes triggered too
+ * early. For example, when AC is unplugged and notification is
+ * triggered, battery state is still reported as "Full", and changes to
+ * "Discharging" only after short delay, without any notification.
+ */
if (battery_notification_delay_ms > 0)
msleep(battery_notification_delay_ms);
if (event == ACPI_BATTERY_NOTIFY_INFO)
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 07/12] ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-03-27 12:08 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ACPI: CPPC: " Xiaofei Tan
` (6 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-03-27 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb, rui.zhang, bhelgaas
Cc: Xiaofei Tan, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-pci, linuxarm
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including
following types:
WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
WARNING: Block comments use a trailing */ on a separate line
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/button.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/button.c b/drivers/acpi/button.c
index 85e5e03..f25bd33 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/button.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/button.c
@@ -156,10 +156,7 @@ static unsigned long lid_report_interval __read_mostly = 500;
module_param(lid_report_interval, ulong, 0644);
MODULE_PARM_DESC(lid_report_interval, "Interval (ms) between lid key events");
-/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- FS Interface (/proc)
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
-
+/* FS Interface (/proc) */
static struct proc_dir_entry *acpi_button_dir;
static struct proc_dir_entry *acpi_lid_dir;
@@ -348,9 +345,7 @@ static int acpi_button_remove_fs(struct acpi_device *device)
return 0;
}
-/* --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Driver Interface
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
+/* Driver Interface */
int acpi_lid_open(void)
{
if (!lid_device)
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 08/12] ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ACPI: button: " Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-03-27 12:08 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue Xiaofei Tan
` (5 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-03-27 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb, rui.zhang, bhelgaas
Cc: Xiaofei Tan, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-pci, linuxarm
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including
following types:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
WARNING: unnecessary whitespace before a quoted newline
ERROR: spaces required around that '>='
ERROR: switch and case should be at the same indent
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
index ae53740..3dbaf47 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c
@@ -326,6 +326,7 @@ static int send_pcc_cmd(int pcc_ss_id, u16 cmd)
if (unlikely(ret)) {
for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
struct cpc_desc *desc = per_cpu(cpc_desc_ptr, i);
+
if (!desc)
continue;
@@ -777,7 +778,7 @@ int acpi_cppc_processor_probe(struct acpi_processor *pr)
cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER;
memcpy(&cpc_ptr->cpc_regs[i-2].cpc_entry.reg, gas_t, sizeof(*gas_t));
} else {
- pr_debug("Err in entry:%d in CPC table of CPU:%d \n", i, pr->id);
+ pr_debug("Err in entry:%d in CPC table of CPU:%d\n", i, pr->id);
goto out_free;
}
}
@@ -867,7 +868,7 @@ void acpi_cppc_processor_exit(struct acpi_processor *pr)
void __iomem *addr;
int pcc_ss_id = per_cpu(cpu_pcc_subspace_idx, pr->id);
- if (pcc_ss_id >=0 && pcc_data[pcc_ss_id]) {
+ if (pcc_ss_id >= 0 && pcc_data[pcc_ss_id]) {
if (pcc_data[pcc_ss_id]->pcc_channel_acquired) {
pcc_data[pcc_ss_id]->refcount--;
if (!pcc_data[pcc_ss_id]->refcount) {
@@ -954,22 +955,22 @@ static int cpc_read(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 *val)
val, reg->bit_width);
switch (reg->bit_width) {
- case 8:
- *val = readb_relaxed(vaddr);
- break;
- case 16:
- *val = readw_relaxed(vaddr);
- break;
- case 32:
- *val = readl_relaxed(vaddr);
- break;
- case 64:
- *val = readq_relaxed(vaddr);
- break;
- default:
- pr_debug("Error: Cannot read %u bit width from PCC for ss: %d\n",
- reg->bit_width, pcc_ss_id);
- ret_val = -EFAULT;
+ case 8:
+ *val = readb_relaxed(vaddr);
+ break;
+ case 16:
+ *val = readw_relaxed(vaddr);
+ break;
+ case 32:
+ *val = readl_relaxed(vaddr);
+ break;
+ case 64:
+ *val = readq_relaxed(vaddr);
+ break;
+ default:
+ pr_debug("Error: Cannot read %u bit width from PCC for ss: %d\n",
+ reg->bit_width, pcc_ss_id);
+ ret_val = -EFAULT;
}
return ret_val;
@@ -993,23 +994,23 @@ static int cpc_write(int cpu, struct cpc_register_resource *reg_res, u64 val)
val, reg->bit_width);
switch (reg->bit_width) {
- case 8:
- writeb_relaxed(val, vaddr);
- break;
- case 16:
- writew_relaxed(val, vaddr);
- break;
- case 32:
- writel_relaxed(val, vaddr);
- break;
- case 64:
- writeq_relaxed(val, vaddr);
- break;
- default:
- pr_debug("Error: Cannot write %u bit width to PCC for ss: %d\n",
- reg->bit_width, pcc_ss_id);
- ret_val = -EFAULT;
- break;
+ case 8:
+ writeb_relaxed(val, vaddr);
+ break;
+ case 16:
+ writew_relaxed(val, vaddr);
+ break;
+ case 32:
+ writel_relaxed(val, vaddr);
+ break;
+ case 64:
+ writeq_relaxed(val, vaddr);
+ break;
+ default:
+ pr_debug("Error: Cannot write %u bit width to PCC for ss: %d\n",
+ reg->bit_width, pcc_ss_id);
+ ret_val = -EFAULT;
+ break;
}
return ret_val;
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 09/12] ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ACPI: CPPC: " Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-03-27 12:08 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations Xiaofei Tan
` (4 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-03-27 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb, rui.zhang, bhelgaas
Cc: Xiaofei Tan, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-pci, linuxarm
Fix the following coding style issue reported by checkpatch.pl
ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
FILE: drivers/acpi/custom_method.c:22:
+static ssize_t cm_write(struct file *file, const char __user * user_buf,
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/custom_method.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/custom_method.c b/drivers/acpi/custom_method.c
index 7b54dc9..443fdf62 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/custom_method.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/custom_method.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ static struct dentry *cm_dentry;
/* /sys/kernel/debug/acpi/custom_method */
-static ssize_t cm_write(struct file *file, const char __user * user_buf,
+static ssize_t cm_write(struct file *file, const char __user *user_buf,
size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
{
static char *buf;
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 10/12] ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-03-27 12:08 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (3 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-03-27 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb, rui.zhang, bhelgaas
Cc: Xiaofei Tan, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-pci, linuxarm
Add a missed blank line after declarations, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
index 0961537..16c0fe8 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/device_pm.c
@@ -966,6 +966,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_dev_resume);
int acpi_subsys_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
int ret = pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev);
+
return ret ? ret : acpi_dev_suspend(dev, true);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_subsys_runtime_suspend);
@@ -980,6 +981,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_subsys_runtime_suspend);
int acpi_subsys_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
{
int ret = acpi_dev_resume(dev);
+
return ret ? ret : pm_generic_runtime_resume(dev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_subsys_runtime_resume);
@@ -1171,6 +1173,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_subsys_freeze);
int acpi_subsys_restore_early(struct device *dev)
{
int ret = acpi_dev_resume(dev);
+
return ret ? ret : pm_generic_restore_early(dev);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_subsys_restore_early);
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 11/12] ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-03-27 12:08 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ACPI: dock: " Xiaofei Tan
` (2 subsequent siblings)
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-03-27 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb, rui.zhang, bhelgaas
Cc: Xiaofei Tan, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-pci, linuxarm
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including
following types:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
WARNING: Block comments should align the * on each line
ERROR: open brace '{' following function definitions go on the next line
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
index da4ff2a..a07d4ad 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@ static const struct sysfs_ops acpi_data_node_sysfs_ops = {
static void acpi_data_node_release(struct kobject *kobj)
{
struct acpi_data_node *dn = to_data_node(kobj);
+
complete(&dn->kobj_done);
}
@@ -130,7 +131,7 @@ static void acpi_hide_nondev_subnodes(struct acpi_device_data *data)
* Return: 0: no _HID and no _CID
* -EINVAL: output error
* -ENOMEM: output is truncated
-*/
+ */
static int create_pnp_modalias(struct acpi_device *acpi_dev, char *modalias,
int size)
{
@@ -431,7 +432,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(path);
/* sysfs file that shows description text from the ACPI _STR method */
static ssize_t description_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr,
- char *buf) {
+ char *buf)
+{
struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev);
int result;
@@ -456,7 +458,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(description);
static ssize_t
sun_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
- char *buf) {
+ char *buf)
+{
struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev);
acpi_status status;
unsigned long long sun;
@@ -471,7 +474,8 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sun);
static ssize_t
hrv_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
- char *buf) {
+ char *buf)
+{
struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev);
acpi_status status;
unsigned long long hrv;
@@ -485,7 +489,8 @@ hrv_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(hrv);
static ssize_t status_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
- char *buf) {
+ char *buf)
+{
struct acpi_device *acpi_dev = to_acpi_device(dev);
acpi_status status;
unsigned long long sta;
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 12/12] ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-03-27 12:08 ` Xiaofei Tan
2021-03-29 12:50 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-04-08 14:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-03-27 12:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb, rui.zhang, bhelgaas
Cc: Xiaofei Tan, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linux-pci, linuxarm
Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl, including
following types:
WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
ERROR: spaces required around that ':'
WARNING: Statements should start on a tabstop
Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com>
---
drivers/acpi/dock.c | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/dock.c b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
index 0937cea..7cf9215 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/dock.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/dock.c
@@ -271,6 +271,7 @@ static void hotplug_dock_devices(struct dock_station *ds, u32 event)
if (!acpi_device_enumerated(adev)) {
int ret = acpi_bus_scan(adev->handle);
+
if (ret)
dev_dbg(&adev->dev, "scan error %d\n", -ret);
}
@@ -502,6 +503,7 @@ static ssize_t flags_show(struct device *dev,
struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
{
struct dock_station *dock_station = dev->platform_data;
+
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", dock_station->flags);
}
@@ -523,7 +525,7 @@ static ssize_t undock_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
begin_undock(dock_station);
ret = handle_eject_request(dock_station, ACPI_NOTIFY_EJECT_REQUEST);
acpi_scan_lock_release();
- return ret ? ret: count;
+ return ret ? ret : count;
}
static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(undock);
@@ -535,10 +537,11 @@ static ssize_t uid_show(struct device *dev,
{
unsigned long long lbuf;
struct dock_station *dock_station = dev->platform_data;
+
acpi_status status = acpi_evaluate_integer(dock_station->handle,
"_UID", NULL, &lbuf);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
- return 0;
+ return 0;
return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%llx\n", lbuf);
}
--
2.8.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-27 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ACPI: dock: " Xiaofei Tan
@ 2021-03-29 12:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-29 13:37 ` [Linuxarm] " Xiaofei Tan
2021-04-08 14:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
13 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-03-29 12:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiaofei Tan
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Zhang, Rui, Bjorn Helgaas,
ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux PCI,
linuxarm
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 1:11 PM Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl.
> Only cleanup and no function changes.
>
> Differences from v2 to v3:
> - Remove the modifications that may cause function change.
>
> Differences from v1 to v2:
> - Add subsystem and module name in the name of patch 05/15.
> - Change to use more proper module name for some patch names.
>
> Xiaofei Tan (12):
> ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue
> ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues
> ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function
> ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations
> ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations
> ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues
> ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues
> ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues
> ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue
> ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations
> ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues
> ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues
>
> drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c | 8 ++---
> drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 1 -
> drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 2 ++
> drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 4 +++
> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 18 +++--------
> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> drivers/acpi/button.c | 9 ++----
> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> drivers/acpi/custom_method.c | 2 +-
> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 3 ++
> drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c | 15 ++++++---
> drivers/acpi/dock.c | 7 +++--
> 12 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
>
> --
Can you please stop sending new versions of this for a while?
You've sent three of them over the last weekend and honestly I haven't
had a chance to look at the first one even.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [Linuxarm] Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues
2021-03-29 12:50 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2021-03-29 13:37 ` Xiaofei Tan
0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Xiaofei Tan @ 2021-03-29 13:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Rafael J. Wysocki
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Zhang, Rui, Bjorn Helgaas,
ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux PCI,
linuxarm
Hi Rafael,
On 2021/3/29 20:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 1:11 PM Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> wrote:
>>
>> Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl.
>> Only cleanup and no function changes.
>>
>> Differences from v2 to v3:
>> - Remove the modifications that may cause function change.
>>
>> Differences from v1 to v2:
>> - Add subsystem and module name in the name of patch 05/15.
>> - Change to use more proper module name for some patch names.
>>
>> Xiaofei Tan (12):
>> ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue
>> ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues
>> ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function
>> ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations
>> ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations
>> ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues
>> ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues
>> ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues
>> ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue
>> ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations
>> ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues
>> ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues
>>
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_apd.c | 8 ++---
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_ipmi.c | 1 -
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_lpss.c | 2 ++
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c | 4 +++
>> drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c | 18 +++--------
>> drivers/acpi/battery.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>> drivers/acpi/button.c | 9 ++----
>> drivers/acpi/cppc_acpi.c | 71 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
>> drivers/acpi/custom_method.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/acpi/device_pm.c | 3 ++
>> drivers/acpi/device_sysfs.c | 15 ++++++---
>> drivers/acpi/dock.c | 7 +++--
>> 12 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>
> Can you please stop sending new versions of this for a while?
>
OK.
> You've sent three of them over the last weekend and honestly I haven't
> had a chance to look at the first one even.
I tried to fix a low-level mistake as quickly as possible. I'm sorry for
that
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxarm mailing list -- linuxarm@openeuler.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to linuxarm-leave@openeuler.org
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues
2021-03-27 12:08 [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: fix some coding style issues Xiaofei Tan
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2021-03-29 12:50 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] acpi: " Rafael J. Wysocki
@ 2021-04-08 14:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
13 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2021-04-08 14:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xiaofei Tan
Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki, Len Brown, Zhang, Rui, Bjorn Helgaas,
ACPI Devel Maling List, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux PCI,
linuxarm
On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 1:11 PM Xiaofei Tan <tanxiaofei@huawei.com> wrote:
>
> Fix some coding style issues reported by checkpatch.pl.
> Only cleanup and no function changes.
>
> Differences from v2 to v3:
> - Remove the modifications that may cause function change.
>
> Differences from v1 to v2:
> - Add subsystem and module name in the name of patch 05/15.
> - Change to use more proper module name for some patch names.
>
> Xiaofei Tan (12):
> ACPI: APD: fix a block comment align issue
> ACPI: processor: fix some coding style issues
> ACPI: ipmi: remove useless return statement for void function
> ACPI: LPSS: add a missed blank line after declarations
> ACPI: acpi_pad: add a missed blank line after declarations
> ACPI: battery: fix some coding style issues
> ACPI: button: fix some coding style issues
> ACPI: CPPC: fix some coding style issues
> ACPI: custom_method: fix a coding style issue
> ACPI: PM: add a missed blank line after declarations
> ACPI: sysfs: fix some coding style issues
> ACPI: dock: fix some coding style issues
All applied as 5.13 material, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread